Electric field control of antiferroelectric domain pattern
Source abstract
Abstract
Control of domain and domain wall configurations in antiferroelectrics is a necessary step towards practical use of new functionalities based on polar domain wall structures. Here we propose and demonstrate a domain engineering scheme that provides an antiferroelectric state with only one type of orientational domains and one type of walls. We demonstrate with in situ synchrotron diffraction experiment that in a material, where the transition from the high-symmetry nonpolar phase to that antiferroelectric occurs via crossing an intermediate, once the transition is passed under a moderate electric field, the final antiferroelectric domain state can be fully controlled. A theoretical analysis shows that such a phenomenon can be explained in terms of biquadratic coupling between the polarization and antiferroelectric order parameter. This analysis also suggests that the electric-field control of the antiferroelectric state may be possible in a more general case where the intermediate ferroelectric state is absent. Anisotropy of lattice excitations in the intermediate polar phase under electric field is uncovered by an inelastic x-ray scattering experiment, which indicates that lattice instability is a driving force of transformation towards antiferroelectric phase despite of a strong first character of the transition.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Multiferroics and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41524-018-0121-810.1038/s41524-018-0121-8 ↗
2. 10.1126/sciadv.170051210.1126/sciadv.1700512 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160016010.1002/adma.201600160 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmat.2018.11.00510.1016/j.jmat.2018.11.005 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.22410710.1103/PhysRevB.64.224107 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.05410210.1103/PhysRevB.94.054102 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20110371710.1002/adma.201103717 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms403110.1038/ncomms4031 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRev.83.107810.1103/PhysRev.83.1078 ↗
10. 10.1088/0022-3719/12/8/01210.1088/0022-3719/12/8/012 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.493512210.1063/1.4935122 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.180881211510.1073/pnas.1808812115 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.36598210.1063/1.365982 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.01.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.01.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.01810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.018 ↗
16. 10.1107/S160057751600241110.1107/S1600577516002411 ↗
17. 10.1134/S102745101503013110.1134/S1027451015030131 ↗
18. 10.1107/S160057671601134110.1107/S1600576716011341 ↗
19. 10.1107/S160057671801131710.1107/S1600576718011317 ↗
20. A. Q. R. Baron · SPring-8 Inform. Newslett. · 2010 · 15 · 14
21. 10.1134/S106378341805032310.1134/S1063783418050323 ↗
22. 10.1143/JPSJ.53.22610.1143/JPSJ.53.226 ↗
23. 10.1080/0015019890822143610.1080/00150198908221436 ↗
24. S. Vakhrushev · 2018
25. 10.1524/zkri.2005.220.12.99410.1524/zkri.2005.220.12.994 ↗
26. 10.1080/0015019049050890910.1080/00150190490508909 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.19760110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.197601 ↗
28. 10.1088/1742-6596/769/1/01207010.1088/1742-6596/769/1/012070 ↗
29. 10.1038/ncomms322910.1038/ncomms3229 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.14430110.1103/PhysRevB.90.144301 ↗