Improving Li-ion interfacial transport in hybrid solid electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of commercial solid-state batteries has to date been hindered by the individual limitations of inorganic and organic solid electrolytes, motivating hybrid concepts. However, the room-temperature conductivity of hybrid solid electrolytes is still insufficient to support the required battery performance. A key challenge is to assess the Li-ion transport over the inorganic and organic interfaces and relate this to surface chemistry. Here we study the interphase structure and the Li-ion transport across the interface of hybrid solid electrolytes using solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In a hybrid solid polyethylene oxide polymer-inorganic electrolyte, we introduce two representative types of ionic liquid that have different miscibilities with the polymer. The poorly miscible ionic liquid wets the polymer-inorganic interface and increases the local polarizability. This lowers the diffusional barrier, resulting in an overall room-temperature conductivity of 2.47 × 10-4 S cm-1. A critical current density of 0.25 mA cm-2 versus a Li-metal anode shows improved stability, allowing cycling of a LiFePO4-Li-metal solid-state cell at room temperature with a Coulombic efficiency of 99.9%. Tailoring the local interface environment between the inorganic and organic solid electrolyte components in hybrid solid electrolytes seems to be a viable route towards designing highly conducting hybrid solid electrolytes.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Armand, M. & Tarascon, J.-M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).10.1038/451652a ↗
2. Dunn, B., Kamath, H. & Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 334, 928–935 (2011).10.1126/science.1212741 ↗
3. Cheng, X. B., Zhao, C. Z., Yao, Y. X., Liu, H. & Zhang, Q. Recent advances in energy chemistry between solid-state electrolyte and safe lithium-metal anodes. Chem 5, 74–96 (2019).10.1016/j.chempr.2018.12.002 ↗
4. Zaman, W., Hortance, N., Dixit, M. B., De Andrade, V. & Hatzell, K. B. Visualizing percolation and ion transport in hybrid solid electrolytes for Li-metal batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 23914–23921 (2019).10.1039/C9TA05118J ↗
5. Armand, M. The history of polymer electrolytes. Solid State Ion. 69, 309–319 (1994).10.1016/0167-2738(94)90419-7 ↗
6. Bouchet, R. et al. Single-ion BAB triblock copolymers as highly efficient electrolytes for lithium-metal batteries. Nat. Mater. 12, 452–457 (2013).10.1038/nmat3602 ↗
7. Ma, Q. et al. Single lithium‐ion conducting polymer electrolytes based on a super‐delocalized polyanion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2521–2525 (2016).10.1002/anie.201509299 ↗
8. Dixit, M. B. et al. Scalable manufacturing of hybrid solid electrolytes with interface control. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 45087–45097 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b15463 ↗
9. Osada, I., de Vries, H., Scrosati, B. & Passerini, S. Ionic‐liquid‐based polymer electrolytes for battery applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 500–513 (2016).10.1002/anie.201504971 ↗
10. Liu, M. et al. Tandem interface and bulk Li-ion transport in a hybrid solid electrolyte with microsized active filler. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 2336–2342 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01371 ↗
11. Yang, K. et al. Stable interface chemistry and multiple ion transport of composite electrolyte contribute to ultra-long cycling solid-state LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2/lithium metal batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 24668–24675 (2021).10.1002/anie.202110917 ↗
12. Croce, F., Sacchetti, S. & Scrosati, B. Advanced lithium batteries based on high-performance composite polymer electrolytes. J. Power Sources 162, 685–689 (2006).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.07.038 ↗
13. Syzdek, J. et al. Ceramic-in-polymer versus polymer-in-ceramic polymeric electrolytes—A novel approach. J. Power Sources 194, 66–72 (2009).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.070 ↗
14. Hassoun, J. & Scrosati, B. A high‐performance polymer tin sulfur lithium ion battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 2371–2374 (2010).10.1002/anie.200907324 ↗
15. Płcharski, J. & Weiczorek, W. PEO based composite solid electrolyte containing nasicon. Solid State Ion. 28, 979–982 (1988).10.1016/0167-2738(88)90315-3 ↗
16. Xu, K. Electrolytes and interphases in Li-ion batteries and beyond. Chem. Rev. 114, 11503–11618 (2014).10.1021/cr500003w ↗
17. Lei, D. et al. Cross-linked beta alumina nanowires with compact gel polymer electrolyte coating for ultra-stable sodium metal battery. Nat. Commun. 10, 4244 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-11960-w ↗
18. Zheng, J., Tang, M. X. & Hu, Y. Y. Lithium ion pathway within Li7La3Zr2O12-polyethylene oxide composite electrolytes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 12538–12542 (2016).10.1002/anie.201607539 ↗
19. Wang, S. et al. A dendrite-suppressed flexible polymer-in-ceramic electrolyte membrane for advanced lithium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 353, 136604 (2020).10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136604 ↗
20. Fergus, J. W. Ceramic and polymeric solid electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 195, 4554–4569 (2010).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.076 ↗
21. Blanga, R., Burstein, L., Berman, M., Greenbaum, S. & Golodnitsky, D. Solid polymer-in-ceramic electrolyte formed by electrophoretic deposition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, D3084–D3089 (2015).10.1149/2.0221511jes ↗
22. Chen, L. et al. PEO/garnet composite electrolytes for solid-state lithium batteries: from “ceramic-in-polymer” to “polymer-in-ceramic”. Nano Energy 46, 176–184 (2018).10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.037 ↗
23. Huo, H. Y. et al. Rational design of hierarchical “ceramic-in-polymer” and “polymer-in-ceramic” electrolytes for dendrite-free solid-state batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1804004 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201804004 ↗
24. Bonizzoni, S. et al. NASICON-type polymer-in-ceramic composite electrolytes for lithium batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 6142–6149 (2019).10.1039/C9CP00405J ↗
25. Dixit, M. B. et al. Nanoscale mapping of extrinsic interfaces in hybrid solid electrolytes. Joule 4, 207–221 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2019.11.015 ↗
26. Simon, F. J. et al. Properties of the interphase formed between argyrodite-type Li6PS5Cl and polymer-based PEO10:LiTFSI. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 42186–42196 (2019).10.1021/acsami.9b14506 ↗
27. Simon, F. J., Hanauer, M., Richter, F. H. & Janek, J. Interphase formation of PEO20:LiTFSI–Li6PS5Cl composite electrolytes with lithium metal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 11713–11723 (2020).10.1021/acsami.9b22968 ↗
28. Zheng, J., Wang, P., Liu, H. & Hu, Y.-Y. Interface-enabled ion conduction in Li10GeP2S12–poly (ethylene oxide) hybrid electrolytes. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 1452–1459 (2019).10.1021/acsaem.8b02008 ↗
29. Yu, C. et al. Accessing the bottleneck in all-solid state batteries, lithium-ion transport over the solid-electrolyte-electrode interface. Nat. Commun. 8, 1086 (2017).10.1038/s41467-017-01187-y ↗
30. Ganapathy, S., Yu, C., van Eck, E. R. H. & Wagemaker, M. Peeking across grain boundaries in a solid-state ionic conductor. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 1092–1097 (2019).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00610 ↗
31. Schwietert, T. K. et al. Clarifying the relationship between redox activity and electrochemical stability in solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 19, 428–435 (2020).10.1038/s41563-019-0576-0 ↗
32. Hoefling, A. et al. Mechanism for the stable performance of sulfur-copolymer cathode in lithium–sulfur battery studied by solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 30, 2915–2923 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05105 ↗
33. Rataboul, F. et al. Molecular understanding of the formation of surface zirconium hydrides upon thermal treatment under hydrogen of [(⋮SiO)Zr(CH2tBu)3] by using advanced solid-state NMR techniques. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 12541–12550 (2004).10.1021/ja038486h ↗
34. Zhu, C., Cheng, H. & Yang, Y. Electrochemical characterization of two types of PEO-based polymer electrolytes with room-temperature ionic liquids. J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, A569 (2008).10.1149/1.2931523 ↗
35. Kodama, K. et al. Structural effects of polyethers and ionic liquids in their binary mixtures on lower critical solution temperature liquid-liquid phase separation. Polym. J. 43, 242–248 (2011).10.1038/pj.2010.140 ↗
36. Cesare Marincola, F. et al. NMR investigation of imidazolium‐based ionic liquids and their aqueous mixtures. ChemPhysChem 13, 1339–1346 (2012).10.1002/cphc.201100810 ↗
37. Wang, B.-H., Xia, T., Chen, Q. & Yao, Y.-F. Probing the dynamics of Li+ ions on the crystal surface: a solid-state NMR study. Polymers 12, 391 (2020).10.3390/polym12020391 ↗
38. Zhao, Z. et al. Ionic‐association‐assisted viscoelastic nylon electrolytes enable synchronously coupled interface for solid batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2000347 (2020).10.1002/adfm.202000347 ↗
39. Ganapathy, S., van Eck, E. R., Kentgens, A. P., Mulder, F. M. & Wagemaker, M. Equilibrium lithium‐ion transport between nanocrystalline lithium‐inserted anatase TiO2 and the electrolyte. Chem. Eur. J. 17, 14811–14816 (2011).10.1002/chem.201101431 ↗
40. Kumar, M. & Sekhon, S. S. Role of plasticizer’s dielectric constant on conductivity modification of PEO–NH4F polymer electrolytes. Eur. Polym. J. 38, 1297–1304 (2002).10.1016/S0014-3057(01)00310-X ↗
41. Liu, M. et al. Novel gel polymer electrolyte for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Energy 22, 278–289 (2016).10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.008 ↗
42. Fung, B., Khitrin, A. & Ermolaev, K. An improved broadband decoupling sequence for liquid crystals and solids. J. Magn. Reson. 142, 97–101 (2000).10.1006/jmre.1999.1896 ↗