Accurate infrared interferometric thickness measurement of Silicon carbide epitaxial layers using dynamic refractive index correction
Source abstract
Abstract
Silicon carbide (SiC) epitaxial layers are critical components in wide-bandgap semiconductor devices, where precise thickness measurement is essential for performance and reliability. Conventional infrared interferometry typically assumes a constant refractive index, leading to systematic errors due to material dispersion and carrier effects. This study proposes a physics-consistent framework that integrates Sellmeier dispersion theory with the Drude model to establish a dynamic refractive index for SiC. An analytical thickness expression is derived, reducing relative error by 2–5% and decreasing systematic deviation from 3–5% to 1–2% compared with fixed-index methods. To improve spectral peak extraction, an enhanced FFT-based approach incorporating Hanning windowing, zero-padding, and multi-band partitioning is developed. Measurements at incident angles of 10° and 15° yield consistent thickness estimates, with weighted averaging further improving stability. For multi-beam interference, a compensation strategy based on Fabry–Pérot theory is introduced and validated using silicon reference samples, achieving a thickness of 3.981 ± 0.013 μm and reducing systematic error by 10–15%. Comparative results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves lower systematic error (1.1–1.8%) and improved multi-angle consistency, indicating its effectiveness for high-precision thickness metrology and its applicability to other semiconductor and thin-film materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shandong Huayu University of Technology
Beijing University of Agriculture
Mid Sweden University
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2025.01.00310.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2025.01.003 ↗
2. 10.3390/mi1406120010.3390/mi14061200 ↗
3. 10.1109/JPROC.2002.102157110.1109/JPROC.2002.1021571 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2023.227400710.1080/10589759.2023.2274007 ↗
5. 10.54097/ghqks11410.54097/ghqks114 ↗
6. 10.32604/cmes.2024.05563310.32604/cmes.2024.055633 ↗
7. 10.1080/10589759.2010.52182710.1080/10589759.2010.521827 ↗
8. 10.1080/10589759.2025.249680110.1080/10589759.2025.2496801 ↗
9. 10.1080/10589759.2015.108190310.1080/10589759.2015.1081903 ↗
10. 10.1109/TIM.2023.330775110.1109/TIM.2023.3307751 ↗
11. 10.1080/10589759.2025.257239310.1080/10589759.2025.2572393 ↗
12. 10.1080/17415977.2020.176259610.1080/17415977.2020.1762596 ↗
13. 10.1080/09500340.2025.256968910.1080/09500340.2025.2569689 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2025.11304810.1016/j.optlastec.2025.113048 ↗
15. 10.3390/opt602002610.3390/opt6020026 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.13670110.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136701 ↗
17. 10.1364/OL.52482510.1364/OL.524825 ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms942010.1038/ncomms9420 ↗
19. He MR, Zhu BW, Pan Q, et al. Research on spectral distortion correction for ultra-high spectral resolution imaging spectrometers. Acta Optica Sin. 2025;(15):1530002.
20. 10.7498/aps.66.04420210.7498/aps.66.044202 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.isci.2025.11275910.1016/j.isci.2025.112759 ↗
22. 10.1109/PROC.1978.1083710.1109/PROC.1978.10837 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-648X/ad4d4710.1088/1361-648X/ad4d47 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0439310.1021/acsanm.1c04393 ↗
25. 10.1364/JOSAB.22.00201810.1364/JOSAB.22.002018 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.109.01350710.1103/PhysRevA.109.013507 ↗
27. 10.1080/0278089970895303810.1080/02780899708953038 ↗
28. 10.3901/JME.2025.02.09710.3901/JME.2025.02.097 ↗
29. Li JY, Cao XR, Tang JX, et al. Mechanical characteristics and quality control of silicon wafers processed by magneto-rheological ultra-precision machining. J Changchun Univ Technol. 2024;45(4):322–330.
30. 10.37188/OPE.20253313.202010.37188/OPE.20253313.2020 ↗
31. 10.1080/17538947.2023.227441810.1080/17538947.2023.2274418 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20220459110.1002/adfm.202204591 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.coco.2023.10155210.1016/j.coco.2023.101552 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41598-022-13033-310.1038/s41598-022-13033-3 ↗
35. 10.1007/s10589-024-00589-110.1007/s10589-024-00589-1 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10092-024-00568-210.1007/s10092-024-00568-2 ↗
37. 10.1109/TPEL.2023.325845710.1109/TPEL.2023.3258457 ↗
38. Chintakindi SR, Varaprasad OVSR, Siva Sarma DVSS. Improved Hanning window based interpolated FFT for power harmonic analysis. TENCON 2015-2015 IEEE Region 10 Conference; Macao, China. IEEE; 2015. p. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/TENCON.2015.7373150
39. Chen Y, Chen X, Zhang YF, et al. Design and spectral characteristics of short-mid wave infrared filters for high-resolution detectors. Infrared Technol. 2024;46(5):592–598.
40. Dunn WL, Shultis JK. Exploring Monte Carlo methods. Elsevier; 2022.
41. Campos L, Silva MJS. On a generalization of the Airy, hyperbolic and circular functions. Nonlinear Stud. 2022;29(2):529. Available from: https://openurl.ebsco.com/EPDB%3Agcd%3A2%3A3202738/detailv2?sid=ebsco%3Aplink%3Ascholar&id=ebsco%3Agcd%3A157761670&crl=c&link_origin=www.google.com
42. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.01325510.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.013255 ↗
43. 10.1109/JIOT.2026.366505010.1109/JIOT.2026.3665050 ↗
44. 10.3390/app15221202010.3390/app152212020 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41578-022-00423-210.1038/s41578-022-00423-2 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ress.2025.11186510.1016/j.ress.2025.111865 ↗
47. 10.1364/OE.14.01188510.1364/OE.14.011885 ↗
48. 10.1364/AO.55.00628510.1364/AO.55.006285 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41598-021-84883-610.1038/s41598-021-84883-6 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.optcom.2013.03.05510.1016/j.optcom.2013.03.055 ↗
51. 10.1021/jp025722m10.1021/jp025722m ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2026.11346910.1016/j.compositesb.2026.113469 ↗
53. 10.1063/5.027542510.1063/5.0275425 ↗