Cooperative mechanisms of fast-ion conduction in gallium-based oxides with tetrahedral moieties
Source abstract
Abstract
The need for greater energy efficiency has garnered increasing support for the use of fuel-cell technology, a prime example being the solid-oxide fuel cell. A crucial requirement for such devices is a good ionic (O(2-) or H+) conductor as the electrolyte. Traditionally, fluorite- and perovskite-type oxides have been targeted, although there is growing interest in alternative structure types for intermediate-temperature (400-700 ( composite function)C) solid-oxide fuel cells. In particular, structures containing tetrahedral moieties, such as La(1-x)Ca(x)MO(4-x/2)(M=Ta,Nb,P) (refs 7,8), La(1-x)Ba(1+x)GaO(4-x/2) (refs 9,10) and La(9.33+x)Si(6)O(26+3x/2) (ref. 11), have been attracting considerable attention recently. However, an atomic-scale understanding of the conduction mechanisms in these systems is still lacking; such mechanistic detail is important for developing strategies for optimizing the conductivity, as well as identifying next-generation materials. In this context, we report a combined experimental and computational modelling study of the La(1-x)Ba(1+x)GaO(4-x/2) system, which exhibits both proton and oxide-ion conduction. Here we show that oxide-ion conduction proceeds via a cooperative 'cog-wheel'-type process involving the breaking and re-forming of Ga(2)O(7) units, whereas the rate-limiting step for proton conduction is intra-tetrahedron proton transfer. Both mechanisms are unusual for ceramic oxide materials, and similar cooperative processes may be important in related systems containing tetrahedral moieties.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Steele, B. C. H. & Heinzel, A. Materials for fuel-cell technologies. Nature 414, 345–352 (2001).10.1038/35104620 ↗
2. Atkinson, A. et al. Advanced anodes for high-temperature fuel cells. Nature Mater. 3, 17–27 (2004).10.1038/nmat1040 ↗
3. Goodenough, J. B. Oxide-ion electrolytes. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 33, 9 (2003).10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091651 ↗
4. Norby, T. & Larring, Y. Concentration and transport of protons in oxides. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2, 593–599 (1997).10.1016/S1359-0286(97)80051-4 ↗
5. Kreuer, K. D. Proton-conducting oxides. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 33, 333–359 (2003).10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091825 ↗
6. Iwahara, H. Proton conducting ceramics and their applications. Solid State Ion. 86–88, 9–15 (1996).10.1016/0167-2738(96)00087-2 ↗
7. Haugsrud, R. & Norby, T. Proton conduction in rare-earth ortho-niobates and ortho-tantalates. Nature Mater. 5, 193–196 (2006).10.1038/nmat1591 ↗
8. Kitamura, N., Amezawa, K. & Tomii, Y. Electrical conduction properties of Sr-doped LaPO4 and CePO4 under oxidizing and reducing conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, A658–A663 (2005).10.1149/1.1861993 ↗
9. Li, S., Schönberger, F. & Slater, P. La1−xBa1+xGaO4−x/2: a novel high temperature proton conductor. Chem. Comm. 21, 2694–2695 (2003).10.1039/B310073A ↗
10. Schönberger, F., Kendrick, E., Islam, M. S. & Slater, P. Investigation of proton conduction in La1−xBa1+xGaO4−x/2 and La1−xSr2+xGaO5−x/2 . Solid State Ion. 176, 2951–2953 (2005).10.1016/j.ssi.2005.09.028 ↗
11. Kendrick, E., Islam, M. S. & Slater, P. R. Developing apatites for solid oxide fuel cells: Insight into structural, transport and doping properties. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 3104–3111 (2007).10.1039/b704426g ↗
12. Kilner, J. A. Optimisation of oxygen ion transport in materials for ceramic membrane devices. Faraday Discuss. 134, 9–15 (2007).10.1039/B615306M ↗
13. Haile, S. M., Boysen, D. A., Chisholm, C. R. I. & Merle, R. B. Solid acids as fuel cell electrolytes. Nature 410, 910–913 (2001).10.1038/35073536 ↗
14. Larson, A. C. & Von Dreele, R. B. “General Structure Analysis System (GSAS)”, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report LAUR 86–748 (1994) Toby, B. H. EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS. J. Appl. Cryst. 34, 210–213 (2001).10.1107/S0021889801002242 ↗
15. Gale, J. D. & Rohl, A. L. The general utility lattice program. Mol. Simul. 29, 291–341 (2003).10.1080/0892702031000104887 ↗
16. Catlow, C. R. A. (ed.) Computer Modelling in Inorganic Crystallography (Academic, San Diego, 1997).
17. Refson, K. Moldy: a portable molecular dynamics simulation program for serial and parallel computers. Comput. Phys. Commun. 126, 309–328 (2000).10.1016/S0010-4655(99)00496-8 ↗
18. Baroni, S. et al. .
19. Vanderbilt, D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892–7895 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
20. Burke, K., Perdew, J. P. & Wang, Y. in Electronic Density Functional Theory: Recent Progress and New Directions (eds Dobson, J. F., Vignale, G. & Das, M. P.) (Plenum, New York, 1998).
21. Perdew, J. P. et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671–6687 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
22. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
23. Islam, M. S. Ionic transport in ABO3 perovskite oxides: a computer modelling tour. J. Mater. Chem. 10, 1027–1038 (2000).10.1039/a908425h ↗
24. Minervini, L., Grimes, R. W. & Sickafus, K. E. Disorder in pyrochlore oxides. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 83, 1873–1878 (2000).10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01484.x ↗
25. Sayle, T. X. T., Parker, S. C. & Sayle, D. C. Oxygen transport in unreduced, reduced and Rh(III)-doped CeO2 crystals. Faraday Discuss. 134, 377–397 (2007).10.1039/B601521B ↗