Spatiotemporal targeting of messenger RNA lipid nanoparticles to the endometrium for the treatment of reproductive disorders
Source abstract
Abstract
Dysfunctions of the endometrium, the uterus inner lining, can impair embryo implantation and reduce pregnancy rates. Intrauterine administration of cytokines has shown potential to improve endometrium function, but it is challenged by poor targeting and dose-limiting systemic side effects. Here we present a strategy for introducing therapeutic messenger RNA into the endometrium for the treatment of reproductive disorders. mRNA was loaded into a ligand-conjugated lipid nanoparticle (LNP), enabling multivalent interactions with the temporally overexpressed integrin receptors on the endometrial surface during the window of implantation. Conjugating the targeting ligand directly to the lipid component enhanced endometrial protein expression after intrauterine infusion and reduced systemic expression in the liver and spleen. A single infusion of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mRNA-loaded LNP sustained local protein expression for several hours and reduced GM-CSF systemic exposure. In a murine model of endometrial injury, GM-CSF mRNA-loaded LNP improved embryo implantation rates, outperforming recombinant GM-CSF. Our strategy demonstrates the efficacy of using mRNA to improve fertility outcomes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Reproductive System and Pregnancy · Cell Adhesion Molecules Research · Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Mareckova, M. et al. An integrated single-cell reference atlas of the human endometrium. Nat. Genet. 56, 1925–1937 (2024).10.1038/s41588-024-01873-w ↗
2. Giudice, L. C. & Kao, L. C. Endometriosis. Lancet 364, 1789–1799 (2004).10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5 ↗
3. March, C. M. Management of Asherman’s syndrome. Reprod. Biomed. Online 23, 63–76 (2011).10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.018 ↗
4. Lortet-Tieulent, J., Ferlay, J., Bray, F. & Jemal, A. International patterns and trends in endometrial cancer incidence, 1978–2013. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 110, 354–361 (2018).10.1093/jnci/djx214 ↗
5. Murphy, A. R., Campo, H. & Kim, J. J. Strategies for modelling endometrial diseases. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 18, 727–743 (2022).10.1038/s41574-022-00725-z ↗
6. Shufaro, Y., Simon, A., Laufer, N. & Fatum, M. Thin unresponsive endometrium—a possible complication of surgical curettage compromising ART outcome. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 25, 421–425 (2008).10.1007/s10815-008-9245-y ↗
7. Mahajan, N. & Sharma, S. The endometrium in assisted reproductive technology: how thin is thin? J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 9, 3–8 (2016).10.4103/0974-1208.178632 ↗
8. Xue, Z. et al. Research progress on the mechanism between polycystic ovary syndrome and abnormal endometrium. Front. Physiol. 12, 788772 (2021).10.3389/fphys.2021.788772 ↗
9. Liu, K. E., Hartman, M., Hartman, A., Luo, Z. C. & Mahutte, N. The impact of a thin endometrial lining on fresh and frozen-thaw IVF outcomes: an analysis of over 40 000 embryo transfers. Hum. Reprod. 33, 1883–1888 (2018).10.1093/humrep/dey281 ↗
10. von Wolff, M. et al. Thin endometrium is also associated with lower clinical pregnancy rate in unstimulated menstrual cycles: a study based on natural cycle IVF. Front. Endocrinol. 9, 776 (2018).10.3389/fendo.2018.00776 ↗
11. Mouhayar, Y., Franasiak, J. M. & Sharara, F. I. Obstetrical complications of thin endometrium in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 36, 607–611 (2019).10.1007/s10815-019-01407-y ↗
12. Lv, H. et al. Deciphering the endometrial niche of human thin endometrium at single-cell resolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2115912119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2115912119 ↗
13. Zheng, Y. et al. Thin endometrium is associated with higher risks of preterm birth and low birth weight after frozen single blastocyst transfer. Front. Endocrinol. 13, 1040140 (2022).10.3389/fendo.2022.1040140 ↗
14. Coughlan, C. et al. Recurrent implantation failure: definition and management. Reprod. Biomed. Online 28, 14–38 (2014).10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.011 ↗
15. Fu, X. et al. Varied cellular abnormalities in thin vs. normal endometrium in recurrent implantation failure by single-cell transcriptomics. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 22, 90 (2024).10.1186/s12958-024-01263-1 ↗
16. Wang, Y., Tang, Z. & Teng, X. New advances in the treatment of thin endometrium. Front. Endocrinol. 15, 1269382 (2024).10.3389/fendo.2024.1269382 ↗
17. Gharibeh, N. et al. Cell-based therapy in thin endometrium and Asherman syndrome. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 13, 33 (2022).10.1186/s13287-021-02698-8 ↗
18. Bakhsh, A. S. et al. Effects of autologous platelet-rich plasma in women with repeated implantation failure undergoing assisted reproduction. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 26, 84–87 (2022).10.5935/1518-0557.20210046 ↗
19. Gleicher, N. et al. A pilot cohort study of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium resistant to standard therapies. Hum. Reprod. 28, 172–177 (2013).10.1093/humrep/des370 ↗
20. Gao, M. et al. Intrauterine injection of human chorionic gonadotropin before embryo transfer can improve in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil. Steril. 112, 89–97.e1 (2019).10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.027 ↗
21. Hosseini Aghdam, S. et al. Growth hormone: a potential treatment of patients with refractory thin endometrium: a clinical trial study. Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 16, 251–255 (2022).
22. Kong, X. et al. Efficacy of intrauterine infusion therapy before embryo transfer in recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Reprod. Immunol. 156, 103819 (2023).10.1016/j.jri.2023.103819 ↗
23. He, Y. et al. Subcutaneous injection granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is superior to intrauterine infusion on patients with recurrent implantation failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J. Reprod. Immunol. 163, 104250 (2024).10.1016/j.jri.2024.104250 ↗
24. Abbasi, S. et al. Co-encapsulation of Cas9 mRNA and guide RNA in polyplex micelles enables genome editing in mouse brain. J. Control. Release 332, 260–268 (2021).10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.02.026 ↗
25. Pardi, N. et al. Expression kinetics of nucleoside-modified mRNA delivered in lipid nanoparticles to mice by various routes. J. Control. Release 217, 345–351 (2015).10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.007 ↗
26. Swingle, K. L. et al. Placenta-tropic VEGF mRNA lipid nanoparticles ameliorate murine pre-eclampsia. Nature 637, 412–421 (2025).10.1038/s41586-024-08291-2 ↗
27. Chaudhary, N. et al. Lipid nanoparticle structure and delivery route during pregnancy dictate mRNA potency, immunogenicity, and maternal and fetal outcomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2307810121 (2024).10.1073/pnas.2307810121 ↗
28. Abbasi, S. et al. Carrier-free mRNA vaccine induces robust immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in mice and non-human primates without systemic reactogenicity. Mol. Ther. 32, 1266–1283 (2024).10.1016/j.ymthe.2024.03.022 ↗
29. Golomb, G., Shaked, I. & Hoffman, A. Intrauterine administration of peptide drugs for systemic effect. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 17, 179–190 (1995).10.1016/0169-409X(95)00086-M ↗
30. Lessey, B. A. et al. Integrin adhesion molecules in the human endometrium. Correlation with the normal and abnormal menstrual cycle. J. Clin. Invest. 90, 188–195 (1992).10.1172/JCI115835 ↗
31. Illera, M. J. et al. Blockade of the alpha(v)beta(3) integrin adversely affects implantation in the mouse. Biol. Reprod. 62, 1285–1290 (2000).10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1285 ↗
32. Lessey, B. A. et al. Further characterization of endometrial integrins during the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 62, 497–506 (1994).10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56937-4 ↗
33. Thomas, K. et al. Endometrial integrin expression in women undergoing IVF and ICSI: a comparison of the two groups and fertile controls. Hum. Reprod. 18, 364–369 (2003).10.1093/humrep/deg104 ↗
34. Liu, J. et al. The effects and mechanisms of GM-CSF on endometrial regeneration. Cytokine 125, 154850 (2020).10.1016/j.cyto.2019.154850 ↗
35. Vu, T. Q., Sant’Anna, L. E. & Kamat, N. P. Tuning targeted liposome avidity to cells via lipid phase separation. Biomacromolecules 24, 1574–1584 (2023).10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01338 ↗
36. Paria, B. C., Huet-Hudson, Y. M. & Dey, S. K. Blastocyst’s state of activity determines the “window” of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10159–10162 (1993).10.1073/pnas.90.21.10159 ↗
37. Schneider, C. S. et al. Nanoparticles that do not adhere to mucus provide uniform and long-lasting drug delivery to airways following inhalation. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601556 (2017).10.1126/sciadv.1601556 ↗
38. Park, H. J. et al. Integrins functioning in uterine endometrial stromal and epithelial cells in estrus. Reproduction 153, 351–360 (2017).10.1530/REP-16-0516 ↗
39. Ma, Z. et al. TCR triggering by pMHC ligands tethered on surfaces via poly(ethylene glycol) depends on polymer length. PLoS ONE 9, e112292 (2014).10.1371/journal.pone.0112292 ↗
40. Mui, B. L. et al. Influence of polyethylene glycol lipid desorption rates on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of siRNA lipid nanoparticles. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2, e139 (2013).10.1038/mtna.2013.66 ↗
41. Stewart, P. L. et al. Cryo-EM visualization of an exposed RGD epitope on adenovirus that escapes antibody neutralization. EMBO J. 16, 1189–1198 (1997).10.1093/emboj/16.6.1189 ↗
42. Safford, H. C. et al. Probing the role of lipid nanoparticle elasticity on mRNA delivery to the placenta. Nano Lett. 25, 4800–4808 (2025).10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c06241 ↗
43. Dilliard, S. A., Cheng, Q. & Siegwart, D. J. On the mechanism of tissue-specific mRNA delivery by selective organ targeting nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2109256118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2109256118 ↗
44. Geisler, H. C. et al. EGFR-targeted ionizable lipid nanoparticles enhance in vivo mRNA delivery to the placenta. J. Control. Release 371, 455–469 (2024).10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.05.036 ↗
45. Li, Z. et al. Triple branched RGD modification on liposomes: a prospective strategy to enhance the glioma targeting efficiency. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 60, 116704 (2022).10.1016/j.bmc.2022.116704 ↗
46. Cossu, J., Thoreau, F. & Boturyn, D. Multimeric RGD-based strategies for selective drug delivery to tumor tissues. Pharmaceutics 15, 525 (2023).10.3390/pharmaceutics15020525 ↗
47. Zhang, L. et al. Role of PEGylated lipid in lipid nanoparticle formulation for in vitro and in vivo delivery of mRNA vaccines. J. Control. Release 380, 108–124 (2025).10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.01.071 ↗
48. Abstiens, K., Gregoritza, M. & Goepferich, A. M. Ligand density and linker length are critical factors for multivalent nanoparticle-receptor interactions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 1311–1320 (2019).10.1021/acsami.8b18843 ↗
49. Beer, J. H., Springer, K. T. & Coller, B. S. Immobilized Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides of varying lengths as structural probes of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor. Blood 79, 117–128 (1992).10.1182/blood.V79.1.117.117 ↗
50. Leese, H. J. The formation and function of oviduct fluid. J. Reprod. Fertil. 82, 843–856 (1988).10.1530/jrf.0.0820843 ↗
51. Huang, P., Yao, C., Wei, L. & Lin, Z. The intrauterine perfusion of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) before frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with two or more implantation failures. Hum. Fertil. 25, 301–305 (2020).10.1080/14647273.2020.1811904 ↗
52. Obidniak, D., Gzgzyan, A., Dzhemlikhanova, L. & Feoktistov, A. Effect of colony-stimulating growth factor on outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil. Steril. 106, e134–e135 (2016).10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.401 ↗
53. Kim, C.-H., Moon, J.-W., Choi, S. & Moon, S. Y. Intrauterine infusion of G-CSF just before embryo transfer may improve the embryo implantation rate following IVF/ICSI in patients with recurrent implantation failure. Fertil. Steril. 118, e168–e169 (2022).10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.485 ↗
54. Lessey, B. A., Castelbaum, A. J., Sawin, S. W. & Sun, J. Integrins as markers of uterine receptivity in women with primary unexplained infertility. Fertil. Steril. 63, 535–542 (1995).10.1016/S0015-0282(16)57422-6 ↗
55. Creus, M. et al. alphavbeta3 integrin expression and pinopod formation in normal and out-of-phase endometria of fertile and infertile women. Hum. Reprod. 17, 2279–2286 (2002).10.1093/humrep/17.9.2279 ↗
56. Kumar, A., Taghi Khani, A., Sanchez Ortiz, A. & Swaminathan, S. GM-CSF: a double-edged sword in cancer immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 13, 901277 (2022).10.3389/fimmu.2022.901277 ↗
57. Hong, I. S. Stimulatory versus suppressive effects of GM-CSF on tumor progression in multiple cancer types. Exp. Mol. Med. 48, e242 (2016).10.1038/emm.2016.64 ↗
58. Griffith, O. W. et al. Embryo implantation evolved from an ancestral inflammatory attachment reaction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E6566–E6575 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1701129114 ↗
59. Mor, G., Cardenas, I., Abrahams, V. & Guller, S. Inflammation and pregnancy: the role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1221, 80–87 (2011).10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05938.x ↗
60. Dekel, N., Gnainsky, Y., Granot, I., Racicot, K. & Mor, G. The role of inflammation for a successful implantation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 72, 141–147 (2014).10.1111/aji.12266 ↗
61. Johnson, G. A., Burghardt, R. C., Bazer, F. W., Seo, H. & Cain, J. W. Integrins and their potential roles in mammalian pregnancy. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 115 (2023).10.1186/s40104-023-00918-0 ↗
62. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources and Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1986).
63. Van Guyse, J. F. R. et al. Facile generation of heterotelechelic poly(2-oxazoline)s towards accelerated exploration of poly(2-oxazoline)-based nanomedicine. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 63, e202404972 (2024).10.1002/anie.202404972 ↗
64. Wei, W. et al. GM-CSF improves endometrial receptivity in a thin endometrium rat model by upregulating HOXA10. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 30, gaad042 (2023).10.1093/molehr/gaad042 ↗