Coordinated planning of European charging infrastructure and energy system for optimal V1G and V2G deployment
Source abstract
Abstract
Vehicle charging infrastructure targets in Europe currently rely on uniform benchmarks and overlook the flexibility that could be provided by future smart charging (V1G) and vehicle to grid operation (V2G). To address this gap, we explicitly represent charging infrastructure and its costs in a cost minimizing European energy system model, allowing uncontrolled charging, V1G, and V2G to compete. We find that V1G captures the majority of system cost savings, amounting to 19 to 42 billion euros per year, or 2.2 to 4.5 percent, and substantially reduces infrastructure requirements. V2G provides more limited system cost savings of up to 2.5 billion euros per year, but generates substantial balancing market revenues of around 6.4 billion euros per year. V2G deployment is most cost effective in photovoltaic dominated systems and in scenarios with limited grid expansion, where combined solar and wind generation is relatively scarce. Charging infrastructure requirements vary across countries, reflecting either utilization maximization or flexibility maximization. This indicates that uniform EU targets risk overestimating infrastructure needs in some regions while constraining the benefits of smart charging in others.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure · Wireless Power Transfer Systems · Transportation and Mobility Innovations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: REPowerEU Plan (European Commission, 2022); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52022DC0230
2. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources (Recast) (European Commission, 2016); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0575
3. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal (European Commission, 2019); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0640
4. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: ‘Fit for 55’: Delivering the EU’s 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality (European Commission, 2021); https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021DC0550
5. Sustainability of Europe’s mobility systems 2024—climate. European Environment Agency https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/sustainability-of-europes-mobility-systems/climate (2024).
6. EU Transport in Figures – Statistical Pocketbook 2024 (European Union, 2024); https://transport.ec.europa.eu/facts-funding/studies-data/eu-transport-figures-statistical-pocketbook/statistical-pocketbook-2024_en
7. Cars and vans. European Commission https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/road-transport-reducing-co2-emissions-vehicles/co2-emission-performance-standards-cars-and-vans_en (accessed 26 April 2025).
8. Stock of Electric Vehicles by Category and NUTS 2 Region (Eurostat, accessed 26 July 2025); https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tran_r_elvehst/default/table?lang=en
9. Zeyen, E., Kalweit, S., Victoria, M. & Brown, T. Shifting burdens: how delayed decarbonisation of road transport affects other sectoral emission reductions. Environ. Res. Lett. 20, 044044 (2025).10.1088/1748-9326/adc290 ↗
10. Global EV Outlook 2021 (IEA; 2021); https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2021
11. Mangipinto, A. et al. Impact of mass-scale deployment of electric vehicles and benefits of smart charging across all European countries. Appl. Energy 312, 118676 (2022).10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118676 ↗
12. Muratori, M. Impact of uncoordinated plug-in electric vehicle charging on residential power demand. Nat. Energy 3, 193–201 (2018).10.1038/s41560-017-0074-z ↗
13. Helgeson, B. & Peter, J. The role of electricity in decarbonizing European road transport – development and assessment of an integrated multi-sectoral model. Appl. Energy 262, 114365 (2020).10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114365 ↗
14. Global EV Outlook 2025 (IEA, 2025); https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2025
15. Crozier, C., Morstyn, T. & McCulloch, M. The opportunity for smart charging to mitigate the impact of electric vehicles on transmission and distribution systems. Appl. Energy 268, 114973 (2020).10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114973 ↗
16. Needell, Z., Wei, W. & Trancik, J. E. Strategies for beneficial electric vehicle charging to reduce peak electricity demand and store solar energy. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4, 101287 (2023).10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101287 ↗
17. Gunkel, P. A., Bergaentzlé, C., Græsted Jensen, I. & Scheller, F. From passive to active: flexibility from electric vehicles in the context of transmission system development. Appl. Energy 277, 115526 (2020).10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115526 ↗
18. Graabak, I., Wu, Q., Warland, L. & Liu, Z. Optimal planning of the nordic transmission system with 100 vehicle penetration of passenger cars by 2050. Energy 107, 648–660 (2016).10.1016/j.energy.2016.04.060 ↗
19. Wang, Z., Sasse, J.-P. & Trutnevyte, E. Home or workplace charging? Spatio-temporal flexibility of electric vehicles within Swiss electricity system. Energy 320, 135452 (2025).10.1016/j.energy.2025.135452 ↗
20. Powell, S., Cezar, G. V., Min, L., Azevedo, I. M. L. & Rajagopal, R. Charging infrastructure access and operation to reduce the grid impacts of deep electric vehicle adoption. Nat. Energy 7, 932–945 (2022).10.1038/s41560-022-01105-7 ↗
21. Victoria, M., Zhu, K., Brown, T., Andresen, G. B. & Greiner, M. The role of storage technologies throughout the decarbonisation of the sector-coupled European energy system. Energy Convers. Manag. 201, 111977 (2019).10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111977 ↗
22. Kalweit, S., Zeyen, E. & Victoria, M. Endogenous transformation of land transport in Europe for different climate targets. Energy Convers. Manag. 344, 120203 (2025).10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120203 ↗
23. Bogdanov, D. & Breyer, C. Role of smart charging of electric vehicles and vehicle-to-grid in integrated renewables-based energy systems on country level. Energy 301, 131635 (2024).10.1016/j.energy.2024.131635 ↗
24. Syla, A., Parra, D. & Patel, M. K. Assessing flexibility from electric vehicles using an open-source energy system model: trade-offs between smart charging, vehicle-to-grid and an extensive charging infrastructure. Energy 326, 136236 (2025).10.1016/j.energy.2025.136236 ↗
25. Brown, T., Schlachtberger, D., Kies, A., Schramm, S. & Greiner, M. Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system. Energy 160, 720–739 (2018).10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222 ↗
26. TYNDP 2024 Scenarios Report (ENTSO-E, ENTSOG, 2024); https://2024.entsos-tyndp-scenarios.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/TYNDP_2024_Scenarios_Report_FInal_Version_250128_web.pdf
27. Syla, A., Rinaldi, A., Parra, D. & Patel, M. K. Optimal capacity planning for the electrification of personal transport: the interplay between flexible charging and energy system infrastructure. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 192, 114214 (2024).10.1016/j.rser.2023.114214 ↗
28. Guéret, A., Schill, W. & Gaete-Morales, C. Impacts of electric carsharing on a power sector with variable renewables. Cell Rep. Sustain. 1, 100241 (2024).
29. Verzijlbergh, R., Brancucci Martínez-Anido, C., Lukszo, Z. & de Vries, L. Does controlled electric vehicle charging substitute cross-border transmission capacity? Appl. Energy 120, 169–180 (2014).10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.020 ↗
30. Brown, T., Hörsch, J. & Schlachtberger, D. PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis. J. Open Res. Softw. 6, 4 (2018).10.5334/jors.188 ↗
31. Parajeles Herrera, M., Garrison, J. & Hug, G. The role of unidirectional charging flexibility in the planning and operation of the future Swiss electricity system. Appl. Energy 403, 127078 (2026).10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127078 ↗
32. Muessel, J., Ruhnau, O. & Madlener, R. Accurate and scalable representation of electric vehicles in energy system models: a virtual storage-based aggregation approach. iScience 26, 107816 (2023).10.1016/j.isci.2023.107816 ↗
33. Miorelli, F., Wulff, N., Fuchs, B., Gils, H. C. & Jochem, P. venco.py: a Python model to represent the charging flexibility and vehicle-to-grid potential of electric vehicles in energy system models. J. Open Source Softw. 10, 6896 (2025).10.21105/joss.06896 ↗
34. Wulff, N. et al. Comparing power-system and user-oriented battery electric vehicle charging representation and its implications on energy system modeling. Energies 13, 1093 (2020).10.3390/en13051093 ↗
35. Hanemann, P., Behnert, M. & Bruckner, T. Effects of electric vehicle charging strategies on the German power system. Appl. Energy 203, 608–622 (2017).10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.039 ↗
36. Liao, C., Deng, J., Chen, X. M. & Yuan, Q. Optimizing electric vehicle charging patterns and infrastructure for grid decarbonization. Commun. Sustain. 1, 43 (2026).10.1038/s44458-026-00037-7 ↗
37. Hanig, L. et al. Finding gaps in the national electric vehicle charging station coverage of the United States. Nat. Commun. 16, 561 (2025).10.1038/s41467-024-55696-8 ↗
38. Zhan, W., Liao, Y., Deng, J., Wang, Z. & Yeh, S. Large-scale empirical study of electric vehicle usage patterns and charging infrastructure needs. npj Sustain. Mobil. Transp. 2, 9 (2025).10.1038/s44333-024-00023-3 ↗
39. Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation. European Commission https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/clean-transport/alternative-fuels-sustainable-mobility-europe/alternative-fuels-infrastructure_en (accessed 24 November 2025).
40. Bernard, M. R., Kok, I., Dallmann, T. & Ragon, P.-L. Deploying Charging Infrastructure to Support an Accelerated Transition to Zero-Emission Vehicles (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2022).
41. Pickering, B., Lombardi, F. & Pfenninger, S. Diversity of options to eliminate fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system. Joule 6, 1253–1276 (2022).10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.009 ↗
42. Tröndle, T., Pfenninger, S. & Lilliestam, J. Home-made or imported: on the possibility for renewable electricity autarky on all scales in Europe. Energy Strategy Rev. 26, 100388 (2019).10.1016/j.esr.2019.100388 ↗
43. TYNDP 2018 Scenario Report (ENTSO-E, ENTSOG, 2018); https://eepublicdownloads.entsoe.eu/clean-documents/tyndp-documents/TYNDP2018/Scenario_Report_2018_Final.pdf
44. Sanvito, F. RAMP-mobility. GitHub https://github.com/FraSanvit/RAMP-mobility/tree/V2G_output (2025).
45. Brown, T., Neumann, F. & Riepin, I. Price formation without fuel costs: the interaction of demand elasticity with storage bidding. Energy Econ. 147, 108483 (2025).10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108483 ↗
46. Lanz, L., Noll, B., Schmidt, T. S. & Steffen, B. Comparing the levelized cost of electric vehicle charging options in Europe. Nat. Commun. 13, 5277 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-32835-7 ↗
47. Muratori, M. et al. Trends and 2025 insights on the rise of electric vehicles in the USA. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. 1, 827–845 (2025).10.1038/s44359-025-00108-3 ↗
48. Lombardi, F. et al. Near-optimal energy planning strategies with modeling to generate alternatives to flexibly explore practically desirable options. Joule 9, 102144 (2025).10.1016/j.joule.2025.102144 ↗
49. Kern, T. & Kigle, S. Modeling and evaluating bidirectionally chargeable electric vehicles in the future European energy system. Energy Rep. 8, 694–708 (2022).10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.277 ↗
50. Frank, F., Gnann, T., Speth, D., Weißenburger, B. & Lux, B. Potential impact of controlled electric car charging and vehicle-to-grid on Germany’s future power system. Adv. Appl. Energy 19, 100227 (2025).10.1016/j.adapen.2025.100227 ↗
51. Guéret, A., Gaete-Morales, C. & Schill, W.-P. A moderate share of V2G outperforms large-scale smart charging of electric vehicles and benefits other consumers. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15284 (2025).
52. Chen, J., Craig, M. T., Michalek, J., Bruchon, M. & Vaishnav, P. Negative electric vehicle emissions: vehicle-to-grid can incentivize enough wind and solar investment to reverse EV charging emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 21090–21101 (2025).10.1021/acs.est.5c06944 ↗
53. Bernard, M. R., Nicholas, M., Wappelhorst, S. & Hall, D. A Review of the AFIR Proposal: How Much Power Output is Needed for Public Charging Infrastructure in the European Union? White Paper (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2022); https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/europe-ldv-review-of-afir-proposal-how-much-power-output-needed-for-public-charging-infrastructure-in-the-eu-mar22-2.pdf
54. Global EV Outlook 2025 Ch. 4 (IEA, 2025); https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2025/trends-in-heavy-duty-electric-vehicles
55. Electricity Data Explorer (Ember, accessed 17 April 2026); https://ember-energy.org/data/electricity-data-explorer/
56. Eurostat Database (European Union, accessed 28 October 2025); https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
57. Mantzos, L. et al. JRC-IDEES 2015 (European Commission, Joint Research Centre, 2018); http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-10110-10001
58. Wiese, F. et al. Open Power System Data – frictionless data for electricity system modelling. Appl. Energy 236, 401–409 (2019).10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.097 ↗
59. Pfenninger, S. & Staffell, I. Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data. Energy 114, 1251–1265 (2016).10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060 ↗
60. Staffell, I. & Pfenninger, S. Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output. Energy 114, 1224–1239 (2016).10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068 ↗
61. De Felice, M. & Kavvadias, K. Energy modelling-toolkit/hydro-power-database: JRC Hydro-power database – release 07 Zenodo https://zenodo.org/record/4289229 (2020).
62. Technology catalogue for commercial freight and passenger transport. Danish Energy Agency https://ens.dk/en/analyses-and-statistics/technology-catalogue-commercial-freight-and-passenger-transport (accessed 24 September 2025).
63. Pfenninger, S. & Pickering, B. Calliope: a multi-scale energy systems modelling framework. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 825 (2018).10.21105/joss.00825 ↗
64. Pestana, R. et al. e-Highway 2050 WP4: European transmission grid modular development plan from 2022 to 2050 - release 01 Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/8232662 (2015).
65. Burke, A. F., Zhao, J. & Fulton, L. M. Projections of the costs of light-duty battery-electric and fuel cell vehicles (2020–2040) and related economic issues. Res. Transp. Econ. 105, 101440 (2024).10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101440 ↗
66. Mantzos, L. et al. JRC-IDEES: Integrated Database of the European Energy Sector: Methodological Note Technical Report JRC108244 (European Union, 2017); https://doi.org/10.2760/18272510.2760/182725 ↗
67. Road Traffic Performance by Category of Vehicle Registration and Traffic, Type of Vehicle and Motor Energy (Eurostat, accessed 2 November 2025); https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/road_tf_veh/default/table?lang=en&category=road.road_tf
68. Lombardi, F. et al. RAMP: stochastic simulation of user-driven energy demand time series. J. Open Source Softw. 9, 6418 (2024).10.21105/joss.06418 ↗
69. Automatische Dauerzählstellen: Rohdaten. Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) https://www.bast.de/DE/Publikationen/Daten/Verkehrstechnik/DZ.html?nn=427910 (accessed 29 October 2025).
70. Hasselwander, S., Rettich, J., Schmid, S. & Siefkes, T. How will future BEV models develop? Market potential of different battery technologies assessed by a ML-based manufacturer agent. J. Energy Storage 131, 117195 (2025).10.1016/j.est.2025.117195 ↗
71. Renault Trucks E-Tech Master. Renault Trucks https://www.renault-trucks.co.uk/product/renault-trucks-e-tech-master-electric (accessed 17 April 2026).
72. Sevdari, K., Calearo, L., Bakken, B. H., Andersen, P. B. & Marinelli, M. Experimental validation of onboard electric vehicle chargers to improve the efficiency of smart charging operation. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 60, 103512 (2023).
73. Borlaug, B., Salisbury, S., Gerdes, M. & Muratori, M. Levelized cost of charging electric vehicles in the United States. Joule 4, 1470–1485 (2020).10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.013 ↗
74. Nicholas, M. Estimating Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Costs Across Major U.S. Metropolitan Areas Working Paper 2019-14 (International Council on Clean Transportation, 2019); https://theicct.org/publication/estimating-electric-vehicle-charging-infrastructure-costs-across-major-u-s-metropolitan-areas/
75. Nelder, C. & Rogers, E. Reducing EV Charging Infrastructure Costs (Rocky Mountain Institute, 2019); https://rmi.org/app/uploads/2020/01/RMI-EV-Charging-Infrastructure-Costs.pdf
76. Wood, E. & Borlaug, B. The 2030 National Charging Network: Estimating U.S. Light-Duty Demand For Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure (National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), accessed 2 November 2025); https://data.nlr.gov/submissions/214
77. Herbst, I. et al. Laden im Quartier: Informationssammlung zur Elektromobilität für Gemeinden (Bundesamt für Energie, 2023); https://pubdb.bfe.admin.ch/de/publication/download/12068
78. Bennett, J. et al. Estimating the Breakeven Cost of Delivered Electricity To Charge Class 8 Electric Tractors Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-82092 (NREL, 2022); https://afdc.energy.gov/files/u/publication/estimating_the_breakeven_cost_of_delivered_electricity_to_charge_class_8_electric_tractors_2023.pdf10.2172/1894645 ↗
79. Bracci, J., Koleva, M. & Chung, M. Levelized Cost of Dispensed Hydrogen for Heavy-Duty Vehicles Technical Report NREL/TP-5400-88818 (NREL, 2024); https://docs.nlr.gov/docs/fy24osti/88818.pdf10.2172/2322556 ↗
80. Sanvito, F. D. Pre-built V2G sector-coupled Euro-Calliope model Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18433372 (2026).10.5281/zenodo.18433372 ↗
81. Sanvito, F. D. Results of the study “Coordinated planning of European charging infrastructure and energy system for optimal V1G and V2G deployment” Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18431612 (2026).10.5281/zenodo.18431612 ↗