Sustainable functional ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
The rapid rise of functional ceramics across various sectors, including electronics, energy storage and automotive, is projected to drive annual growth rates of up to 35% until 2030. With this significant growth, the substantial energy required for mining and ceramic manufacturing leads to notable greenhouse gas emissions. In this Review, we discuss measures to enhance the sustainability of functional ceramic materials, including low-energy and low-CO2 production methods. We evaluate their potential impact and technology readiness for functional ceramics with different nanoscale architectures and varying levels of structural and chemical complexity across diverse fields. We examine end-of-life recycling strategies and assess the role of critical raw materials in both established and rapidly growing markets, concluding with a discussion of supporting policy measures. Through this work, we propose a tangible action plan to lower CO2-equivalent emissions in producing future functional ceramics, whether through synthesis techniques, manufacturing tools, densification processes, or chemical and reaction protocols. This provides a blueprint for designing and manufacturing the next generation of more sustainable functional ceramic materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Ganguly, C. CERAMICS-as we enter the third millennium. Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc. 59, 63–67 (2000).10.1080/0371750X.2000.10799907 ↗
2. Pampuch, R. in An Introduction to Ceramics (eds Carpenter, B. et al.) Vol. 86, 1–17 (Springer, 2014).10.1007/978-3-319-10410-2_1 ↗
3. Heimann, R. B. Classic and Advanced Ceramics: From Fundamentals to Applications (Wiley, 2010).10.1002/9783527630172 ↗
4. Furszyfer Del Rio, D. D. et al. Decarbonizing the ceramics industry: a systematic and critical review of policy options, developments and sociotechnical systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 157, 112081 (2022).10.1016/j.rser.2022.112081 ↗
5. Habashi, F. Refractories and the industrial revolution. Refractories 1, 14–18 (2012).
6. Greil, P. Advanced engineering ceramics. Adv. Eng. Mater. 4, 247–254 (2002).10.1002/1527-2648(20020503)4:5<247::AID-ADEM247>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
7. Ibn-Mohammed, T. et al. Decarbonising ceramic manufacturing: a techno-economic analysis of energy efficient sintering technologies in the functional materials sector. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 39, 5213–5235 (2019).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.08.011 ↗
8. Oliveira, M. C., Iten, M., Cruz, P. L. & Monteiro, H. Review on energy efficiency progresses, technologies and strategies in the ceramic sector focusing on waste heat recovery. Energies 13, 6096 (2020).10.3390/en13226096 ↗
9. Iron And Steel Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product (Iron Ore, Steel), By Region (NA, Europe, APAC, CSA, MEA), And Segment Forecasts, 2023–2030 (Grand View Research, 2021); https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/iron-steel-market
10. Cement Market Size, Share & Covid-19 Impact Analysis, by Tape (Portland, Blended, and Others), by Application (Residential, and Non-residential), and Regional Forecast, 2022–2029 (Fortune Business Insights, 2021); https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/cement-market-101825
11. Plastic Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product (PE, PP, PU, PVC, PET, Polystyrene, ABS, PBT, PPO, Epoxy Polymers, LCP, PC, Polyamide), By Application, By End-use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023–2030 (Grand View Research, 2021); https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/global-plastics-market
12. Basic Chemicals Market by Product Type (Organic and Inorganic) and End User (Chemical Industry, Food & Beverages, Textiles, Pharmaceuticals, Pulp & Paper, Polymer, and Others): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2030 (Allied Market Research, 2021); https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/basic-chemicals-market-A14984
13. Aluminum Market By End User Industry (Transport, Building & Construction, Electrical Engineering, Consumer Goods, Foil & Packaging, Machinery & Equipment, Others), By Series (SERIES 1, SERIES 2, SERIES 3, SERIES 4, SERIES 5, SERIES 6, SERIES 7, SERIES 8), By Processing Method (Flat Rolled, Castings, Extrusions, Forgings, Pigments & Powder, Rod & Bar): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2031 (Allied Market Research, 2021); https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/aluminium-market
14. Isella, A. & Manca, D. GHG emissions by (petro)chemical processes and decarbonization priorities—a review. Energies 15, 7560 (2022).10.3390/en15207560 ↗
15. Bauer, F., Tilsted, J. P., Pfister, S., Oberschelp, C. & Kulionis, V. Mapping GHG emissions and prospects for renewable energy in the chemical industry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 39, 100881 (2023).10.1016/j.coche.2022.100881 ↗
16. Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2023 (International Energy Agency, 2023); https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-progress-2023
17. Wright, L. & Chalasani, S. Steel GHG Emissions Reporting Guidance (RMI, 2023); https://rmi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/steel_emissions_reporting_guidance.pdf
18. IPPC Climate Change 2022:Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022); https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FullReport.pdf
19. Rissman, J. et al. Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070. Appl. Energy 266, 114848 (2020).10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114848 ↗
20. Muthukannan, M. & Ganesh, A. S. C. The environmental impact caused by the cearmic industries and assessment methodologies. IJQR 13, 315–334 (2019).10.24874/IJQR13.02-05 ↗
21. World Energy Outlook 2022 (International Energy Agency, 2022); https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022
22. Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism (text with EEA relevance). OJ L. 130, 52–104 (2023).
23. Ceramics Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Product (Traditional, Advanced), By Application (Abrasives, Tiles), By End-use (Industrial, Medical), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2023–2030 (Grand View Research, 2023); https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/ceramics-market
24. Ceramic Tiles Market Size, Analysis, Industry Report [2023–2028] (Fortune Business Insigts, 2022); https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/ceramic-tiles-market-102377
25. Abrasives Market Size, Share & Growth Analysis Report, 2030 (Grand View Research, 2022); https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/abrasives-market
26. Sanitary Ware Market Size Global Report, 2022–2030 (Polaris Market Research, 2022); https://www.polarismarketresearch.com/index.php/industry-analysis/sanitary-ware-market
27. Solid State Battery Market—Global Industry Assessment & Forecast (Vantage Market Research, 2022); https://www.vantagemarketresearch.com
28. Advanced Ceramics Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, By Material (TAlumina, Titanate, Silicon, Carbide, Silicon, Nitride, Others), End-Use (Electical & Electronics, Transportation, Medical, Chemical, Others), and Regional Forecast, 2021–2028 (Fortune Business Insigts, 2021); https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/advanced-ceramics-market-105073
29. Perovskite Solar Cell Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, By Type (Rigid and Flexible), End-User (BIPV, Power Station, Transportation & Mobility, Consumer Electronics, Others) and Regional Forecast, 2023–2030 (Fortune Business Insigts, 2023); https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/perovskite-solar-cell-market-101556
30. Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitor (MLCC) Market Outlook by Type (General Capacitor, Array, Serial Construction, Mega Cap), Rated Voltage Range (Low Range, Mid-Range, High Range), Dielectric Type (X7R, X5R, C0G, Y5V), End User (Electronics, Automotive, Industrial, Telecommunication)—Growth Forecast to 2030 (Prescient & Strategic Intelligence, 2022); https://www.psmarketresearch.com/market-analysis/multi-layer-ceramic-capacitor-mlcc-market
31. Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Market Size | Global Growth Trends, 2030 (Strategic Market Research, 2022); https://www.strategicmarketresearch.com/market-report/solid-oxide-fuel-cell-market
32. Global battery market size by technology. Statista https://www.statista.com/statistics/1339880/global-battery-market-size-by-technology/ (2022).
33. The battery cell component opportunity in Europe and North America. McKinsey & Company https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/the-battery-cell-component-opportunity-in-europe-and-north-america (2024).
34. Raabe, D., Tasan, C. C. & Olivetti, E. A. Strategies for improving the sustainability of structural metals. Nature 575, 64–74 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1702-5 ↗
35. Defferriere, T., Klotz, D., Gonzalez-Rosillo, J. C., Rupp, J. L. M. & Tuller, H. L. Photo-enhanced ionic conductivity across grain boundaries in polycrystalline ceramics. Nat. Mater. 21, 438–444 (2022).10.1038/s41563-021-01181-2 ↗
36. Defferriere, T., Helal, A. S., Li, J., Rupp, J. L. M. & Tuller, H. L. Ionic conduction-based polycrystalline oxide gamma ray detection—radiation-ionic effects. Adv. Mater. 36, 2309253 (2024).10.1002/adma.202309253 ↗
37. Kim, K. J., Balaish, M., Wadaguchi, M., Kong, L. & Rupp, J. L. M. Solid-state Li-metal batteries: challenges and horizons of oxide and sulfide solid electrolytes and their interfaces. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2002689 (2021).10.1002/aenm.202002689 ↗
38. Bérardan, D., Franger, S., Meena, A. K. & Dragoe, N. Room temperature lithium superionic conductivity in high entropy oxides. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 9536–9541 (2016).10.1039/C6TA03249D ↗
39. Pérez-Tomás, A., Mingorance, A., Tanenbaum, D. & Lira-Cantú, M. in The Future of Semiconductor Oxides in Next-Generation Solar Cells (ed. Lira-Cantu, M.) 267–356 (Elsevier, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811165-9.00008-910.1016/B978-0-12-811165-9.00008-9 ↗
40. Kong, L., Williams, P. J., Brushett, F. & Rupp, J. L. M. Unveiling coexisting battery-type and pseudocapacitive intercalation mechanisms in lithium titanate. Adv. Energy Mater. 15, e03080 (2025).10.1002/aenm.202503080 ↗
41. Abyzov, A. M. Aluminum oxide and alumina ceramics (review). Part 1. Properties of Al2O3 and commercial production of dispersed Al2O3. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 60, 24–32 (2019).10.1007/s11148-019-00304-2 ↗
42. Parikh, P. B. Alumina ceramics: engineering applications and domestic market potential. Trans. Indian Ceram. Soc. 54, 179–184 (1995).10.1080/0371750X.1995.10804716 ↗
43. De Bortoli, L. S., Schabbach, L. M., Fredel, M. C., Hotza, D. & Henriques, B. Ecological footprint of biomaterials for implant dentistry: is the metal-free practice an eco-friendly shift? J. Clean. Prod. 213, 723–732 (2019).10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.189 ↗
44. Viazzi, C., Bonino, J. P. & Ansart, F. Synthesis by sol–gel route and characterization of yttria stabilized zirconia coatings for thermal barrier applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 201, 3889–3893 (2006).10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.241 ↗
45. López-Gándara, C., Ramos, F. M. & Cirera, A. YSZ-based oxygen sensors and the use of nanomaterials: a review from classical models to current trends. J. Sens. 2009, 258489 (2009).10.1155/2009/258489 ↗
46. Ormerod, R. M. Solid oxide fuel cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 32, 17–28 (2003).10.1039/b105764m ↗
47. Hong, K., Lee, T. H., Suh, J. M., Yoon, S.-H. & Jang, H. W. Perspectives and challenges in multilayer ceramic capacitors for next generation electronics. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 9782–9802 (2019).10.1039/C9TC02921D ↗
48. Malik, M., Chan, K. H. & Azimi, G. Review on the synthesis of LiNixMnyCo1−x−yO2 (NMC) cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Today Energy 28, 101066 (2022).10.1016/j.mtener.2022.101066 ↗
49. Huo, H. & Janek, J. Solid-state batteries: from ‘all-solid’to ‘almost-solid’. Natl Sci. Rev. 10, nwad098 (2023).10.1093/nsr/nwad098 ↗
50. Wang, C. et al. Garnet-type solid-state electrolytes: materials, interfaces, and batteries. Chem. Rev. 120, 4257–4300 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00427 ↗
51. Balaish, M. et al. Processing thin but robust electrolytes for solid-state batteries. Nat. Energy 6, 227–239 (2021).10.1038/s41560-020-00759-5 ↗
52. Kim, K. J. & Rupp, J. L. M. All ceramic cathode composite design and manufacturing towards low interfacial resistance for garnet-based solid-state lithium batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4930–4945 (2020).10.1039/D0EE02062A ↗
53. Pfenninger, R., Struzik, M., Garbayo, I., Stilp, E. & Rupp, J. L. M. A low ride on processing temperature for fast lithium conduction in garnet solid-state battery films. Nat. Energy 4, 475–483 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0384-4 ↗
54. Struzik, M., Garbayo, I., Pfenninger, R. & Rupp, J. L. M. A simple and fast electrochemical CO2 sensor based on Li7La3Zr2O12 for environmental monitoring. Adv. Mater. 30, 1804098 (2018).10.1002/adma.201804098 ↗
55. Balaish, M. & Rupp, J. L. M. Widening the range of trackable environmental and health pollutants for Li-garnet-based sensors. Adv. Mater. 33, 2100314 (2021).10.1002/adma.202100314 ↗
56. Balaish, M. & Rupp, J. L. M. Design of triple and quadruple phase boundaries and chemistries for environmental SO2 electrochemical sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 14691–14699 (2021).10.1039/D1TA02399C ↗
57. Horne, R., Grant, T. & Verghese, K. Life Cycle Assessment: Principles, Practice, and Prospects (CSIRO, 2009).10.1071/9780643097964 ↗
58. Aluminium Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions (International Aluminium Institute, 2023); https://international-aluminium.org/statistics/greenhouse-gas-emissions-aluminium-sector/
59. Ma, Y., Preveniou, A., Kladis, A. & Pettersen, J. B. Circular economy and life cycle assessment of alumina production: simulation-based comparison of Pedersen and Bayer processes. J. Clean. Prod. 366, 132807 (2022).10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132807 ↗
60. Life-Cycle Inventory Data for Aluminium Production and Transformation Processes in Europe (European Aluminum, 2018); https://european-aluminium.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/european-aluminium-environmental-profile-report-2018-executive-summary.pdf
61. Muthu, S. S. Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors Vol. 1 (Springer, 2014); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-41-210.1007/978-981-4560-41-2 ↗
62. Sun, X., Luo, X., Zhang, Z., Meng, F. & Yang, J. Life cycle assessment of lithium nickel cobalt manganese oxide (NCM) batteries for electric passenger vehicles. J. Clean. Prod. 273, 123006 (2020).10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123006 ↗
63. Rosa, D. M. Comparative Life-cycle Assessment of the Production of 3YSZysz by Co-precipitation Process and Emulsion Detonation Synthesis (Univ. Coimbra, 2022).
64. Smith, L., Ibn-Mohammed, T., Koh, S. C. L. & Reaney, I. M. Life cycle assessment and environmental profile evaluations of high volumetric efficiency capacitors. Appl. Energy 220, 496–513 (2018).10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.067 ↗
65. Schreiber, A. et al. Oxide ceramic electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium batteries—cost-cutting cell design and environmental impact. Green. Chem. 25, 399–414 (2023).10.1039/D2GC03368B ↗
66. Koltun, P. & Tharumarajah, A. Life cycle impact of rare earth elements. ISRN Metall. 2014, 1–10 (2014).10.1155/2014/907536 ↗
67. Bauer, C. et al. Charging sustainable batteries. Nat. Sustain. 5, 176–178 (2022).10.1038/s41893-022-00864-1 ↗
68. Munjal, M. et al. Process cost analysis of performance challenges and their mitigations in sodium-ion battery cathode materials. Joule https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2025.101871 (2025).10.1016/j.joule.2025.101871 ↗
69. Smith, L. et al. Comparative environmental profile assessments of commercial and novel material structures for solid oxide fuel cells. Appl. Energy 235, 1300–1313 (2019).10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.028 ↗
70. Mankins, J. C. Technology readiness assessments: a retrospective. Acta Astronaut. 65, 1216–1223 (2009).10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.058 ↗
71. Jouhara, H. et al. Waste heat recovery technologies and applications. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 6, 268–289 (2018).10.1016/j.tsep.2018.04.017 ↗
72. Garofalo, E., Bevione, M., Cecchini, L., Mattiussi, F. & Chiolerio, A. Waste heat to power: technologies, current applications, and future potential. Energy Technol. 8, 2000413 (2020).10.1002/ente.202000413 ↗
73. Delpech, B., Axcell, B. & Jouhara, H. A review on waste heat recovery from exhaust in the ceramics industry. E3S Web Conf. 22, 00034 (2017).10.1051/e3sconf/20172200034 ↗
74. Ibáñez-Forés, V., Bovea, M. D. & Azapagic, A. Assessing the sustainability of best available techniques (BAT): methodology and application in the ceramic tiles industry. J. Clean. Prod. 51, 162–176 (2013).10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.01.020 ↗
75. Yüksek, İ, Öztaş, S. K. & Tahtalı, G. The evaluation of fired clay brick production in terms of energy efficiency: a case study in Turkey. Energy Effic. 13, 1473–1483 (2020).10.1007/s12053-020-09896-y ↗
76. Industrial Decarbonisation & Energy Efficiency Roadmaps to 2050 (Department of Energy and Climate Change and the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2015).
77. Wei, M., McMillan, C. A. & De La Rue Du Can, S. Electrification of industry: potential, challenges and outlook. Curr. Sustain. Renew. Energy Rep. 6, 140–148 (2019).
78. Tromans, D. Mineral comminution: energy efficiency considerations. Miner. Eng. 21, 613–620 (2008).10.1016/j.mineng.2007.12.003 ↗
79. Mining Industry of the Future Fiscal Year 2004 Annual Report, Industrial Technologies Program, US Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, February (Department of Energy, 2005); https://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/resources/mining/pdfs/mining_fy2004.pdf
80. Valery, W. & Jankovic, A. The future of comminution. In Proc. 34th IOC on Mining and Metallurgy (University of Belgrade, Technical Faculty, 2002).
81. Rahaman, M. N. Ceramic Processing and Sintering (CRC Press, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1201/978131527412610.1201/9781315274126 ↗
82. Santos, T., Hennetier, L., Costa, V. A. F. & Costa, L. C. Microwave versus conventional porcelain firing: temperature measurement. J. Manuf. Process. 41, 92–100 (2019).10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.03.038 ↗
83. Chojnacka, K. et al. Improvements in drying technologies—efficient solutions for cleaner production with higher energy efficiency and reduced emission. J. Clean. Prod. 320, 128706 (2021).10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128706 ↗
84. Al-Shakarchi, E. K. Dielectric properties of BaTiO3-ceramic prepared by freeze drying method. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 57, 245–250 (2010).10.3938/jkps.57.245 ↗
85. Raghupathy, B. P. C. & Binner, J. G. P. Spray freeze drying of YSZ nanopowder. J. Nanopart. Res. 14, 921 (2012).10.1007/s11051-012-0921-6 ↗
86. Mann, M. et al. Evaluation of scalable synthesis methods for aluminum-substituted Li7La3Zr2O12 solid electrolytes. Materials 14, 6809 (2021).10.3390/ma14226809 ↗
87. Rahaman, M. N. Sintering of Ceramics (CRC Press, 2008).10.1201/b15869 ↗
88. Schütte, P. Tantalum: Sustainability Information (Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, 2021).
89. Lee, S.-S. & Hong, T.-W. Life cycle assessment for proton conducting ceramics synthesized by the sol–gel process. Materials 7, 6677–6685 (2014).10.3390/ma7096677 ↗
90. Flegler, A. J., Burye, T. E., Yang, Q. & Nicholas, J. D. Cubic yttria stabilized zirconia sintering additive impacts: a comparative study. Ceram. Int. 40, 16323–16335 (2014).10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.071 ↗
91. Hallmann, L., Ulmer, P., Reusser, E., Louvel, M. & Hämmerle, C. H. F. Effect of dopants and sintering temperature on microstructure and low temperature degradation of dental Y-TZP-zirconia. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 32, 4091–4104 (2012).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.07.032 ↗
92. Ede, S. R. & Luo, Z. Tuning the intrinsic catalytic activities of oxygen-evolution catalysts by doping: a comprehensive review. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 20131–20163 (2021).10.1039/D1TA04032D ↗
93. He, D., He, G., Jiang, H., Chen, Z. & Huang, M. Enhanced durability and activity of the perovskite electrocatalyst Pr0.5Ba0.5CoO3−δ by Ca doping for the oxygen evolution reaction at room temperature. Chem. Commun. 53, 5132–5135 (2017).10.1039/C7CC00786H ↗
94. Lu, M., Wang, H., Song, X. & Sun, F. Effect of doping level on residual stress, coating-substrate adhesion and wear resistance of boron-doped diamond coated tools. J. Manuf. Process. 88, 145–156 (2023).10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.01.041 ↗
95. Zhang, Z., Meng, Y. & Xiao, D. Tri-sites co-doping: an efficient strategy towards the realization of 4.6V-LiCoO2 with cyclic stability. Energy Storage Mater. 56, 443–456 (2023).10.1016/j.ensm.2023.01.019 ↗
96. Ahaliabadeh, Z., Kong, X., Fedorovskaya, E. & Kallio, T. Extensive comparison of doping and coating strategies for Ni-rich positive electrode materials. J. Power Sources 540, 231633 (2022).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231633 ↗
97. Maier, J. Defect chemistry and ionic conductivity in thin films. Solid State Ion. 23, 59–67 (1987).10.1016/0167-2738(87)90082-8 ↗
98. Seebauer, E. G. & Noh, K. W. Trends in semiconductor defect engineering at the nanoscale. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 70, 151–168 (2010).10.1016/j.mser.2010.06.007 ↗
99. Lubomirsky, I. Mechanical properties and defect chemistry. Solid State Ion. 177, 1639–1642 (2006).10.1016/j.ssi.2006.01.020 ↗
100. Loy, D. A. in Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (ed. Meyers, R. A.) 257–276 (Elsevier, 2003); https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00697-910.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00697-9 ↗