Developing high-power Li||S batteries via transition metal/carbon nanocomposite electrocatalyst engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
The activity of electrocatalysts for the sulfur reduction reaction (SRR) can be represented using volcano plots, which describe specific thermodynamic trends. However, a kinetic trend that describes the SRR at high current rates is not yet available, limiting our understanding of kinetics variations and hindering the development of high-power Li||S batteries. Here, using Le Chatelier's principle as a guideline, we establish an SRR kinetic trend that correlates polysulfide concentrations with kinetic currents. Synchrotron X-ray adsorption spectroscopy measurements and molecular orbital computations reveal the role of orbital occupancy in transition metal-based catalysts in determining polysulfide concentrations and thus SRR kinetic predictions. Using the kinetic trend, we design a nanocomposite electrocatalyst that comprises a carbon material and CoZn clusters. When the electrocatalyst is used in a sulfur-based positive electrode (5 mg cm-2 of S loading), the corresponding Li||S coin cell (with an electrolyte:S mass ratio of 4.8) can be cycled for 1,000 cycles at 8 C (that is, 13.4 A gS-1, based on the mass of sulfur) and 25 °C. This cell demonstrates a discharge capacity retention of about 75% (final discharge capacity of 500 mAh gS-1) corresponding to an initial specific power of 26,120 W kgS-1 and specific energy of 1,306 Wh kgS-1.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Peng, L. et al. A fundamental look at electrocatalytic sulfur reduction reaction. Nat. Catal. 3, 762–770 (2020).10.1038/s41929-020-0498-x ↗
2. Zhao, C. et al. A high-energy and long-cycling lithium–sulfur pouch cell via a macroporous catalytic cathode with double-end binding sites. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 166–173 (2020).10.1038/s41565-020-00797-w ↗
3. Zhao, C. X. et al. Semi-immobilized molecular electrocatalysts for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19865–19872 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c09107 ↗
4. Zhou, G., Chen, H. & Cui, Y. Formulating energy density for designing practical lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Energy 7, 312–319 (2022).10.1038/s41560-022-01001-0 ↗
5. Li, G., Chen, Z. & Lu, J. Lithium–sulfur batteries for commercial applications. Chem 4, 3–7 (2018).10.1016/j.chempr.2017.12.012 ↗
6. Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S. H., Zu, C. & Su, Y. S. Rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem. Rev. 114, 11751–11787 (2014).10.1021/cr500062v ↗
7. Fang, R. et al. More reliable lithium–sulfur batteries: status, solutions and prospects. Adv. Mater. 29, 1606823 (2017).10.1002/adma.201606823 ↗
8. Pang, Q., Liang, X., Kwok, C. Y. & Nazar, L. F. Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes. Nat. Energy 1, 16132 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.132 ↗
9. Tikekar, M. D., Choudhury, S., Tu, Z. Y. & Archer, L. A. Design principles for electrolytes and interfaces for stable lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Energy 1, 16114–116120 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.114 ↗
10. Yang, X., Luo, J. & Sun, X. Towards high-performance solid-state Li–S batteries: from fundamental understanding to engineering design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2140–2195 (2020).10.1039/C9CS00635D ↗
11. Yang, Y. et al. Electrocatalysis in lithium sulfur batteries under lean electrolyte conditions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 15549–15552 (2018).10.1002/anie.201808311 ↗
12. Song, Y. et al. Rationalizing electrocatalysis of Li–S chemistry by mediator design: progress and prospects. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 1901075 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201901075 ↗
13. Hua, W. et al. Selective catalysis remedies polysulfide shuttling in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2101006 (2021).10.1002/adma.202101006 ↗
14. Dibden, J. W., Smith, J. W., Zhou, N., Garcia-Araez, N. & Owen, J. R. Predicting the composition and formation of solid products in lithium-sulfur batteries by using an experimental phase diagram. Chem. Commun. 52, 12885–12888 (2016).10.1039/C6CC05881G ↗
15. Shen, Z. et al. Cation-doped ZnS catalysts for polysulfide conversion in lithium–sulfur batteries. Nat. Catal. 5, 555–563 (2022).10.1038/s41929-022-00804-4 ↗
16. Zhong, Y. R. et al. Surface chemistry in cobalt phosphide-stabilized lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 1455–1459 (2018).10.1021/jacs.7b11434 ↗
17. Xue, W. et al. Intercalation-conversion hybrid cathodes enabling Li–S full-cell architectures with jointly superior gravimetric and volumetric energy densities. Nat. Energy 4, 374–382 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0351-0 ↗
18. Du, Z. et al. Cobalt in nitrogen-doped graphene as single-atom catalyst for high-sulfur content lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 3977–3985 (2019).10.1021/jacs.8b12973 ↗
19. Zhou, G. et al. Catalytic oxidation of Li2S on the surface of metal sulfides for Li–S batteries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 840–845 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1615837114 ↗
20. De Heer, J. The principle of Le Châtelier and Braun. J. Chem. Educ. 34, 375 (1957).10.1021/ed034p375 ↗
21. Zhang, L. et al. In situ optical spectroscopy characterization for optimal design of lithium–sulfur batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 5432–5453 (2019).10.1039/C9CS00381A ↗
22. Li, H. et al. Revealing principles for design of lean-electrolyte lithium metal anode via in-situ spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2012–2022 (2020).10.1021/jacs.9b11774 ↗
23. Li, H. et al. Reversible electrochemical oxidation of sulfur in ionic liquid for high-voltage Al−S batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 5714 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-26056-7 ↗
24. Liu, L. & Corma, A. Metal catalysts for heterogeneous catalysis: from single atoms to nanoclusters and nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 118, 4981–5079 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00776 ↗
25. Zou, Q. & Lu, Y. C. Solvent-dictated lithium sulfur redox reactions: an operando UV-vis spectroscopic study. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1518–1525 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00228 ↗
26. Li, H. et al. Unraveling the catalyst-solvent interactions in lean-electrolyte sulfur reduction electrocatalysis for Li–S batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202213863 (2022).10.1002/anie.202213863 ↗
27. He, Q., Freiberg, A. T. S., Patel, M. U. M., Qian, S. & Gasteiger, H. A. Operando identification of liquid intermediates in lithium–sulfur batteries via transmission UV–vis spectroscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc. 167, 080508 (2020).10.1149/1945-7111/ab8645 ↗
28. Hwang, J. et al. Perovskites in catalysis and electrocatalysis. Science 358, 751–756 (2017).10.1126/science.aam7092 ↗
29. Singh, J. P., Park, J. Y., Chae, K. H., Ahn, D. & Lee, S. Soft X-ray absorption spectroscopic investigation of Li(Ni0.8Co0.1Mn0.1)O2 cathode materials. Nanomaterials 10, 759 (2020).10.3390/nano10040759 ↗
30. Massalski, T. B. & Okamoto, H. Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams 2nd edn (ASM International, 1990).
31. Kurata, H. & Colliex, C. Electron-energy-loss core-edge structures in manganese oxides. Phys. Rev. B 48, 2102–2108 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.48.2102 ↗
32. Lin, F. et al. Synchrotron X-ray analytical techniques for studying materials electrochemistry in rechargeable batteries. Chem. Rev. 117, 13123–13186 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00007 ↗
33. Fan, F. Y., Carter, W. C. & Chiang, Y. M. Mechanism and kinetics of Li2S precipitation in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 5203–5209 (2015).10.1002/adma.201501559 ↗
34. Bhargav, A., He, J., Gupta, A. & Manthiram, A. Lithium–sulfur batteries: attaining the critical metrics. Joule 4, 285–291 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.001 ↗
35. Vivanco, J. P. & Rodriguez-Monroy, C. Graphene applications in the energy field: state-of-the-art and impact. In Proc. 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology (2018).