journal article·2025-10-11Open access

Automated Digital Discovery and Synthesis of CuO-Based Nanoparticle Heterostructures for Catalysis

Daniel Hervitz, Yibin Jiang, Daniel Salley, Mark McNulty, Philip. J Kitson, Leroy Cronin

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The discovery and synthesis of composite nanomaterials often rely on molecular self-assembly and crystallization, posing significant challenges due to the vast chemical space and the irreproducibility of experimental methods. We present a programmable robotic platform, controlled by the universal Chemical Description Language (χDL), that enables the solid-phase synthesis of composite nanomaterials. In addition to synthesis, the platform validates its catalytic performance through an automated workflow. This platform enables open-ended exploration of composition-morphology-activity relationships, with high accuracy and reproducibility, while also reducing synthesis time and cost. In this study, we are moving beyond the colloidal, plasmonic-focused systems previously explored in robotic platforms to the discovery, synthesis, and catalytic properties of CuO-based nanomaterials, such as CuO-Au and CuO-Ag 2 O NP heterostructures that show good reproducibility across repeated syntheses. Remarkably, even at very low metal loadings, as confirmed by ICP (Au wt % = 0.06%, Ag wt % = 0.03%), the heterostructures exhibited enhanced photodegradation efficiency of the dye Methyl Green (MG) compared with pristine CuO. The degradation yield increased from 45 ± 2% for pristine CuO to 57 ± 3% for CuO-Au and 65 ± 2% for CuO-Ag 2 O, as observed through real-time UV–vis spectroscopy. Additionally, a kinetic assay of the synthesis process provided insights into the self-assembly mechanism, highlighting the interactions between the core material (CuO NPs) and the surface coatings (Au or Ag 2 O). This work demonstrates a shift from traditional manual experimentation to programmable, data-driven workflows, highlighting both the progress and the remaining challenges in the automation of solid-phase nanomaterial synthesis in the field of materials science.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry

The University of Glasgow, University Avenue

Funding

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · HORIZON EUROPE European Innovation Council · H2020 European Research Council

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s44160-023-00250-510.1038/s44160-023-00250-5 ↗
2. 10.1126/sciadv.abo262610.1126/sciadv.abo2626 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.282.5391.111110.1126/science.282.5391.1111 ↗
4. 10.1016/0021-9797(91)90442-B10.1016/0021-9797(91)90442-B ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0048210.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00482 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.5b0428210.1021/acsami.5b04282 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.01.04910.1016/j.snb.2019.01.049 ↗
8. 10.1039/D1NR07502K10.1039/D1NR07502K ↗
9. 10.1021/acsanm.2c0402210.1021/acsanm.2c04022 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15338710.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153387 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.281.5383.164710.1126/science.281.5383.1647 ↗
12. 10.1149/2.087204jes10.1149/2.087204jes ↗
13. 10.1038/3505104710.1038/35051047 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10854-016-4598-y10.1007/s10854-016-4598-y ↗
15. 10.1021/cr050172k10.1021/cr050172k ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.05210.1016/j.jcis.2010.04.052 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.04410.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.044 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.02910.1016/j.jiec.2017.07.029 ↗
19. 10.1039/C6RA12281G10.1039/C6RA12281G ↗
20. 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.01110.1016/j.powtec.2015.10.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.09.003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.08210.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.082 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.11070710.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110707 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.optmat.2016.11.03510.1016/j.optmat.2016.11.035 ↗
25. 10.3762/bjnano.5.7510.3762/bjnano.5.75 ↗
26. 10.1039/c4nj00227j10.1039/c4nj00227j ↗
27. 10.1021/nl103110610.1021/nl1031106 ↗
28. 10.1021/ic700688f10.1021/ic700688f ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.19410.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.194 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2023.11143510.1016/j.jpcs.2023.111435 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.aav221110.1126/science.aav2211 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11051-012-1101-410.1007/s11051-012-1101-4 ↗
33. 10.3390/met802010710.3390/met8020107 ↗
34. 10.1021/nl034097+10.1021/nl034097+ ↗
35. 10.3390/pr1107220710.3390/pr11072207 ↗
36. 10.3390/s2119657810.3390/s21196578 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.09.00810.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.09.008 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.23510.1016/j.ceramint.2020.06.235 ↗
39. 10.1063/5.008098110.1063/5.0080981 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.saa.2004.10.03510.1016/j.saa.2004.10.035 ↗
41. 10.1039/C2CE26216A10.1039/C2CE26216A ↗
42. 10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00034-010.1016/S0920-5861(98)00034-0 ↗
43. 10.1007/s11051-015-3149-410.1007/s11051-015-3149-4 ↗
44. 10.5772/intechopen.8995410.5772/intechopen.89954 ↗
45. 10.1093/hesc/9780198847816.001.000110.1093/hesc/9780198847816.001.0001 ↗
46. 10.1038/139821a010.1038/139821a0 ↗
47. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.14-071710.3891/acta.chem.scand.14-0717 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0179610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01796 ↗
49. 10.1007/0-387-37825-110.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
50. 10.1039/d2fd00092j10.1039/d2fd00092j ↗
51. 10.1002/978352761136210.1002/9783527611362 ↗
52. Sykepleien · 1968
53. 10.1126/science.115003810.1126/science.1150038 ↗
54. 10.1524/zpch.1999.210.Part_1.13410.1524/zpch.1999.210.Part_1.134 ↗
55. 10.1002/anie.20080224810.1002/anie.200802248 ↗
56. 10.1021/ar960016n10.1021/ar960016n ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13605410.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136054 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15344310.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153443 ↗
59. Ratke L. · 200210.1007/978-3-662-04884-9 ↗