Ultrahigh piezoelectricity in ferroelectric ceramics by design
Source abstract
Abstract
Piezoelectric materials, which respond mechanically to applied electric field and vice versa, are essential for electromechanical transducers. Previous theoretical analyses have shown that high piezoelectricity in perovskite oxides is associated with a flat thermodynamic energy landscape connecting two or more ferroelectric phases. Here, guided by phenomenological theories and phase-field simulations, we propose an alternative design strategy to commonly used morphotropic phase boundaries to further flatten the energy landscape, by judiciously introducing local structural heterogeneity to manipulate interfacial energies (that is, extra interaction energies, such as electrostatic and elastic energies associated with the interfaces). To validate this, we synthesize rare-earth-doped Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-PbTiO3 (PMN-PT), as rare-earth dopants tend to change the local structure of Pb-based perovskite ferroelectrics. We achieve ultrahigh piezoelectric coefficients d33 of up to 1,500 pC N-1 and dielectric permittivity ε33/ε0 above 13,000 in a Sm-doped PMN-PT ceramic with a Curie temperature of 89 °C. Our research provides a new paradigm for designing material properties through engineering local structural heterogeneity, expected to benefit a wide range of functional materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Multiferroics and related materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Jaffe, B., Cook, W. R. & Jaffe, H. Piezoelectric Ceramics (Academic, London, 1971).10.1016/B978-0-12-379550-2.50015-6 ↗
2. Zhang, S. J. et al. Advantages and challenges of relaxor-PbTiO3 ferroelectric crystals for electroacoustic transducers–a review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 68, 1–66 (2015).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.10.002 ↗
3. Rödel, J. et al. Perspective on the development of lead‐free piezoceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92, 1153–1177 (2009).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03061.x ↗
4. Lines, M. E., & Glass, A. M. Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1977).
5. Damjanovic, D. Contributions to the piezoelectric effect in ferroelectric single crystals and ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88, 2663–2676 (2005).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00671.x ↗
6. Li, F., Jin, L., Xu, Z. & Zhang, S. J. Electrostrictive effect in ferroelectrics: An alternative approach to improve piezoelectricity. Appl. Phys. Rev. 1, 011103 (2014).10.1063/1.4861260 ↗
7. Fu, H. & Cohen, R. E. Polarization rotation mechanism for ultrahigh electromechanical response in single-crystal piezoelectrics. Nature 403, 281–283 (2000).10.1038/35002022 ↗
8. Wu, Z. & Cohen, R. E. Pressure-induced anomalous phase transitions and colossal enhancement of piezoelectricity in PbTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 037601 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.037601 ↗
9. Nahas, Y. et al. Microscopic origins of the large piezoelectricity of lead free (Ba,Ca)(Zr,Ti) O3. Nat. Commun. 8, 15944 (2017).10.1038/ncomms15944 ↗
10. Liu, W. & Ren, X. Large piezoelectric effect in Pb-free ceramics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 257602 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.257602 ↗
11. Sluka, T., Tagantsev, A. K., Damjanovic, D., Gureev, M. & Setter, N. Enhanced electromechanical response of ferroelectrics due to charged domain walls. Nat. Commun. 3, 748 (2012).10.1038/ncomms1751 ↗
12. Budimir, M., Damjanovic, D. & Setter, N. Piezoelectric response and free-energy instability in the perovskite crystals BaTiO3, PbTiO3, and Pb(Zr,Ti)O3. Phys. Rev. B 73, 174106 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.174106 ↗
13. Ahart, M. et al. Origin of morphotropic phase boundaries in ferroelectrics. Nature 451, 545–548 (2008).10.1038/nature06459 ↗
14. Cross, L. E. Relaxor ferroelectrics. Ferroelectrics 76, 241–276 (1987).10.1080/00150198708016945 ↗
15. Kutnjak, Z., Petzelt, J. & Blinc, R. The giant electromechanical response in ferroelectric relaxors as a critical phenomenon. Nature 441, 956–959 (2006).10.1038/nature04854 ↗
16. Takenaka, H., Grinberg, I., Liu, S. & Rappe, A. M. Slush-like polar structures in single-crystal relaxors. Nature 546, 391–395 (2017).10.1038/nature22068 ↗
17. Li, F. et al. The origin of ultrahigh piezoelectricity in relaxor-ferroelectric solid solution crystals. Nat. Commun. 7, 13807 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13807 ↗
18. Manley, M. E. et al. Giant electromechanical coupling of relaxor ferroelectrics controlled by polar nanoregion vibrations. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501814 (2016).10.1126/sciadv.1501814 ↗
19. Phelan, D. et al. Role of random electric fields in relaxors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1754–1759 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1314780111 ↗
20. Xu, G. Y., Wen, J. S., Stock, C. & Gehring, P. M. Phase instability induced by polar nanoregions in a relaxor ferroelectric system. Nat. Mater. 7, 562–566 (2008).10.1038/nmat2196 ↗
21. Park, S. E. & Shrout, T. R. Ultrahigh strain and piezoelectric behavior in relaxor based ferroelectric single crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1804–1811 (1997).10.1063/1.365983 ↗
22. Service, R. F. Materials science - shape-changing crystals get shiftier. Science 275, 1878 (1997).10.1126/science.275.5308.1878 ↗
23. Kleemann, W. Relaxor ferroelectrics: Cluster glass ground state via random fields and random bonds. Phys. Status Solidi B 251, 1993–2002 (2014).10.1002/pssb.201350310 ↗
24. Samara, G. A. The relaxational properties of compositionally disordered ABO3 perovskites. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, R367–R411 (2003).10.1088/0953-8984/15/9/202 ↗
25. Chen, J., Chan, H. M. & Harmer, M. P. Ordering structure and dielectric properties of undoped and La/Na‐doped Pb (Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 593–598 (1989).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06180.x ↗
26. Tang, H. et al. Investigation of dielectric and piezoelectric properties in Pb (Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3–PbHfO3–PbTiO3 ternary system. J. Am. Eur. Soc. 33, 2491–2497 (2013).
27. Damjanovic, D. Stress and frequency dependence of the direct piezoelectric effect in ferroelectric ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 82, 1788–1797 (1997).10.1063/1.365981 ↗
28. Cannata, J. M., Williams, J. A., Zhou, Q., Ritter, T. A. & Shung, K. K. Development of a 35-MHz piezo-composite ultrasound array for medical imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Contr. 53, 224–236 (2006).10.1109/TUFFC.2006.1588408 ↗
29. Jia, C. L. et al. Unit-cell scale mapping of ferroelectricity and tetragonality in epitaxial ultrathin ferroelectric films. Nat. Mater. 6, 64–69 (2007).10.1038/nmat1808 ↗
30. Noheda, B., Cox, D. E., Shirane, G., Gao, J. & Ye, Z. G. Phase diagram of the ferroelectric relaxor (1-x)PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3-xPbTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 66, 054104 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevB.66.054104 ↗
31. Bokov, A. A. & Ye, Z.-G. Recent progress in relaxor ferroelectrics with perovskite structure. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 31–52 (2006).10.1007/s10853-005-5915-7 ↗
32. Viehland, D., Jang, S. J., Cross, L. E. & Wuttig, M. Freezing of the polarization fluctuations in lead magnesium niobate relaxors. J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2916–2921 (1990).10.1063/1.346425 ↗
33. Nan, C. W., Bichurin, M. I., Dong, S., Viehland, D. & Srinivasan, G. Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: Historical perspective, status, and future directions. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 031101 (2008).10.1063/1.2836410 ↗
34. Ji, Y. C. et al. Ferroic glasses. npj Comput. Mater. 3, 43 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0039-6 ↗
35. Eerenstein, W., Mathur, N. D. & Scott, J. F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature 442, 759–765 (2006).10.1038/nature05023 ↗