journal article·2020-08

Solvent selection for fabrication of low temperature ZnO electron transport layer in perovskite solar cells

S. Hamideh Ahmadi, Mashhood Ghaffarkani, Mohsen Ameri, Nasser Safari, Ezeddin Mohajerani

Optical Materials· Volume 106
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Zinc Oxide ( Z n O ) with an easy synthesis method, low processing temperature, and high charge carrier mobility has been considered as a proper electron transport layer ( E T L ) for perovskite solar cells. Herein, we investigate the effect of the most common solvents for the preparation of Z n O and investigate their application as E T L for PSC. Z n O layers were prepared from three different solvents 2-methoxyethanol ( 2 M E ) , isopropyl alcohol ( I P A ) and e t h a n o l . A complete investigation of the structural, morphological, optical and device performance was performed. The results show that the type of solvent has a significant effect on electrical, optical and structural properties of Z n O layer, the capping perovskite layer composed of methyl ammonium lead iodide ( M A P b I 3 ) and the total performance of the cell. The Z n O film prepared by 2 M E as the solvent showed the best performance mainly because of better surface coverage by M A P b I 3 , larger grain sizes, fewer pinholes, satisfying the P b / I theoretical stoichiometry in the perovskite layer and the highest absorbance compared to other solvents. In addition, the simulation modeling shows that the Z n O ( 2 M E ) / M A P b I 3 interface has the lowest defect density and for having planar Z n O -based PSCs with PCE of over 22%, the interface defects should be kept under 10 13 c m − 3 .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Green · Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. · 2019 · 27 · 310.1002/pip.3102 ↗
2. Nia · ChemSusChem · 2017 · 10 · 385410.1002/cssc.201700635 ↗
3. Alahbakhshi · ACS Energy Lett. · 2019 · 4 · 292210.1021/acsenergylett.9b01925 ↗
4. Wu · Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 162510.1038/s41467-018-04028-8 ↗
5. Tian · Sol. Energy · 2019 · 183 · 38610.1016/j.solener.2019.03.038 ↗
6. N. Yaghoobi Nia, E. Lamanna, M. Zendehdel, A.L. Palma, F. Zurlo, L.A. Castriotta, A. Di Carlo, Small, (2019), p. 1904399.
7. Ameri · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 52 · 12550110.1088/1361-6463/aafea9 ↗
8. Taleghani · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 40560110.1088/0022-3727/49/40/405601 ↗
9. Alahbakhshi · Opt. Mater. · 2017 · 64 · 36610.1016/j.optmat.2017.01.008 ↗
10. Cao · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30 · 170559610.1002/adma.201705596 ↗
11. Ameri · J. Phys. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 22560110.1088/0022-3727/49/22/225601 ↗
12. Yang · J. Mater. Chem. · 2016 · 4 · 397010.1039/C5TA09011C ↗
13. Pashaei · J. Mater. Chem. · 2019 · 7 · 2186710.1039/C9TA05121J ↗
14. Luo · Sol. Energy · 2018 · 163 · 28910.1016/j.solener.2018.01.035 ↗
15. Cao · Opt. Mater. · 2018 · 84 · 49810.1016/j.optmat.2018.07.027 ↗
16. Shahroosvand · Int. J. Photoenergy · 2011 · 2011
17. Ameri · J. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 47 · 199310.1007/s11664-017-6000-0 ↗
18. Dixon · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016 · 4 · 694610.1039/C6TC01881E ↗
19. Azadinia · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2018 · 135 · 4653310.1002/app.46533 ↗
20. Zhang · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 408710.1002/adma.200803827 ↗
21. Hautier · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 544710.1021/cm404079a ↗
22. Claudio Fazolo, Silvia Maiello, Luca La Notte, Gianpaolo Susanna et al10.1016/j.orgel.2019.03.008 ↗
23. Wu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 680710.1002/adfm.201602231 ↗
24. Verschraegen · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 627610.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.049 ↗
25. Ameri · 2020 · vol. 205 · 110251
26. Zargoosh · Talanta · 2012 · 93 · 3710.1016/j.talanta.2011.11.029 ↗
27. Abdelaziz · Opt. Mater. · 2019 · 91 · 23910.1016/j.optmat.2019.03.023 ↗
28. Pelicano · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 805910.1039/C7TC01934C ↗
29. Ma · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 2446210.1021/jp308480u ↗
30. Taheri · 2D Mater. · 2018 · 510.1088/2053-1583/aad983 ↗
31. Winer · J. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 26 · 130910.1557/jmr.2011.69 ↗
32. Hameiri · Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. · 2015 · 23 · 169710.1002/pip.2716 ↗
33. Mohammadian · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 461410.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01909 ↗
34. Wu · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2018 · 122 · 23610.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11245 ↗
35. Fu · RSC Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 39010.1039/C7RA11149E ↗
36. Guo · Dalton Trans. · 2016 · 45 · 380610.1039/C5DT04420K ↗
37. Idigoras · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 1358310.1039/C6CP01265E ↗
38. Dkhissi · ChemSusChem · 2016 · 9 · 68710.1002/cssc.201501659 ↗
39. Ameri · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 1007410.1021/acsami.8b19820 ↗
40. Alessandro lorenzo palma, pier gianni medaglia, shaik mohammed zakeeruddin