How Ti Doping Improves the Catalytic Methane Dry Reforming of Nanoporous Reduced LaNiO 3 Perovskites
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We studied the effect of Ti substitution on nickel B-sites in LaNiO 3 to unravel the influence of Ti doping on structural stability, Ni exsolution, and methane dry reforming (DRM) properties. Ni can be substituted by Ti down to compositions of x Ni = 0.25 without compromising both phase and structure purity. At even higher Ti doping levels, formation of the pyrochlore-type La 2 Ti 2 O 7 phase occurs. Ti substitution has a significant influence on the stability under reducing conditions and the appearance of specific intermediate structures relevant for DRM operation. Full decomposition is only observed for LaNiO 3 and the x Ni = 0.75 sample, which yield the La 2 O 3 phase relevant for DRM activity at low Ti doping levels. A common impurity phase between x Ni = 0.75 and 0.25 is La 2 TiO 5, which acts as a Ti and La sink and hinders the formation of La 2 O 3 . For higher Ti doping levels, hydrogen reduction increases the amount of La 2 Ti 2 O 7 . A common denominator of all samples after hydrogen reduction is the full leaching of all nominally available Ni from the perovskite. The self-activation properties during DRM operation strongly depend on the Ti substitution level. Self-activation with either full or partial decomposition is only possible for LaNiO 3 and x Ni = 0.75, where intermediate lanthanum oxycarbonate formation occurs. For x Ni = 0.50, the remaining perovskite structure is stable, but Ni exsolution nevertheless occurs, triggering DRM activity. Successive Ti doping invokes a change in the DRM mechanism from oxycarbonate-based at low Ti amounts (LaNiO 3 and x Ni = 0.75) to a more reactive-oxygen─dominated one for samples x Ni ≤ 0.50, as indicated by X-ray photoelectron spectra. Ti doping also allows to economize the amount of Ni for DRM applications─ it can be lowered to a quarter of the initial amount referenced to pure LaNiO 3 without compromising DRM activity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalysts for Methane Reforming · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physical Chemistry, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52c, Innsbruck A-6020, Austria
Institut für Geowissenschaften Und Geographie, Martin-Luther Universität Halle, Von-Seckendorff − Platz 3, Halle (Saale) D-06120, Germany
Institute of Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52d, Innsbruck A-6020, Austria
Funding
Austrian Science Fund
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.09.07610.1016/j.rser.2017.09.076 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.10.04110.1016/j.cattod.2020.10.041 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.07.03210.1016/j.cattod.2018.07.032 ↗
4. 10.3390/catal1403017610.3390/catal14030176 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.29710.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.297 ↗
6. 10.1021/acscatal.9b0368710.1021/acscatal.9b03687 ↗
7. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0429010.1021/acscatal.0c04290 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.01010.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.010 ↗
9. 10.1088/2515-7655/ab8c1f10.1088/2515-7655/ab8c1f ↗
10. 10.1039/D3TA03292B10.1039/D3TA03292B ↗
11. 10.1039/D3CC00456B10.1039/D3CC00456B ↗
12. 10.1002/smll.20200647910.1002/smll.202006479 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0925710.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09257 ↗
14. 10.3390/surfaces702002010.3390/surfaces7020020 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2025.10262010.1016/j.mtchem.2025.102620 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00071-X10.1016/S0926-860X(99)00071-X ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.abb157310.1126/sciadv.abb1573 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcat.2018.01.01510.1016/j.jcat.2018.01.015 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.18010.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.08.180 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ces.2023.11869010.1016/j.ces.2023.118690 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2024.15542510.1016/j.cej.2024.155425 ↗
22. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
23. 2024
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.441410.1103/PhysRevB.46.4414 ↗
25. 10.1107/S205252061900210510.1107/S2052520619002105 ↗
26. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
27. 10.1006/jssc.1999.848310.1006/jssc.1999.8483 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.10145510.1016/j.jcou.2021.101455 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.03.00310.1016/j.jssc.2015.03.003 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.30710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.307 ↗
31. 10.1107/S0365110X5300207610.1107/S0365110X53002076 ↗
32. 10.1002/zaac.1939241021510.1002/zaac.19392410215 ↗
33. 10.1016/0025-5408(79)90095-310.1016/0025-5408(79)90095-3 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14836010.1016/j.cej.2023.148360 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.02.00610.1016/j.apcatb.2009.02.006 ↗
36. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b0174410.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01744 ↗
37. 10.1002/cssc.20130073710.1002/cssc.201300737 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.12.04510.1016/j.cattod.2007.12.045 ↗
39. 10.1039/F2983790118110.1039/F29837901181 ↗
40. 10.1002/cphc.20190031410.1002/cphc.201900314 ↗
41. 10.1039/C6CP05392K10.1039/C6CP05392K ↗
42. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.10191010.1016/j.mtchem.2024.101910 ↗
43. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0122910.1021/acscatal.0c01229 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.56310.1103/PhysRevB.49.563 ↗
45. 10.1016/0022-4596(89)90232-610.1016/0022-4596(89)90232-6 ↗
46. Moulder, J. F.; Stickle, W. F.; Sobol, P. E.; Bomben, K. D. Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy ; Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1992; Vol. 148, pp. 479–486.
47. 10.1002/sia.302610.1002/sia.3026 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.05110.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.051 ↗
49. 10.1016/0169-4332(93)90429-F10.1016/0169-4332(93)90429-F ↗
50. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.04110.1016/j.susc.2006.01.041 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.elspec.2011.04.00210.1016/j.elspec.2011.04.002 ↗
52. 10.1088/1742-6596/100/1/01202510.1088/1742-6596/100/1/012025 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.08610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.086 ↗
54. 10.1016/0368-2048(75)80032-610.1016/0368-2048(75)80032-6 ↗
55. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04131.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04131.x ↗
56. 10.1007/s10562-021-03601-z10.1007/s10562-021-03601-z ↗