Who or what is 'the public'?
Source abstract
Abstract
It is essential to recognize the heterogeneous nature of 'the public' in engagement activities and to treat people as citizens rather than as mere laypersons, consumers or stakeholders.
The source flagged this abstract for review. Check formulas and completeness against the original publication.
Source: openaire · Quality: needs review · Source record ↗
Source flags: short_text
Source flags: short_text
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Social Media and Politics · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Media Studies and Communication
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Brown, S. Nature Nanotech. 4, 609–611 (2009).10.1038/nnano.2009.278 ↗
2. Toumey, C. Nature Nanotech. 2, 386–387 (2007).10.1038/nnano.2007.204 ↗
3. Gavelin, K., Wilson, R. & Doubleday, R Democratic Technologies? (Nanotechnology Engagement Group, 2007); http://go.nature.com/BE861e
4. Jones, R. Nature Nanotech. 2, 262–263 (2006).10.1038/nnano.2007.123 ↗
5. Macnaughten, P., Kearnes, M. & Wynne, B. Sci. commun. 27, 268–291 (2005).10.1177/1075547005281531 ↗
6. Recommendation on a Code of Conduct for Responsible Nanosciences & Nanotechnologies Research (European Commission, Brussels, 2008); http://go.nature.com/ptYWjE
7. Winston, R. in The Road Ahead (ed. Stilgoe, J.) 89–93 (Sciencewise, 2009); http://go.nature.com/BGZ6gQ
8. Delgado, A., Kjølberg, K. L. & Wickson, F. Public Underst. Sci. 10.1177/0963662510363054 (2010).
9. Nordmann, A. & Rip, A. Nature Nanotech. 4, 273–274 (2009).10.1038/nnano.2009.26 ↗
10. Tait, J. EMBO Rep. 10, S18–S22 (2009).10.1038/embor.2009.138 ↗
11. Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Slovic, P., Gaskil, J. & Cohen, G. Nature Nanotech. 4, 87–90 (2009).10.1038/nnano.2008.341 ↗
12. Pidgeon, N., Herr Harthorn, B., Bryant, K. & Rogers-Hayden, T. Nature Nanotech. 4, 95–98 (2009).10.1038/nnano.2008.362 ↗
13. Toumey, C. Nature Nanotech. 4, 136–137 (2009).10.1038/nnano.2009.16 ↗
14. Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network: http://www.nisenet.org/
15. Service, R. F. Science 304, 1732–1734 (2004).10.1126/science.304.5678.1732 ↗
16. Kulinowski, K. B. Sci. Technol. Soc. 24, 13–20 (2004).10.1177/0270467604263112 ↗
17. Consumer Conference Nanotechnology: Background Information for Journalists (Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, 2006); http://www.bfr.bund.de/cd/8567
18. Meili, C. Nano-regulation (The Innovation Society, 2006); http://go.nature.com/I4iU7F
19. Stirling, A. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 33, 262–294 (2008).10.1177/0162243907311265 ↗
20. Toumey, C., Reynolds, J. R. & Aggelopoulou, A. J. Bus. Chem. 3, 3–8 (September 2006).
21. Rogers-Hayden, T. & Pidgeon, N. Nanotechnol. Law Bus. 3, 167–178 (2006).
22. Miller, J. Public Underst. Sci. 7, 203–223 (1998).10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001 ↗
23. Mooney, C. Do Scientists Understand the Public? (AAAS, 2010); http://go.nature.com/u9qW4c