Biomolecular condensates undergo a generic shear-mediated liquid-to-solid transition
Source abstract
Abstract
Membrane-less organelles resulting from liquid-liquid phase separation of biopolymers into intracellular condensates control essential biological functions, including messenger RNA processing, cell signalling and embryogenesis1-4. It has recently been discovered that several such protein condensates can undergo a further irreversible phase transition, forming solid nanoscale aggregates associated with neurodegenerative disease5-7. While the irreversible gelation of protein condensates is generally related to malfunction and disease, one case where the liquid-to-solid transition of protein condensates is functional, however, is that of silk spinning8,9. The formation of silk fibrils is largely driven by shear, yet it is not known what factors control the pathological gelation of functional condensates. Here we demonstrate that four proteins and one peptide system, with no function associated with fibre formation, have a strong propensity to undergo a liquid-to-solid transition when exposed to even low levels of mechanical shear once present in their liquid-liquid phase separated form. Using microfluidics to control the application of shear, we generated fibres from single-protein condensates and characterized their structural and material properties as a function of shear stress. Our results reveal generic backbone-backbone hydrogen bonding constraints as a determining factor in governing this transition. These observations suggest that shear can play an important role in the irreversible liquid-to-solid transition of protein condensates, shed light on the role of physical factors in driving this transition in protein aggregation-related diseases and open a new route towards artificial shear responsive biomaterials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Connective tissue disorders research · RNA Research and Splicing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Brangwynne, C. P. et al. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science 324, 1729–1732 (2009).10.1126/science.1172046 ↗
2. Wippich, F. et al. Dual specificity kinase DYRK3 couples stress granule condensation/dissolution to MTORC1 signaling. Cell 152, 791–805 (2013).10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.033 ↗
3. Strzelecka, M. et al. Coilin-dependent SnRNP assembly is essential for zebrafish embryogenesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 403–409 (2010).10.1038/nsmb.1783 ↗
4. Patel, A. et al. A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell 162, 1066–1077 (2015).10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.047 ↗
5. Murakami, T. et al. ALS/FTD mutation-induced phase transition of FUS liquid droplets and reversible hydrogels into irreversible hydrogels impairs RNP granule function. Neuron 88, 678–690 (2015).10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.030 ↗
6. Qamar, S. et al. FUS phase separation is modulated by a molecular chaperone and methylation of arginine cation-π interactions. Cell 173, 720–734 (2018).10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.056 ↗
7. Jin, H.-J. & Kaplan, D. L. Mechanism of silk processing in insects and spiders. Nature 424, 1057–1061 (2003).10.1038/nature01809 ↗
8. Heim, M., Keerl, D. & Scheibel, T. Spider silk: from soluble protein to extraordinary fiber. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48, 3584–3596 (2009).10.1002/anie.200803341 ↗
9. de Kruif, C. G., Weinbreck, F. & de Vries, R. Complex coacervation of proteins and anionic polysaccharides. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 9, 340–349 (2004).10.1016/j.cocis.2004.09.006 ↗
10. Ianiro, A. et al. Liquid–liquid phase separation during amphiphilic self-assembly. Nat. Chem. 11, 320–328 (2019).10.1038/s41557-019-0210-4 ↗
11. Vollrath, F., Porter, D. & Holland, C. The science of silks. MRS Bull. 38, 73–80 (2013).10.1557/mrs.2012.314 ↗
12. Holland, C., Vollrath, F., Ryan, A. J. & Mykhaylyk, O. O. Silk and synthetic polymers: reconciling 100 degrees of separation. Adv. Mater. 24, 105–109 (2012).10.1002/adma.201103664 ↗
13. Vollrath, F. & Knight, D. P. Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410, 541–548 (2001).10.1038/35069000 ↗
14. Weber, S. C. & Brangwynne, C. P. Getting RNA and protein in phase. Cell 149, 1188–1191 (2012).10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.022 ↗
15. Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science 357, eaaf4382 (2017).10.1126/science.aaf4382 ↗
16. Yuan, C. et al. Nucleation and growth of amino acid and peptide supramolecular polymers through liquid–liquid phase separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 131, 18284–18291 (2019).10.1002/ange.201911782 ↗
17. Iserman, C. et al. Condensation of Ded1p promotes a translational switch from housekeeping to stress protein production. Cell 181, 818–831 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.009 ↗
18. Liao, Y.-C. et al. RNA granules hitchhike on lysosomes for long-distance transport, using annexin A11 as a molecular tether. Cell 179, 147–164 (2019).10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.050 ↗
19. Ruggeri, F. S. et al. Infrared nanospectroscopy characterization of oligomeric and fibrillar aggregates during amyloid formation. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–9 (2015).10.1038/ncomms8831 ↗
20. Ruggeri, F. et al. Identification of oxidative stress in red blood cells with nanoscale chemical resolution by infrared nanospectroscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2582 (2018).10.3390/ijms19092582 ↗
21. Ruggeri, F. S. et al. Concentration-dependent and surface-assisted self-assembly properties of a bioactive estrogen receptor α-derived peptide. J. Pept. Sci. 21, 95–104 (2015).10.1002/psc.2730 ↗
22. Boeynaems, S. et al. Phase separation of C9orf72 dipeptide repeats perturbs stress granule dynamics. Mol. Cell 65, 1044–1055 (2017).10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.013 ↗
23. Ke, H. et al. Shear-induced assembly of a transient yet highly stretchable hydrogel based on pseudopolyrotaxanes. Nat. Chem. 11, 470–477 (2019).10.1038/s41557-019-0235-8 ↗
24. Zebrowski, J., Prasad, V., Zhang, W., Walker, L. & Weitz, D. Shake-Gels: shear-induced gelation of laponite–PEO mixtures. Colloids Surf. A 213, 189–197 (2003).10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00512-5 ↗
25. Axelrod, D., Koppel, D. E., Schlessinger, J., Elson, E. & Webb, W. W. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys. J. 16, 1055–1069 (1976).10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85755-4 ↗
26. Niwayama, R. et al. Bayesian inference of forces causing cytoplasmic streaming in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos and mouse oocytes. PLoS ONE 11, e0159917 (2016).10.1371/journal.pone.0159917 ↗
27. Goldstein, R. E. & van de Meent, J.-W. A physical perspective on cytoplasmic streaming. Interface Focus 5, 20150030 (2015).10.1098/rsfs.2015.0030 ↗
28. Brown, A. Axonal transport of membranous and nonmembranous cargoes: a unified perspective. J. Cell Biol. 160, 817–821 (2003).10.1083/jcb.200212017 ↗
29. Brown, A. Slow axonal transport: stop and go traffic in the axon. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 153–156 (2000).10.1038/35040102 ↗
30. Kaether, C., Skehel, P. & Dotti, C. G. Axonal membrane proteins are transported in distinct carriers: a two-color video microscopy study in cultured hippocampal neurons. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1213–1224 (2000).10.1091/mbc.11.4.1213 ↗
31. Ochs, S. Fast axoplasmic transport of materials in mammalian nerve and its integrative role. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 193, 43–58 (1972).10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb27822.x ↗
32. Roy, S., Zhang, B., Lee, V. M.-Y. & Trojanowski, J. Q. Axonal transport defects: a common theme in neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Neuropathol. 109, 5–13 (2005).10.1007/s00401-004-0952-x ↗
33. Li, X. et al. 3D culture of chondrocytes in gelatin hydrogels with different stiffness. Polymers (Basel). 8, 269 (2016).10.3390/polym8080269 ↗
34. Vigolo, D., Ramakrishna, S. N. & deMello, A. J. Facile tuning of the mechanical properties of a biocompatible soft material. Sci. Rep. 9, 7125 (2019).10.1038/s41598-019-43579-8 ↗
35. Chao, P.-H. G. et al. Silk hydrogel for cartilage. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 95B, 84–90 (2010).10.1002/jbm.b.31686 ↗
36. Partlow, B. P. et al. Highly tunable elastomeric silk biomaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4615–4624 (2014).10.1002/adfm.201400526 ↗
37. Ashby, M. F., Gibson, L. J., Wegst, U. & Olive, R. The mechanical properties of natural materials. I. Material property charts. Proc. R. Soc. A 450, 123–140 (1995).
38. Knowles, T. P. J. & Buehler, M. J. Nanomechanics of functional and pathological amyloid materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 469–479 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2011.102 ↗
39. Rockwood, D. N. et al. Materials fabrication from bombyx mori silk fibroin. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1612–1631 (2011).10.1038/nprot.2011.379 ↗
40. Ruggeri, F. S., Šneideris, T., Chia, S., Vendruscolo, M. & Knowles, T. P. J. Characterizing individual protein aggregates by infrared nanospectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. 12, e60108 (2019).
41. Müller, J. et al. High-resolution CMOS MEA platform to study neurons at subcellular, cellular, and network levels. Lab Chip 15, 2767–2780 (2015).10.1039/C5LC00133A ↗
42. Ruggeri, F. S. et al. Nanoscale studies link amyloid maturity with polyglutamine diseases onset. Sci. Rep. 6, 31155 (2016).10.1038/srep31155 ↗
43. Shimanovich, U. et al. Silk micrococoons for protein stabilisation and molecular encapsulation. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–9 (2017).10.1038/ncomms15902 ↗
44. Yang, H. & Wang, K. Genomic variant annotation and prioritization with ANNOVAR and WANNOVAR. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1556–1566 (2015).10.1038/nprot.2015.105 ↗
45. Xia, Y. & Whitesides, G. M. Soft lithography. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 153–184 (1998).10.1146/annurev.matsci.28.1.153 ↗
46. Levin, A. et al. Ostwald’s rule of stages governs structural transitions and morphology of dipeptide supramolecular polymers. Nat. Commun. 5, 5219 (2014).10.1038/ncomms6219 ↗