Solvent selection for fabrication of low temperature ZnO electron transport layer in perovskite solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Zinc Oxide ( Z n O ) with an easy synthesis method, low processing temperature, and high charge carrier mobility has been considered as a proper electron transport layer ( E T L ) for perovskite solar cells. Herein, we investigate the effect of the most common solvents for the preparation of Z n O and investigate their application as E T L for PSC. Z n O layers were prepared from three different solvents 2-methoxyethanol ( 2 M E ) , isopropyl alcohol ( I P A ) and e t h a n o l . A complete investigation of the structural, morphological, optical and device performance was performed. The results show that the type of solvent has a significant effect on electrical, optical and structural properties of Z n O layer, the capping perovskite layer composed of methyl ammonium lead iodide ( M A P b I 3 ) and the total performance of the cell. The Z n O film prepared by 2 M E as the solvent showed the best performance mainly because of better surface coverage by M A P b I 3 , larger grain sizes, fewer pinholes, satisfying the P b / I theoretical stoichiometry in the perovskite layer and the highest absorbance compared to other solvents. In addition, the simulation modeling shows that the Z n O ( 2 M E ) / M A P b I 3 interface has the lowest defect density and for having planar Z n O -based PSCs with PCE of over 22%, the interface defects should be kept under 10 13 c m − 3 .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Green · Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. · 2019 · 27 · 310.1002/pip.3102 ↗
2. Nia · ChemSusChem · 2017 · 10 · 385410.1002/cssc.201700635 ↗
3. Alahbakhshi · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 292210.1021/acsenergylett.9b01925 ↗
4. Wu · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 162510.1038/s41467-018-04028-8 ↗
5. Tian · Sol. Energy · 2019 · 183 · 38610.1016/j.solener.2019.03.038 ↗
6. N. Yaghoobi Nia, E. Lamanna, M. Zendehdel, A.L. Palma, F. Zurlo, L.A. Castriotta, A. Di Carlo, Small, (2019), p. 1904399.
7. Ameri · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 52 · 12550110.1088/1361-6463/aafea9 ↗
8. Taleghani · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 40560110.1088/0022-3727/49/40/405601 ↗
9. Alahbakhshi · Opt. Mater. · 2017 · 64 · 36610.1016/j.optmat.2017.01.008 ↗
10. Cao · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170559610.1002/adma.201705596 ↗
11. Ameri · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 22560110.1088/0022-3727/49/22/225601 ↗
12. Yang · J. Mater. Chem. · 2016 · 4 · 397010.1039/C5TA09011C ↗
13. Pashaei · J. Mater. Chem. · 2019 · 7 · 2186710.1039/C9TA05121J ↗
14. Luo · Sol. Energy · 2018 · 163 · 28910.1016/j.solener.2018.01.035 ↗
15. Cao · Opt. Mater. · 2018 · 84 · 49810.1016/j.optmat.2018.07.027 ↗
16. Shahroosvand · Int. J. Photoenergy · 2011 · 2011
17. Ameri · J. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 47 · 199310.1007/s11664-017-6000-0 ↗
18. Dixon · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016 · 4 · 694610.1039/C6TC01881E ↗
19. Azadinia · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2018 · 135 · 4653310.1002/app.46533 ↗
20. Zhang · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 408710.1002/adma.200803827 ↗
21. Hautier · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 544710.1021/cm404079a ↗
22. Claudio Fazolo, Silvia Maiello, Luca La Notte, Gianpaolo Susanna et al10.1016/j.orgel.2019.03.008 ↗
23. Wu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 680710.1002/adfm.201602231 ↗
24. Verschraegen · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 627610.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.049 ↗
25. Ameri · 2020 · vol. 205 · 110251
26. Zargoosh · Talanta · 2012 · 93 · 3710.1016/j.talanta.2011.11.029 ↗
27. Abdelaziz · Opt. Mater. · 2019 · 91 · 23910.1016/j.optmat.2019.03.023 ↗
28. Pelicano · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 805910.1039/C7TC01934C ↗
29. Ma · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 2446210.1021/jp308480u ↗
30. Taheri · 2D Mater. · 2018 · 510.1088/2053-1583/aad983 ↗
31. Winer · J. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 26 · 130910.1557/jmr.2011.69 ↗
32. Hameiri · Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. · 2015 · 23 · 169710.1002/pip.2716 ↗
33. Mohammadian · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 461410.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01909 ↗
34. Wu · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 23610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11245 ↗
35. Fu · RSC Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 39010.1039/C7RA11149E ↗
36. Guo · Dalton Trans. · 2016 · 45 · 380610.1039/C5DT04420K ↗
37. Idigoras · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 1358310.1039/C6CP01265E ↗
38. Dkhissi · ChemSusChem · 2016 · 9 · 68710.1002/cssc.201501659 ↗
39. Ameri · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 1007410.1021/acsami.8b19820 ↗
40. Alessandro lorenzo palma, pier gianni medaglia, shaik mohammed zakeeruddin