The perils of pre-emptive regulation
Source abstract
Abstract
In its rush to introduce new regulations about the handling of nanomaterials, the city of Berkeley in California has made mistakes that should not be repeated elsewhere.
The source flagged this abstract for review. Check formulas and completeness against the original publication.
Source: openaire · Quality: needs review · Source record ↗
Source flags: short_text
Source flags: short_text
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (13)
Show source-provided references
1. Berkeley's hazardous-material reporting requirements to encompass nanoparticles .
2. Sadrieh, N. & Espandiari, P. Nanotechnology Law & Business 3, 339–349 (2006).
3. Maynard, A. D. et al. Nature 444, 267–269 (2006).10.1038/444267a ↗
4. Al-Hadithy, N. A. CEAC Action Calendar dated 5 December 2006; An acceptable minimum level of regulation for nanofacilities .
5. icon.rice.edu/research.cfm .
6. Oberdörster, G., Oberdörster, E. & Oberdörster, J. Environ. Health Perspect. 13, 823–840 (2005).10.1289/ehp.7339 ↗
7. Maynard, A. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 51, 1–12 (2007).
8. NIOSH: Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology; www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/nanotech/safenano
9. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Top 20 Hazardous Substances; www.atsdr.cdc.gov/cxcx3.html .
10. Goldman, L. & Coussen, C. (eds) Implications of Nanotechnology for Environmental Health Research (National Academies Press, Washington DC, 2005).
11. Donaldson, K. et al. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 2, 1–14 (2005).
12. Colvin, V. et al. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 1166–1170 (2003).10.1038/nbt875 ↗
13. Kuempel, E. et al. Inhalation Toxicology 18, 717–724 (2006).10.1080/08958370600747887 ↗