High-Performance and Radiation Tolerant Ultraviolet Photodetector Based on 3C-SiC Nanowire
Source abstract
Abstract
Silicon carbide (SiC) nanowires (NWs) are promising candidates for ultraviolet (UV) photodetectors (PDs) in space applications due to their wide bandgap, lightweight, low power consumption, and high radiation tolerance. In this study, we report a high-performance and radiation-tolerant UV PD based on a SiC NW field-effect transistor (FET). The PD exhibits an exceptionally high responsivity of 245.48 A W –1 and a remarkable detectivity of 2.61 × 10 9 Jones. The degradation in the PD’s detection performance was negligible during 1 MeV proton irradiation up to a fluence of 2.1 × 10 12 cm –2, demonstrating an outstanding radiation tolerance. Furthermore, the performance degradation process and underlying mechanism of the PD under an extremely high irradiation fluence of 1 × 10 15 cm –2 were investigated. The results are crucial for designing and optimizing UV PDs based on SiC NWs for future space applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ga2O3 and related materials · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Technology, School of Physics
Peking University
Institute of Electronic Engineering, China Academy of Engineering Physics
Aerospace System Engineering
CAPT and HEDPS, College of Engineering
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jare.2013.03.00210.1016/j.jare.2013.03.002 ↗
2. Wrbanek, J. D.; Wrbanek, S. Y.; Fralick, G. C.; Chen, L.Y. Micro-Fabricated Solid-State Radiation Detectors for Active Personal Dosimetry; NASA/TM-2007-214674; NASA, 2007.
3. 10.1109/TED.2024.345893310.1109/TED.2024.3458933 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.08610.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.086 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mtelec.2024.10011610.1016/j.mtelec.2024.100116 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.diamond.2008.11.01310.1016/j.diamond.2008.11.013 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41578-023-00583-910.1038/s41578-023-00583-9 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0011210.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00112 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mtnano.2024.10054410.1016/j.mtnano.2024.100544 ↗
10. 10.3390/s1807207210.3390/s18072072 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apmt.2024.10211410.1016/j.apmt.2024.102114 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15925510.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159255 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.11474110.1016/j.sna.2023.114741 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sna.2022.11387810.1016/j.sna.2022.113878 ↗
15. 10.1088/1748-0221/14/10/T1000210.1088/1748-0221/14/10/T10002 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.233674410.1063/1.2336744 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0295510.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02955 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0756810.1021/acsomega.3c07568 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.501943510.1063/1.5019435 ↗
20. 10.1038/srep2345710.1038/srep23457 ↗
21. 10.1109/TED.2020.300430610.1109/TED.2020.3004306 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.274721310.1063/1.2747213 ↗
23. Prasai D. · J. Mater. Res. · 2013 · 28 · 33
24. 10.1002/adfm.20180625010.1002/adfm.201806250 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.09110.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nima.2024.16934410.1016/j.nima.2024.169344 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b1388110.1021/acsami.7b13881 ↗
28. 10.1109/TNS.2003.81292710.1109/TNS.2003.812927 ↗
29. 10.1109/TNANO.2012.220660710.1109/TNANO.2012.2206607 ↗
30. 10.1109/TNS.2008.200104010.1109/TNS.2008.2001040 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.133310.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1333 ↗