Minimum doping densities for p–n junctions
Source abstract
Abstract
In their Article, Cui et al.1 describe the fabrication and characterization of planar p–n junction solar cells based on lead-halide perovskites. The formation of a p–n junction is noteworthy given the doping densities, measured using the Hall effect, which were reported to vary from ND = 1 × 1012 cm−3 to 8 × 1012 cm−3 for the solution-processed n-type layer and to equal NA = 8 × 109 cm−3 for the evaporated p-type layer. Although these devices outperform their counterparts that are supposedly undoped, the results raise three important questions. Are the reported doping densities high enough to change the electrostatic potential distribution in the device from that of undoped ones? Are the doping densities high enough for the p–n junction to remain intact under typical photovoltaic operation conditions? Is a p–n junction beneficial for photovoltaic performance given the typical properties of lead-halide perovskites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. Cui, P. et al. Planar p–n homojunction perovskite solar cells with efficiency exceeding 21.3%. Nat. Energy 4, 150–159 (2019).10.1038/s41560-018-0324-8 ↗
2. Sendner, M. et al. Optical phonons in methylammonium lead halide perovskites and implications for charge transport. Mater. Horiz. 3, 613–620 (2016).10.1039/C6MH00275G ↗
3. Tress, W., Leo, K. & Riede, M. Influence of hole-transport layers and donor materials on open-circuit voltage and shape of I–V curves of organic solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 2140–2149 (2011).10.1002/adfm.201002669 ↗
4. Würfel, U., Cuevas, A. & Würfel, P. Charge carrier separation in solar cells. IEEE J. Photovoltaics 5, 461–469 (2015).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2363550 ↗
5. Burgelman, M., Verschraegen, J., Degrave, S. & Nollet, P. Modeling thin-film PV devices. Prog. Photovolt. 12, 143–153 (2004).10.1002/pip.524 ↗
6. Burgelman, M., Nollet, P. & Degrave, S. Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells. Thin Solid Films 361, 527–532 (2000).10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1 ↗
7. Green, M. A. Solar cell fill factors: general graph and empirical expressions. Solid State Electron. 24, 788–789 (1981).10.1016/0038-1101(81)90062-9 ↗
8. Stocks, M. J., Cuevas, A. & Blakers, A. W. Prog. Photovolt. 4, 35–54 (1996).10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(199601/02)4:1<35::AID-PIP115>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
9. Green, M. A. Prog. Photovolt. 4, 375–380 (1996).10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(199609/10)4:5<375::AID-PIP146>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
10. Kirchartz, T., Bisquert, J., Mora-Sero, I. & Garcia-Belmonte, G. Classification of solar cells according to mechanisms of charge separation and charge collection. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 4007–4014 (2015).10.1039/C4CP05174B ↗
11. Guillemoles, J. F., Lubomirsky, I., Riess, I. & Cahen, D. Thermodynamic stability of p/n junctions. J. Phys. Chem. 99, 14486–14493 (1995).10.1021/j100039a041 ↗
12. Rakita, Y., Lubomirsky, I. & Cahen, D. When defects become ‘dynamic’: halide perovskites: a new window on materials? Mater. Horiz. 6, 1297–1305 (2019).10.1039/C9MH00606K ↗
13. Staub, F. et al. Beyond bulk lifetimes: insights into lead halide perovskite films from time-resolved photoluminescence. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 044017 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.044017 ↗
14. Tvingstedt, K. et al. Radiative efficiency of lead iodide based perovskite solar cells. Sci. Rep. 4, 6071 (2014).10.1038/srep06071 ↗