Field optimization for bifacial modules
Source abstract
Abstract
Bifacial modules are gaining more and more interest in PV market applications and strategies of major manu-facturers. The bifacial photovoltaic module is able to generate energy from both sides of the photovoltaic cell, thus increasing the energy production compared to a standard photovoltaic module. In order to obtain the maximum production from a bifacial panel, all the characteristics that influence its performance must be studied and optimized. The specific aim of this research work is the design of a bifacial photovoltaic field optimized for the exploitation of the albedo of the soil. The study for minimizing losses due to light reflection on the ground was conducted considering the following aspects: identification of suitable materials, optical simulations of possible configurations, field measurements on a small-scale system. To improve the RetroReflectivity (RR) of the ground the optimal RR material is the one with a diameter of microspheres of 200-300 mu m regardless of density. From the optical simulations the best configuration is a mixed ground with diffusive parts and a RR part. The results of the measurements show that once the ground is prepared in an appropriate way, we can have more than a 10% improvement in maximum power achieved and 2/3 of the light that hits the ground can be recovered.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies · Urban Heat Island Mitigation · Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Bifacial photovoltaics 2021: status, opportunities and challenges10.3390/en14082076 ↗
2. Bifacial solar photovoltaics – a technology review10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.041 ↗
3. Analysis of retroreflective surfaces for urban heat island mitigation: a new analytical model10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.038 ↗
4. Castellani · 2016
5. Yuan · 2016
6. Optical analysis of glass bead retro-reflective materials for urban heat island mitigation10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.011 ↗
7. Experimental assessment of the combined effect of retroreflective façades and pavement in urban canyon
8. Using cool pavements as a mitigation strategy to fight urban heat island: a review of the actual developments10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.047 ↗
9. Local climate change and urban heat island mitigation techniques – the state of the art10.3846/13923730.2015.1111934 ↗
10. Retroreflective façades for urban heat island mitigation: experimental investigation and energy evaluations10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.129 ↗
11. Costanzo · 2021
12. A normalization procedure to compare retro- reflective and traditional diffusive materials in terms of UHI mitigation potential10.1063/1.5138818 ↗
13. Glass beads retro-reflective coating for building application: albedo assessment in urban canyon configurations10.1088/1742-6596/2177/1/012033 ↗
14. Experimental analysis of the effect of geometry and façade materials on urban district's equivalent albedo10.3390/su9071245 ↗
15. Beneficial effects of retroreflective materials in urban canyons: results from seasonal monitoring campaign10.1088/1742-6596/655/1/012012 ↗
16. Value of bifacial photovoltaics used with highly reflective ground materials on single-axis trackers and fixed-tilt systems: a Danish case study10.1049/iet-rpg.2020.0580 ↗
17. Bembe · 2018 · 734
18. Characterizing electrical output of bifacial photovoltaic modules by altering reflective materials10.4236/jbcpr.2016.41003 ↗
19. The effect of the substrate on the optic performance of retro-reflective coatings: an in-lab investigation10.3390/en14102921 ↗
20. An investigation towards the optimum design of retro-reflective materials as building envelopes for the enhancement of optical performance10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129466 ↗
21. Reflectance nomenclature and directional reflectance and emissivity10.1364/AO.9.001474 ↗