Pair correlation microscopy reveals the role of nanoparticle shape in intracellular transport and site of drug release
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoparticle size, surface charge and material composition are known to affect the uptake of nanoparticles by cells. However, whether nanoparticle shape affects transport across various barriers inside the cell remains unclear. Here we used pair correlation microscopy to show that polymeric nanoparticles with different shapes but identical surface chemistries moved across the various cellular barriers at different rates, ultimately defining the site of drug release. We measured how micelles, vesicles, rods and worms entered the cell and whether they escaped from the endosomal system and had access to the nucleus via the nuclear pore complex. Rods and worms, but not micelles and vesicles, entered the nucleus by passive diffusion. Improving nuclear access, for example with a nuclear localization signal, resulted in more doxorubicin release inside the nucleus and correlated with greater cytotoxicity. Our results therefore demonstrate that drug delivery across the major cellular barrier, the nuclear envelope, is important for doxorubicin efficiency and can be achieved with appropriately shaped nanoparticles.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Structure and Function · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Jiang, W., Kim, B. Y., Rutka, J. T. & Chan, W. C. Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 145–150 (2008).10.1038/nnano.2008.30 ↗
2. Davis, M. E., Chen, Z. G. & Shin, D. M. Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 7, 771–782 (2008).10.1038/nrd2614 ↗
3. Ahn, S., Seo, E., Kim, K. & Lee, S. J. Controlled cellular uptake and drug efficacy of nanotherapeutics. Sci. Rep. 3, 1997 (2013).10.1038/srep01997 ↗
4. Ruthardt, N., Lamb, D. C. & Brauchle, C. Single-particle tracking as a quantitative microscopy-based approach to unravel cell entry mechanisms of viruses and pharmaceutical nanoparticles. Mol. Ther. 19, 1199–1211 (2011).10.1038/mt.2011.102 ↗
5. Yarbrough, M. L., Mata, M. A., Sakthivel, R. & Fontoura, B. M. Viral subversion of nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Traffic 15, 127–140 (2014).10.1111/tra.12137 ↗
6. Dohner, K. & Sodeik, B. The role of the cytoskeleton during viral infection. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 285, 67–108 (2005).
7. Champion, J. A., Katare, Y. K. & Mitragotri, S. Making polymeric micro- and nanoparticles of complex shapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11901–11904 (2007).10.1073/pnas.0705326104 ↗
8. Champion, J. A., Katare, Y. K. & Mitragotri, S. Particle shape: a new design parameter for micro- and nanoscale drug delivery carriers. J. Control Release 121, 3–9 (2007).10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.03.022 ↗
9. Karagoz, B., Boyer, C. & Davis, T. P. Simultaneous polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) and guest molecule encapsulation. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 35, 417–421 (2014).10.1002/marc.201300730 ↗
10. Barua, S. et al. Particle shape enhances specificity of antibody-displaying nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3270–3275 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1216893110 ↗
11. Chu, Z. et al. Unambiguous observation of shape effects on cellular fate of nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 4, 4495 (2014).10.1038/srep04495 ↗
12. Chithrani, B. D. & Chan, W. C. Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano. Lett. 7, 1542–1550 (2007).10.1021/nl070363y ↗
13. Agarwal, R. et al. Mammalian cells preferentially internalize hydrogel nanodiscs over nanorods and use shape-specific uptake mechanisms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17247–17252 (2013).10.1073/pnas.1305000110 ↗
14. Xu, Z. P. et al. Subcellular compartment targeting of layered double hydroxide nanoparticles. J. Control Release 130, 86–94 (2008).10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.021 ↗
15. Hinde, E., Cardarelli, F., Digman, M. A. & Gratton, E. In vivo pair correlation analysis of EGFP intranuclear diffusion reveals DNA-dependent molecular flow. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16560–16565 (2010).10.1073/pnas.1006731107 ↗
16. Hinde, E., Cardarelli, F., Digman, M. A. & Gratton, E. Changes in chromatin compaction during the cell cycle revealed by micrometer-scale measurement of molecular flow in the nucleus. Biophys. J. 102, 691–697 (2012).10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4026 ↗
17. Hinde, E. et al. The impact of mitotic versus interphase chromatin architecture on the molecular flow of EGFP by pair correlation analysis. Biophys. J. 100, 1829–1836 (2011).10.1016/j.bpj.2011.02.024 ↗
18. Hinde, E., Kong, X., Yokomori, K. & Gratton, E. Chromatin dynamics during DNA repair revealed by pair correlation analysis of molecular flow in the nucleus. Biophys. J. 107, 55–65 (2014).10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.027 ↗
19. Digman, M. A. & Gratton, E. Imaging barriers to diffusion by pair correlation functions. Biophys. J. 97, 665–673 (2009).10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.048 ↗
20. Digman, M. A. & Gratton, E. Lessons in fluctuation correlation spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 62, 645–668 (2011).10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103424 ↗
21. dos Santos, T., Varela, J., Lynch, I., Salvati, A. & Dawson, K. A. Effects of transport inhibitors on the cellular uptake of carboxylated polystyrene nanoparticles in different cell lines. PLoS ONE 6, e24438 (2011).10.1371/journal.pone.0024438 ↗
22. Chu, Z. et al. Rapid endosomal escape of prickly nanodiamonds: implications for gene delivery. Sci. Rep. 5, 11661 (2015).10.1038/srep11661 ↗
23. Cardarelli, F. & Gratton, E. In vivo imaging of single-molecule translocation through nuclear pore complexes by pair correlation functions. PLoS ONE 5, e10475 (2010).10.1371/journal.pone.0010475 ↗
24. Scott, C. C., Vacca, F. & Gruenberg, J. Endosome maturation, transport and functions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 31, 2–10 (2014).10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.034 ↗
25. Huotari, J. & Helenius, A. Endosome maturation. EMBO J. 30, 3481–3500 (2011).10.1038/emboj.2011.286 ↗
26. Kerr, M. & Teasdale, R. D. Live imaging of endosome dynamics. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 31, 11–19 (2014).10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.027 ↗
27. Alber, F. et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450, 695–701 (2007).10.1038/nature06405 ↗
28. Adams, R. L. & Wente, S. R. Uncovering nuclear pore complexity with innovation. Cell 152, 1218–1221 (2013).10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.042 ↗
29. Ghosh, K., Kanapathipillai, M., Korin, N., McCarthy, J. R. & Ingber, D. E. Polymeric nanomaterials for islet targeting and immunotherapeutic delivery. Nano Letters 12, 203–208 (2012).10.1021/nl203334c ↗
30. Misra, R. & Sahoo, S. K. Intracellular trafficking of nuclear localization signal conjugated nanoparticles for cancer therapy. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 39, 152–163 (2010).10.1016/j.ejps.2009.11.010 ↗
31. Karagoz, B. et al. Polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) - control over the morphology of nanoparticles for drug delivery applications. Poly. Chem. 5, 350–355 (2014).10.1039/C3PY01306E ↗