journal article·2007-01Open access

Rare-earth solid-state qubits

S. Bertaina, S. Gambarelli, A. Tkachuk, I. N. Kurkin, B. Malkin, A. Stepanov, B. Barbara

Nature Nanotechnology· Volume 2· Issue 1

Abstract

Quantum bits (qubits) are the basic building blocks of any quantum computer. Superconducting qubits have been created with a 'top-down' approach that integrates superconducting devices into macroscopic electrical circuits [1-3], whereas electron-spin qubits have been demonstrated in quantum dots [4-6]. The phase coherence time (Tau2) and the single qubit figure of merit (QM) of superconducting and electron-spin qubits are similar -- Tau2 ~ microseconds and QM ~10-1000 below 100mK -- and it should be possible to scale-up these systems, which is essential for the development of any useful quantum computer. Bottom-up approaches based on dilute ensembles of spins have achieved much larger values of tau2 (up to tens of ms) [7, 8], but these systems cannot be scaled up, although some proposals for qubits based on 2D nanostructures should be scalable [9-11]. Here we report that a new family of spin qubits based on rare-earth ions demonstrates values of Tau2 (~ 50microseconds) and QM (~1400) at 2.5 K, which suggests that rare-earth qubits may, in principle, be suitable for scalable quantum information processing at 4He temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum optics and atomic interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Leggett, A. J. Superconducting qubits — a major roadblock dissolved? Science 296, 861–862 (2002).10.1126/science.1071703 ↗
2. Chiorescu, I. et al. Coherent dynamics of a flux qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator. Nature 431, 159–163 (2004).10.1038/nature02831 ↗
3. Pashkin, A., Astafiev, O., Nakamura, Y. & Tsai, J. S. Demonstration of conditional gate operation using superconducting charge qubits. Nature 425, 941–944 (2003).10.1038/nature02015 ↗
4. Koppens, F. L. H. et al. Driven coherent oscillations at a single electron spin in a quantum dot. Nature 442, 766–771 (2006).10.1038/nature05065 ↗
5. Oosterkamp, T. H. et al. Microwave spectroscopy of a quantum-dot molecule. Nature 395, 873–876 (1998).10.1038/27617 ↗
6. Petta, J. R. et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science 309, 2180–2184 (2005).10.1126/science.1116955 ↗
7. Tyryshkin, A. M., Lyon, S. A., Astashkin, A. V. & Raitsimring, A. M. Electron spin relaxation times in phosphorous donors in silicon. Phys. Rev. B 68, 193207 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.193207 ↗
8. Mehring, M., Scherer, W. & Weidinger, A. Pseudo-entanglement of spin states in the multilevel 15N@C60 system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 206603 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.206603 ↗
9. Vandersypen, L. M. K. et al. Experimental realization of Shor's quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature 414, 883–887 (2001).10.1038/414883a ↗
10. Loss, D. & DiVincenzo, D. P. Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev. A 57, 120–126 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 ↗
11. Kane, B. E. A silicon based nuclear spin quantum computer. Nature 393, 133–137 (1998).10.1038/30156 ↗
12. Thomas, L. et al. Macroscopic quantum tunneling of the magnetization in a single crystal of nanomagnets. Nature 383, 145–148 (1996)10.1038/383145a0 ↗
13. Giraud, R., Wernsdorfer, W., Tkatchuk, A., Mailly, D. & Barbara, B. Nuclear spin driven quantum relaxation in LiY0.998 Ho0.002 F4 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 057203 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.057203 ↗
14. Giraud, R., Tkachuk, A. M. & Barbara, B. Quantum dynamics of atomic magnets: co-tunneling and dipolar-biased-tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 257204 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.257204 ↗
15. Stamp, P. C. E. & Tupitsyn, I. S. Coherence window in the dynamics of quantum nanomagnets. Phys. Rev. B 69, 014401 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.69.014401 ↗
16. Rabi, I. I. Space quantization in a gyrating magnetic field. Phys. Rev. 51, 652–655 (1937).10.1103/PhysRev.51.652 ↗
17. Shakurov, G. S. et al. Direct measurement of anti-crossings of the electron-nuclear energy levels in LiYF4 : Ho with submillimeter EPR spectroscopy. Appl. Magn. Reson. 28, 251–265 (2005).10.1007/BF03166760 ↗
18. Kurkin, I. N. & Shekun, L. Ya. Paramagnetic resonance linewidths for impurity ions in scheelite single crystals. Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 9, 444–448 (1967).
19. Shakhmuratov, R. N., Gelardi, F. M. & Cannas, M. Non-Bloch transients in solids: free induction decay and transient nutations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2963–2966 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2963 ↗
20. Agnello, S., Boscaino, R., Cannas, M., Gelardi, F. M. & Shakhmuratov, R. N. Transient nutation decay: the effect of field-modified dipolar interactions. Phys. Rev. A 59, 4087–4090 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevA.59.4087 ↗
21. Prokof'ev, N. V. & Stamp, P. C. E. Theory of the spin-bath. Rep. Prog. Phys. 63, 669–726 (2000).10.1088/0034-4885/63/4/204 ↗
22. Gallis, S. et al. Photoluminescence in erbium doped amorphous silicon oxycarbide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 091901 (2005).10.1063/1.2032600 ↗
23. Hori, Y. et al. GaN quantum dots doped with Tb. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 53102 (2006).10.1063/1.2168504 ↗
24. Ohno, H. et al. Electric-field control of ferromagnetism. Nature 408, 944–946 (2000).10.1038/35050040 ↗
25. Leuenberger, M. N. & Loss, D. Grover algorithm for large nuclear spins in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 68, 165317 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.165317 ↗
26. Tkachuk, A. M., Razumova, I. K., Malyshev, A. V. & Gapontsev, V. P. Population of lasing erbium in YLT : Er3+ crystals under upconversion cw LD pumping. J. Luminescence 94–95, 317–320 (2001).10.1016/S0022-2313(01)00393-3 ↗
27. Ishikawa, N., Sugita, M., Ishikawa, T., Koshihara, S. & Kaisu, Y. Lanthanide double-decker complexes functioning as magnets at single-molecular level. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 8694–8695 (2003).10.1021/ja029629n ↗
28. Zhang, Y., Holzwarth, N. A. W. & Williams, R. T. Electronic band structures of the scheelite materials CaMoO4, CaWO4, PbMoO4, and PbWO4 . Phys. Rev. B 57, 12738 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevB.57.12738 ↗
29. Stevens, K. W. H. The theory of paramagnetic relaxation. Proc. Phys. Soc. London A65, 209–217 (1952).10.1088/0370-1298/65/3/308 ↗
30. Bernal, E. G. Optical spectrum and magnetic properties of Er3+ in CaWO4 . J. Chem. Phys. 55, 2538–2549 (1971).10.1063/1.1676445 ↗
31. Antipin, A. A. et al. Paramagnetic resonance and spin-lattice relaxation of Er3+ and Tb3+ ions in CaWO4 crystal lattice. Sov. Phys. Solid State 10, 468–474 (1968).
32. Abragam, A. & Bleaney, B. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Transition Ions (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1970).
33. Rowan, L. G., Hahn, E. L. & Mims, W. B. Electronic spin-echo envelope modulation. Phys. Rev. A 137, A61–A71 (1969).10.1103/PhysRev.137.A61 ↗