A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract There is growing interest in applying machine learning techniques in the research of materials science. However, although it is recognized that materials datasets are typically smaller and sometimes more diverse compared to other fields, the influence of availability of materials data on training machine learning models has not yet been studied, which prevents the possibility to establish accurate predictive rules using small materials datasets. Here we analyzed the fundamental interplay between the availability of materials data and the predictive capability of machine learning models. Instead of affecting the model precision directly, the effect of data size is mediated by the degree of freedom (DoF) of model, resulting in the phenomenon of association between precision and DoF. The appearance of precision–DoF association signals the issue of underfitting and is characterized by large bias of prediction, which consequently restricts the accurate prediction in unknown domains. We proposed to incorporate the crude estimation of property in the feature space to establish ML models using small sized materials data, which increases the accuracy of prediction without the cost of higher DoF. In three case studies of predicting the band gap of binary semiconductors, lattice thermal conductivity, and elastic properties of zeolites, the integration of crude estimation effectively boosted the predictive capability of machine learning models to state-of-art levels, demonstrating the generality of the proposed strategy to construct accurate machine learning models using small materials dataset.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Computational Drug Discovery Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Jordan, M. I.., & Mitchell, T. M.. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349, 255–260 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
2. Agrawal, A. & Choudhary, A. Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the fourth paradigm of science in materials science. APL Mater. 4, 053208 (2016).10.1063/1.4946894 ↗
3. Lookman, T., Alexander, F. J. & Rajan, K. Information Science for Materials Discovery and Design (Springer, Switzerland, 2016).10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5 ↗
4. Hill, J. et al. Materials science with large-scale data and informatics: unlocking new opportunities. MRS Bull. 41, 399–409 (2016).10.1557/mrs.2016.93 ↗
5. Kalidindi, S. R. & Graef, M.D. Materials data science: current status and future outlook. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 45, 171–193 (2015).10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-020844 ↗
6. Rajan, K. Materials informatics: the materials “gene” and big data. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 45, 153–169 (2015).10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021132 ↗
7. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Comput. Mater. 3, 54 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
8. Seko, A., Hayashi, H., Nakayama, K., Takahashi, A. & Tanaka, I. Representation of compounds for machine-learning prediction of physical properties. Phys. Rev. B 95, 144110 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.95.144110 ↗
9. Schütt, K. T. et al. How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: towards fast prediction of electronic properties. Phys. Rev. B 89, 205118 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.205118 ↗
10. Isayev, O. et al. Materials cartography: representing and mining materials space using structural and electronic fingerprints. Chem. Mater. 27, 735–743 (2015).10.1021/cm503507h ↗
11. Medasani, B. et al. Predicting defect behavior in B2 intermetallics by merging ab initio modeling and machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 1 (2016).10.1038/s41524-016-0001-z ↗
12. Jong, M.D. et al. A statistical learning framework for materials science: application to elastic moduli of k-nary inorganic polycrystalline compounds. Sci. Rep. 6, 34256 (2016).10.1038/srep34256 ↗
13. Legrain, F., Carrete, J., Roekeghem, A. V., Curtarolo, S. & Mingo, N. How chemical composition alone can predict vibrational free energies and entropies of solids. Chem. Mater. 29, 6220–6227 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00789 ↗
14. Chi, C. et al. Accurate force field for molybdenum by machine learning large materials data. Phys. Rev. Mater 1, 043603 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.043603 ↗
15. Li, Z., Kermode, J. R. & Vita, A. D. Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096405 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.096405 ↗
16. Takahashi, A., Seko, A. & Tanaka, I. Conceptual and practical bases for the high accuracy of machine learning interatomic potentials: application to elemental titanium. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 063801 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.063801 ↗
17. Li, Z., Wang, S., Chin, W. S., Achenie, L. E. & Xin, H. High-throughput screening of bimetallic catalysts enabled by machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 24131–24138 (2017).10.1039/C7TA01812F ↗
18. Ma, X., Li, Z., Achenie, L. E. K. & Xin, H. Machine-learning-augmented chemisorption model for CO2 electroreduction catalyst screening. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 3528–3533 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01660 ↗
19. Oliynyk, A. O. et al. High-throughput machine-learning-driven synthesis of full-Heusler compounds. Chem. Mater. 28, 7324–7331 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02724 ↗
20. Monnodi-Kanakkithodi, A., Huan, T. D. & Ramprasad, R. Mining materials design rules from data: the example of polymer dielectrics. Chem. Mater. 29, 9901–9010 (2017).
21. Sendek, A. D. et al. Holistic computational structure screening of more than 12,000 candidates for solid lithium-ion conductor materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 306–320 (2017).10.1039/C6EE02697D ↗
22. Ulissi, Z. W., Medford, A. J., Bligaard, T. & Nørskov, J. K. To address surface reaction network complexity using scaling relations machine learning and DFT calculations. Nat. Commun. 8, 14621 (2016).10.1038/ncomms14621 ↗
23. Raccuglia, P. et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature 553, 73–77 (2016).10.1038/nature17439 ↗
24. Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat. Commun. 7, 11241 (2015).10.1038/ncomms11241 ↗
25. Dey, R. et al. Informatics-aided bandgap engineering for solar materials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 83, 185–195 (2014).10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.10.016 ↗
26. Kim, E., Huang, K., Jegelka, S. & Olivetti, E. Virtual screening of inorganic materials synthesis parameters with deep learning. npj Comput. Mater. 3, 53 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0055-6 ↗
27. Kim, E. et al. Machine-learned and codified synthesis parameters of oxide materials. Sci. Data 4, 170127 (2017).10.1038/sdata.2017.127 ↗
28. Faber, F. A., Lindmaa, A., Lilienfeld, O. A. V. & Armiento, R. Machine learning energies of 2 million Elpasolite (ABC2D6) crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 135502 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.135502 ↗
29. Schmidt, J. et al. Predicting the thermodynamic stability of solids combining density functional theory and machine learning. Chem. Mater. 29, 5090–5103 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00156 ↗
30. Ghiringhelli, L. M., Vybiral, J., Levchenko, S. V., Draxl, C. & Scheffler, M. Big data of materials science: critical role of the descriptor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 105503 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 ↗
31. Evans, J. D. & Coudert, F.-X. Predicting the mechanical properties of zeolite frameworks by machine learning. Chem. Mater. 29, 7833–7839 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02532 ↗
32. Wu, H. et al. Robust FCC solute diffusion predictions from ab-initio machine learning methods. Comput. Mater. Sci. 134, 160–165 (2017).10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.03.052 ↗
33. Meredig, B. et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094104 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094104 ↗
34. Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A. & Wolverton, C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 16028 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
35. Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. J. An Introduction to the Bootstrap (Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, 1993).10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 ↗
36. Geman, S., Bienenstock, E. & Doursat, R. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma. Neural Comput. 4, 1–58 (1992).10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 ↗
37. Zou, H., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. On the “degrees of freedom” of the LASSO. Ann. Stat. 5, 2173–2192 (2007).10.1214/009053607000000127 ↗
38. Preacher, K. J. & Kelley, K. Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychol. Methods 16, 93–115 (2011).10.1037/a0022658 ↗
39. Pilania, G. et al. Machine learning bandgaps of double perovskites. Sci. Rep. 6, 19375 (2016).10.1038/srep19375 ↗
40. Curtarolo, S. et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat. Mater. 12, 191–201 (2013).10.1038/nmat3568 ↗
41. Lee, J., Seko, A., Shitara, K., Nakayama, K. & Tanaka, I. Prediction model of band gap for inorganic compounds by combination of density functional theory calculations and machine learning techniques. Phys. Rev. B 93, 115104 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.115104 ↗
42. Pilania, G., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Multi-fidelity machine learning models for accurate bandgap predictions of solids. Comput. Mater. Sci. 129, 156–163 (2017).10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.12.004 ↗
43. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
44. Lany, S. Band-structure calculations for the 3d transition metal oxides in GW. Phys. Rev. B 87, 085112 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.085112 ↗
45. Setyawan, W., Gaume, R. M., Lam, S., Feigelson, R. S. & Curtarolo, S. High-throughput combinatorial database of electronic band structures for inorganic scintillator materials. ACS Comb. Sci. 13, 382–390 (2011).10.1021/co200012w ↗
46. Slack, G. A. The thermal conductivity of nonmetallic crystals. Solid State Phys. 34, 1–71 (1979).10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60359-8 ↗
47. Miller, S. A. et al. Capturing anharmonicity in a lattice thermal conductivity Model for high-throughput predictions. Chem. Mater. 29, 2494–2501 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04179 ↗
48. Madsen, G. K., Katre, A. & Bera, C. Calculating the thermal conductivity of the silicon clathrates using the quasi-harmonic approximation. Phys. Status Solidi A 213, 802–807 (2015).10.1002/pssa.201532615 ↗
49. Toher, C. et al. High-throughput computational screening of thermal conductivity, Debye temperature, and Grüneisen parameter using a quasiharmonic Debye model. Phys. Rev. B 90, 174107 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.174107 ↗
50. Weber, M. J. Handbook of Optical Materials (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2002).10.1201/9781420050196 ↗
51. Madelung, O. Semiconductors: Data Handbook 3rd edn (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, New York, 2004).10.1007/978-3-642-18865-7 ↗
52. Wu, J. et al. Unusual properties of the fundamental band gap of InN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 3967 (2002).10.1063/1.1482786 ↗
53. Yan, J. et al. Material descriptors for predicting thermoelectric performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 983–994 (2015).10.1039/C4EE03157A ↗
54. Biswas, K., Zhao, L.-D. & Kanatzidis, M. G. Tellurium-free thermaoelectric: the anisotropic n-type semiconductor Bi2S3. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 634–638 (2012).10.1002/aenm.201100775 ↗
55. Plata, J. J. et al. An efficient and accurate framework for calculating lattice thermal conductivity of solids: AFLOW-AAPL automatic anharmonic phonon library. Npj Comput. Mater. 3, 45 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0046-7 ↗
56. Tan, Q. et al. Thermoelectrics with earth abundant elements: low thermal conductivity and high thermopower in doped SnS. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 17302 (2014).10.1039/C4TA04462B ↗
57. Zhang, H. et al. Thermoelectric properties of polycrystalline SrZn2Sb2 prepared by spark plasma sintering. J. Electron. Mater. 39, 1772–1776 (2010).10.1007/s11664-010-1151-2 ↗
58. Vočadlo, N. L. & Price, G. D. The Grüneisen parameter—computer calculations via lattice dynamics. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 82, 261–270 (1994).10.1016/0031-9201(94)90076-0 ↗
59. Pedregosa, F et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
60. Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).10.18637/jss.v033.i01 ↗
61. Ridgeway, G. gbm: Generalized boosted regression models, version 2.1. The Comprehensive R Archive Network 1–34 (2017).
62. Kelley, K. Confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: theory, application, and implementation. J. Stat. Softw. 20, 1–24 (2007).10.18637/jss.v020.i08 ↗