journal article·2025-07

Modulation of SARS-CoV-2 spike binding to ACE2 through conformational selection

Prithwidip Saha, Ignacio Fernandez, Fidan Sumbul, Claire Valotteau, Dorota Kostrz, Annalisa Meola, Eduard Baquero, Arvind Sharma, James R. Portman, François Stransky, Thomas Boudier, Pablo Guardado-Calvo, Charlie Gosse, Terence Strick, Felix A. Rey, Felix Rico

Nature Nanotechnology· Volume 20· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The first step of SARS-CoV-2 infection involves the interaction between the viral trimeric spike protein (S) and the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The receptor-binding domain (RBD) of S adopts two conformations: open and closed, respectively accessible and inaccessible to ACE2. Although these changes surely affect ACE2 binding, a quantitative description of the underlying mechanisms has remained elusive. Here we visualize RBD opening and closing using high-speed atomic force microscopy, gaining access to the corresponding transition rates. We also probe the S/ACE2 interaction at the ensemble level with biolayer interferometry and at the single-molecule level with atomic force microscopy and magnetic tweezers, evidencing that RBD dynamics hinder ACE2 binding but have no effect on unbinding. The resulting modulation is quantitatively predicted by a conformational selection model in which each S protomer behaves independently. Our work thus reveals a molecular mechanism by which RBD accessibility and binding strength can be tuned separately, providing hints to better understand the joint evolution of immune evasion and infectivity.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research · Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. Yan, R. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 367, 1444–1448 (2020).10.1126/science.abb2762 ↗
2. Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181, 281–292.e6 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058 ↗
3. Wrapp, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 367, 1260–1263 (2020).10.1126/science.abb2507 ↗
4. Cai, Y. et al. Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Science 369, 1586–1592 (2020).10.1126/science.abd4251 ↗
5. Henderson, R. et al. Controlling the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein conformation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 925–933 (2020).10.1038/s41594-020-0479-4 ↗
6. Yao, H. et al. Molecular architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Cell 183, 730–738.e13 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.018 ↗
7. Benton, D. J. et al. Receptor binding and priming of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 for membrane fusion. Nature 588, 327–330 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2772-0 ↗
8. Ke, Z. et al. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature 588, 498–502 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2665-2 ↗
9. Yang, J. et al. Molecular interaction and inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 binding to the ACE2 receptor. Nat. Commun. 11, 4541 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-18319-6 ↗
10. Cao, W. et al. Biomechanical characterization of SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD and human ACE2 protein–protein interaction. Biophys. J. 120, 1011–1019 (2021).10.1016/j.bpj.2021.02.007 ↗
11. Tian, F. et al. N501Y mutation of spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 strengthens its binding to receptor ACE2. eLife 10, e69091 (2021).10.7554/eLife.69091 ↗
12. Hu, W. et al. Mechanical activation of spike fosters SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. Cell Res. 31, 1047–1060 (2021).10.1038/s41422-021-00558-x ↗
13. Koehler, M. et al. Molecular insights into receptor binding energetics and neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nat. Commun. 12, 6977 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-27325-1 ↗
14. Bauer, M. S. et al. A tethered ligand assay to probe SARS-CoV-2:ACE2 interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2114397119 (2022).10.1073/pnas.2114397119 ↗
15. Zhu, R. et al. Force-tuned avidity of spike variant-ACE2 interactions viewed on the single-molecule level. Nat. Commun. 13, 7926 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-35641-3 ↗
16. Shang, J. et al. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11727–11734 (2020).10.1073/pnas.2003138117 ↗
17. Díaz-Salinas, M. A. et al. Conformational dynamics and allosteric modulation of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. eLife 11, e75433 (2022).10.7554/eLife.75433 ↗
18. Hsieh, C.-L. et al. Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spikes. Science 369, 1501–1505 (2020).10.1126/science.abd0826 ↗
19. Xiong, X. et al. A thermostable, closed SARS-CoV-2 spike protein trimer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 934–941 (2020).10.1038/s41594-020-0478-5 ↗
20. Benton, D. J. et al. The effect of the D614G substitution on the structure of the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2022586118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2022586118 ↗
21. Zhang, J. et al. Structural impact on SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by D614G substitution. Science 372, 525–530 (2021).10.1126/science.abf2303 ↗
22. Yin, W. et al. Structures of the Omicron spike trimer with ACE2 and an anti-Omicron antibody. Science 375, 1048–1053 (2022).10.1126/science.abn8863 ↗
23. Gur, M. et al. Conformational transition of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein between its closed and open states. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 075101 (2020).10.1063/5.0011141 ↗
24. Turoňová, B. et al. In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges. Science 370, 203–208 (2020).10.1126/science.abd5223 ↗
25. Zimmerman, M. I. & Bowman, G. SARS-CoV-2 simulations go exascale to capture spike opening and reveal cryptic pockets across the proteome. Biophys. J. 120, 651–659 (2021).10.1016/j.bpj.2020.11.1909 ↗
26. Choi, Y. K. et al. Structure, dynamics, receptor binding, and antibody binding of the fully glycosylated full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in a viral membrane. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 2479–2487 (2021).10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01144 ↗
27. Lu, M. et al. Real-time conformational dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 spikes on virus particles. Cell Host Microbe 28, 880–891.e8 (2020).10.1016/j.chom.2020.11.001 ↗
28. Serrão, V. H. B. & Lee, J. E. FRETing over SARS-CoV-2: conformational dynamics of the spike glycoprotein. Cell Host Microbe 28, 778–779 (2020).10.1016/j.chom.2020.11.008 ↗
29. Yang, Z. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants increase kinetic stability of open spike conformations as an evolutionary strategy. mBio 13, e03227-21 (2022).10.1128/mbio.03227-21 ↗
30. Hoffmann, D. et al. Identification of lectin receptors for conserved SARS-CoV-2 glycosylation sites. EMBO J. 40, e108375 (2021).10.15252/embj.2021108375 ↗
31. Lim, K. et al. Millisecond dynamic of SARS-CoV-2 spike and its interaction with ACE2 receptor and small extracellular vesicles. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10, e12170 (2021).10.1002/jev2.12170 ↗
32. Ando, T. et al. A high-speed atomic force microscope for studying biological macromolecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12468–12472 (2001).10.1073/pnas.211400898 ↗
33. Amyot, R., Marchesi, A., Franz, C. M., Casuso, I. & Flechsig, H. Simulation atomic force microscopy for atomic reconstruction of biomolecular structures from resolution-limited experimental images. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009970 (2022).10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009970 ↗
34. McKinney, S. A., Joo, C. & Ha, T. Analysis of single-molecule FRET trajectories using hidden Markov modeling. Biophys. J. 91, 1941–1951 (2006).10.1529/biophysj.106.082487 ↗
35. McCallum, M., Walls, A. C., Bowen, J. E., Corti, D. & Veesler, D. Structure-guided covalent stabilization of coronavirus spike glycoprotein trimers in the closed conformation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 942–949 (2020).10.1038/s41594-020-0483-8 ↗
36. Gobeil, S. M.-C. et al. D614G mutation alters SARS-CoV-2 spike conformation and enhances protease cleavage at the S1/S2 junction. Cell Rep. 34, 108630 (2021).10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108630 ↗
37. Qu, K. et al. Engineered disulfide reveals structural dynamics of locked SARS-CoV-2 spike. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010583 (2022).10.1371/journal.ppat.1010583 ↗
38. Cameroni, E. et al. Broadly neutralizing antibodies overcome SARS-CoV-2 Omicron antigenic shift. Nature 602, 664–670 (2022).10.1038/s41586-021-04386-2 ↗
39. McCallum, M. et al. Structural basis of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron immune evasion and receptor engagement. Science 375, 864–868 (2022).10.1126/science.abn8652 ↗
40. Cerutti, G. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike. Cell Rep. 38, 110428 (2022).10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110428 ↗
41. Cui, Z. et al. Structural and functional characterizations of infectivity and immune evasion of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron. Cell 185, 860–871.e13 (2022).10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.019 ↗
42. Wieczór, M., Tang, P. K., Orozco, M. & Cossio, P. Omicron mutations increase interdomain interactions and reduce epitope exposure in the SARS-CoV-2 spike. iScience 26, 105981 (2023).10.1016/j.isci.2023.105981 ↗
43. Guo, L. et al. Engineered trimeric ACE2 binds viral spike protein and locks it in ‘Three-up’ conformation to potently inhibit SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell Res. 31, 98–100 (2021).10.1038/s41422-020-00438-w ↗
44. Pak, A. J., Yu, A., Ke, Z., Briggs, J. A. G. & Voth, G. A. Cooperative multivalent receptor binding promotes exposure of the SARS-CoV-2 fusion machinery core. Nat. Commun. 13, 1002 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-28654-5 ↗
45. Zhou, P. et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579, 270–273 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 ↗
46. Zhang, J. et al. Structural and functional impact by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike mutations. Cell Rep. 39, 110729 (2022).10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110729 ↗
47. Bauer, M. S. et al. Single-molecule force stability of the SARS-CoV-2–ACE2 interface in variants-of-concern. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 399–405 (2024).10.1038/s41565-023-01536-7 ↗
48. Rico, F., Russek, A., González, L., Grubmüller, H. & Scheuring, S. Heterogeneous and rate-dependent streptavidin–biotin unbinding revealed by high-speed force spectroscopy and atomistic simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6594–6601 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1816909116 ↗
49. Valotteau, C., Sumbul, F. & Rico, F. High-speed force spectroscopy: microsecond force measurements using ultrashort cantilevers. Biophys. Rev. 11, 689–699 (2019).10.1007/s12551-019-00585-4 ↗
50. Cossio, P., Hummer, G. & Szabo, A. Kinetic ductility and force-spike resistance of proteins from single-molecule force spectroscopy. Biophys. J. 111, 832–840 (2016).10.1016/j.bpj.2016.05.054 ↗
51. Gosse, C. & Croquette, V. Magnetic tweezers: micromanipulation and force measurement at the molecular level. Biophys. J. 82, 3314–3329 (2002).10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75672-5 ↗
52. Kostrz, D. et al. A modular DNA scaffold to study protein–protein interactions at single-molecule resolution. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 988–993 (2019).10.1038/s41565-019-0542-7 ↗
53. Bell, G. I. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells: a theoretical framework for adhesion mediated by reversible bonds between cell surface molecules. Science 200, 618–627 (1978).10.1126/science.347575 ↗
54. De Souza, A. S. et al. Molecular dynamics analysis of fast-spreading severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants and their effects on the interaction with human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. ACS Omega 7, 30700–30709 (2022).10.1021/acsomega.1c07240 ↗
55. Prévost, J. et al. Impact of temperature on the affinity of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein for host ACE2. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101151 (2021).10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101151 ↗
56. Forest-Nault, C. et al. Impact of the temperature on the interactions between common variants of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain and the human ACE2. Sci. Rep. 12, 11520 (2022).10.1038/s41598-022-15215-5 ↗
57. Gong, S. Y. et al. Temperature influences the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike from Omicron subvariants and human ACE2. Viruses 14, 2178 (2022).10.3390/v14102178 ↗
58. Hinterdorfer, P., Baumgartner, W., Gruber, H. J., Schilcher, K. & Schindler, H. Detection and localization of individual antibody-antigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3477–3481 (1996).10.1073/pnas.93.8.3477 ↗
59. Rankl, C. et al. Multiple receptors involved in human rhinovirus attachment to live cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17778–17783 (2008).10.1073/pnas.0806451105 ↗
60. Stransky, F. et al. in Methods in Enzymology Vol. 694 (eds Shon, M. J. & Yoon, T.-Y.) 51–82 (Academic Press, 2024).
61. Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R. & Wright, P. E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 789–796 (2009).10.1038/nchembio.232 ↗
62. Di Cera, E. Mechanisms of ligand binding. Biophys. Rev. 1, 011303 (2020).10.1063/5.0020997 ↗
63. Yurkovetskiy, L. et al. Structural and functional analysis of the D614G SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variant. Cell 183, 739–751.e8 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.032 ↗
64. Weissman, D. et al. D614G spike mutation increases SARS CoV-2 susceptibility to neutralization. Cell Host Microbe 29, 23–31.e4 (2021).10.1016/j.chom.2020.11.012 ↗
65. Dadonaite, B. et al. Spike deep mutational scanning helps predict success of SARS-CoV-2 clades. Nature 631, 617–626 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07636-1 ↗
66. Ozono, S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 D614G spike mutation increases entry efficiency with enhanced ACE2-binding affinity. Nat. Commun. 12, 848 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-21118-2 ↗
67. Mannar, D. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: spike protein mutational analysis and epitope for broad neutralization. Nat. Commun. 13, 4696 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-32262-8 ↗
68. Planas, D. et al. Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature 602, 671–675 (2022).10.1038/s41586-021-04389-z ↗
69. Kumar, S. et al. Mutations in S2 subunit of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron spike strongly influence its conformation, fusogenicity, and neutralization sensitivity. J. Virol. 97, e00922–e00923 (2023).10.1128/jvi.00922-23 ↗
70. Temmam, S. et al. Bat coronaviruses related to SARS-CoV-2 and infectious for human cells. Nature 604, 330–336 (2022).10.1038/s41586-022-04532-4 ↗
71. Gámbaro, F. et al. Introductions and early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in France, 24 January to 23 March 2020. Eurosurveillance 25, 2001200 (2020).10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.26.2001200 ↗
72. Güthe, S. et al. Very fast folding and association of a trimerization domain from bacteriophage T4 fibritin. J. Mol. Biol. 337, 905–915 (2004).10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.020 ↗
73. Pallesen, J. et al. Immunogenicity and structures of a rationally designed prefusion MERS-CoV spike antigen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7348–E7357 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1707304114 ↗
74. Heinz, F. X. & Stiasny, K. Distinguishing features of current COVID-19 vaccines: knowns and unknowns of antigen presentation and modes of action. npj Vaccines 6, 104 (2021).10.1038/s41541-021-00369-6 ↗
75. Zhang, C. et al. Development and structural basis of a two-MAb cocktail for treating SARS-CoV-2 infections. Nat. Commun. 12, 264 (2021).10.1038/s41467-020-20465-w ↗
76. Yin, J. et al. Genetically encoded short peptide tag for versatile protein labeling by Sfp phosphopantetheinyl transferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15815–15820 (2005).10.1073/pnas.0507705102 ↗
77. Schoeler, C. et al. Ultrastable cellulosome-adhesion complex tightens under load. Nat. Commun. 5, 5635 (2014).10.1038/ncomms6635 ↗
78. Jobst, M. A., Schoeler, C., Malinowska, K. & Nash, M. A. Investigating receptor-ligand systems of the cellulosome with AFM-based single-molecule force spectroscopy. J. Vis. Exp. 20, 50950 (2013).
79. Wang, Y. J. et al. Combining DNA scaffolds and acoustic force spectroscopy to characterize individual protein bonds. Biophys. J. 122, 2518–2530 (2023).10.1016/j.bpj.2023.05.004 ↗
80. Revyakin, A., Ebright, R. H. & Strick, T. R. Single-molecule DNA nanomanipulation: improved resolution through use of shorter DNA fragments. Nat. Methods 2, 127–138 (2005).10.1038/nmeth0205-127 ↗
81. Duboc, C., Fan, J., Graves, E. T. & Strick, T. R. in Methods in Enzymology Vol. 582 (eds Spies, M. & Chemla, Y. R.) 275–296 (Academic Press, 2017).10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.048 ↗
82. Strick, T. R., Allemand, J.-F., Bensimon, D., Bensimon, A. & Croquette, V. The elasticity of a single supercoiled DNA molecule. Science 271, 1835–1837 (1996).10.1126/science.271.5257.1835 ↗