journal article·2019-02-15Open access

Designing interfaces in energy materials applications with first-principles calculations

Keith T. Butler, Gopalakrishnan Sai Gautam, Pieremanuele Canepa

npj Computational Materials· Volume 5· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Materials for energy-related applications, which are crucial for a sustainable energy economy, rely on combining materials that form complex heterogenous interfaces. Simultaneously, progress in computational materials science in describing complex interfaces is critical for improving the understanding and performance of energy materials. Hence, we present an in-depth review of the physical quantities regulating interfaces in batteries, photovoltaics, and photocatalysts, that are accessible from modern electronic structure methods, with a focus on density functional theory calculations. For each energy application, we highlight unique approaches that have been developed to calculate interfacial properties and explore the possibility of applying some of these approaches across disciplines, leading to a unified overview of interface design. Finally, we identify a set of challenges for further improving the theoretical description of interfaces in energy devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Kroemer, H. Nobel Lecture: quasielectric fields and band offsets: teaching electrons new tricks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 783–793 (2001).10.1103/RevModPhys.73.783 ↗
2. Schroder, D. K. & Meier, D. L. Solar cell contact resistance—a review. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 31, 637–647 (1984).10.1109/T-ED.1984.21583 ↗
3. Logadottir, A. et al. The Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relation and the volcano plot for ammonia synthesis over transition metal catalysts. J. Catal. 197, 229–231 (2001).10.1006/jcat.2000.3087 ↗
4. Hammer, B. & Nørskov, J. in Impact of Surface Science on Catalysis, Vol. 45, 71–129 (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 2000).10.1016/S0360-0564(02)45013-4 ↗
5. Urban, A., Seo, D.-H. & Ceder, G. Computational understanding of Li-ion batteries. npj Comput. Mater. 2 16002 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.2 ↗
6. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
7. Anisimov, V. I., Zaanen, J. & Andersen, O. K. Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner. I. Phys. Rev. B 44, 943–954 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
8. Mori-Sánchez, P., Cohen, A. J. & Yang, W. Localization and delocalization errors in density functional theory and implications for band-gap prediction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 146401 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.146401 ↗
9. Freysoldt, C. et al. First-principles calculations for point defects in solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 253–305 (2014).10.1103/RevModPhys.86.253 ↗
10. Corà, F. et al. in Structure and Bonding, 171–232 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004).
11. Heyd, J., Peralta, J. E., Scuseria, G. E. & Martin, R. L. Energy band gaps and lattice parameters evaluated with the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof screened hybrid functional. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 174101 (2005).10.1063/1.2085170 ↗
12. Hybertsen, M. S. & Louie, S. G. Electron correlation in semiconductors and insulators: band gaps and quasiparticle energies. Phys. Rev. B 34, 5390–5413 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 ↗
13. Dion, M., Rydberg, H., Schröder, E., Langreth, D. C. & Lundqvist, B. I. Van der Waals density functional for general geometries. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246401 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.246401 ↗
14. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
15. Richard, M. M. Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods, Vol. 52 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2011).
16. Reuter, K. & Scheffler, M. Composition, structure, and stability of RuO2 (110) as a function of oxygen pressure. Phys. Rev. B 65, 035406 (2001).
17. Canepa, P. et al. Particle morphology and lithium segregation to surfaces of the Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolyte. Chem. Mater. 30, 3019–3027 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00649 ↗
18. Sun, W. & Ceder, G. Efficient creation and convergence of surface slabs. Surf. Sci. 617, 53–59 (2013).10.1016/j.susc.2013.05.016 ↗
19. Moll, N., Kley, A., Pehlke, E. & Scheffler, M. GaAs equilibrium crystal shape from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 54, 8844–8855 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.8844 ↗
20. Tasker, P. W. The stability of ionic crystal surfaces. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 12, 4977–4984 (1979).10.1088/0022-3719/12/22/036 ↗
21. Sai Gautam, G., Senftle, T. P. & Carter, E. A. Understanding the effects of Cd and Ag doping in Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. Chem. Mater. 30, 4543–4555 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00677 ↗
22. Barnard, A. S. & Curtiss, L. A. Prediction of TiO2 nanoparticle phase and shape transitions controlled by surface chemistry. Nano. Lett. 5, 1261–1266 (2005).10.1021/nl050355m ↗
23. Harding, J. H. et al. Computational techniques at the organic—Inorganic interface in biomineralization. Chem. Rev. 108, 4823–4854 (2008).10.1021/cr078278y ↗
24. Marmier, A. & Parker, S. C. Ab initio morphology and surface thermodynamics of α-Al2O3. Phys. Rev. B 69, 115409 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.69.115409 ↗
25. Wang, L., Zhou, F., Meng, Y. S. & Ceder, G. First-principles study of surface properties of LiFePO4: surface energy, structure, Wulff shape, and surface redox potential. Phys. Rev. B 76, 165435 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165435 ↗
26. Tran, R. et al. Data descriptor: surface energies of elemental crystals. Sci. Data 3, 160080 (2016).10.1038/sdata.2016.80 ↗
27. Van De Walle, C. G. & Martin, R. M. Theoretical study of band offsets at semiconductor interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 35, 8154–8165 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevB.35.8154 ↗
28. Finnis, M. W. The theory of metal-ceramic interfaces. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8, 5811–5836 (1996).10.1088/0953-8984/8/32/003 ↗
29. Canepa, P. et al. Understanding the initial stages of reversible Mg deposition and stripping in inorganic nonaqueous electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 27, 3317–3325 (2015).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00389 ↗
30. Sai Gautam, G., Canepa, P., Richards, W. D., Malik, R. & Ceder, G. Role of structural H2O in intercalation electrodes: the case of Mg in nanocrystalline xerogel-V2O5. Nano. Lett. 16, 2426–2431 (2016).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05273 ↗
31. Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).10.1021/jp047349j ↗
32. Peterson, A. A., Abild-Pedersen, F., Studt, F., Rossmeisl, J. & Nørskov, J. K. How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy & Environ. Sci. 3, 1311 (2010).10.1039/c0ee00071j ↗
33. Walsh, A. & Butler, K. T. Prediction of electron energies in metal oxides. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 364–372 (2014).10.1021/ar400115x ↗
34. Peressi, M., Binggeli, N. & Baldereschi, A. Band engineering at interfaces: theory and numerical experiments. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 31, 1273–1299 (1998).10.1088/0022-3727/31/11/002 ↗
35. Bredas, J.-L. Mind the gap! Mater. Horiz. 1, 17–19 (2014).10.1039/C3MH00098B ↗
36. Franciosi, A. Heterojunction band offset engineering. Surf. Sci. Rep. 25, 1–140 (1996).10.1016/0167-5729(95)00008-9 ↗
37. Klein, A. Energy band alignment at interfaces of semiconducting oxides: a review of experimental determination using photoelectron spectroscopy and comparison with theoretical predictions by the electron affinity rule, charge neutrality levels, and the common anion. Thin. Solid. Films. 520, 3721–3728 (2012).10.1016/j.tsf.2011.10.055 ↗
38. Robertson, J. Band offsets, Schottky barrier heights, and their effects on electronic devices. J. Vac. Sci. & Technol. A: Vac., Surf., Films 31, 050821 (2013).10.1116/1.4818426 ↗
39. Tung, R. T. & Kronik, L. Band offset formation at semiconductor heterojunctions through density-based minimization of interface energy. Phys. Rev. B 94, 075310 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075310 ↗
40. Kumagai, Y., Butler, K. T., Walsh, A. & Oba, F. Theory of ionization potentials of nonmetallic solids. Phys. Rev. B 95, 125309 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.125309 ↗
41. Van De Walle, C. G. Band lineups and deformation potentials in the model-solid theory. Phys. Rev. B 39, 1871–1883 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevB.39.1871 ↗
42. Van De Walle, C. G. Universal alignment of hydrogen levels in semiconductors and insulators. Phys. B 376-377, 1–6 (2006).10.1016/j.physb.2005.12.004 ↗
43. Anderson, R. L. Germanium-gallium arsenide heterojunctions. IBM J. Res. Dev. 4, 283–287 (1960).10.1147/rd.43.0283 ↗
44. Wager, J. Transparent electronics: Schottky barrier and heterojunction considerations. Thin. Solid. Films. 516, 1755–1764 (2008).10.1016/j.tsf.2007.06.164 ↗
45. Mönch, W. Barrier heights of real Schottky contacts explained by metal-induced gap states and lateral inhomogeneities. J. Vac. Sci. & Technol. B: Microelectron. Nanometer Struct. Process., Meas., Phenom. 17, 1867 (1999).10.1116/1.590839 ↗
46. Yin, W.-J., Gong, X.-G. & Wei, S.-H. Origin of the unusually large band-gap bowing and the breakdown of the band-edge distribution rule in the SnxGe1−x alloys. Phys. Rev. B 78, 161203 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.161203 ↗
47. Peng, H. et al. Convergence of density and hybrid functional defect calculations for compound semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 88, 115201 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.115201 ↗
48. Singh-Miller, N. E. & Marzari, N. Surface energies, work functions, and surface relaxations of low-index metallic surfaces from first principles. Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 80, 235407 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.235407 ↗
49. Pashley, M. D. Electron counting model and its application to island structures on molecular-beam epitaxy grown GaAs(001) and ZnSe(001). Phys. Rev. B 40, 10481–10487 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevB.40.10481 ↗
50. Tersoff, J. Schottky barriers and semiconductor band structures. Phys. Rev. B 32, 6968–6971 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevB.32.6968 ↗
51. Toroker, M. C. et al. First principles scheme to evaluate band edge positions in potential transition metal oxide photocatalysts and photoelectrodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 16644–16654 (2011).10.1039/c1cp22128k ↗
52. Alidoust, N., Toroker, M. C., Keith, J. A. & Carter, E. A. Significant reduction in NiO band gap upon formation of LixNi1−xO alloys: applications to solar energy conversion. ChemSusChem 7, 195–201 (2014).10.1002/cssc.201300595 ↗
53. Kanan, D. K. & Carter, E. A. Band gap engineering of MnO via ZnO alloying: a potential new visible-light photocatalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C. 116, 9876–9887 (2012).10.1021/jp300590d ↗
54. Wei, S. H. & Zunger, A. Calculated natural band offsets of all II–VI and III–V semiconductors: Chemical trends and the role of cation d orbitals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 2011–2013 (1998).10.1063/1.121249 ↗
55. Chen, S., Gong, X. G. & Wei, S. H. Band-structure anomalies of the chalcopyrite semiconductors CuGaX 2 versus AgGaX 2 (X=S and Se) and their alloys. Phys. Rev. B 75, 205209 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.75.205209 ↗
56. Butler, K. T., Frost, J. M. & Walsh, A. Band alignment of the hybrid halide perovskites CH3NH3PbCl3, CH3NH3PbBr3 and CH3NH3PbI3. Mater. Horiz. 2, 228–231 (2015).10.1039/C4MH00174E ↗
57. Butler, K. T., Buckeridge, J., Catlow, C. R. A. & Walsh, A. Crystal electron binding energy and surface work function control of tin dioxide. Phys. Rev. B 89, 115320 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.115320 ↗
58. Giordano, L., Cinquini, F. & Pacchioni, G. Tuning the surface metal work function by deposition of ultrathin oxide films: density functional calculations. Phys. Rev. B 73, 045414 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045414 ↗
59. Rhoderick, E. H. Metal-semiconductor contacts. IEE Proc. I - Solid-State Electron Devices 129, 1–14 (1982).10.1049/ip-i-1.1982.0001 ↗
60. Osterloh, F. E. Inorganic materials as catalysts for photochemical splitting of water. Chem. Mater. 20, 35–54 (2008).10.1021/cm7024203 ↗
61. Aydinol, M. K., Kohan, A. F., Ceder, G., Cho, K. & Joannopoulos, J. Ab initio study of lithium intercalation in metal oxides and metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 56, 1354–1365 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevB.56.1354 ↗
62. Dalverny, A.-L., Filhol, J.-S. & Doublet, M.-L. Interface electrochemistry in conversion materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 10134 (2011).10.1039/c0jm04202a ↗
63. Haruyama, J., Sodeyama, K., Han, L., Takada, K. & Tateyama, Y. Space-charge layer effect at interface between oxide cathode and sulfide electrolyte in all-solid-state lithium-ion battery. Chem. Mater. 26, 4248–4255 (2014).10.1021/cm5016959 ↗
64. Zhu, Y., He, X. & Mo, Y. Origin of outstanding stability in the lithium solid electrolyte materials: Insights from thermodynamic analyses based on first-principles calculations. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 23685–23693 (2015).10.1021/acsami.5b07517 ↗
65. Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C. & Ceder, G. Interface stability in solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 28, 266–273 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 ↗
66. Hannah, D. C., Sai Gautam, G., Canepa, P. & Ceder, G. On the balance of intercalation and conversion reactions in battery cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1800379 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201800379 ↗
67. Ong, S. P., Andreussi, O., Wu, Y., Marzari, N. & Ceder, G. Electrochemical windows of room-temperature ionic liquids from molecular dynamics and density functional theory calculations. Chem. Mater. 23, 2979–2986 (2011).10.1021/cm200679y ↗
68. Aurbach, D. The study of electrolyte solutions based on ethylene and diethyl carbonates for rechargeable Li batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 2882 (1995).10.1149/1.2048659 ↗
69. Leung, K. Electronic structure modeling of electrochemical reactions at electrode/electrolyte interfaces in lithium ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 1539–1547 (2013).10.1021/jp308929a ↗
70. Suo, L. et al. How solid-electrolyte interphase forms in aqueous electrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 18670–18680 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b10688 ↗
71. Filhol, J.-S. & Neurock, M. Elucidation of the electrochemical activation of water over Pd by first principles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 402–406 (2006).10.1002/anie.200502540 ↗
72. Pinto, L. M. C., Spohr, E., Quaino, P., Santos, E. & Schmickler, W. Why silver deposition is so fast: Solving the enigma of metal deposition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7883–7885 (2013).10.1002/anie.201301998 ↗
73. Chen, C. et al. Accurate force field for molybdenum by machine learning large materials data. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 043603 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.043603 ↗
74. Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O. & Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559, 547–555 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
75. Aykol, M. et al. High-throughput computational design of cathode coatings for Li-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 7, 13779 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13779 ↗
76. Wenzel, S. et al. Direct observation of the interfacial instability of the fast ionic conductor Li10GeP2S12 at the lithium metal anode. Chem. Mater. 28, 2400–2407 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00610 ↗
77. Han, F., Zhu, Y., He, X., Mo, Y. & Wang, C. Electrochemical stability of Li10GeP2S12 and Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501590 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201501590 ↗
78. Smith, A. J., Burns, J. C., Zhao, X., Xiong, D. & Dahn, J. R. A high precision coulometry study of the sei growth in li/graphite cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 158, A447–A452 (2011).10.1149/1.3557892 ↗
79. Tang, H. et al. Probing solid-solid interfacial reactions in all-solid-state sodium-ion batteries with first-principles calculations. Chem. Mater. 30, 163–173 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04096 ↗
80. Luntz, A. C., Voss, J. & Reuter, K. Interfacial challenges in solid-state Li ion batteries. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4599–4604 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02352 ↗
81. Stegmaier, S., Voss, J., Reuter, K. & Luntz, A. C. Li+ defects in a solid-state Li ion battery: theoretical insights with a Li3OCl electrolyte. Chem. Mater. 29, 4330–4340 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00659 ↗
82. Song, T., Kanevce, A. & Sites, J. R. Emitter/absorber interface of CdTe solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 119, 233104 (2016).10.1063/1.4953820 ↗
83. Sinai, O. et al. Multiscale approach to the electronic structure of doped semiconductor surfaces. Phys. Rev. B 91, 075311 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.075311 ↗
84. Whittles, T. J. et al. Core levels, band alignments, and valence-band states in CuSbS2 for solar cell applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 41916–41926 (2017).10.1021/acsami.7b14208 ↗
85. Burton, L. A., Kumagai, Y., Walsh, A. & Oba, F. DFT investigation into the underperformance of sulfide materials in photovoltaic applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 9132–9140 (2017).10.1039/C7TA00673J ↗
86. Klein, A. Energy band alignment in chalcogenide thin film solar cells from photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 134201 (2015).10.1088/0953-8984/27/13/134201 ↗
87. J Jackson, A., M Ganose, A., Regoutz, A., G Egdell, R. & O Scanlon, D. Galore: broadening and weighting for simulation of photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 773 (2018).10.21105/joss.00773 ↗
88. Stevanović, V. et al. Variations of ionization potential and electron affinity as a function of surface orientation: the case of orthorhombic sns. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 211603 (2014).10.1063/1.4879558 ↗
89. Butler, K. T., Vullum, P. E., Muggerud, A. M., Cabrera, E. & Harding, J. H. Structural and electronic properties of silver/silicon interfaces and implications for solar cell performance. Phys. Rev. B 83, 235307 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.235307 ↗
90. Lindblad, R. et al. Electronic structure of TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 648–653 (2014).10.1021/jz402749f ↗
91. Steim, R., Kogler, F. R. & Brabec, C. J. Interface materials for organic solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 2499–2512 (2010).10.1039/b921624c ↗
92. Hachmann, J. et al. The harvard clean energy project: large-scale computational screening and design of organic photovoltaics on the world community grid. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2241–2251 (2011).10.1021/jz200866s ↗
93. Niedzialek, D. et al. First principles calculations of charge transfer excitations in polymer-fullerene complexes: influence of excess energy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 1972–1984 (2015).10.1002/adfm.201402682 ↗
94. Koch, N. Energy levels at interfaces between metals and conjugated organic molecules. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 20, 184008 (2008).10.1088/0953-8984/20/18/184008 ↗
95. Braun, S., Salaneck, W. R. & Fahlman, M. Energy-level alignment at organic/metal and organic/organic interfaces. Adv. Mater. 21, 1450–1472 (2009).10.1002/adma.200802893 ↗
96. Butler, K. T. et al. Band energy control of molybdenum oxide by surface hydration. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 231605 (2015).10.1063/1.4937460 ↗
97. Greiner, M. T. et al. Universal energy-level alignment of molecules on metal oxides. Nat. Mater. 11, 76–81 (2012).10.1038/nmat3159 ↗
98. Ley, L., Smets, Y., Pakes, C. I. & Ristein, J. Calculating the universal energy-level alignment of organic molecules on metal oxides. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 794–805 (2013).10.1002/adfm.201201412 ↗
99. Zhou, Y. et al. A universal method to produce low-work function electrodes for organic electronics. Science 336, 327–332 (2012).10.1126/science.1218829 ↗
100. Marsili, M., Mosconi, E., De Angelis, F. & Umari, P. Large scale GW-BSE calculations with N 3 scaling: excitonic effects in dye sensitised solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 95, 075415 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.075415 ↗