Ferroelastic-switching-driven large shear strain and piezoelectricity in a hybrid ferroelectric
Source abstract
Abstract
Materials that can produce large controllable strains are widely used in shape memory devices, actuators and sensors1,2, and great efforts have been made to improve the strain output3-6. Among them, ferroelastic transitions underpin giant reversible strains in electrically driven ferroelectrics or piezoelectrics and thermally or magnetically driven shape memory alloys7,8. However, large-strain ferroelastic switching in conventional ferroelectrics is very challenging, while magnetic and thermal controls are not desirable for practical applications. Here we demonstrate a large shear strain of up to 21.5% in a hybrid ferroelectric, C6H5N(CH3)3CdCl3, which is two orders of magnitude greater than that in conventional ferroelectric polymers and oxides. It is achieved by inorganic bond switching and facilitated by structural confinement of the large organic moieties, which prevents undesired 180° polarization switching. Furthermore, Br substitution can soften the bonds, allowing a sizable shear piezoelectric coefficient (d35 ≈ 4,830 pm V-1) at the Br-rich end of the solid solution, C6H5N(CH3)3CdBr3xCl3(1-x). The electromechanical properties of these compounds suggest their potential in lightweight and high-energy-density devices, and the strategy described here could inspire the development of next-generation piezoelectrics and electroactive materials based on hybrid ferroelectrics.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Trolier-McKinstry, S. & Muralt, P. Thin film piezoelectrics for MEMS. J. Electroceram. 12, 7–17 (2004).10.1023/B:JECR.0000033998.72845.51 ↗
2. Mohd Jani, J., Leary, M., Subic, A. & Gibson, M. A. A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater. Des. 56, 1078–1113 (2014).10.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.084 ↗
3. Park, S.-E. & Shrout, T. R. Ultrahigh strain and piezoelectric behavior in relaxor based ferroelectric single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1804–1811 (1997).10.1063/1.365983 ↗
4. Pelrine, R., Kornbluh, R., Pei, Q. & Joseph, J. High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100%. Science 287, 836–839 (2000).10.1126/science.287.5454.836 ↗
5. Ren, X. Large electric-field-induced strain in ferroelectric crystals by point-defect-mediated reversible domain switching. Nat. Mater. 3, 91–94 (2004).10.1038/nmat1051 ↗
6. Lai, A., Du, Z., Gan, C. L. & Schuh, C. A. Shape memory and superelastic ceramics at small scales. Science 341, 1505–1508 (2013).10.1126/science.1239745 ↗
7. Chopra, H. D., Ji, C. & Kokorin, V. V. Magnetic-field-induced twin boundary motion in magnetic shape-memory alloys. Phys. Rev. B 61, R14913–R14915 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.61.R14913 ↗
8. Nagarajan, V. et al. Dynamics of ferroelastic domains in ferroelectric thin films. Nat. Mater. 2, 43–47 (2003).10.1038/nmat800 ↗
9. Otsuka, K. & Ren, X. Physical metallurgy of Ti–Ni-based shape memory alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 50, 511–678 (2005).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
10. Chmielus, M., Zhang, X. X., Witherspoon, C., Dunand, D. C. & Müllner, P. Giant magnetic-field-induced strains in polycrystalline Ni–Mn–Ga foams. Nat. Mater. 8, 863–866 (2009).10.1038/nmat2527 ↗
11. Hao, J., Li, W., Zhai, J. & Chen, H. Progress in high-strain perovskite piezoelectric ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 135, 1–57 (2019).10.1016/j.mser.2018.08.001 ↗
12. Meng, H. & Hu, J. A brief review of stimulus-active polymers responsive to thermal, light, magnetic, electric, and water/solvent stimuli. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 21, 859–885 (2010).10.1177/1045389X10369718 ↗
13. Huber, J. E., Fleck, N. A. & Ashby, M. F. The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 453, 2185–2205 (1997).10.1098/rspa.1997.0117 ↗
14. Mitzi, D. B. Templating and structural engineering in organic–inorganic perovskites. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1–12 (2001).10.1039/b007070j ↗
15. Li, W. et al. Chemically diverse and multifunctional hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16099 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.99 ↗
16. Chen, B. et al. Large electrostrictive response in lead halide perovskites. Nat. Mater. 17, 1020–1026 (2018).10.1038/s41563-018-0170-x ↗
17. Shu, L. et al. Photoflexoelectric effect in halide perovskites. Nat. Mater. 19, 605–609 (2020).10.1038/s41563-020-0659-y ↗
18. Liao, W.-Q. et al. A molecular perovskite solid solution with piezoelectricity stronger than lead zirconate titanate. Science 363, 1206–1210 (2019).10.1126/science.aav3057 ↗
19. You, Y.-M. et al. An organic-inorganic perovskite ferroelectric with large piezoelectric response. Science 357, 306–309 (2017).10.1126/science.aai8535 ↗
20. Tang, Y.-Y. et al. Multiaxial molecular ferroelectric thin films bring light to practical applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 8051–8059 (2018).10.1021/jacs.8b04600 ↗
21. Aizu, K. Possible species of ‘ferroelastic’ crystals and of simultaneously ferroelectric and ferroelastic crystals. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 27, 387–396 (1969).10.1143/JPSJ.27.387 ↗
22. Malakooti, M. H. & Sodano, H. A. Direct measurement of piezoelectric shear coefficient. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 214106 (2013).10.1063/1.4809636 ↗
23. Brochu, P. & Pei, Q. in Electroactivity in Polymeric Materials (ed. Rasmussen, L.) 1–56 (Springer, 2012).10.1007/978-1-4614-0878-9_1 ↗
24. Altammar, H., Dhingra, A. & Salowitz, N. Ultrasonic sensing and actuation in laminate structures using bondline-embedded d35 piezoelectric sensors. Sensors 18, 3885 (2018).10.3390/s18113885 ↗
25. Viehland, D. et al. Effect of uniaxial stress on the large-signal electromechanical properties of electrostrictive and piezoelectric lead magnesium niobate lead titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1969–1972 (2004).10.1063/1.1641960 ↗
26. Guerin, S. et al. Control of piezoelectricity in amino acids by supramolecular packing. Nat. Mater. 17, 180–186 (2018).10.1038/nmat5045 ↗
27. Tressler, J. F., Alkoy, S. & Newnham, R. E. Piezoelectric sensors and sensor materials. J. Electroceram. 2, 257–272 (1998).10.1023/A:1009926623551 ↗
28. Li, F., Zhang, S., Xu, Z., Wei, X. & Shrout, T. R. Critical property in relaxor-PbTiO3 single crystals – shear piezoelectric response. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 2118–2128 (2011).10.1002/adfm.201002711 ↗
29. Damjanovic, D. Stress and frequency dependence of the direct piezoelectric effect in ferroelectric ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1788–1797 (1997).10.1063/1.365981 ↗
30. Bellaiche, L. & Vanderbilt, D. Intrinsic piezoelectric response in perovskite alloys: PMN-PT versus PZT. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1347–1350 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1347 ↗
31. Damjanovic, D. & Demartin, M. The Rayleigh law in piezoelectric ceramics. J. Phys. D 29, 2057–2060 (1996).10.1088/0022-3727/29/7/046 ↗
32. Li, F. et al. Ultrahigh piezoelectricity in ferroelectric ceramics by design. Nat. Mater. 17, 349–354 (2018).10.1038/s41563-018-0034-4 ↗
33. Li, F. et al. Giant piezoelectricity of Sm-doped Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 single crystals. Science 364, 264–268 (2019).10.1126/science.aaw2781 ↗
34. Rodriguez, B. J., Callahan, C., Kalinin, S. V. & Proksch, R. Dual-frequency resonance-tracking atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 18, 475504 (2007).10.1088/0957-4484/18/47/475504 ↗
35. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
36. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
37. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
38. Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).10.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
39. Resta, R. Macroscopic polarization in crystalline dielectrics: the geometric phase approach. Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 899–915 (1994).10.1103/RevModPhys.66.899 ↗
40. King-Smith, R. D. & Vanderbilt, D. Theory of polarization of crystalline solids. Phys. Rev. B 47, 1651–1654 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.1651 ↗
41. Sheppard, D., Xiao, P., Chemelewski, W., Johnson, D. D. & Henkelman, G. A generalized solid-state nudged elastic band method. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 136, 074103 (2012).
42. Dronskowski, R. & Bloechl, P. E. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8617–8624 (1993).10.1021/j100135a014 ↗
43. Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 5461–5466 (2011).10.1021/jp202489s ↗
44. Maintz, S., Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. LOBSTER: A tool to extract chemical bonding from plane-wave based DFT. J. Comput. Chem. 37, 1030–1035 (2016).10.1002/jcc.24300 ↗