Tunnelling readout of hydrogen-bonding-based recognition
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen bonding has a ubiquitous role in electron transport and in molecular recognition, with DNA base pairing being the best-known example. Scanning tunnelling microscope images and measurements of the decay of tunnel current as a molecular junction is pulled apart by the scanning tunnelling microscope tip are sensitive to hydrogen-bonded interactions. Here, we show that these tunnel-decay signals can be used to measure the strength of hydrogen bonding in DNA base pairs. Junctions that are held together by three hydrogen bonds per base pair (for example, guanine-cytosine interactions) are stiffer than junctions held together by two hydrogen bonds per base pair (for example, adenine-thymine interactions). Similar, but less pronounced effects are observed on the approach of the tunnelling probe, implying that attractive forces that depend on hydrogen bonds also have a role in determining the rise of current. These effects provide new mechanisms for making sensors that transduce a molecular recognition event into an electronic signal.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Beratan, D. N., Onuchic, J. N., Winkler, J. R. & Gray, H. B. Electron-tunneling pathways in proteins. Science 258, 1714–1741 (1992).10.1126/science.1334572 ↗
2. de Rege, P. J. F., Williams, S. A. & Therien, M. J. Direct evaluation of electronic coupling mediated by hydrogen bonds: implications for biological electron transfer. Science 269, 1409–1413 (1995).10.1126/science.7660123 ↗
3. Jeffrey, G. A. & Saenger, W. Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures (Springer, 1991).10.1007/978-3-642-85135-3 ↗
4. Ohshiro, T. & Umezawa, Y. Complementary base-pair-facilitated electron tunneling for electrically pinpointing complementary nucleobases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10–14 (2006).10.1073/pnas.0506130103 ↗
5. He, J., Lin, L., Zhang, P. & Lindsay, S. M. Identification of DNA base-pairing via tunnel-current decay. Nano Lett. 7, 3854–3858 (2007).10.1021/nl0726205 ↗
6. Zwolak, M. & Di Ventra, M. Electronic signature of DNA nucleotides via transverse transport. Nano Lett. 5, 421–424 (2005).10.1021/nl048289w ↗
7. Tao, N. Probing potential-tuned resonant tunneling through redox molecules with scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4066–4069 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4066 ↗
8. Troisi, A. & Ratner, M. A. Modeling the inelastic electron tunneling spectra of molecular wire junctions. Phys. Rev. B 72, 033408 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.72.033408 ↗
9. Wuttke, D. S., Bjerrum, M. J., Winkler, J. R. & Gray, H. B. Electron-tunneling pathways in cytochrome c. Science 256, 1007–1009 (1992).10.1126/science.256.5059.1007 ↗
10. Cui, X. D. et al. Reproducible measurement of single-molecule conductivity. Science 294, 571–574 (2001).10.1126/science.1064354 ↗
11. Branton, B. et al. Nanopore sequencing. Nature Biotechnol. 26, 1146–1153 (2008).10.1038/nbt.1495 ↗
12. Lindsay, S. M. & Ratner, M. A. Molecular transport junctions: clearing mists. Adv. Mater. 19, 23–31 (2007).10.1002/adma.200601140 ↗
13. He, J., Chen, F. & Lindsay, S. M. Length dependence of charge transport in oligoanilines. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 072112 (2007).10.1063/1.2472758 ↗
14. Pethica, J. B. & Oliver, W. C. Tip surface interactions in STM and AFM. Physica Scripta T19, 61–66 (1987).10.1088/0031-8949/1987/T19A/010 ↗
15. Xu, B., Xiao, X. & Tao, N. J. Measurements of single-molecule electromechanical properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 16164–16165 (2003).10.1021/ja038949j ↗
16. Israelachvilli, J. N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic Press, 1991).
17. Sponer, J., Jurecka, P. & Hobza, P. Accurate interaction energies of hydrogen-bonded nucleic acid base pairs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 10142–10151 (2004).10.1021/ja048436s ↗
18. Tomfohr, J. K. & Sankey, O. F. Theoretical analysis of electron transport through organic molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 1542–1554 (2004).10.1063/1.1625911 ↗
19. Mujica, V., Kemp, M. & Ratner, M. A. Electron conduction in molecular wires. I. A scattering formalism. J. Chem. Phys. 101, 6849–6855 (1994).10.1063/1.468314 ↗
20. Landauer, R. Conductance determined by transmission: Probes and quantized constriction resistance. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1, 8099–8110 (1989).10.1088/0953-8984/1/43/011 ↗
21. Imry, Y. & Landauer, R. Conductance viewed as transmission. Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S306–S312 (1999).10.1103/RevModPhys.71.S306 ↗
22. Williams, J. M., Han, T. & Beebe, T. P. Determination of single-bond forces from contact force variances in atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 12, 1291–1295 (1996).10.1021/la950500j ↗
23. Hutter, J. L. & Bechhoefer, J. Calibration of atomic force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868–1873 (1993).10.1063/1.1143970 ↗