High-throughput in situ sizing and quantum yield determination of individual perovskite nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Colloidal nanocrystals exhibit high tunability and low-cost solution processing attractive for next-generation electronic applications. However, colloidal nanocrystals are inherently heterogeneous and the impact of this heterogeneity on device performance has been largely disregarded, since analytical techniques cannot assess the functionality of individual nanocrystals on a large scale. Here we introduce a rapid, in situ method to determine the size and quantum yield of thousands of individual nanocrystals within minutes, based on interferometric scattering microscopy and photoluminescence imaging. Monitoring the life cycle of CsPbBr 3 perovskite nanocubes, our approach uncovers phenomena masked by bulk averaging. We find a substantial performance spread across the nanocubes and an anticorrelation of quantum yield and size. During a subsequent solution-phase defect engineering process, we uncover size-dependent enhancement kinetics, which initially favour the enhancement of smaller nanocubes. Finally, we image light-induced degradation by tracking the size reduction and photobleaching of single sub-20-nm nanocrystals, finding material loss decreases at higher laser powers due to the trapping of photoinduced electrons by the formed metallic lead.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Liz-Marzán, L. M. et al. Celebrating a Nobel prize to the ‘discovery of quantum dots, an essential milestone in nanoscience.’ ACS Nano 17, 19474–19475 (2023).10.1021/acsnano.3c09671 ↗
2. Kagan, C. R., Lifshitz, E., Sargent, E. H. & Talapin, D. V. Building devices from colloidal quantum dots. Science 353, aac5523 (2016).10.1126/science.aac5523 ↗
3. Gao, Y. et al. Microsecond-response perovskite light-emitting diodes for active-matrix displays. Nat. Electron. 7, 487–496 (2024).10.1038/s41928-024-01181-5 ↗
4. Hao, M. et al. Ligand-assisted cation-exchange engineering for high-efficiency colloidal Cs1−xFAxPbI3 quantum dot solar cells with reduced phase segregation. Nat. Energy 5, 79–88 (2020).10.1038/s41560-019-0535-7 ↗
5. Kaplan, A. E. K. et al. Hong–Ou–Mandel interference in colloidal CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals. Nat. Photon. 17, 775–780 (2023).10.1038/s41566-023-01225-w ↗
6. Zhou, J., Chizhik, A. I., Chu, S. & Jin, D. Single-particle spectroscopy for functional nanomaterials. Nature 579, 41–50 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2048-8 ↗
7. Liu, M. et al. Colloidal quantum dot electronics. Nat. Electron. 4, 548–558 (2021).10.1038/s41928-021-00632-7 ↗
8. Galland, C. et al. Two types of luminescence blinking revealed by spectroelectrochemistry of single quantum dots. Nature 479, 203–207 (2011).10.1038/nature10569 ↗
9. Gerhard, M. et al. Microscopic insight into non-radiative decay in perovskite semiconductors from temperature-dependent luminescence blinking. Nat. Commun. 10, 1698 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-09640-w ↗
10. Darmawan, Y. A., Yamauchi, M. & Masuo, S. In situ observation of a photodegradation-induced blueshift in perovskite nanocrystals using single-particle spectroscopy combined with atomic force microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 18770–18776 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04923 ↗
11. Hinsch, A. et al. Fluorescence quantum yield and single-particle emission of CdSe dot/CdS rod nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 24338–24346 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07957 ↗
12. Orfield, N. J. et al. Quantum yield heterogeneity among single nonblinking quantum dots revealed by atomic structure-quantum optics correlation. ACS Nano 10, 1960–1968 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.5b05876 ↗
13. Griffiths, J. T. et al. Effect of size on the luminescent efficiency of perovskite nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 6998–7004 (2019).10.1021/acsaem.8b02132 ↗
14. Shamsi, J., Urban, A. S., Imran, M., Trizio, L. D. & Manna, L. Metal halide perovskite nanocrystals: synthesis, post-synthesis modifications, and their optical properties. Chem. Rev. 119, 3296–3348 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00644 ↗
15. Lindfors, K., Kalkbrenner, T., Stoller, P. & Sandoghdar, V. Detection and spectroscopy of gold nanoparticles using supercontinuum white light confocal microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 037401 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.037401 ↗
16. Ginsberg, N. S., Hsieh, C.-L., Kukura, P., Piliarik, M. & Sandoghdar, V. Interferometric scattering microscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 5, 23 (2025).10.1038/s43586-025-00391-1 ↗
17. Gruber, C. G., Frey, L., Guntermann, R., Medina, D. D. & Cortés, E. Early stages of covalent organic framework formation imaged in operando. Nature 630, 872–877 (2024).10.1038/s41586-024-07483-0 ↗
18. Delor, M., Weaver, H. L., Yu, Q. & Ginsberg, N. S. Imaging material functionality through three-dimensional nanoscale tracking of energy flow. Nat. Mater. 19, 56 (2020).10.1038/s41563-019-0498-x ↗
19. Merryweather, A. J., Schnedermann, C., Jacquet, Q., Grey, C. P. & Rao, A. Operando optical tracking of single-particle ion dynamics in batteries. Nature 594, 522–528 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03584-2 ↗
20. Taylor, R. W. et al. Interferometric scattering microscopy reveals microsecond nanoscopic protein motion on a live cell membrane. Nat. Photon. 13, 480 (2019).10.1038/s41566-019-0414-6 ↗
21. Ding, L. et al. Lanthanide ion resonance-driven Rayleigh scattering of nanoparticles for dual-modality interferometric scattering microscopy. Adv. Sci. 9, e2203354 (2022).10.1002/advs.202203354 ↗
22. Carpenter, W. B., Lavania, A. A., Squires, A. H. & Moerner, W. E. Label-free anti-Brownian trapping of single nanoparticles in solution. J. Phys. Chem. C 128, 20275–20286 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c05878 ↗
23. Kukura, P., Celebrano, M., Renn, A. & Sandoghdar, V. Imaging a single quantum dot when it is dark. Nano Lett 9, 926–929 (2009).10.1021/nl801735y ↗
24. Young, G. et al. Quantitative mass imaging of single biological macromolecules. Science 360, 423 (2018).10.1126/science.aar5839 ↗
25. Piliarik, M. & Sandoghdar, V. Direct optical sensing of single unlabelled proteins and super-resolution imaging of their binding sites. Nat. Commun. 5, 4495 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5495 ↗
26. Tong, Y. et al. Highly luminescent cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals with tunable composition and thickness by ultrasonication. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 13887–13892 (2016).10.1002/anie.201605909 ↗
27. Fiuza-Maneiro, N. et al. Ligand chemistry of inorganic lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. ACS Energy Lett. 8, 1152–1191 (2023).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02363 ↗
28. Maier, S. A. Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications (Springer, 2007).10.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
29. Dastjerdi, H. M., Mahmoodabadi, R. G., Bär, M., Sandoghdar, V. & Köstler, H. PiSCAT: a Python package for interferometric scattering microscopy. J. Open Source Softw. 7, 4024 (2022).10.21105/joss.04024 ↗
30. Dastjerdi, H. M. et al. Optimized analysis for sensitive detection and analysis of single proteins via interferometric scattering microscopy. J. Phys. D 55, 054002 (2022).10.1088/1361-6463/ac2f68 ↗
31. Palstra, I. M. et al. Intermittency of CsPbBr3 perovskite quantum dots analyzed by an unbiased statistical analysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 12061–12072 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01671 ↗
32. Palstra, I. M. & Koenderink, A. F. A Python toolbox for unbiased statistical analysis of fluorescence intermittency of multilevel emitters. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 12050–12060 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01670 ↗
33. Chouhan, L. et al. Real-time blinking suppression of perovskite quantum dots by halide vacancy filling. ACS Nano 15, 2831–2838 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.0c08802 ↗
34. Gallagher, S. et al. Ligand equilibrium influences photoluminescence blinking in CsPbBr3: a change point analysis of widefield imaging data. ACS Nano 18, 19208–19219 (2024).10.1021/acsnano.4c04968 ↗
35. Bohn, B. J. et al. Boosting tunable blue luminescence of halide perovskite nanoplatelets through postsynthetic surface trap repair. Nano Lett. 18, 5231–5238 (2018).10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02190 ↗
36. Fanizza, E. et al. Post-synthesis phase and shape evolution of CsPbBr3 colloidal nanocrystals: the role of ligands. Nano Res. 12, 1155–1166 (2019).10.1007/s12274-019-2371-2 ↗
37. Omagari, S., Hirao, E. & Vacha, M. Luminescence variability of CsPbBr3 nanocrystals in single-particle emitter applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 8, 16603–16613 (2025).10.1021/acsanm.5c03524 ↗
38. Takagi, T., Omagari, S. & Vacha, M. Suppression of blinking in single CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals through surface ligand exchange. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 19004–19012 (2023).10.1039/D3CP01844J ↗
39. Wanchun, X., Shengzhong, L. & Wolfgang, T. A review on the stability of inorganic metal halide perovskites: challenges and opportunities for stable solar cells. Energ. Environ. Sci. 14, 2090 (2021).10.1039/D1EE00157D ↗
40. Thiesbrummel, J. et al. Ion-induced field screening as a dominant factor in perovskite solar cell operational stability. Nat. Energy 9, 664–676 (2024).10.1038/s41560-024-01487-w ↗
41. Hwang, J. & Moerner, W. E. Interferometry of a single nanoparticle using the Gouy phase of a focused laser beam. Opt. Commun. 280, 487 (2007).10.1016/j.optcom.2007.08.032 ↗
42. Yuan, G. et al. The degradation and blinking of single CsPbI3 perovskite quantum dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 13407–13415 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11168 ↗
43. de Mello, J. C., Wittmann, H. F. & Friend, R. H. An improved experimental determination of external photoluminescence quantum efficiency. Adv. Mater. 9, 230–232 (1997).10.1002/adma.19970090308 ↗
44. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 676–682 (2019).10.1038/nmeth.2019 ↗
45. Edelstein, A. D., Tsuchida, M. A., Amodaj, N., Pinkard, H., Vale, R. D. & Stuurman, N. Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. J. Biol. Methods 1, e11 (2014).10.14440/jbm.2014.36 ↗
46. Photons, Electrons, and Gray Levels (2020); https://www.photometrics.com/learn/white-papers/photons-electron-and-gray-levels
47. Whitcher, T. J. et al. Dual phases of crystalline and electronic structures in the nanocrystalline perovskite CsPbBr3. NPG Asia Mater. 11, 70 (2019).10.1038/s41427-019-0170-6 ↗
48. Polyanskiy, M. N. Refractiveindex.info database of optical constants. Sci. Data 11, 94 (2024).10.1038/s41597-023-02898-2 ↗
49. Matsuzaki, K., Liu, H.-W., Gotzinger, S. & Sandoghdar, V. On quantum efficiency measurements and plasmonic antennas. ACS Photonics 8, 1508–1521 (2021).10.1021/acsphotonics.1c00169 ↗
50. Ensign, D. L. & Pande, V. S. Bayesian detection of intensity changes in single molecule and molecular dynamics trajectories. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 280–292 (2010).10.1021/jp906786b ↗
51. Gruber, C. G. Highthroughput in situ sizing and quantum yield determination of individual perovskite nanocrystals. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19552116 (2026).10.5281/zenodo.19552116 ↗