Minimally invasive bioelectronic implants
Source abstract
Abstract
Bioelectronic implants enable therapeutic and diagnostic intervention of physiological systems by interfacing electronic devices with living tissues. However, conventional implant strategies often require highly invasive surgical procedures, such as thoracotomies and craniotomies, motivating the development of minimally invasive bioelectronic systems that can be precisely deployed and operated while reducing tissue trauma, recovery time and long-term complications. This Review highlights recent advancements in minimally invasive bioelectronic systems within specified anatomical sites. Originating from techniques used in stent and catheter development, current bioelectronic platforms are now designed with a dual focus on optimizing macroscale ergonomics and achieving seamless integration with the dynamic internal biological environment. Recent innovations include miniaturized neural probes, optoelectronic cardiac pacemakers and bioadhesive cardiac pacing leads. These devices use advanced materials, including shape-memory alloys, programmable polymers and dynamic actuators, to combine structural versatility with multifunctional performance. Looking ahead, emerging designs are expected to leverage retrievable implants, expandable occluders and responsive structures that enable facile deployment and superior adaptation to tissue motion, thereby reducing mechanical mismatch and enhancing long-term biocompatibility. By advancing minimally invasive delivery and patient-specific design, bioelectronics is positioned to enable more effective and personalized clinical interventions.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Soft Robotics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Park, Y., Chung, T. S., Lee, G. & Rogers, J. A. Materials chemistry of neural interface technologies and recent advances in three-dimensional systems. Chem. Rev. 122, 5277–5316 (2022).10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00639 ↗
2. Won, S. M., Song, E., Reeder, J. T. & Rogers, J. A. Emerging modalities and implantable technologies for neuromodulation. Cell 181, 115–135 (2020).10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.054 ↗
3. Zhang, Y. M. et al. Advances in bioresorbable materials and electronics. Chem. Rev. 123, 11722–11773 (2023).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00408 ↗
4. Vázquez-Guardado, A., Yang, Y. Y., Bandodkar, A. J. & Rogers, J. A. Recent advances in neurotechnologies with broad potential for neuroscience research. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1522–1536 (2020).10.1038/s41593-020-00739-8 ↗
5. Someya, T., Bao, Z. & Malliaras, G. G. The rise of plastic bioelectronics. Nature 540, 379–385 (2016).10.1038/nature21004 ↗
6. Zhang, A., Jiang, Y., Loh, K. Y., Bao, Z. & Deisseroth, K. Genetically targeted chemical assembly. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 82–94 (2024).10.1038/s44222-023-00110-z ↗
7. Zhao, C., Park, J., Root, S. E. & Bao, Z. Skin-inspired soft bioelectronic materials, devices and systems. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 671–690 (2024).10.1038/s44222-024-00194-1 ↗
8. Oldroyd, P. et al. Fabrication of thin-film electrodes and organic electrochemical transistors for neural implants. Nat. Protoc. 20, 2100–2124 (2025).10.1038/s41596-024-01116-6 ↗
9. Rivnay, J. et al. Organic electrochemical transistors. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17086 (2018).10.1038/natrevmats.2017.86 ↗
10. Lee, S. et al. Permeable bioelectronics toward biointegrated systems. Chem. Rev. 124, 6543–6591 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00823 ↗
11. Wang, C., Yokota, T. & Someya, T. Natural biopolymer-based biocompatible conductors for stretchable bioelectronics. Chem. Rev. 121, 2109–2146 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00897 ↗
12. Wang, Y. et al. Skin bioelectronics towards long-term, continuous health monitoring. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51, 3759–3793 (2022).10.1039/D2CS00207H ↗
13. Shahriari, D., Rosenfeld, D. & Anikeeva, P. Emerging frontier of peripheral nerve and organ interfaces. Neuron 108, 270–285 (2020).10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.025 ↗
14. Chen, R., Canales, A. & Anikeeva, P. Neural recording and modulation technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16093 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.93 ↗
15. Frank, J. A., Antonini, M.-J. & Anikeeva, P. Next-generation interfaces for studying neural function. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1013–1023 (2019).10.1038/s41587-019-0198-8 ↗
16. Hong, G. & Lieber, C. M. Novel electrode technologies for neural recordings. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 330–345 (2019).10.1038/s41583-019-0140-6 ↗
17. Tian, B. & Lieber, C. M. Nanowired bioelectric interfaces. Chem. Rev. 119, 9136–9152 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00795 ↗
18. Zhang, A. & Lieber, C. M. Nano-bioelectronics. Chem. Rev. 116, 215–257 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00608 ↗
19. Jiang, Y. & Tian, B. Inorganic semiconductor biointerfaces. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 473–490 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0062-3 ↗
20. Ledesma, H. A. et al. An atlas of nano-enabled neural interfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 645–657 (2019).10.1038/s41565-019-0487-x ↗
21. Shi, J., Li, P., Kim, S. & Tian, B. Implantable bioelectronic devices for photoelectrochemical and electrochemical modulation of cells and tissues. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 3, 485–504 (2025).10.1038/s44222-025-00285-7 ↗
22. Nair, V. et al. Miniature battery-free bioelectronics. Science 382, eabn4732 (2023).10.1126/science.abn4732 ↗
23. Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y. & Longaker, M. T. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453, 314–321 (2008).10.1038/nature07039 ↗
24. Marsell, R. & Einhorn, T. A. The biology of fracture healing. Injury 42, 551–555 (2011).10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031 ↗
25. Handorf, A. M., Zhou, Y., Halanski, M. A. & Li, W.-J. Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis 11, 1–15 (2015).10.1080/15476278.2015.1019687 ↗
26. Andreone, B. J., Lacoste, B. & Gu, C. Neuronal and vascular interactions. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 38, 25–46 (2015).10.1146/annurev-neuro-071714-033835 ↗
27. Rwei, A. Y. et al. A wireless, skin-interfaced biosensor for cerebral hemodynamic monitoring in pediatric care. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31674–31684 (2020).10.1073/pnas.2019786117 ↗
28. Bai, H. et al. A filamentary soft robotic probe for multimodal in utero monitoring of fetal health. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01605-3 (2026).10.1038/s41551-025-01605-3 ↗
29. Orton, E. C. Epicardial pacemaker implantation in small animals. J. Vet. Cardiol. 22, 65–71 (2019).10.1016/j.jvc.2018.11.004 ↗
30. Santilli, R. A., Giacomazzi, F., Porteiro Vázquez, D. M. & Perego, M. Indications for permanent pacing in dogs and cats. J. Vet. Cardiol. 22, 20–39 (2019).10.1016/j.jvc.2018.12.003 ↗
31. Piech, D. K. et al. A wireless millimetre-scale implantable neural stimulator with ultrasonically powered bidirectional communication. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4, 207–222 (2020).10.1038/s41551-020-0518-9 ↗
32. Zhang, Y. et al. Millimetre-scale bioresorbable optoelectronic systems for electrotherapy. Nature 640, 77–86 (2025).10.1038/s41586-025-08726-4 ↗
33. Prominski, A. et al. Porosity-based heterojunctions enable leadless optoelectronic modulation of tissues. Nat. Mater. 21, 647–655 (2022).10.1038/s41563-022-01249-7 ↗
34. Li, P. et al. Monolithic silicon for high spatiotemporal translational photostimulation. Nature 626, 990–998 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07016-9 ↗
35. Jin, S. et al. Injectable tissue prosthesis for instantaneous closed-loop rehabilitation. Nature 623, 58–65 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06628-x ↗
36. Gong, S., Lu, Y., Yin, J., Levin, A. & Cheng, W. Materials-driven soft wearable bioelectronics for connected healthcare. Chem. Rev. 124, 455–553 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00502 ↗
37. Sunwoo, S.-H. et al. Soft bioelectronics for the management of cardiovascular diseases. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2, 8–24 (2024).10.1038/s44222-023-00102-z ↗
38. Dai, Y. et al. Soft hydrogel semiconductors with augmented biointeractive functions. Science 386, 431–439 (2024).10.1126/science.adp9314 ↗
39. Shi, J. et al. Monolithic-to-focal evolving biointerfaces in tissue regeneration and bioelectronics. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 73–86 (2024).10.1038/s44286-023-00008-y ↗
40. Zhang, A. et al. Ultraflexible endovascular probes for brain recording through micrometer-scale vasculature. Science 381, 306–312 (2023).10.1126/science.adh3916 ↗
41. Hettick, M. et al. Minimally invasive implantation of scalable high-density cortical microelectrode arrays for multimodal neural decoding and stimulation. Nat. Biomed. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-025-01501-w (2025).10.1038/s41551-025-01501-w ↗
42. Li, N. et al. Immune-compatible designs of semiconducting polymers for bioelectronics with suppressed foreign-body response. Nat. Mater. 25, 124–132 (2026).10.1038/s41563-025-02213-x ↗
43. Jiang, Y. et al. Wireless, closed-loop, smart bandage with integrated sensors and stimulators for advanced wound care and accelerated healing. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 652–662 (2023).10.1038/s41587-022-01528-3 ↗
44. Lan, Y. et al. Soft biodegradable implants for long-distance and wide-angle sensing. Nature 649, 366–374 (2026).10.1038/s41586-025-09874-3 ↗
45. Jung, T. et al. A wireless subdural-contained brain–computer interface with 65,536 electrodes and 1,024 channels. Nat. Electron. 8, 1272–1288 (2025).10.1038/s41928-025-01509-9 ↗
46. Xie, C. et al. Three-dimensional macroporous nanoelectronic networks as minimally invasive brain probes. Nat. Mater. 14, 1286–1292 (2015).10.1038/nmat4427 ↗
47. Tian, B. et al. Macroporous nanowire nanoelectronic scaffolds for synthetic tissues. Nat. Mater. 11, 986–994 (2012).10.1038/nmat3404 ↗
48. Wang, Z. et al. Fibre integrated circuits by a multilayered spiral architecture. Nature 650, 102–109 (2026).10.1038/s41586-025-09974-0 ↗
49. Khatib, M. et al. High-density soft bioelectronic fibres for multimodal sensing and stimulation. Nature 645, 656–664 (2025).10.1038/s41586-025-09481-2 ↗
50. Shi, J. et al. Active biointegrated living electronics for managing inflammation. Science 384, 1023–1030 (2024).10.1126/science.adl1102 ↗
51. Wu, J. et al. Adhesive anti-fibrotic interfaces on diverse organs. Nature 630, 360–367 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07426-9 ↗
52. Wang, C. et al. Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs. Science 377, 517–523 (2022).10.1126/science.abo2542 ↗
53. Luozhong, S. et al. Poly(carboxybetaine) lipids enhance mRNA therapeutics efficacy and reduce their immunogenicity. Nat. Mater. 24, 1852–1861 (2025).10.1038/s41563-025-02240-8 ↗
54. Sin, M.-C., Chen, S.-H. & Chang, Y. Hemocompatibility of zwitterionic interfaces and membranes. Polym. J. 46, 436–443 (2014).10.1038/pj.2014.46 ↗
55. Zhang, L. et al. Zwitterionic hydrogels implanted in mice resist the foreign-body reaction. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 553–556 (2013).10.1038/nbt.2580 ↗
56. He, C. et al. Magnetically actuated dexterous tools for minimally invasive operation inside the brain. Sci. Robot. 10, eadk4249 (2025).10.1126/scirobotics.adk4249 ↗
57. Kim, Y. et al. Telerobotic neurovascular interventions with magnetic manipulation. Sci. Robot. 7, eabg9907 (2022).10.1126/scirobotics.abg9907 ↗
58. Choi, Y. S. et al. Fully implantable and bioresorbable cardiac pacemakers without leads or batteries. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 1228–1238 (2021).10.1038/s41587-021-00948-x ↗
59. Heng, W. et al. A smart mask for exhaled breath condensate harvesting and analysis. Science 385, 954–961 (2024).10.1126/science.adn6471 ↗
60. Li, W. et al. Hydrogen evolution and dynamics in hydrogel electrochemical cells for ischemia–reperfusion therapy. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2, 484–497 (2025).10.1038/s44286-025-00259-x ↗
61. Webber, M. J. & Tibbitt, M. W. Dynamic and reconfigurable materials from reversible network interactions. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 541–556 (2022).10.1038/s41578-021-00412-x ↗
62. Zhang, F. et al. Rapidly deployable and morphable 3D mesostructures with applications in multimodal biomedical devices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026414118 (2021).10.1073/pnas.2026414118 ↗
63. Liu, B. et al. 4D printed hydrogel scaffold with swelling-stiffening properties and programmable deformation for minimally invasive implantation. Nat. Commun. 15, 1857 (2024).
64. Liu, Y. et al. Electro-thermal actuation in percolative ferroelectric polymer nanocomposites. Nat. Mater. 22, 873–879 (2023).10.1038/s41563-023-01564-7 ↗
65. Xia, X. et al. Electrochemically reconfigurable architected materials. Nature 573, 205–213 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1538-z ↗
66. Jiang, Y. et al. Topological supramolecular network enabled high-conductivity, stretchable organic bioelectronics. Science 375, 1411–1417 (2022).10.1126/science.abj7564 ↗
67. Lendlein, A. & Langer, R. Biodegradable, elastic shape-memory polymers for potential biomedical applications. Science 296, 1673–1676 (2002).10.1126/science.1066102 ↗
68. Gaharwar, A. K., Singh, I. & Khademhosseini, A. Engineered biomaterials for in situ tissue regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 686–705 (2020).10.1038/s41578-020-0209-x ↗
69. Lu, Y., Aimetti, A. A., Langer, R. & Gu, Z. Bioresponsive materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16075 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.75 ↗
70. Ulijn, R. V. et al. Bioresponsive hydrogels. Mater. Today 10, 40–48 (2007).10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70049-4 ↗
71. Doshi, S. et al. Soft photonic skins with dynamic texture and colour control. Nature 649, 345–352 (2026).10.1038/s41586-025-09948-2 ↗
72. Li, M., Pal, A., Aghakhani, A., Pena-Francesch, A. & Sitti, M. Soft actuators for real-world applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 235–249 (2022).10.1038/s41578-021-00389-7 ↗
73. Zhu, D. S. et al. Minimally invasive delivery of therapeutic agents by hydrogel injection into the pericardial cavity for cardiac repair. Nat. Commun. 12, 1412 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-21682-7 ↗
74. Hong, G. et al. A method for single-neuron chronic recording from the retina in awake mice. Science 360, 1447–1451 (2018).10.1126/science.aas9160 ↗
75. Modi, P. et al. Robotic assisted dual kidney transplantation with monolateral iliac vessels. Urology 144, 234–240 (2020).10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.030 ↗
76. Wagner, D. et al. Space available for trans-sacral implants to treat fractures of the pelvis assessed by virtual implant positioning. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 139, 1385–1391 (2019).10.1007/s00402-019-03204-9 ↗
77. Liu, X. et al. Magnetic soft microfiberbots for robotic embolization. Sci. Robot. 9, eadh2479 (2024).10.1126/scirobotics.adh2479 ↗
78. Borhani, S., Hassanajili, S., Tafti, S. H. A. & Rabbani, S. Cardiovascular stents: overview, evolution, and next generation. Prog. Biomater. 7, 175–205 (2018).10.1007/s40204-018-0097-y ↗
79. Wessely, R. New drug-eluting stent concepts. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 7, 194–203 (2010).10.1038/nrcardio.2010.14 ↗
80. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee et al. Endoscopic mucosal tissue sampling. Gastrointest. Endosc. 78, 216–224 (2013).10.1016/j.gie.2013.04.167 ↗
81. ASGE Technology Committee et al. Endoscopic closure devices. Gastrointest. Endosc. 76, 244–251 (2012).10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.028 ↗
82. Steiger, C. et al. Ingestible electronics for diagnostics and therapy. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 83–98 (2019).10.1038/s41578-018-0070-3 ↗
83. Kaplan, A. G., Lipkin, M. E., Scales, C. D. Jr & Preminger, G. M. Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy. Nat. Rev. Urol. 13, 135–140 (2016).10.1038/nrurol.2015.271 ↗
84. Byrne, R. A., Joner, M., Alfonso, F. & Kastrati, A. Drug-coated balloon therapy in coronary and peripheral artery disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 11, 13–23 (2014).10.1038/nrcardio.2013.165 ↗
85. Angel, L. F., Tapson, V., Galgon, R. E., Restrepo, M. I. & Kaufman, J. Systematic review of the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 22, 1522–1530 (2011).10.1016/j.jvir.2011.08.024 ↗
86. Streiff, M. B. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood 95, 3669–3677 (2000).10.1182/blood.V95.12.3669.012k49_3669_3677 ↗
87. Kalva, S. P. & Athanasoulis, C. A. Variation in the use of inferior vena cava filters for VTE. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10, 368–370 (2013).10.1038/nrcardio.2013.65 ↗
88. Huang, Y. X., Li, Q., Liu, M., Zhao, M. & Chen, Y. Numerical simulation and in vitro experimental study of the hemodynamic performance of vena cava filters with helical forms. Sci. Rep. 14, 17903 (2024).10.1038/s41598-024-68925-3 ↗
89. Faccini, A. & Butera, G. Atrial septal defect (ASD) device trans-catheter closure: limitations. J. Thorac. Dis. 10, S2923–S2930 (2018).10.21037/jtd.2018.07.128 ↗
90. Holzer, R. & Hijazi, Z. M. Interventional approach to congenital heart disease. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 19, 84–90 (2004).10.1097/00001573-200403000-00003 ↗
91. Shi, D. et al. Biodegradable atrial septal defect occluders: a current review. Acta Biomater. 96, 68–80 (2019).10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.073 ↗
92. Lentz, R. J., Argento, A. C., Colby, T. V., Rickman, O. B. & Maldonado, F. Transbronchial cryobiopsy for diffuse parenchymal lung disease: a state-of-the-art review of procedural techniques, current evidence, and future challenges. J. Thorac. Dis. 9, 2186–2203 (2017).10.21037/jtd.2017.06.96 ↗
93. Otti, V. et al. Posterior uveal biopsy and the trans-scleral Essen forceps biopsy technique. Eye 39, 139–144 (2025).10.1038/s41433-024-03394-6 ↗
94. Kinoshita, K. et al. Efficacy of combined transbronchial lung cryobiopsy and conventional forceps biopsy for lung malignancies: a prospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 13, 1850 (2023).10.1038/s41598-023-29007-y ↗
95. Zhang, H. et al. Tissue sampling for biliary strictures using novel elbow biopsy forceps. Sci. Rep. 11, 10895 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-90197-4 ↗
96. Sweeney, D. D., Smaldone, M. C. & Docimo, S. G. Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children. Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol. 4, 26–38 (2007).10.1038/ncpuro0677 ↗
97. Fichtinger, R. S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: the ORANGE II PLUS multicenter randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 42, 1799–1809 (2024).10.1200/JCO.23.01019 ↗
98. Tholey, G. & Desai, J. P. A compact and modular laparoscopic grasper with tridirectional force measurement capability. J. Med. Devices 2, 031001 (2008).10.1115/1.2952817 ↗
99. Saunders, B. P. & Tsiamoulos, Z. P. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colonic polyps. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13, 486–496 (2016).10.1038/nrgastro.2016.96 ↗
100. Draganov, P. V., Wang, A. Y., Othman, M. O. & Fukami, N. AGA Institute clinical practice update: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the United States. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 16–25 (2019).10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.041 ↗