A lightweight network for photovoltaic cell defect detection with feature enhancement and attention mechanism
Source abstract
Abstract
Detecting defects in photovoltaic (PV) modules is essential due to the challenges posed by multiscale variations, small targets, and complex backgrounds. Existing methods often fail to balance detection accuracy and efficiency. To address these challenges, we proposed Global Perception-YOLO (GP-YOLO), an efficient PV cell defect detector that combined high precision with a lightweight design. First, Reversible Column Networks (RevCol) were employed as the backbone of YOLOv8, enabling efficient propagation of multi-level features. This approach reduces parameter count and GFLOPs, while improving the richness and fidelity of feature representations. Second, the Global Attention Mechanism Transformation Module (GATM) was designed to analyse the interrelationships among input data, identifying and amplifying key features. Finally, the GATM module replaced the ConModule in the PAN path, forming a GP-PAN structure. This captured global context to reduce detail loss during convolutions and upsampling, while mitigating information degradation during feature fusion. On PVEL-AD, GP-YOLO improves mAP@0.5 and mAP@0.5:0.95 by 2.47% and 5.25%, while reducing parameters and GFLOPs by 22.52% and 20.77% compared with the baseline, indicating strong potential for PV cell defect detection. Evaluations on Enterprise PV and NEU further confirm superior cross-domain generalisation and robustness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chongqing Jiaotong University
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing Municipality · China Scholarship Council · Scientific Research Fund of Chongqing Jiaotong University
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. IRENA. Renewable energy statistics 2023. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency; 2023.
2. IEA. Cop28 tripling renewable capacity pledge. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2024. Available from: https://www.iea.org/reports/cop28-tripling-renewable-capacity-pledge
3. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.156-158.110.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.156-158.1 ↗
4. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.301021210.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010212 ↗
5. Sepanski A Reil F Vaaßen W et al. Assessing fire risks in photovoltaic systems and developing safety concepts for risk minimization. 2018. U.S. Department of Energy Solar Energy Technologies Office.
6. BRE National Solar Centre. Fire and solar PV systems – investigations and evidence. Report no.: p100874-1004 Issue 2.9. 2018. Available from cited 2025 Jun 29]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/786882/Fires_and_solar_PV_systems-Investigations_Evidence_Issue_2.9.pdf
7. Bellini E. Japanese government warns against fire risk from rooftop PV. PV magazine. 2019. Available from cited 2025 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.pv-magazine.com/2019/01/30/japanese-government-warns-against-fire-risk-from-rooftop-pv/
8. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11235310.1016/j.rser.2022.112353 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.01010.1016/j.renene.2017.11.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11246610.1016/j.measurement.2023.112466 ↗
11. 10.1051/epjpv/202300110.1051/epjpv/2023001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.11886610.1016/j.enconman.2024.118866 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.03.04910.1016/j.solener.2020.03.049 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.aei.2023.10214710.1016/j.aei.2023.102147 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.energy.2019.11631910.1016/j.energy.2019.116319 ↗
16. Bartler A, Mauch L, Yang B, et al. Automated detection of solar cell defects with deep learning. In: 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO); Rome, Italy. 20182018. p. 2035–2039. doi: 10.23919/EUSIPCO.2018.855302510.23919/EUSIPCO.2018.8553025 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.06710.1016/j.solener.2019.02.067 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.renene.2023.11938910.1016/j.renene.2023.119389 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.solener.2023.112245110.1016/j.solener.2023.1122451 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10786610.1016/j.engappai.2024.107866 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11481010.1016/j.eswa.2021.114810 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.12.00710.1016/j.solmat.2011.12.007 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2019.10.00410.1016/j.jsamd.2019.10.004 ↗
24. 10.1109/TII.2012.220966310.1109/TII.2012.2209663 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.solener.2023.11224510.1016/j.solener.2023.112245 ↗
26. 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.342081810.1109/TNNLS.2024.3420818 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-024-66234-310.1038/s41598-024-66234-3 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solmat.2025.11377710.1016/j.solmat.2025.113777 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.knosys.2024.11288210.1016/j.knosys.2024.112882 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41598-024-72717-010.1038/s41598-024-72717-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11512110.1016/j.measurement.2024.115121 ↗
32. 10.3390/electronics1318378310.3390/electronics13183783 ↗
33. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.322820610.1109/ACCESS.2022.3228206 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41598-024-57990-310.1038/s41598-024-57990-3 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41598-024-52451-310.1038/s41598-024-52451-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.12544210.1016/j.eswa.2024.125442 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00521-020-05150-910.1007/s00521-020-05150-9 ↗
38. 10.32604/cmc.2024.05806310.32604/cmc.2024.058063 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.10937310.1016/j.patcog.2023.109373 ↗
40. 10.1109/TIM.2023.330237210.1109/TIM.2023.3302372 ↗
41. 10.1109/TGRS.2023.332728510.1109/TGRS.2023.3327285 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10928910.1016/j.engappai.2024.109289 ↗
43. 10.1109/TPWRD.2024.346791510.1109/TPWRD.2024.3467915 ↗
44. Cai Y, Zhou Y, Han Q. Reversible column networks. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR); Kigali, Rwanda. 2023.
45. Tishby N, Zaslavsky N. Deep learning and the information bottleneck principle. In: 2015 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW); Jerusalem, Israel. 2015. p. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ITW.2015.7133169
46. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); Las Vegas. 2016. p. 770–778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90
47. 10.1155/int/1780491910.1155/int/17804919 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.patcog.2025.11135510.1016/j.patcog.2025.111355 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.11120910.1016/j.patcog.2024.111209 ↗
50. Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, et al. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2014;27:3320–3328.
51. 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.12266910.1016/j.eswa.2023.122669 ↗
52. Howard A, Sandler M, Chu G, et al. Searching for Mobilenetv3. In: Proc IEEE/CVF Int Conf Comput Vis; Seoul, Korea (South). 2019. p. 1314–1324. doi: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00140
53. 10.1109/TII.2022.316284610.1109/TII.2022.3162846 ↗
54. 10.1109/TIM.2021.308356110.1109/TIM.2021.3083561 ↗
55. Zhang H Li F Liu S et al. Dino: DETR with improved denoising anchor boxes for end-to-end object detection. 2022. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.03605
56. Lin T-Y, Goyal P, Girshick R, et al. Focal loss for dense object detection. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV); Venice, Italy. 2017. p. 2999–3007. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.32410.1109/ICCV.2017.324 ↗
57. Wang N, Gao Y, Chen H. Nas-fcos: fast neural architecture search for object detection. In: IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR); Seattle, WA, USA. 2020. p. 11940–11948. doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01196
58. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257703110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
59. 10.1155/int/178049910.1155/int/1780499 ↗
60. 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.352437710.1109/TPAMI.2024.3524377 ↗
61. Hu J, Shen L, Sun G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; Salt Lake City. 2018. p. 7132–7141. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.0074510.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
62. Ouyang D, He S, Zhang G, et al. Efficient multi-scale attention module with cross-spatial learning. In: ICASSP 2023 – 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP); Rhodes Island, Greece. 2023. p. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP49357.2023.10096516
63. Yang L, Zhang R-Y, Li L, et al. SimAM: a simple, parameter-free attention module for convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning (PMLR). 2021. p. 11863–11874.
64. 10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_110.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_1 ↗
65. Misra D, Nalamada T, Arasanipalai AU, et al. Rotate to attend: convolutional triplet attention module. In: 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV); Waikoloa, HI, USA. 2021. p. 3138–3147. doi: 10.1109/WACV48630.2021.0031810.1109/WACV48630.2021.00318 ↗