Power generation by reverse electrodialysis in a single-layer nanoporous membrane made from core–rim polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoporous graphene and related atomically thin layered materials are promising candidates in reverse electrodialysis research owing to their remarkable ionic conductivity and high permselectivity. The synthesis of atomically thin nanoporous membranes with a narrow pore size distribution, however, remains challenging. Here, we report the fabrication of nanoporous carbon membranes via the thermal crosslinking of core-rim structured monomers, that is, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The mechanically robust, centimetre-sized membrane has a pore size of 3.6 ± 1.8 nm and a thickness of 2.0 ± 0.5 nm. When applied to reverse electrodialysis, the nanoporous carbon membrane offers a high short-circuit current with an output power density of 67 W m-2, which is about two orders of magnitude beyond that of the classic ion-exchange membranes and current prototype nanoporous membranes reported in the literature. Crosslinked and atomically thin porous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon membranes therefore represent new scaffolds that will revolutionize the rapidly developing fields of sustainable energy and membrane technology.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Graphene research and applications · Fuel Cells and Related Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (75)
Show source-provided references
1. Logan, B. E. & Elimelech, M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 488, 313–319 (2012).10.1038/nature11477 ↗
2. Schroeder, T. B. H. et al. An electric-eel-inspired soft power source from stacked hydrogels. Nature 552, 214–218 (2017).10.1038/nature24670 ↗
3. Mei, Y. & Tang, C. Y. Recent developments and future perspectives of reverse electrodialysis technology: a review. Desalination 425, 156–174 (2018).10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.021 ↗
4. Yip, N. Y., Brogioli, D., Hamelers, H. V. M. & Nijmeijer, K. Salinity gradients for sustainable energy: primer, progress, and prospects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 12072–12094 (2016).10.1021/acs.est.6b03448 ↗
5. Giorno, L, Drioli, E. & Strathmann, H. Permselectivity of ion-exchange membranes in Encyclopedia of Membranes (Springer, 2016).10.1007/978-3-662-44324-8_994 ↗
6. Guo, X. et al. Permselectivity and conductivity of membranes based on sulfonated naphthalenic copolyimides. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 13694–13702 (2007).10.1021/jp0734631 ↗
7. Yip, N. Y. & Elimelech, M. Comparison of energy efficiency and power density in pressure retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 11002–11012 (2014).10.1021/es5029316 ↗
8. Geise, G. M., Hickner, M. A. & Logan, B. E. Ionic resistance and permselectivity tradeoffs in anion exchange membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 10294–10301 (2013).10.1021/am403207w ↗
9. Macha, M., Marion, S., Nandigana, V. V. R. & Radenovic, A. 2D materials as an emerging platform for nanopore-based power generation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 588–605 (2019).10.1038/s41578-019-0126-z ↗
10. Sint, K., Wang, B. & Král, P. Selective ion passage through functionalized graphene nanopores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16448–16449 (2008).10.1021/ja804409f ↗
11. Siria, A. et al. Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube. Nature 494, 455–458 (2013).10.1038/nature11876 ↗
12. Feng, J. D. et al. Single-layer MoS2 nanopores as nanopower generators. Nature 536, 197–200 (2016).10.1038/nature18593 ↗
13. Yang, Y. et al. Large-area graphene-nanomesh/carbon-nanotube hybrid membranes for ionic and molecular nanofiltration. Science 364, 1057–1062 (2019).10.1126/science.aau5321 ↗
14. Moreno, C. et al. Bottom-up synthesis of multifunctional nanoporous graphene. Science 360, 199–203 (2018).10.1126/science.aar2009 ↗
15. Angelova, P. et al. A universal scheme to convert aromatic molecular monolayers into functional carbon nanomembranes. ACS Nano 7, 6489–6497 (2013).10.1021/nn402652f ↗
16. Bauer, T. et al. Synthesis of free-standing, monolayered organometallic sheets at the air/water interface. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 7879–7884 (2011).10.1002/anie.201100669 ↗
17. Zheng, Z. et al. Synthesis of two-dimensional analogues of copolymers by site-to-site transmetalation of organometallic monolayer sheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6103–6110 (2014).10.1021/ja501849y ↗
18. Nishikata, Y., Konishi, T., Morikawa, A., Kakimoto, M.-a. & Imai, Y. Preparation and monolayer thickness of Langmuir–Blodgett films of polyimides having various chemical structures. Polym. J. 20, 269–272 (1988).10.1295/polymj.20.269 ↗
19. Silva, N. J., Machado, F. B. C., Lischka, H. & Aquino, A. J. A. π–π stacking between polyaromatic hydrocarbon sheets beyond dispersion interactions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 22300–22310 (2016).10.1039/C6CP03749F ↗
20. Schneider, G. F., Calado, V. E., Zandbergen, H., Vandersypen, L. M. K. & Dekker, C. Wedging transfer of nanostructures. Nano Lett. 10, 1912–1916 (2010).10.1021/nl1008037 ↗
21. Bilkan, M. T., Şahin, O. & Yurdakul, Ş. Experimental and DFT studies of solvent effects on molecular structure and physical properties of dipyridylamine pyridine based ligand. J. Mol. Struct. 1133, 580–590 (2017).10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.11.078 ↗
22. Anariba, F., Viswanathan, U., Bocian, D. F. & McCreery, R. L. Determination of the structure and orientation of organic molecules tethered to flat graphitic carbon by ATR-FT-IR and Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 78, 3104–3112 (2006).10.1021/ac052042h ↗
23. Maghsoumi, A. et al. Edge chlorination of hexa-peri-hexabenzocoronene investigated by density functional theory and vibrational spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 11869–11878 (2016).10.1039/C5CP07755A ↗
24. Beloded, A. A., Koshechko, V. G., Pokhodenko, V. D., Nemoshkalenko, V. V. & Aleshin, V. G. X-ray photoelectron spectra of radical cations of the triphenylamine series and some heterocyclic compounds. Theor. Exp. Chem. 17, 99–103 (1981).10.1007/BF01114442 ↗
25. Susi, T., Pichler, T. & Ayala, P. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of graphitic carbon nanomaterials doped with heteroatoms. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 6, 177–192 (2015).10.3762/bjnano.6.17 ↗
26. Yuan, K. et al. 2D heterostructures derived from MoS2-templated, cobalt-containing conjugated microporous polymer sandwiches for the oxygen reduction reaction and electrochemical energy storage. ChemElectroChem 4, 709–715 (2017).10.1002/celc.201600850 ↗
27. Johra, F. T., Lee, J.-W. & Jung, W.-G. Facile and safe graphene preparation on solution based platform. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20, 2883–2887 (2014).10.1016/j.jiec.2013.11.022 ↗
28. Wu, Z.-S. et al. Bottom-up fabrication of sulfur-doped graphene films derived from sulfur-annulated nanographene for ultrahigh volumetric capacitance micro-supercapacitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4506–4512 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b00805 ↗
29. Ma, Z. et al. Sulfur-doped graphene derived from cycled lithium–sulfur batteries as a metal-free electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 1888–1892 (2015).10.1002/anie.201410258 ↗
30. Zuo, C. & Jagodzinski, P. W. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering of pyridine using different metals: differences and explanation based on the selective formation of α-pyridyl on metal surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 1788–1793 (2005).10.1021/jp0406363 ↗
31. Matsuoka, R. et al. Crystalline graphdiyne nanosheets produced at a gas/liquid or liquid/liquid interface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 3145–3152 (2017).10.1021/jacs.6b12776 ↗
32. Maghsoumi, A., Brambilla, L., Castiglioni, C., Müllen, K. & Tommasini, M. Overtone and combination features of G and D peaks in resonance Raman spectroscopy of the C78H26 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. J. Raman Spectrosc. 46, 757–764 (2015).10.1002/jrs.4717 ↗
33. Verzhbitskiy, I. A. et al. Raman fingerprints of atomically precise graphene nanoribbons. Nano Lett. 16, 3442–3447 (2016).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04183 ↗
34. Mao, J., Cao, X., Olk, D. C., Chu, W. & Schmidt-Rohr, K. Advanced solid-state NMR spectroscopy of natural organic matter. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 100, 17–51 (2017).10.1016/j.pnmrs.2016.11.003 ↗
35. Wang, S., Tang, Y., Schobert, H. H., Guo, Yn & Su, Y. FTIR and 13C NMR investigation of coal component of Late Permian coals from Southern China. Energy Fuels 25, 5672–5677 (2011).10.1021/ef201196v ↗
36. Rollings, R. C., Kuan, A. T. & Golovchenko, J. A. Ion selectivity of graphene nanopores. Nat. Commun. 7, 11408 (2016).10.1038/ncomms11408 ↗
37. Wang, L. et al. Fundamental transport mechanisms, fabrication and potential applications of nanoporous atomically thin membranes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 509–522 (2017).10.1038/nnano.2017.72 ↗
38. Jain, T. et al. Heterogeneous sub-continuum ionic transport in statistically isolated graphene nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 1053–1057 (2015).10.1038/nnano.2015.222 ↗
39. Feng, J. D. et al. Observation of ionic Coulomb blockade in nanopores. Nat. Mater. 15, 850–855 (2016).10.1038/nmat4607 ↗
40. Esfandiar, A. et al. Size effect in ion transport through angstrom-scale slits. Science 358, 511–513 (2017).10.1126/science.aan5275 ↗
41. Gao, J. et al. High-performance ionic diode membrane for salinity gradient power generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 12265–12272 (2014).10.1021/ja503692z ↗
42. Plett, T. S. et al. Solid-state ionic diodes demonstrated in conical nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 6170–6176 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00258 ↗
43. Siwy, Z. S. & Howorka, S. Engineered voltage-responsive nanopores. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1115–1132 (2010).10.1039/B909105J ↗
44. Karnik, R., Duan, C. H., Castelino, K., Daiguji, H. & Majumdar, A. Rectification of ionic current in a nanofluidic diode. Nano Lett. 7, 547–551 (2007).10.1021/nl062806o ↗
45. Ouyang, W., Wang, W., Zhang, H. X., Wu, W. G. & Li, Z. H. Nanofluidic crystal: a facile, high-efficiency and high-power-density scaling up scheme for energy harvesting based on nanofluidic reverse electrodialysis. Nanotechnology 24, 345401 (2013).10.1088/0957-4484/24/34/345401 ↗
46. Weinstein, J. N. & Leitz, F. B. Electric power from differences in salinity: the dialytic battery. Science 191, 557–559 (1976).10.1126/science.191.4227.557 ↗
47. Cao, L. et al. On the origin of ion selectivity in ultrathin nanopores: insights for membrane-scale osmotic energy conversion. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1804189 (2018).10.1002/adfm.201804189 ↗
48. Jia, W. L. et al. 7-azaindolyl- and 2,2′-dipyridylamino-functionalized molecular stars with sixfold symmetry: self-assembly, luminescence, and coordination compounds. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 832–842 (2005).10.1002/chem.200400804 ↗
49. Thompson, C. M. et al. Substituent effects on the gas sorption and selectivity properties of hexaphenylbenzene and hexabenzocoronene based porous polymers. Macromolecules 47, 8645–8652 (2014).10.1021/ma501663j ↗
50. Pantelic, R. S. et al. Graphene: substrate preparation and introduction. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 234–238 (2011).10.1016/j.jsb.2010.10.002 ↗
51. Hartmann, S. R. & Hahn, E. L. Nuclear double resonance in the rotating frame. Phys. Rev. 128, 2042–2053 (1962).10.1103/PhysRev.128.2042 ↗
52. Metz, G., Wu, X. L. & Smith, S. O. Ramped-amplitude cross polarization in magic-angle-spinning NMR. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 110, 219–227 (1994).10.1006/jmra.1994.1208 ↗
53. Fung, B. M., Khitrin, A. K. & Ermolaev, K. An improved broadband decoupling sequence for liquid crystals and solids. J. Magn. Reson. 142, 97–101 (2000).10.1006/jmre.1999.1896 ↗
54. Martín-Yerga, D., Rama, E. C. & Costa-García, A. Electrochemical study and applications of selective electrodeposition of silver on quantum dots. Anal. Chem. 88, 3739–3746 (2016).10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04568 ↗
55. Barlag, R. et al. A student-made silver–silver chloride reference electrode for the general chemistry laboratory: ∼10 min preparation. J. Chem. Educ. 91, 766–768 (2014).10.1021/ed400722e ↗
56. Baerends, E. J. et al. ADF2017, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry https://www.scm.com (Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
57. Berendsen, H. J. C., van der Spoel, D. & van Drunen, R. GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91, 43–56 (1995).10.1016/0010-4655(95)00042-E ↗
58. Lindahl, E., Hess, B. & van der Spoel, D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Model. 7, 306–317 (2001).10.1007/s008940100045 ↗
59. Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005).10.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
60. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435–447 (2008).10.1021/ct700301q ↗
61. Pronk, S. et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics 29, 845–854 (2013).10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055 ↗
62. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1–2, 19–25 (2015).10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
63. Páll, S., Abraham, M. J., Kutzner, C., Hess, B. & Lindahl, E. in Solving Software Challenges for Exascale (eds Markidis, S. & Laure, E.) 3–27 (Springer International Publishing, 2015).10.1007/978-3-319-15976-8_1 ↗
64. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
65. York, D. M., Darden, T. A. & Pedersen, L. G. The effect of long‐range electrostatic interactions in simulations of macromolecular crystals: a comparison of the Ewald and truncated list methods. J. Chem. Phys. 99, 8345–8348 (1993).10.1063/1.465608 ↗
66. Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).10.1063/1.2408420 ↗
67. Horn, H. W. et al. Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 9665–9678 (2004).10.1063/1.1683075 ↗
68. Vega, C. & de Miguel, E. Surface tension of the most popular models of water by using the test-area simulation method. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 154707 (2007).10.1063/1.2715577 ↗
69. Chen, F. & Smith, P. E. Simulated surface tensions of common water models. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 221101 (2007).10.1063/1.2745718 ↗
70. Jorgensen, W. L., Maxwell, D. S. & Tirado-Rives, J. Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 11225–11236 (1996).10.1021/ja9621760 ↗
71. Kaminski, G. A., Friesner, R. A., Tirado-Rives, J. & Jorgensen, W. L. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 6474–6487 (2001).10.1021/jp003919d ↗
72. Martin, M. G. Comparison of the AMBER, CHARMM, COMPASS, GROMOS, OPLS, TraPPE and UFF force fields for prediction of vapor–liquid coexistence curves and liquid densities. Fluid Phase Equilib. 248, 50–55 (2006).10.1016/j.fluid.2006.07.014 ↗
73. Martínez, J. M. & Martínez, L. Packing optimization for automated generation of complex system’s initial configurations for molecular dynamics and docking. J. Comput. Chem. 24, 819–825 (2003).10.1002/jcc.10216 ↗
74. Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E. G. & Martínez, J. M. PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2157–2164 (2009).10.1002/jcc.21224 ↗
75. Roe, D. R. & Cheatham, T. E. PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3084–3095 (2013).10.1021/ct400341p ↗