Machine learning for accelerating the discovery of high-performance donor/acceptor pairs in non-fullerene organic solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and computer science together with current approaches in material synthesis and optimization will act as an effective approach for speeding up the discovery of high-performance photoactive materials in organic solar cells (OSCs). Yet, like model selection in statistics, the choice of appropriate machine learning (ML) algorithms plays a vital role in the process of new material discovery in databases. In this study, we constructed five common algorithms, and introduced 565 donor/acceptor (D/A) combinations as training data sets to evaluate the practicalities of these ML algorithms and their application potential when guiding material design and D/A pairs screening. Thus, the best predictive capabilities are provided by using the random forest (RF) and boosted regression trees (BRT) approaches beyond other ML algorithms in the data set. Furthermore, >32 million D/A pairs were screened and calculated by RF and BRT models, respectively. Among them, six photovoltaic D/A pairs are selected and synthesized to compare their predicted and experimental power conversion efficiencies. The outcome of ML and experiment verification demonstrates that the RF approach can be effectively applied to high-throughput virtual screening for opening new perspectives to design of materials and D/A pairs, thereby accelerating the development of OSCs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Bredas, J. L., Norton, J. E., Cornil, J. & Coropceanu, V. Molecular understanding of organic solar cells: the challenges. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 1691–1699 (2009).10.1021/ar900099h ↗
2. Yuan, J. et al. Single-junction organic solar cell with over 15% efficiency using fused-ring acceptor with electron-deficient core. Joule 3, 1140–1151 (2019).10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.004 ↗
3. Meng, L. et al. Organic and solution-processed tandem solar cells with 17.3% efficiency. Science 361, 1094 (2018).10.1126/science.aat2612 ↗
4. Ameri, T., Khoram, P., Min, J. & Brabec, C. J. Organic ternary solar cells: a review. Adv. Mater. 25, 4245–4266 (2013).10.1002/adma.201300623 ↗
5. Guo, J. & Min, J. A cost analysis of fully solution-processed ITO-free organic solar modules. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1802521 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201802521 ↗
6. Cui, Y. et al. Achieving over 15% efficiency in organic photovoltaic cells via copolymer design. Adv. Mater. 31, 1808356 (2019).10.1002/adma.201808356 ↗
7. Min, J. et al. Processability: evaluation of electron donor materials for solution-processed organic solar cells via a novel figure of merit. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700465 (2017).10.1002/aenm.201700465 ↗
8. Bakulin, A. A. et al. The role of driving energy and delocalized states for charge separation in organic semiconductors. Science 335, 1340 (2012).10.1126/science.1217745 ↗
9. Bin, H. et al. 9.73% efficiency nonfullerene all organic small molecule solar cells with absorption-complementary donor and acceptor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5085–5094 (2017).10.1021/jacs.6b12826 ↗
10. Zhou, C. et al. Toward high efficiency polymer solar cells: influence of local chemical environment and morphology. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1601081 (2017).10.1002/aenm.201601081 ↗
11. Ye, L. et al. Enhanced efficiency in fullerene-free polymer solar cell by incorporating fine-designed donor and acceptor materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 9274–9280 (2015).10.1021/acsami.5b02012 ↗
12. Bin, H. et al. 11.4% Efficiency non-fullerene polymer solar cells with trialkylsilyl substituted 2D-conjugated polymer as donor. Nat. Commun. 7, 13651 (2016).
13. Lin, H. et al. High-performance non-fullerene polymer solar cells based on a pair of donor-acceptor materials with complementary absorption properties. Adv. Mater. 27, 7299–7304 (2015).10.1002/adma.201502775 ↗
14. Zhao, F., Wang, C. & Zhan, X. Morphology control in organic solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703147 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201703147 ↗
15. Ye, L. et al. Miscibility-function relations in organic solar cells: significance of optimal miscibility in relation to percolation. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1703058 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201703058 ↗
16. Lee, H., Park, C., Sin, D. H., Park, J. H. & Cho, K. Recent advances in morphology optimization for organic photovoltaics. Adv. Mater. 30, 1800453 (2018).10.1002/adma.201800453 ↗
17. Min, J. et al. Time-dependent morphology evolution of solution-processed small molecule solar cells during solvent vapor annealing. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1502579 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201502579 ↗
18. Benanti, T. L. & Venkataraman, D. Organic solar cells: an overview focusing on active layer morphology. Photosynth. Res. 87, 73–81 (2006).10.1007/s11120-005-6397-9 ↗
19. Li, Y. et al. Perylene diimide-based cathode interfacial materials: adjustable molecular structures and conformation, optimized film morphology, and much improved performance of non-fullerene polymer solar cells. Mater. Chem. Front. 3, 1840–1848 (2019).10.1039/C9QM00236G ↗
20. Wang, J. et al. Regulating bulk-heterojunction molecular orientations through surface free energy control of hole-transporting layers for high-performance organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 31, 1806921 (2019).10.1002/adma.201806921 ↗
21. Kang, Q. et al. A printable organic cathode interlayer enables over 13% efficiency for 1-cm2 organic solar cells. Joule 3, 227–239 (2019).10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.024 ↗
22. Agrawal, A. & Choudhary, A. Perspective: materials informatics and big data: Realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. APL Mater. 4, 053208 (2016).10.1063/1.4946894 ↗
23. Alexander, T. Best practices for QSAR model development, validation, and exploitation. Mol. Inf. 29, 476–488 (2010).10.1002/minf.201000061 ↗
24. Libbrecht, M. W. & Noble, W. S. Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 321–332 (2015).10.1038/nrg3920 ↗
25. Wilmer, C. E. et al. Large-scale screening of hypothetical metal–organic frameworks. Nat. Chem. 4, 83 (2011).10.1038/nchem.1192 ↗
26. Gomez-Bombarelli, R. et al. Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a high-throughput virtual screening and experimental approach. Nat. Mater. 15, 1120–1127 (2016).10.1038/nmat4717 ↗
27. Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O. & Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559, 547–555 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
28. Xia, R. & Kais, S. Quantum machine learning for electronic structure calculations. Nat. Commun. 9, 4195 (2018).
29. Pereira, F. et al. Machine learning methods to predict density functional theory B3LYP energies of HOMO and LUMO orbitals. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 57, 11–21 (2017).10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00340 ↗
30. Friederich, P., Konrad, M., Strunk, T. & Wenzel, W. Machine learning of correlated dihedral potentials for atomistic molecular force fields. Sci. Rep. 8, 2559 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-21070-0 ↗
31. Wu, K. et al. Prediction of polymer properties using infinite chain descriptors (ICD) and machine learning: toward optimized dielectric polymeric materials. J. Polym. Sci. Part B. 54, 2082–2091 (2016).10.1002/polb.24117 ↗
32. Raccuglia, P. et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature 533, 73–76 (2016).10.1038/nature17439 ↗
33. Sun, W. et al. The use of deep learning to fast evaluate organic photovoltaic materials. Adv. Theory Simul. 2, 1800116 (2019).10.1002/adts.201800116 ↗
34. Padula, D., Simpson, J. D. & Troisi, A. Combining electronic and structural features in machine learning models to predict organic solar cells properties. Mater. Horiz. 6, 343–349 (2019).10.1039/C8MH01135D ↗
35. Lee, M. H. Insigsign. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1900891 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201900891 ↗
36. Nagasawa, S., Al-Naamani, E. & Saeki, A. Computer-aided screening of conjugated polymers for organic solar cell: classification by random forest. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 2639–2646 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00635 ↗
37. Kaya, M. & Hajimirza, S. Application of artificial neural network for accelerated optimization of ultra thin organic solar cells. Sol. Energy 165, 159–166 (2018).10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.062 ↗
38. Jorgensen, P. B. et al. Machine learning-based screening of complex molecules for polymer solar cells. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241735 (2018).10.1063/1.5023563 ↗
39. Lopez, S. A., Sanchez-Lengeling, B., de Goes Soares, J. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Design principles and top non-fullerene acceptor candidates for organic photovoltaics. Joule 1, 857–870 (2017).10.1016/j.joule.2017.10.006 ↗
40. Sahu, H., Rao, W., Troisi, A. & Ma, H. Toward predicting efficiency of organic solar cells via machine learning and improved descriptors. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801032 (2018).10.1002/aenm.201801032 ↗
41. Lee, M.-H. Insights from machine learning techniques for predicting the efficiency of fullerene derivatives-based ternary organic solar cells at ternary blend design. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1900891 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201900891 ↗
42. Lee, M.-H. Robust random forest based non-fullerene organic solar cells efficiency prediction. Org. Electron. 76, 105465 (2020).10.1016/j.orgel.2019.105465 ↗
43. Lin, Y.-C. et al. Enhancing photovoltaic performance by tuning the domain sizes of a small-molecule acceptor by side-chain-engineered polymer donors. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 3072–3082 (2019).10.1039/C8TA11059J ↗
44. Wang, T. et al. A wide-bandgap D–A copolymer donor based on a chlorine substituted acceptor unit for high performance polymer solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 14070–14078 (2019).10.1039/C9TA03272J ↗
45. Zhang, G. et al. Nonfullerene acceptor molecules for bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Chem. Rev. 118, 3447–3507 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00535 ↗
46. Yang, J. et al. Aromatic-diimide-based n-type conjugated polymers for all-polymer solar cell applications. Adv. Mater. 0, 1804699 (2018).
47. Xu, X. et al. Single-junction polymer solar cells with 16.35% efficiency enabled by a platinum(ii) complexation strategy. Adv. Mater. 31, 1901872 (2019).10.1002/adma.201901872 ↗
48. Wang, T. et al. Solution-processed polymer solar cells with over 17% efficiency enabled by an iridium complexation approach. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2000590 (2020).10.1002/aenm.202000590 ↗
49. Fan, Q. et al. Overcoming the energy loss in asymmetrical non-fullerene acceptor-based polymer solar cells by halogenation of polymer donors. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 15404–15410 (2019).10.1039/C9TA02243K ↗
50. Sutherland, B. R. Beyond photovoltaic lab efficiency. Joule 2, 1032–1034 (2018).10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.001 ↗
51. Cui, Y. et al. Over 16% efficiency organic photovoltaic cells enabled by a chlorinated acceptor with increased open-circuit voltages. Nat. Commun. 10, 2515 (2019).
52. Tabor, D. P. et al. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 5–20 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z ↗