journal article·2023-08

Selectively anchoring Cu(OH)2 and CuO on amine-modified brookite TiO2 for enhanced CO2 photoreduction

Zhangjing Chen, Liangliang Li, Gang Cheng

Carbon Letters· Volume 33· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Photocatalytic CO2 reduction is a promising approach for reducing CO2 emissions and achieving the goal of carbon neutrality. In this work, selectively coupling Cu(OH)2 and CuO with amine-modified brookite TiO2 (NH2–B–TiO2) has been achieved by a simple precipitation method. The results show that CuO is better than Cu(OH)2 as a co-catalyst to enhance the CO2 photoreduction capability of NH2–B–TiO2. The highest rates of CO2 conversion to CH4 and CO of NH2–B–TiO2–CuO composite reach 6.05 and 3.25 μmol h−1 g−1, respectively, which is higher than 8 times the yield of CH4 of NH2–B–TiO2. It is proposed that the NH2–B–TiO2–CuO composite offers an effective charge transfer through the formation of a p–n junction between NH2–B–TiO2 and CuO interfaces, while in the NH2–B–TiO2–Cu(OH)2 composite, the Cu(OH)2 dominantly serves as an electron sink to capture photo-induced electrons, promoting photo-induced carrier separation. This work provides an ingenious synthetic method for selectively anchoring Cu(OH)2 and CuO on semiconductors with different charge transfer routes for an efficient CO2 photoreduction. Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang X, Wang P, Lv X, Niu X, Lin X, Zhong S, Wang D, Lin H, Chen J, Bai S (2022) Stacking engineering of semiconductor heterojunctions on hollow carbon spheres for boosting photocatalytic CO2 reduction. ACS Catal 12:2569–258010.1021/acscatal.1c05401 ↗
2. Zhang W, Jiang M, Yang S, Hu Y, Mu B, Tie Z, Jin Z (2022) In-situ grown CuOx nanowire forest on copper foam: A 3D hierarchical and freestanding electrocatalyst with enhanced carbonaceous product selectivity in CO2 reduction. Nano Res Energy 1:e912003310.26599/NRE.2022.9120033 ↗
3. Li F, Anjarsari Y, Wang J, Azzahiidah R, Jiang J, Zou J, Xiang K, Ma H, Arramel, (2022) Modulation of the lattice structure of 2D carbon-based materials for improving photo/electric properties. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00380-410.1007/s42823-022-00380-4 ↗
4. Chang X, Wang T, Gong J (2016) CO2 photo-reduction: insights into CO2 activation and reaction on surfaces of photocatalysts. Energ Environ Sci 9:2177–219610.1039/C6EE00383D ↗
5. Deng Z, Ji J, Xing M, Zhang J (2020) The role of oxygen defects in metal oxides for CO2 reduction. Nanoscale Adv 2:4986–499510.1039/D0NA00535E ↗
6. Li L, Hasan MuI, Farwa HR, Peng L, Xu N, Niazi NK, Zhang J-N, Qiao J (2022) Copper as a single metal atom based photo-, electro-, and photoelectrochemical catalyst decorated on carbon nitride surface for efficient CO2 reduction: A review. Nano Res Energy 1:e9120015
7. Fu J, Jiang K, Qiu X, Yu J, Liu M (2020) Product selectivity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. Mater Today 32:222–24310.1016/j.mattod.2019.06.009 ↗
8. Ye S, Wang R, Wu M-Z, Yuan Y-P (2015) A review on g-C3N4 for photocatalytic water splitting and CO2 reduction. Appl Surf Sci 358:15–2710.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.173 ↗
9. Li M, Liu Z, Wu S, Zhang J (2022) Advances for CO2 photocatalytic reduction in porous Ti-based photocatalysts. ACS EST Engg 2:942–95610.1021/acsestengg.1c00447 ↗
10. Jiang Z, Sun W, Miao W, Yuan Z, Yang G, Kong F, Yan T, Chen J, Huang B, An C, Ozin GA (2019) Living atomically dispersed Cu ultrathin TiO2 nanosheet CO2 reduction photocatalyst. Adv Sci 6:190028910.1002/advs.201900289 ↗
11. Park J, Liu H, Piao G, Kang U, Jeong HW, Janáky C, Park H (2022) Synergistic conversion of CO2 into C1 and C2 gases using hybrid in-doped TiO2 and g-C3N4 photocatalysts. Chem Eng J 437:13538810.1016/j.cej.2022.135388 ↗
12. Rasouli K, Alamdari A, Sabbaghi S (2022) Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of α-Fe2O3@TiO2 photocatalyst: optimization of effective factors in the fabrication of photocatalyst and removal of non-biodegradable cefixime via response surface methodology-central composite design. Sep Purif Technol 307:12279910.1016/j.seppur.2022.122799 ↗
13. Hwang Y, Sorcar S, Lee J, Jung J, Cho C, In S-i (2023) Reduced TiO2 quantum dots/graphene for solar light driven CO2 reduction into precisely controlled C1 vs C2 hydrocarbon products without noble Co-catalyst. J Power Sources 556:23243010.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232430 ↗
14. Yuan L, Lu K-Q, Zhang F, Fu X, Xu Y-J (2018) Unveiling the interplay between light-driven CO2 photocatalytic reduction and carbonaceous residues decomposition: a case study of Bi2WO6-TiO2 binanosheets. Appl Catal B 237:424–43110.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.019 ↗
15. Zhao W, Liu C (2020) Mesoporous Cu–Cu2O@TiO2 heterojunction photocatalysts derived from metal–organic frameworks. RSC Adv 10:14550–1455510.1039/D0RA01327G ↗
16. Li Q, Xia Y, Yang C, Lv K, Lei M, Li M (2018) Building a direct Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst by ZnIn2S4 nanosheets and TiO2 hollowspheres for highly-efficient artificial photosynthesis. Chem Eng J 349:287–29610.1016/j.cej.2018.05.094 ↗
17. Chiu Y-H, Hsu Y-J (2017) Au@Cu7S4 yolk@shell nanocrystal-decorated TiO2 nanowires as an all-day-active photocatalyst for environmental purification. Nano Energy 31:286–29510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.036 ↗
18. Wang J, Qin Q, Li F, Anjarsari Y, Sun W, Azzahiidah R, Zou J, Xiang K, Ma H, Jiang J, Arramel, (2022) Recent advances of MXenes Mo2C-based materials for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00401-210.1007/s42823-022-00401-2 ↗
19. Deng F, Jiang J, Sirés I (2023) State-of-the-art review and bibliometric analysis on electro-fenton process. Carbon Lett 33:17–3410.1007/s42823-022-00420-z ↗
20. Jiang J, Xiong Z, Wang H, Liao G, Bai S, Zou J, Wu P, Zhang P, Li X (2022) Sulfur-doped g-C3N4/g-C3N4 isotype step-scheme heterojunction for photocatalytic H2 evolution. J Mater Sci Technol 118:15–2410.1016/j.jmst.2021.12.018 ↗
21. Jeong H, Ryu H, Bae J-S (2021) Improvement of CuO photostability with the help of a BiVO4 capping layer by preventing self-reduction of CuO to Cu2O. J Ind Eng Chem 104:416–42610.1016/j.jiec.2021.08.037 ↗
22. Gawande MB, Goswami A, Felpin F-X, Asefa T, Huang X, Silva R, Zou X, Zboril R, Varma RS (2016) Cu and Cu-based nanoparticles: synthesis and applications in catalysis. Chem Rev 116:3722–381110.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00482 ↗
23. Zhang M, Zhao K, Xiong J, Wei Y, Han C, Li W, Cheng G (2020) A 1D/2D WO3 nanostructure coupled with a nanoparticulate CuO cocatalyst for enhancing solar-driven CO2 photoreduction: the impact of the crystal facet. Sustain Energ Fuels 4:2593–260310.1039/D0SE00034E ↗
24. Sekar K, Chuaicham C, Vellaichamy B, Li W, Zhuang W, Lu X, Ohtani B, Sasaki K (2021) Cubic Cu2O nanoparticles decorated on TiO2 nanofiber heterostructure as an excellent synergistic photocatalyst for H2 production and sulfamethoxazole degradation. Appl Catal B 294:12022110.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120221 ↗
25. Yang G, Qiu P, Xiong J, Zhu X, Cheng G (2022) Facilely anchoring Cu2O nanoparticles on mesoporous TiO2 nanorods for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction through efficient charge transfer. Chin Chem Lett 33:3709–371210.1016/j.cclet.2021.10.047 ↗
26. Li M, Wu Y, Gu E, Song W, Zeng D (2022) Anchoring CuO nanospindles on g-C3N4 nanosheets for photocatalytic pollutant degradation and CO2 reduction. J Alloys Compd 914:16533910.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165339 ↗
27. Verma A, Jaihindh DP, Fu Y-P (2019) Photocatalytic 4-nitrophenol degradation and oxygen evolution reaction in CuO/g-C3N4 composites prepared by deep eutectic solvent-assisted chlorine doping. Dalton Trans 48:8594–861010.1039/C9DT01046G ↗
28. Zhang S, Wang H, Yeung M, Fang Y, Yu H, Peng F (2013) Cu(OH)2-modified TiO2 nanotube arrays for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 38:7241–724510.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.027 ↗
29. Yu J, Ran J (2011) Facile preparation and enhanced photocatalytic H2-production activity of Cu(OH)2 cluster modified TiO2. Energ Environ Sci 4:1364–137110.1039/c0ee00729c ↗
30. Sharma S, Pai MR, Kaur G, Divya SVR, Dass S, Shrivastav R (2019) Efficient hydrogen generation on CuO core/AgTiO2 shell nano-hetero-structures by photocatalytic splitting of water. Renew Energ 136:1202–121610.1016/j.renene.2018.09.091 ↗
31. Fang B, Xing Y, Bonakdarpour A, Zhang S, Wilkinson DP (2015) Hierarchical CuO–TiO2 Hollow Microspheres for Highly Efficient Photodriven Reduction of CO2 to CH4. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:2381–238810.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00724 ↗
32. Kim HR, Razzaq A, Grimes CA, In SI (2017) Heterojunction p-n-p Cu2O/S-TiO2/CuO: Synthesis and application to photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to methane. J Util 20:91–9610.1016/j.jcou.2017.05.008 ↗
33. Jin L, Shaaban E, Bamonte S, Cintron D, Shuster S, Zhang L, Li G, He J (2021) Surface basicity of metal@TiO2 to enhance photocatalytic efficiency for CO2 reduction. ACS Appl Mater Interf 13:38595–3860310.1021/acsami.1c09119 ↗
34. Liao Y, Cao S-W, Yuan Y, Gu Q, Zhang Z, Xue C (2014) Efficient CO2 capture and photoreduction by amine-functionalized TiO2. Chem Eur J 20:10220–1022210.1002/chem.201403321 ↗
35. Gan Y, Wei Y, Xiong J, Cheng G (2018) Impact of post-processing modes of precursor on adsorption and photocatalytic capability of mesoporous TiO2 nanocrystallite aggregates towards ciprofloxacin removal. Chem Eng J 349:1–1610.1016/j.cej.2018.05.051 ↗
36. Wei Y, Cheng G, Xiong J, Zhu J, Gan Y, Zhang M, Li Z, Dou S (2019) Synergistic impact of cocatalysts and hole scavenger for promoted photocatalytic H2 evolution in mesoporous TiO2-NiSx hybrid. J Energy Chem 32:45–5610.1016/j.jechem.2018.05.013 ↗
37. Chen Z, Zhu X, Xiong J, Wen Z, Cheng G (2023) A p–n junction by coupling amine-enriched brookite–TiO2 nanorods with cuxs nanoparticles for improved photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Materials 16:96010.3390/ma16030960 ↗
38. Wang S, Zhao X, Muhammad Adeel Sharif H, Chen Z, Chen Y, Zhou B, Xiao K, Yang B, Duan Q (2021) Amine-CdS for exfoliating and distributing bulk MoO3 for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution and Cr(VI) reduction. Chem Eng J 406:12684910.1016/j.cej.2020.126849 ↗
39. Gao J, Lu Z, Jin C, Yu X, Jiang H, Wang L, Sun L, Wang W, Liu Q (2023) Integrated p-n/Schottky-junctions for a high near-infrared photocatalytic H2 production upon CdZnS/CoP/CoO ternary hybrids with steering charge transfer. Fuel 333:12633110.1016/j.fuel.2022.126331 ↗
40. Shang Q, Huang X, Tan X, Yu T (2017) High activity Ti3+-modified brookite TiO2/graphene nanocomposites with specific facets exposed for water splitting. Ind Eng Chem Res 56:9098–910610.1021/acs.iecr.7b01263 ↗
41. Zang Y, Li L, Xu Y, Zuo Y, Li G (2014) Hybridization of brookite TiO2 with g-C3N4: a visible-light-driven photocatalyst for As3+ oxidation. MO Degrad Water Splitt Hydrogen Evolut J Mater Chem A 2:15774–15780
42. Warsi A-Z, Hussien OK, Iftikhar A, Aziz F, Alhashmialameer D, Mahmoud SF, Warsi MF, Saleh DI (2022) Co-precipitation assisted preparation of Ag2O, CuO and Ag2O/CuO nanocomposite: Characterization and improved solar irradiated degradation of colored and colourless organic effluents. Ceram Int 48:19056–1906710.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.194 ↗
43. Liu J, Li Y, Ke J, Wang S, Wang L, Xiao H (2018) Black NiO-TiO2 nanorods for solar photocatalysis: recognition of electronic structure and reaction mechanism. Appl Catal B 224:705–71410.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.028 ↗
44. Wei H, McMaster WA, Tan JZY, Chen D, Caruso RA (2018) Tricomponent brookite/anatase TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction in mesoporous hollow microspheres for enhanced visible-light photocatalysis. J Mater Chem A 6:7236–724510.1039/C8TA00386F ↗
45. Jiang T, Wang K, Guo T, Wu X, Zhang G (2020) Fabrication of Z-scheme MoO3/Bi2O4 heterojunction photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. Chinese J Catal 41:161–16910.1016/S1872-2067(19)63391-7 ↗
46. Chen C, Wang D, Li Y, Huang H, Ke Y (2021) ‘Flower-like AgBr/CeO2 Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalyst with enhanced visible light photocatalytic and antibacterial activities. Appl Surf Sci 565:15053410.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150534 ↗
47. Shao Y, Dou Z, Liang X, Zhang X, Ji M, Pang M, Wang M, Wang X (2022) ZnIn2S4 nanosheet growth on amine-functionalized SiO2 for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Catal Sci Technol 12:606–61210.1039/D1CY01740C ↗
48. Jiang J, Bai S, Yang M, Zou J, Li N, Peng J, Wang H, Xiang K, Liu S, Zhai T (2022) Strategic design and fabrication of MXenes-Ti3CNCl2@CoS2 core-shell nanostructure for high-efficiency hydrogen evolution. Nano Res 15:5977–598610.1007/s12274-022-4276-8 ↗
49. Zhao Y, Zada A, Yang Y, Pan J, Wang Y, Yan Z, Xu Z, Qi K (2021) Photocatalytic Removal of Antibiotics on g-C3N4 Using Amorphous CuO as Cocatalysts. Front Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.79773810.3389/fchem.2021.797738 ↗
50. Meng A, Wu S, Cheng B, Yu J, Xu J (2018) Hierarchical TiO2/Ni(OH)2 composite fibers with enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance. J Mater Chem A 6:4729–473610.1039/C7TA10073F ↗
51. Aguirre ME, Zhou R, Eugene AJ, Guzman MI, Grela MA (2017) Cu2O/TiO2 heterostructures for CO2 reduction through a direct Z-scheme: Protecting Cu2O from photocorrosion. Appl Catal B 217:485–49310.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.058 ↗
52. Zhao X, Sun L, Jin X, Xu M, Yin S, Li J, Li X, Shen D, Yan Y, Huo P (2021) Cu media constructed Z-scheme heterojunction of UiO-66-NH2/Cu2O/Cu for enhanced photocatalytic induction of CO2. Appl Surf Sci 545:14896710.1016/j.apsusc.2021.148967 ↗
53. Xiong Z, Lei Z, Kuang C-C, Chen X, Gong B, Zhao Y, Zhang J, Zheng C, Wu JCS (2017) Selective photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into CH4 over Pt-Cu2O TiO2 nanocrystals: the interaction between Pt and Cu2O cocatalysts. Appl Catal B 202:695–70310.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.001 ↗
54. Gai Q, Ren S, Zheng X, Liu W, Dong Q (2021) The synergy of photodeposited CoNi co-catalysts for the photocatalytic performance of C3N4/CdS nanosheets: optimized Gibbs free energy and Co–S bridging bonds. Catal Sci Technol 11:5579–558910.1039/D1CY00811K ↗
55. Xu H, Li S, Ge L, Han C, Gao Y, Dai D (2017) In-situ synthesis of novel plate-like Co(OH)2 co-catalyst decorated TiO2 nanosheets with efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution activity. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:22877–2288610.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.186 ↗
56. Qiu P, Lu M, Cheng G, Li W, Liu L, Xiong J (2023) Co-implantation of oxygen vacancy and well-dispersed Cu cocatalyst into TiO2 nanoparticles for promoting solar-to-hydrogen evolution. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48:933–94210.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.245 ↗
57. Yang M, Chen Y, Wang H, Zou Y, Wu P, Zou J, Jiang J (2022) Solvothermal preparation of CeO2 nanoparticles–graphene nanocomposites as an electrochemical sensor for sensitive detecting pentachlorophenol. Carbon Lett 32:1277–128510.1007/s42823-022-00353-7 ↗
58. Liu Y, Li Y, Peng F, Lin Y, Yang S, Zhang S, Wang H, Cao Y, Yu H (2019) 2H- and 1T- mixed phase few-layer MoS2 as a superior to Pt co-catalyst coated on TiO2 nanorod arrays for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl Catal B 241:236–24510.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.040 ↗
59. Li K, Zhang C, Li X, Du Y, Yang P, Zhu M (2019) A nanostructured CuWO4/Mn3O4 with p/n heterojunction as photoanode toward enhanced water oxidation. Catal Today 335:173–17910.1016/j.cattod.2018.11.003 ↗
60. Zhao W, Li J, Dai B, Cheng Z, Xu J, Ma K, Zhang L, Sheng N, Mao G, Wu H, Wei K, Leung DYC (2019) Simultaneous removal of tetracycline and Cr(VI) by a novel three-dimensional AgI/BiVO4 p-n junction photocatalyst and insight into the photocatalytic mechanism. Chem Eng J 369:716–72510.1016/j.cej.2019.03.115 ↗
61. Putri LK, Ng B-J, Ong W-J, Lee HW, Chang WS, Chai S-P (2018) Engineering nanoscale p–n junction via the synergetic dual-doping of p-type boron-doped graphene hybridized with n-type oxygen-doped carbon nitride for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J Mater Chem A 6:3181–319410.1039/C7TA09723A ↗
62. Zou J, Wu S, Liu Y, Sun Y, Cao Y, Hsu J-P, Shen Wee AT, Jiang J (2018) An ultra-sensitive electrochemical sensor based on 2D g-C3N4/CuO nanocomposites for dopamine detection. Carbon 130:652–66310.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.008 ↗
63. Jiang J, Ou-yang L, Zhu L, Zheng A, Zou J, Yi X, Tang H (2014) Dependence of electronic structure of g-C3N4 on the layer number of its nanosheets: a study by Raman spectroscopy coupled with first-principles calculations. Carbon 80:213–22110.1016/j.carbon.2014.08.059 ↗