journal article·2021-12Open access

Undoped tin dioxide transparent electrodes for efficient and cost-effective indoor organic photovoltaics (SnO2 electrode for indoor organic photovoltaics)

Jung-Hoon Lee, Young-Jun You, Muhammad Ahsan Saeed, Sang Hyeon Kim, Su-Hwan Choi, Sungmin Kim, Sae Youn Lee, Jin-Seong Park, Jae Won Shim

NPG Asia Materials· Volume 13· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Indoor organic photovoltaics (OPVs) are currently being investigated for small-scale energy generation from artificial light sources to power small electronic devices. Despite recent progress in increasing the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of indoor OPVs, the widespread use of expensive indium tin oxide (ITO) as a transparent conducting electrode (TCE) leads to long energy payback times. This study provides a novel and comprehensive description of low-temperature atomic layer deposition (ALD)-processed indium-free tin dioxide (SnO2) films as inexpensive and efficient TCEs for indoor OPVs. These highly conformal and defect-free ALD-fabricated SnO2 films are applied to a poly(3-hexylthiophene):indene-C60 bisadduct-based OPV system. Under 1 sun illumination, an OPV with an SnO2 TCE exhibits limited operational capacity because of the high sheet resistance (~98 Ω sq−1) of the SnO2 layers. However, under a light-emitting diode (LED) lamp with a luminance of 1000 lx, the series resistance, which is related to the sheet resistance, has a marginal effect on the performance of the indoor OPV system, showing a PCE of 14.6 ± 0.3%. A reference OPV with an ITO TCE has a slightly lower PCE of 13.3 ± 0.8% under the same LED conditions. These results suggest that SnO2 TCEs can be efficient and cost-effective replacements for ITO TCEs in indoor OPV systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Freitag, M. et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells for efficient power generation under ambient lighting. Nat. Photon. 11, 372–378 (2017).10.1038/nphoton.2017.60 ↗
2. Cutting, C. L., Bag, M. & Venkataraman, D. Indoor light recycling: a new home for organic photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. C4, 10367–10370 (2016).
3. Li, G., Zhu, R. & Yang, Y. Polymer solar cells. Nat. Photon. 6, 153–161 (2012).10.1038/nphoton.2012.11 ↗
4. Inganäs, O. Organic photovoltaics over three decades. Adv. Mater. 30, e1800388 (2018).10.1002/adma.201800388 ↗
5. Lee, H. K. H. et al. Organic photovoltaic cells – promising indoor light harvesters for self-sustainable electronics. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 5618–5626 (2018).10.1039/C7TA10875C ↗
6. Hong, L. et al. Eco‐compatible solvent‐processed organic photovoltaic cells with over 16% efficiency. Adv. Mater. 31, e1903441 (2019).10.1002/adma.201903441 ↗
7. Cui, Y. et al. Efficient semitransparent organic solar cells with tunable color enabled by an ultralow‐bandgap nonfullerene acceptor. Adv. Mater. 29, 1703080 (2017).10.1002/adma.201703080 ↗
8. Shafian, S., Son, J., Kim, Y., Hyun, J. K. & Kim, K. Active-material-independent color-tunable semitransparent organic solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 18887–18895 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b03254 ↗
9. Kim, S., Jahandar, M., Jeong, J. H. & Lim, D. C. Recent progress in solar cell technology for low-light indoor applications. Curr. Altern. Energy 2, 1–15 (2018).10.2174/240546310201180723093354 ↗
10. Steim, R. et al. Organic photovoltaics for low light applications. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 3256–3261 (2011).10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.011 ↗
11. Kippelen, B. & Brédas, J.-L. Organic photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2, 251–261 (2009).10.1039/b812502n ↗
12. Choi, D.-W., Maeng, W. J. & Park, J.-S. The conducting tin oxide thin films deposited via atomic layer deposition using tetrakis-dimethylamino tin and peroxide for transparent flexible electronics. Appl. Surf. Sci. 313, 585–590 (2014).10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.06.027 ↗
13. Ngamsinlapasathian, S., Sreethawong, T., Suzuki, Y. & Yoshikawa, S. Doubled layered ITO/SnO2 conducting glass for substrate of dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90, 2129–2140 (2006).10.1016/j.solmat.2005.12.005 ↗
14. Goo, J. S., Lee, J.-H., Shin, S.-C., Park, J.-S. & Shim, J. W. Undoped ZnO electrodes for low-cost indoor organic photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 23464–23472 (2018).10.1039/C8TA08432G ↗
15. Thangaraju, B. Structural and electrical studies on highly conducting spray deposited fluorine and antimony doped SnO2 thin films from SnCl2 precursor. Thin Solid Films 402, 71–78 (2002).10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01667-4 ↗
16. Kim, H., Auyeung, R. C. Y. & Piqué, A. Transparent conducting F-doped SnO2 thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition. Thin Solid Films 516, 5052–5056 (2008).10.1016/j.tsf.2007.11.079 ↗
17. Stefik, M. et al. Transparent, conducting Nb:SnO2 for host–guest photoelectrochemistry. Nano Lett. 12, 5431–5435 (2012).10.1021/nl303101n ↗
18. Vaufrey, D. et al. Reactive ion etching of sol–gel-processed SnO2 transparent conducting oxide as a new material for organic light emitting diodes. Synth. Met. 127, 207–211 (2002).10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00624-5 ↗
19. Kim, H. & Piqué, A. Transparent conducting Sb-doped SnO2 thin films grown by pulsed-laser deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 218–220 (2004).10.1063/1.1639515 ↗
20. Ruske, M., Bräuer, G., Pistner, J., Pfäfflin, U. & Szczyrbowski, J. Properties of SnO2 films prepared by DC and MF reactive sputtering. Thin Solid Films 351, 146–150 (1999).10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00083-8 ↗
21. Khan, A. F., Mehmood, M., Rana, A. M. & Bhatti, M. T. Effect of annealing on electrical resistivity of rf-magnetron sputtered nanostructured SnO2 thin films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 8562–8565 (2009).10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.06.020 ↗
22. Heo, J., Hock, A. S. & Gordon, R. G. Low temperature atomic layer deposition of tin oxide. Chem. Mater. 22, 4964–4973 (2010).10.1021/cm1011108 ↗
23. Heo, J., Kim, S. B. & Gordon, R. G. Atomic layer deposition of tin oxide with nitric oxide as an oxidant gas. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 4599–4602 (2012).10.1039/c2jm16557k ↗
24. Lee, B. K. et al. An, Physical/chemical properties of tin oxide thin film transistors prepared using plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition. Mater. Res. Bull. 47, 3052–3055 (2012).10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.04.120 ↗
25. Korotchenkov, G., Brynzari, V. & Dmitriev, S. Electrical behavior of SnO2 thin films in humid atmosphere. Sens. Actuators B 54, 197–201 (1999).10.1016/S0925-4005(99)00016-7 ↗
26. Edwards, P. P., Porch, A., Jones, M. O., Morgan, D. V. & Perks, R. M. Basic materials physics of transparent conducting oxides. Dalton Trans. 19, 2995–3002 (2004).10.1039/b408864f ↗
27. Nomura, K. et al. Room-temperature fabrication of transparent flexible thin-film transistors using amorphous oxide semiconductors. Nature 432, 488–492 (2004).10.1038/nature03090 ↗
28. Pan, J., Wang, L., Yu, J. C., Liu, G. & Cheng, H.-M. A nonstoichiometric SnO2−δ nanocrystal-based counter electrode for remarkably improving the performance of dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 50, 7020–7023 (2014).10.1039/c4cc02066a ↗
29. Tauc, J., Grigorovici, R. & Vancu, A. Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous germanium. Phys. Stat. Solidi B 15, 627–637 (1966).10.1002/pssb.19660150224 ↗
30. Wang, C.-H., Chen, S.-W., Wu, J.-M., Wei, C.-N. & Bor, H.-Y. Effect of postdeposition oxidation and subsequent reduction annealing on electric and optical properties of amorphous ZnO – SnO2 transparent conducting films. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 14, P5 (2010).10.1149/1.3528169 ↗
31. Ziabari, A. A. & Rozati, S. Carrier transport and bandgap shift in n-type degenerate ZnO thin films: the effect of band edge nonparabolicity. Phys. B: Cond. Matt. 407, 4512–4517 (2012).10.1016/j.physb.2012.08.024 ↗
32. Takagi, A. et al. Carrier transport and electronic structure in amorphous oxide semiconductor, a-InGaZnO4. Thin Solid Films 486, 38–41 (2005).10.1016/j.tsf.2004.11.223 ↗
33. Zhou, Y. et al. A universal method to produce low–work function electrodes for organic electronics. Science 336, 327–332 (2012).10.1126/science.1218829 ↗
34. Yoo, S., Domercq, B. & Kippelen, B. Intensity-dependent equivalent circuit parameters of organic solar cells based on pentacene and C60. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 103706 (2005).10.1063/1.1895473 ↗
35. Park, S. Y. et al. Alkoxybenzothiadiazole-based fullerene and nonfullerene polymer solar cells with high shunt resistance for indoor photovoltaic applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 3885–3894 (2018).10.1021/acsami.7b18152 ↗
36. Mihailetchi, V. D., Blom, P. W. M., Hummelen, J. C. & Rispens, M. T. Cathode dependence of the open-circuit voltage of polymer: fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6849–6854 (2003).10.1063/1.1620683 ↗
37. You, Y. J. et al. Highly efficient indoor organic photovoltaics with spectrally matched fluorinated phenylene‐alkoxybenzothiadiazole‐based wide bandgap polymers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1901171 (2019).10.1002/adfm.201901171 ↗