Actinia-like multifunctional nanocoagulant for single-step removal of water contaminants
Source abstract
Abstract
Current technologies for water purification are limited by their contaminant-specific removal capability, requiring multiple processes to meet water quality objectives. Here we show an innovative biomimetic micellar nanocoagulant that imitates the structure of Actinia, a marine predator that uses its tentacles to ensnare food, for the removal of an array of water contaminants with a single treatment step. The Actinia-like micellar nanocoagulant has a core-shell structure and readily disperses in water while maintaining a high stability against aggregation. To achieve effective coagulation, the nanocoagulant everts its configuration, similar to Actinia. The shell hydrolyses into 'flocs' and destabilizes and enmeshes colloidal particles while the core is exposed to water, like the extended tentacles of Actinia, and adsorbs the dissolved contaminants. The technology, with its ability to remove a broad spectrum of contaminants and produce high-quality water, has the potential to be a cost-effective replacement for current water treatment processes.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods · Water Treatment and Disinfection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Shannon, M. A. et al. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452, 301–310 (2008).10.1038/nature06599 ↗
2. Elimelech, M. The global challenge for adequate and safe water. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 55, 3–10 (2006).10.2166/aqua.2005.064 ↗
3. Qu, X. L., Alvarez, P. J. J. & Li, Q. L. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water Res. 47, 3931–3946 (2013).10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.058 ↗
4. Service, R. F. Desalination freshens up. Science 313, 1088–1090 (2006).10.1126/science.313.5790.1088 ↗
5. Grant, S. B. et al. Taking the ‘waste’ out of ‘wastewater’ for human water security and ecosystem sustainability. Science 337, 681–686 (2012).10.1126/science.1216852 ↗
6. Ali, I. & Gupta, V. K. Advances in water treatment by adsorption technology. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2661–2667 (2006).10.1038/nprot.2006.370 ↗
7. Hering, J. G., Waite, T. D., Luthy, R. G., Drewes, J. E. & Sedlak, D. L. A changing framework for urban water systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10721–10726 (2013).10.1021/es4007096 ↗
8. Schwarzenbach, R. P. et al. The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems. Science 313, 1072–1077 (2006).10.1126/science.1127291 ↗
9. Li, J. China gears up to tackle tainted water. Nature 499, 14–15 (2013).10.1038/499015a ↗
10. Morel, F. M. M. & Hering, J. G. Principles and Applications of Aquatic Chemistry (Wiley, New York, 1993).
11. Richardson, S. D. & Temes, T. A. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal. Chem. 90, 398–428 (2018).10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04577 ↗
12. Shon, H. K., Vigneswaran, S. & Snyder, S. A. Effluent organic matter (EfOM) in wastewater: constituents, effects, and treatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 327–374 (2006).10.1080/10643380600580011 ↗
13. Luo, Y. L. et al. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 473, 619–641 (2014).10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.065 ↗
14. Jin, L. Y., Zhang, G. M. & Tian, H. F. Current state of sewage treatment in China. Water Res. 66, 85–98 (2014).10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.014 ↗
15. Zodrow, K. R. et al. Advanced materials, technologies, and complex systems analyses: emerging opportunities to enhance urban water security. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 10274–10281 (2017).10.1021/acs.est.7b01679 ↗
16. Westerhoff, P., Alvarez, P., Li, Q. L., Gardea-Torresdey, J. & Zimmerman, J. Overcoming implementation barriers for nanotechnology in drinking water treatment. Environ. Sci. Nano 3, 1241–1253 (2016).10.1039/C6EN00183A ↗
17. Mauter, M. S. et al. The role of nanotechnology in tackling global water challenges. Nat. Sustain. 1, 166–175 (2018).10.1038/s41893-018-0046-8 ↗
18. Moreira, F. C., Boaventura, R. A. R., Brillas, E. & Vilar, V. J. P. Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: a review on their application to synthetic and real wastewaters. Appl. Catal. B 202, 217–261 (2017).10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.037 ↗
19. Bolisetty, S. & Mezzenga, R. Amyloid–carbon hybrid membranes for universal water purification. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 365–371 (2016).10.1038/nnano.2015.310 ↗
20. Werber, J. R., Osuji, C. O. & Elimelech, M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16018 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.18 ↗
21. Pintilie, L., Torres, C. M., Teodosiu, C. & Castells, F. Urban wastewater reclamation for industrial reuse: an LCA case study. J. Clean Prod. 139, 1–14 (2016).10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.209 ↗
22. Bratby, J. Coagulation and Flocculation in Water and Wastewater Treatment (IWA, London, 2006).
23. Wang, J. P., Yuan, S. J., Wang, Y. & Yu, H. Q. Synthesis, characterization and application of a novel starch-based flocculant with high flocculation and dewatering properties. Water Res. 47, 2643–2648 (2013).10.1016/j.watres.2013.01.050 ↗
24. Stumm, W., Morgan, J. J. & Black, A. P. Chemical aspects of coagulation [with discussion]. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 54, 971–994 (1962).10.1002/j.1551-8833.1962.tb00922.x ↗
25. Stumm, W. & O’Melia, C. R. Stoichiometry of coagulation. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 60, 514–539 (1968).10.1002/j.1551-8833.1968.tb03579.x ↗
26. Bolong, N., Ismail, A. F., Salim, M. R. & Matsuura, T. A review of the effects of emerging contaminants in wastewater and options for their removal. Desalination 239, 229–246 (2009).10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.020 ↗
27. Edzwald, J. K. Coagulation in drinking water treatment: particles, organics and coagulants. Water Sci. Technol. 27, 21–35 (1993).10.2166/wst.1993.0261 ↗
28. Krasner, S. W. & Amy, G. Jar-test evaluations of enhanced coagulation. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 87, 93–107 (1995).10.1002/j.1551-8833.1995.tb06438.x ↗
29. Huang, B. C., Guan, Y. F., Chen, W. & Yu, H. Q. Membrane fouling characteristics and mitigation in a coagulation-assisted microfiltration process for municipal wastewater pretreatment. Water Res. 123, 216–223 (2017).10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.080 ↗
30. Fan, X. J. et al. Performance of an integrated process combining ozonation with ceramic membrane ultra-filtration for advanced treatment of drinking water. Desalination 335, 47–54 (2014).10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.014 ↗
31. Bolto, B., Dixon, D., Eldridge, R. & King, S. Removal of THM precursors by coagulation or ion exchange. Water Res. 36, 5066–5073 (2002).10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00232-4 ↗
32. Wang, X. M. et al. Preparation and evaluation of titanium-based xerogel as a promising coagulant for water/wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 9619–9626 (2016).10.1021/acs.est.6b03321 ↗
33. Zeng, Y. & Park, J. Characterization and coagulation performance of a novel inorganic polymer coagulant–poly-zinc-silicate-sulfate. Colloid Surf. A 334, 147–154 (2009).10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.10.009 ↗
34. Tzoupanos, N. D., Zouboulis, A. I. & Tsoleridis, C. A. A systematic study for the characterization of a novel coagulant (polyaluminium silicate chloride). Colloid Surf. A 342, 30–39 (2009).10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.03.054 ↗
35. Haberkamp, J., Ruhl, A. S., Ernst, M. & Jekel, M. Impact of coagulation and adsorption on DOC fractions of secondary effluent and resulting fouling behaviour in ultrafiltration. Water Res. 41, 3794–3802 (2007).10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.029 ↗
36. Park, T., Ampunan, V., Lee, S. & Chung, E. Chemical behavior of different species of phosphorus in coagulation. Chemosphere 144, 2264–2269 (2016).10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.10.131 ↗
37. Lacasa, E., Canizares, P., Saez, C., Fernandez, F. J. & Rodrigo, M. A. Removal of nitrates from groundwater by electrocoagulation. Chem. Eng. J. 171, 1012–1017 (2011).10.1016/j.cej.2011.04.053 ↗
38. Gabaldon, C. et al. Biological nitrate removal from wastewater of a metal-finishing industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 148, 485–490 (2007).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.02.071 ↗
39. Suarez, S., Lerna, J. M. & Omil, F. Pre-treatment of hospital wastewater by coagulation—flocculation and flotation. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 2138–2146 (2009).10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.015 ↗
40. Liu, J. L. & Wong, M. H. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs): a review on environmental contamination in China. Environ. Int. 59, 208–224 (2013).10.1016/j.envint.2013.06.012 ↗
41. Wei, J. C. et al. Comparison of coagulation behavior and floc structure characteristic of different polyferric-cationic polymer dual-coagulants in humic acid solution. Water Res. 43, 724–732 (2009).10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.004 ↗
42. Matilainen, A., Vepsalainen, M. & Sillanpaa, M. Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: a review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 159, 189–197 (2010).10.1016/j.cis.2010.06.007 ↗
43. Wang, S. P. et al. Label-free imaging, detection, and mass measurement of single viruses by surface plasmon resonance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16028–16032 (2010).10.1073/pnas.1005264107 ↗
44. Hehre, W. J., Ditchfield, R. & Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. XII. Further extensions of Gaussian-type basis sets for use in molecular-orbital studies of organic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2257–2261 (1972).10.1063/1.1677527 ↗
45. Becke, A. D. Density functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993).10.1063/1.464913 ↗
46. Mark, P. & Nilsson, L. Structure and dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E water models at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9954–9960 (2001).10.1021/jp003020w ↗
47. Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S. & TiradoRives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 11225–11236 (1996).10.1021/ja9621760 ↗
48. Jiang, W., Yan, T. Y., Wang, Y. T. & Voth, G. A. Molecular dynamics simulation of the energetic room-temperature ionic liquid, 1-hydroxyethyl-4-amino-1,2,4-triazolium nitrate (HEATN). J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 3121–3131 (2008).10.1021/jp710653g ↗
49. Sprenger, K. G., Jaeger, V. W. & Pfaendtner, J. The general AMBER force field (GAFF) can accurately predict thermodynamic and transport properties of many ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 5882–5895 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b00689 ↗
50. Asensio, J. L., Martinpastor, M. & Jimenezbarbero, J. The use of CVFF and CFF91 force fields in conformational analysis of carbohydrate molecules. Comparison with Amber molecular mechanics and dynamics calculations for methyl α-lactoside. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 17, 137–148 (1995).10.1016/0141-8130(95)92680-O ↗
51. Smith, W. & Forester, T. R. DL_POLY_2.0: a general-purpose parallel molecular dynamics simulation package. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 136–141 (1996).10.1016/S0263-7855(96)00043-4 ↗
52. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
53. Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).10.1063/1.464397 ↗