Aluminium surface work hardening enables multi-scale 3D lithography
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi-scale structures are ubiquitous in biological systems. However, manufacturing man-made structures with controllable features spanning multiple length scales, particularly down to nanoscale features, is very challenging, which seriously impacts their collective properties. Here we introduce an aluminium-based three-dimensional lithography that combines sequential nano-micro-macro-imprinting and anodization of multi-scale anodic aluminium oxide templates to manufacture well-defined multi-scale structures, using various materials. The high-fidelity nano-patterns and micro-patterns were facilitated by the surface work hardening phenomenon, where the nano-patterns can be further fine-tailored by anodization to have high-aspect-ratio and tunable nano-holes. Based on the aluminium-based three-dimensional lithography, multi-scale materials across length scales of at least 107 orders of magnitude were precisely fabricated, including carbon, semiconductors and metals. We integrated pressure sensors and biosensors with superior and customizable performances by tailoring the multi-scale carbon networks on different length scales from nanofibres and micropyramids to macrodome arrays. This work provides a versatile technique for prototyping on-demand multi-scale structures and materials to explore desirable mechanical and physical properties.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Feng, L. et al. Super-hydrophobic surfaces: from natural to artificial. Adv. Mater. 14, 1857–1860 (2002).10.1002/adma.200290020 ↗
2. Liu, M., Wang, S. & Jiang, L. Nature-inspired superwettability systems. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17036 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2017.36 ↗
3. Mandal, J. et al. Hierarchically porous polymer coatings for highly efficient passive daytime radiative cooling. Science 362, 315–319 (2018).10.1126/science.aat9513 ↗
4. Pan, L. et al. An ultra-sensitive resistive pressure sensor based on hollow-sphere microstructure induced elasticity in conducting polymer film. Nat. Commun. 5, 3002 (2014).10.1038/ncomms4002 ↗
5. Wang, D. et al. Design of robust superhydrophobic surfaces. Nature 582, 55–59 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2331-8 ↗
6. Baban, N. S., Orozaliev, A., Kirchhof, S., Stubbs, C. J. & Song, Y. A. Biomimetic fracture model of lizard tail autotomy. Science 375, 770–774 (2022).10.1126/science.abh1614 ↗
7. Kim, J. M. et al. Conformation-modulated three-dimensional electrocatalysts for high-performance fuel cell electrodes. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9083 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abe9083 ↗
8. Architectures down to nano. Nat. Mater. 20, 1451 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01147-4 ↗
9. Begley, M. R., Gianola, D. S. & Ray, T. R. Bridging functional nanocomposites to robust macroscale devices. Science 364, eaav4299 (2019).10.1126/science.aav4299 ↗
10. Bae, W. G. et al. 25th anniversary article: Scalable multiscale patterned structures inspired by nature: the role of hierarchy. Adv. Mater. 26, 675–700 (2014).10.1002/adma.201303412 ↗
11. Ahn, J. et al. Micro-/nanohierarchical structures physically engineered on surfaces: analysis and perspective. Adv. Mater. 36, 2300871 (2023).10.1002/adma.202300871 ↗
12. Gates, B. D. et al. New approaches to nanofabrication: molding, printing, and other techniques. Chem. Rev. 105, 1171–1196 (2005).10.1021/cr030076o ↗
13. Xia, Y., Rogers, J. A., Paul, K. E. & Whitesides, G. M. Unconventional methods for fabricating and patterning nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 99, 1823–1848 (1999).10.1021/cr980002q ↗
14. Hua, F. et al. Polymer imprint lithography with molecular-scale resolution. Nano Lett. 4, 2467–2471 (2004).10.1021/nl048355u ↗
15. Carlson, A., Bowen, A. M., Huang, Y., Nuzzo, R. G. & Rogers, J. A. Transfer printing techniques for materials assembly and micro/nanodevice fabrication. Adv. Mater. 24, 5284–5318 (2012).10.1002/adma.201201386 ↗
16. Gao, H. et al. Large-scale nanoshaping of ultrasmooth 3D crystalline metallic structures. Science 346, 1352–1356 (2014).10.1126/science.1260139 ↗
17. Raut, H. K. et al. Multiscale ommatidial arrays with broadband and omnidirectional antireflection and antifogging properties by sacrificial layer mediated nanoimprinting. ACS Nano 9, 1305–1314 (2015).10.1021/nn5051272 ↗
18. Cho, H. et al. Multiplex lithography for multilevel multiscale architectures and its application to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Nat. Commun. 6, 8484 (2015).10.1038/ncomms9484 ↗
19. Wang, C., Shao, J., Lai, D., Tian, H. & Li, X. Suspended-template electric-assisted nanoimprinting for hierarchical micro-nanostructures on a fragile substrate. ACS Nano 13, 10333–10342 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b04031 ↗
20. Li, Q. et al. Mechanical nanolattices printed using nanocluster-based photoresists. Science 378, 768–773 (2022).10.1126/science.abo6997 ↗
21. Jung, W. et al. Three-dimensional nanoprinting via charged aerosol jets. Nature 592, 54–59 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03353-1 ↗
22. Ye, J. et al. Ultra-low-density digitally architected carbon with a strutted tube-in-tube structure. Nat. Mater. 20, 1498–1505 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01125-w ↗
23. Liu, S.-F. et al. 3D nanoprinting of semiconductor quantum dots by photoexcitation-induced chemical bonding. Science 377, 1112–1116 (2022).10.1126/science.abo5345 ↗
24. Wen, X. et al. 3D-printed silica with nanoscale resolution. Nat. Mater. 20, 1506–1511 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01111-2 ↗
25. Geng, Q., Wang, D., Chen, P. & Chen, S.-C. Ultrafast multi-focus 3-D nano-fabrication based on two-photon polymerization. Nat. Commun. 10, 2179 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-10249-2 ↗
26. Santos, P. J., Gabrys, P. A., Zornberg, L. Z., Lee, M. S. & Macfarlane, R. J. Macroscopic materials assembled from nanoparticle superlattices. Nature 591, 586–591 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03355-z ↗
27. Jiang, Z. & Pikul, J. H. Centimetre-scale crack-free self-assembly for ultra-high tensile strength metallic nanolattices. Nat. Mater. 20, 1512–1518 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01039-7 ↗
28. Grzelczak, M., Liz-Marzán, L. M. & Klajn, R. Stimuli-responsive self-assembly of nanoparticles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 1342–1361 (2019).10.1039/C8CS00787J ↗
29. Bobrin, V. A. et al. Nano- to macro-scale control of 3D printed materials via polymerization induced microphase separation. Nat. Commun. 13, 3577 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-31095-9 ↗
30. Das Gupta, T. et al. Self-assembly of nanostructured glass metasurfaces via templated fluid instabilities. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 320–327 (2019).10.1038/s41565-019-0362-9 ↗
31. Yu, R. et al. Strong light absorption of self-organized 3-D nanospike arrays for photovoltaic applications. ACS Nano 5, 9291–9298 (2011).10.1021/nn203844z ↗
32. He, M. et al. Hierarchical porous surface for efficiently controlling microdroplets’ self‐removal. Adv. Mater. 25, 2291–2295 (2013).10.1002/adma.201204660 ↗
33. Miao, W. et al. Microchannel and nanofiber array morphology enhanced rapid superspreading on animals’ corneas. Adv. Mater. 33, 2007152 (2021).10.1002/adma.202007152 ↗
34. Hu, Y. et al. A hierarchical anodic aluminum oxide template. Nano Lett. 21, 250–257 (2021).10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03585 ↗
35. Gu, L. et al. A biomimetic eye with a hemispherical perovskite nanowire array retina. Nature 581, 278–282 (2020).10.1038/s41586-020-2285-x ↗
36. Lee, W. & Park, S. J. Porous anodic aluminum oxide: anodization and templated synthesis of functional nanostructures. Chem. Rev. 11334, 7487–7556 (2014).10.1021/cr500002z ↗
37. Xu, R., Zeng, Z. & Lei, Y. Well-defined nanostructuring with designable anodic aluminum oxide template. Nat. Commun. 13, 2435 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-30137-6 ↗
38. Fan, Z. et al. Three-dimensional nanopillar-array photovoltaics on low-cost and flexible substrates. Nat. Mater. 8, 648–653 (2009).10.1038/nmat2493 ↗
39. Wen, L., Xu, R., Mi, Y. & Lei, Y. Multiple nanostructures based on anodized aluminium oxide templates. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 244–250 (2017).10.1038/nnano.2016.257 ↗
40. Leung, S.-F. et al. Roll-to-roll fabrication of large scale and regular arrays of three-dimensional nanospikes for high efficiency and flexible photovoltaics. Sci. Rep. 4, 4243 (2014).10.1038/srep04243 ↗
41. Leung, S.-F. et al. Efficient photon capturing with ordered three-dimensional nanowell arrays. Nano Lett. 12, 3682–3689 (2012).10.1021/nl3014567 ↗
42. Bulatov, V. V. et al. Dislocation multi-junctions and strain hardening. Nature 440, 1174–1178 (2006).10.1038/nature04658 ↗
43. Yamakov, V., Wolf, D., Phillpot, S. R., Mukherjee, A. K. & Gleiter, H. Dislocation processes in the deformation of nanocrystalline aluminium by molecular-dynamics simulation. Nat. Mater. 1, 45–49 (2002).10.1038/nmat700 ↗
44. Kohagura, K. et al. An association between uric acid levels and renal arteriolopathy in chronic kidney disease: a biopsy-based study. Hypertens. Res. 36, 43–49 (2012).10.1038/hr.2012.135 ↗
45. Sim, K. et al. Three-dimensional curvy electronics created using conformal additive stamp printing. Nat. Electron. 2, 471–479 (2019).10.1038/s41928-019-0304-4 ↗
46. Xu, S. et al. Assembly of micro/nanomaterials into complex, three-dimensional architectures by compressive buckling. Science 347, 154–159 (2015).10.1126/science.1260960 ↗
47. Bae, G. Y. et al. Linearly and highly pressure-sensitive electronic skin based on a bioinspired hierarchical structural array. Adv. Mater. 28, 5300–5306 (2016).10.1002/adma.201600408 ↗
48. Shi, J. et al. Multiscale hierarchical design of a flexible piezoresistive pressure sensor with high sensitivity and wide linearity range. Small 14, e1800819 (2018).10.1002/smll.201800819 ↗
49. Jian, M. et al. Flexible and highly sensitive pressure sensors based on bionic hierarchical structures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27, 1606066 (2017).10.1002/adfm.201606066 ↗
50. Pang, Y. et al. Epidermis microstructure inspired graphene pressure sensor with random distributed spinosum for high sensitivity and large linearity. ACS Nano 12, 2346–2354 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.7b07613 ↗
51. Pyo, S., Lee, J., Kim, W., Jo, E. & Kim, J. Multi‐layered, hierarchical fabric‐based tactile sensors with high sensitivity and linearity in ultrawide pressure range. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1902484 (2019).10.1002/adfm.201902484 ↗
52. Huang, C. Y. et al. Flexible pressure sensor with an excellent linear response in a broad detection range for human motion monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 3476–3485 (2023).10.1021/acsami.2c19465 ↗
53. Roy, E. et al. Microlens array fabrication by enhanced thermal reflow process: towards efficient collection of fluorescence light from microarrays. Microelectron. Eng. 86, 2255–2261 (2009).10.1016/j.mee.2009.04.001 ↗
54. Xu, R. et al. Programmable multiple plasmonic resonances of nanoparticle superlattice for enhancing photoelectrochemical activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2005170 (2020).10.1002/adfm.202005170 ↗
55. Xue, Y. et al. Rationally designed graphene-nanotube 3D architectures with a seamless nodal junction for efficient energy conversion and storage. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400198 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1400198 ↗
56. Baidoo, J. K. et al. Sequential growth of vertical transition-metal dichalcogenide heterostructures on rollable aluminum foil. ACS Nano 16, 8851–8859 (2022).10.1021/acsnano.1c10233 ↗
57. Jacobsen, K. W., Norskov, J. K. & Puska, M. J. Interatomic interactions in the effective-medium theory. Phys. Rev. B 35, 7423–7442 (1987).10.1103/PhysRevB.35.7423 ↗
58. Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I. & Daw, M. S. Embedded-atom-method functions for the fcc metals Cu, Ag, Au, Ni, Pd, Pt, and their alloys. Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983–7991 (1986).10.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
59. Kanhaiya, K., Kim, S., Im, W. & Heinz, H. Accurate simulation of surfaces and interfaces of ten FCC metals and steel using Lennard–Jones potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 17 (2021).10.1038/s41524-020-00478-1 ↗
60. Heinz, H., Vaia, R. A., Farmer, B. L. & Naik, R. R. Accurate simulation of surfaces and interfaces of face-centered cubic metals using 12−6 and 9−6 Lennard-Jones potentials. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 17281–17290 (2008).10.1021/jp801931d ↗
61. Tsai, D. H. The virial theorem and stress calculation in molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 70, 1375–1382 (1979).10.1063/1.437577 ↗
62. Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
63. Honeycutt, J. D. & Andersen, H. C. Molecular dynamics study of melting and freezing of small Lennard-Jones clusters. J. Phys. Chem. 91, 4950–4963 (1987).10.1021/j100303a014 ↗
64. Faken, D. & Jónsson, H. Systematic analysis of local atomic structure combined with 3D computer graphics. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2, 279–286 (1994).10.1016/0927-0256(94)90109-0 ↗
65. Stukowski A., Bulatov V. V. & Arsenlis A. Automated identification and indexing of dislocations in crystal interfaces. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 20, 085007 (2012).10.1088/0965-0393/20/8/085007 ↗
66. Varillas, J., Očenášek, J., Torner, J. & Alcalá, J. Understanding imprint formation, plastic instabilities and hardness evolutions in FCC, BCC and HCP metal surfaces. Acta Mater. 217, 117122 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117122 ↗