Ultra-high-frequency radio-frequency acoustic molecular imaging with saline nanodroplets in living subjects
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular imaging is a crucial technique in clinical diagnostics but it relies on radioactive tracers or strong magnetic fields that are unsuitable for many patients, particularly infants and pregnant women. Ultra-high-frequency radio-frequency acoustic (UHF-RF-acoustic) imaging using non-ionizing RF pulses allows deep-tissue imaging with sub-millimetre spatial resolution. However, lack of biocompatible and targetable contrast agents has prevented the successful in vivo application of UHF-RF-acoustic imaging. Here we report our development of targetable nanodroplets for UHF-RF-acoustic molecular imaging of cancers. We synthesize all-liquid nanodroplets containing hypertonic saline that are stable for at least 2 weeks and can produce high-intensity UHF-RF-acoustic signals. Compared with concentration-matched iron oxide nanoparticles, our nanodroplets produce at least 1,600 times higher UHF-RF-acoustic signals at the same imaging depth. We demonstrate in vivo imaging using the targeted nanodroplets in a prostate cancer xenograft mouse model expressing gastrin release protein receptor (GRPR), and show that targeting specificity is increased by more than 2-fold compared with untargeted nanodroplets or prostate cancer cells not expressing this receptor.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging · Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Gambhir, S. S., Ge, T. J., Vermesh, O. & Spitler, R. Toward achieving precision health. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaao3612 (2018).10.1126/scitranslmed.aao3612 ↗
2. Hamilton, W., Walter, F. M., Rubin, G. & Neal, R. D. Improving early diagnosis of symptomatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 13, 740–749 (2016).10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.109 ↗
3. Gambhir, S. S. Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 683–693 (2002).10.1038/nrc882 ↗
4. Weissleder, R. Molecular imaging in cancer. Science 312, 1168–1171 (2006).10.1126/science.1125949 ↗
5. Weissleder, R. & Mahmood, U. Molecular imaging. Radiology 219, 316–333 (2001).10.1148/radiology.219.2.r01ma19316 ↗
6. Hussain, T. & Nguyen, Q. T. Molecular imaging for cancer diagnosis and surgery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 66, 90–100 (2014).10.1016/j.addr.2013.09.007 ↗
7. Willmann, J. K., van Bruggen, N., Dinkelborg, L. M. & Gambhir, S. S. Molecular imaging in drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 591–607 (2008).10.1038/nrd2290 ↗
8. Pysz, M. A., Gambhir, S. S. & Willmann, J. K. Molecular imaging: current status and emerging strategies. Clin. Radiol. 65, 500–516 (2010).10.1016/j.crad.2010.03.011 ↗
9. Lin, E. C. Radiation risk from medical imaging. Mayo Clin. Proc. 85, 1142–1146 (2010).10.4065/mcp.2010.0260 ↗
10. James, M. L. & Gambhir, S. S. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiological Rev. 92, 897–965 (2012).10.1152/physrev.00049.2010 ↗
11. Loskutova, K., Grishenkov, D. & Ghorbani, M. Review on acoustic droplet vaporization in ultrasound diagnostics and therapeutics. BioMed. Res. Int. 2019, 9480193 (2019).10.1155/2019/9480193 ↗
12. Jokerst, J. V. & Gambhir, S. S. Molecular imaging with theranostic nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 1050–1060 (2011).10.1021/ar200106e ↗
13. Weber, J., Beard, P. C. & Bohndiek, S. E. Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nat. Methods 13, 639–650 (2016).10.1038/nmeth.3929 ↗
14. Bowen, T. in Proc. 1981 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium 817–822 (IEEE, 1981).
15. Kruger, R. A. et al. Thermoacoustic CT with radio waves: a medical imaging paradigm. Radiology 211, 275–278 (1999).10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap05275 ↗
16. Ku, G. et al. Thermoacoustic and photoacoustic tomography of thick biological tissues toward breast imaging. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 4, 559–565 (2005).10.1177/153303460500400509 ↗
17. Kruger, R. A., Reinecke, D. R. & Kruger, G. A. Thermoacoustic computed tomography—technical considerations. Med. Phys. 26, 1832–1837 (1999).10.1118/1.598688 ↗
18. Wen, L. W., Yang, S. H., Zhong, J. P., Zhou, Q. & Xing, D. Thermoacoustic imaging and therapy guidance based on ultra-short pulsed microwave pumped thermoelastic effect induced with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Theranostics 7, 1976–1989 (2017).10.7150/thno.17846 ↗
19. Kruger, R. A. et al. Breast cancer in vivo: contrast enhancement with thermoacoustic CT at 434 MHz—feasibility study. Radiology 216, 279–283 (2000).10.1148/radiology.216.1.r00jl30279 ↗
20. Omar, M., Kellnberger, S., Sergiadis, G., Razansky, D. & Ntziachristos, V. Near-field thermoacoustic imaging with transmission line pulsers. Med. Phys. 39, 4460–4466 (2012).10.1118/1.4729710 ↗
21. Laqua, D., Just, T. & Husar, P. in Proc. 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1437–1440 (IEEE, 2010).
22. Ogunlade, O. & Beard, P. Exogenous contrast agents for thermoacoustic imaging: an investigation into the underlying sources of contrast. Med. Phys. 42, 170–181 (2016).10.1118/1.4903277 ↗
23. Byrd, D., Hanson, G.W. & Patch, S.K. in Proc. SPIE 7564, Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2010, 756417 (SPIE, 2010).
24. Wu, D., Huang, L., Jiang, M. S. & Jiang, H. Contrast agents for photoacoustic and thermoacoustic imaging: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 23616 (2014).10.3390/ijms151223616 ↗
25. Nie, L., Ou, Z., Yang, S. & Xing, D. Thermoacoustic molecular tomography with magnetic nanoparticle contrast agents for targeted tumor detection. Med. Phys. 37, 4193–4200 (2010).10.1118/1.3466696 ↗
26. Tamarov, K. et al. Electrolytic conductivity-related radiofrequency heating of aqueous suspensions of nanoparticles for biomedicine. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 19, 11510–11517 (2017).10.1039/C7CP00728K ↗
27. Weast, R.C. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 70th edn (CRC Press, 1989).
28. Wolf, A. V. Aqueous Solutions and Body Fluids (Harper & Row, 1966).
29. Engel, R. H., Riggi, S. J. & Fahrenbach, M. J. Insulin: intestinal absorption as water-in-oil-in-water emulsions. Nature 219, 856–857 (1968).10.1038/219856a0 ↗
30. Gresham, P. A., Barnett, M., Smith, S. V. & Schneider, R. Use of a sustained-release multiple emulsion to extend the period of radioprotection conferred by cysteamine. Nature 234, 149 (1971).10.1038/234149a0 ↗
31. Garti, N. & Bisperink, C. Double emulsions: progress and applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 3, 657–667 (1998).10.1016/S1359-0294(98)80096-4 ↗
32. Muschiolik, G. Multiple emulsions for food use. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 12, 213–220 (2007).10.1016/j.cocis.2007.07.006 ↗
33. Chong, D. et al. Advances in fabricating double-emulsion droplets and their biomedical applications. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 19, 1071–1090 (2015).10.1007/s10404-015-1635-8 ↗
34. Chen, L. et al. Photoresponsive monodisperse cholesteric liquid crystalline microshells for tunable omnidirectional lasing enabled by a visible light-driven chiral molecular switch. Adv. Optical Mater. 2, 845–848 (2014).10.1002/adom.201400166 ↗
35. Mezzenga, R., Folmer, B. M. & Hughes, E. Design of double emulsions by osmotic pressure tailoring. Langmuir 20, 3574–3582 (2004).10.1021/la036396k ↗
36. Wen, L. & Papadopoulos, K. D. Effects of osmotic pressure on water transport in W1/O/W2 emulsions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 235, 398–404 (2001).10.1006/jcis.2000.7384 ↗
37. Atzberger, P. J. & Kramer, P. R. Theoretical framework for microscopic osmotic phenomena. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter Phys. 75, 061125 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevE.75.061125 ↗
38. Freire, M. G., Dias, A. M. A., Coelho, M. A. Z., Coutinho, J. A. P. & Marrucho, I. M. Aging mechanisms of perfluorocarbon emulsions using image analysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 286, 224–232 (2005).10.1016/j.jcis.2004.12.036 ↗
39. Hilder, M. H. The solubility of water in edible oils and fats. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 45, 703–707 (1968).10.1007/BF02541262 ↗
40. Freire, M. G., Gomes, L., Santos, L. M., Marrucho, I. M. & Coutinho, J. A. Water solubility in linear fluoroalkanes used in blood substitute formulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 22923–22929 (2006).10.1021/jp0622942 ↗
41. Rotariu, G., Fraga, D. & Hildebrand, J. The solubility of water in normal perfluoroheptane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 6357–6357 (1953).10.1021/ja01120a617 ↗
42. Shpak, O. et al. Acoustic droplet vaporization is initiated by superharmonic focusing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1697–1702 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1312171111 ↗
43. Vernikouskaya, I., Pochert, A., Lindén, M. & Rasche, V. Quantitative 19F MRI of perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether using uniformity correction of the spin excitation and signal reception. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys., Biol. Med. 32, 25–36 (2019).10.1007/s10334-018-0696-6 ↗
44. Tran, T. D. et al. Clinical applications of perfluorocarbon nanoparticles for molecular imaging and targeted therapeutics. Int. J. Nanomed. 2, 515–526 (2007).
45. Joseph, G. M. & Noah, W. Poloxamer 188 (P188) as a membrane resealing reagent in biomedical applications. Recent Pat. Biotechnol. 6, 200–211 (2012).10.2174/1872208311206030200 ↗
46. Lifshitz, I. M. & Slyozov, V. V. The kinetics of precipitation from supersaturated solid solutions. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 19, 35–50 (1961).10.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
47. Sakai, T., Kamogawa, K., Nishiyama, K., Sakai, H. & Abe, M. Molecular diffusion of oil/water emulsions in surfactant-free conditions. Langmuir 18, 1985–1990 (2002).10.1021/la0111248 ↗
48. Doinikov, A. A., Sheeran, P. S., Bouakaz, A. & Dayton, P. A. Vaporization dynamics of volatile perfluorocarbon droplets: a theoretical model and in vitro validation. Med. Phys. 41, 102901 (2014).10.1118/1.4894804 ↗
49. Pitt, W. G., Singh, R. N., Perez, K. X., Husseini, G. A. & Jack, D. R. Phase transitions of perfluorocarbon nanoemulsion induced with ultrasound: a mathematical model. Ultrason. Sonochem. 21, 879–891 (2014).10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.08.005 ↗
50. Cornelio, D. B., Roesler, R. & Schwartsmann, G. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor as a molecular target in experimental anticancer therapy. Ann. Oncol. 18, 1457–1466 (2007).10.1093/annonc/mdm058 ↗