What have we learned from public engagement?
Source abstract
Abstract
The results of exercises in which members of the public discuss nanotechnology with scientists might not be surprising but, as Richard Jones explains, they are still worthwhile.
The source flagged this abstract for review. Check formulas and completeness against the original publication.
Source: openaire · Quality: needs review · Source record ↗
Source flags: short_text
Source flags: short_text
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Service-Learning and Community Engagement
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (3)
Show source-provided references
1. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties (The Royal Society, London, 2004); www.nanotec.org.uk/finalReport.htm .
2. Final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group, to be published in June 2007; www.involve.org.uk/aboutneg .
3. Beringer, J. et al. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: A Review of Government's Progress on its Policy Commitment (Council for Science and Technology, London, 2007); www2.cst.gov.uk/cst/news/Files/nano_review.pdf .