High-energy quasiparticle injection into mesoscopic superconductors
Source abstract
Abstract
At non-zero temperatures, superconductors contain excitations known as Bogoliubov quasiparticles (QPs). The mesoscopic dynamics of QPs inform the design of quantum information processors, among other devices. Knowledge of these dynamics stems from experiments in which QPs are injected in a controlled fashion, typically at energies comparable to the pairing energy1-5. Here we perform tunnel spectroscopy of a mesoscopic superconductor under high electric fields. We observe QP injection due to field-emitted electrons with 106 times the pairing energy, an unexplored regime of QP dynamics. Upon application of a gate voltage, the QP injection decreases the critical current and, at sufficiently high electric field, a field-emission current (<0.1 nA in our device) switches the mesoscopic superconductor into the normal state, consistent with earlier observations6. We expect that high-energy injection will be useful for developing QP-tolerant quantum information processors, will allow rapid control of resonator quality factors and will enable the design of electric-field-controlled superconducting devices with new functionality.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Topological Materials and Phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Levine, J. L. & Hsieh, S. Y. Recombination time of quasiparticles in superconducting aluminum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 994–997 (1968).10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.994 ↗
2. Smith, L. N. & Mochel, J. M. Phonon and quasiparticle dynamics in superconducting aluminum tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1597–1600 (1975).10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1597 ↗
3. Ullom, J. N., Fisher, P. A. & Nahum, M. Measurements of quasiparticle thermalization in a normal metal. Phys. Rev. B 61, 14839–14843 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14839 ↗
4. Barends, R. et al. Quasiparticle relaxation in optically excited high-Q superconducting resonators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 257002 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.257002 ↗
5. Patel, U., Pechenezhskiy, I. V., Plourde, B. L. T., Vavilov, M. G. & McDermott, R. Phonon-mediated quasiparticle poisoning of superconducting microwave resonators. Phys. Rev. B 96, 220501 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.220501 ↗
6. De Simoni, G., Paolucci, F., Solinas, P., Strambini, E. & Giazotto, F. Metallic supercurrent field-effect transistor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 802–805 (2018).10.1038/s41565-018-0190-3 ↗
7. Buck, D. A. The cryotron—a superconductive computer component. Proc. IEEE 44, 482–493 (1956).
8. Krinner, S. et al. Engineering cryogenic setups for 100-qubit scale superconducting circuit systems. EPJ Quantum Technol. 6, 2 (2019).10.1140/epjqt/s40507-019-0072-0 ↗
9. Likharev, K. K. & Semenov, V. K. RSFQ logic/memory family: a new Josephson-junction technology for sub-terahertz-clock-frequency digital systems. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 1, 3–28 (1991).10.1109/77.80745 ↗
10. McCaughan, A. N. & Berggren, K. K. A superconducting-nanowire three-terminal electrothermal device. Nano Lett. 14, 5748–5753 (2014).10.1021/nl502629x ↗
11. Gray, K. E. A superconducting transistor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 32, 392–395 (1978).10.1063/1.90066 ↗
12. Bøttcher, C. G. L. et al. Superconducting, insulating and anomalous metallic regimes in a gated two-dimensional semiconductor–superconductor array. Nat. Phys. 14, 1138–1144 (2018).10.1038/s41567-018-0259-9 ↗
13. Casparis, L. et al. Superconducting gatemon qubit based on a proximitized two-dimensional electron gas. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 915–919 (2018).10.1038/s41565-018-0207-y ↗
14. Glover, R. E. & Sherrill, M. D. Changes in superconducting critical temperature produced by electrostatic charging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 5, 248–250 (1960).10.1103/PhysRevLett.5.248 ↗
15. Wolf, E. L. Principles of Electron Tunneling Spectroscopy 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2012).
16. Serniak, K. et al. Hot nonequilibrium quasiparticles in transmon qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 157701 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.157701 ↗
17. Vepsäläinen, A. P. et al. Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence. Nature 584, 551–556 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2619-8 ↗
18. Li, L., Frunzio, L., Wilson, C. M. & Prober, D. E. Quasiparticle nonequilibrium dynamics in a superconducting Ta film. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1137–1141 (2003).10.1063/1.1533106 ↗
19. Sapra, N. V. et al. On-chip integrated laser-driven particle accelerator. Science 367, 79–83 (2020).10.1126/science.aay5734 ↗
20. Hauser, J. J. Enhancement of superconductivity in aluminum films. Phys. Rev. B 3, 1611–1616 (1971).10.1103/PhysRevB.3.1611 ↗
21. Worledge, D. C. & Geballe, T. H. Maki analysis of spin-polarized tunneling in an oxide ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 62, 447–451 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.62.447 ↗
22. Abrikosov, A. A. & Gorkov, L. P. Contribution to the theory of superconducting alloys with paramagnetic impurities. JETP Lett. 39, 1781 (1960).
23. Tinkham, M. Introduction to Superconductivity 2nd edn (McGraw-Hill, 1996).
24. Meservey, R. & Tedrow, P. M. Properties of very thin aluminum films. J. Appl. Phys. 42, 51–53 (1971).10.1063/1.1659648 ↗
25. Bi, C. et al. Reversible control of Co magnetism by voltage-induced oxidation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 267202 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.267202 ↗
26. Kumar, P. et al. Origin and reduction of 1/f magnetic flux noise in superconducting devices. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 041001 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.041001 ↗
27. Jensen, K. Introduction to the Physics of Electron Emission (John Wiley, 2018).10.1002/9781119051794 ↗
28. Hsieh, S. Y. & Levine, J. L. Diffusion of quasiparticles in superconducting aluminum films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1502–1504 (1968).10.1103/PhysRevLett.20.1502 ↗
29. Blackford, B. L. A tunneling investigation of energy-gap anisotropy in superconducting bulk aluminum crystals. J. Low Temp. Phys. 23, 43–52 (1976).10.1007/BF00117243 ↗