journal article·2022-07-21Open access

Unveiling microscopic carrier loss mechanisms in 12% efficient Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells

Jianjun Li, Jialiang Huang, Fajun Ma, Heng Sun, Jialin Cong, Karen Privat, Richard F. Webster, Soshan Cheong, Yin Yao, Robert Lee Chin, Xiaojie Yuan, Mingrui He, Kaiwen Sun, Hui Li, Yaohua Mai, Ziv Hameiri, Nicholas J. Ekins-Daukes, Richard D. Tilley, Thomas Unold, Martin A. Green, Xiaojing Hao

Nature Energy· Volume 7· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract Understanding carrier loss mechanisms at microscopic regions is imperative for the development of high-performance polycrystalline inorganic thin-film solar cells. Despite the progress achieved for kesterite, a promising environmentally benign and earth-abundant thin-film photovoltaic material, the microscopic carrier loss mechanisms and their impact on device performance remain largely unknown. Herein, we unveil these mechanisms in state-of-the-art Cu 2 ZnSnSe 4 (CZTSe) solar cells using a framework that integrates multiple microscopic and macroscopic characterizations with three-dimensional device simulations. The results indicate the CZTSe films have a relatively long intragrain electron lifetime of 10–30 ns and small recombination losses through bandgap and/or electrostatic potential fluctuations. We identify that the effective minority carrier lifetime of CZTSe is dominated by a large grain boundary recombination velocity (~10 4 cm s −1 ), which is the major limiting factor of present device performance. These findings and the framework can greatly advance the research of kesterite and other emerging photovoltaic materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Creutzig, F. et al. The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. Nat. Energy 2, 1–9 (2017).10.1038/nenergy.2017.140 ↗
2. Green, M. A. Third Generation Photovoltaics, Springer (2006).
3. Liu, F. et al. Emerging inorganic compound thin film photovoltaic materials: progress, challenges and strategies. Mater. Today 41, 120–142 (2020).10.1016/j.mattod.2020.09.002 ↗
4. Zakutayev, A. et al. Emerging inorganic solar cell efficiency tables (version 2). J. Phys. Energy 3, 032003 (2021).10.1088/2515-7655/abebca ↗
5. Osbel Almora, D. B. et al. Device performance of emerging photovoltaic materials (version 2). Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2102526 (2021).10.1002/aenm.202102526 ↗
6. Giraldo, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of thin film kesterite photovoltaic technology: a critical review. Adv. Mater. 31, e1806692 (2019).10.1002/adma.201806692 ↗
7. Walsh, A., Chen, S., Wei, S.-H. & Gong, X.-G. Kesterite thin-film solar cells: advances in materials modelling of Cu2ZnSnS4. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 400–409 (2012).10.1002/aenm.201100630 ↗
8. Son, D. H. et al. Effect of solid-H2S gas reactions on CZTSSe thin film growth and photovoltaic properties of a 12.62% efficiency device. J. Mater. Chem. 7, 25279–25289 (2019).10.1039/C9TA08310C ↗
9. Wang, W. et al. Device characteristics of CZTSSe thin-film solar cells with 12.6% efficiency. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1301465 (2014).10.1002/aenm.201301465 ↗
10. Best research-cell efficiency chart. NREL https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (2022).
11. Siebentritt, S., Igalson, M., Persson, C. & Lany, S. The electronic structure of chalcopyrites-bands, point defects and grain boundaries. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 18, 390–410 (2010).10.1002/pip.936 ↗
12. Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 59). Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 30, 3–12 (2021).10.1002/pip.3506 ↗
13. Yun, J. S. et al. Benefit of grain boundaries in organic–inorganic halide planar perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 875–80 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00182 ↗
14. Li, C. et al. Grain-boundary-enhanced carrier collection in CdTe solar cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 156103 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.156103 ↗
15. Lin, T.-Y. et al. Alkali-induced grain boundary reconstruction on Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells using cesium fluoride post deposition treatment. Nano Energy 68, 104299 (2020).10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104299 ↗
16. Chen, S., Walsh, A., Gong, X. G. & Wei, S. H. Classification of lattice defects in the kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 earth-abundant solar cell absorbers. Adv. Mater. 25, 1522–39 (2013).10.1002/adma.201203146 ↗
17. Martinho, F. et al. Persistent double-layer formation in kesterite solar cells: a critical review. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 39405–39424 (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c10068 ↗
18. Li, J., Wang, D., Li, X., Zeng, Y. & Zhang, Y. Cation substitution in earth-abundant kesterite photovoltaic materials. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700744 (2018).10.1002/advs.201700744 ↗
19. Romanyuk, Y. E. et al. Doping and alloying of kesterites. J. Phys. Energy 1, 044004 (2019).10.1088/2515-7655/ab23bc ↗
20. He, M., Sun, K., Suryawanshi, M. P., Li, J. & Hao, X. Interface engineering of p–n heterojunction for kesterite photovoltaics: a progress review. J. Energy Chem. 60, 1–8 (2021).10.1016/j.jechem.2020.12.019 ↗
21. Fonoll-Rubio, R. et al. Insights into interface and bulk defects in a high efficiency kesterite-based device. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 507–523. (2021).10.1039/D0EE02004D ↗
22. Vishwakarma, M. et al. A direct measurement of higher photovoltage at grain boundaries in CdS/CZTSe solar cells using KPFM technique. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 183, 34–40 (2018).10.1016/j.solmat.2018.01.040 ↗
23. Krause, M. et al. Microscopic origins of performance losses in highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells. Nat. Commun. 11, 4189 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-17507-8 ↗
24. Zhao, Y. et al. Monocrystalline CdTe solar cells with open-circuit voltage over 1 V and efficiency of 17%. Nat. Energy 1, 1–7 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.67 ↗
25. Li, J. et al. Defect control for 12.5% efficiency Cu2ZnSnSe4 kesterite thin‐film solar cells by engineering of local chemical environment. Adv. Mater. 32, 2005268 (2020).10.1002/adma.202005268 ↗
26. Lee, Y. S. et al. Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin-film solar cells by thermal co-evaporation with 11.6% efficiency and improved minority carrier diffusion length. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401372 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201401372 ↗
27. Li, J. et al. Tailoring the defects and carrier density for beyond 10% efficient CZTSe thin film solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 159, 447–455 (2017).10.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.034 ↗
28. Timo Wätjen, J., Engman, J., Edoff, M. & Platzer-Björkman, C. Direct evidence of current blocking by ZnSe in Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 173510 (2012).10.1063/1.4706256 ↗
29. Mendis, B. G. Fully depleted emitter layers: a novel method to improve band alignment in thin-film solar cells. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34, 055008 (2019).10.1088/1361-6641/ab0c2b ↗
30. Hages, C. J., Carter, N. J., Agrawal, R. & Unold, T. Generalized current-voltage analysis and efficiency limitations in non-ideal solar cells: case of Cu2ZnSn(SxSe1−x)4 and Cu2Zn(SnyGe1−y)(SxSe1−x)4. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 234504 (2014).10.1063/1.4882119 ↗
31. Rau, U. Tunneling-enhanced recombination in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 112–114 (1999).10.1063/1.122967 ↗
32. Hegedus, S. S. & Shafarman, W. N. Thin-film solar cells: device measurements and analysis. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 12, 155–176 (2004).10.1002/pip.518 ↗
33. Wang, K. et al. Thermally evaporated Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 143508 (2010).10.1063/1.3499284 ↗
34. Barkhouse, D. A. R., Gunawan, O., Gokmen, T., Todorov, T. K. & Mitzi, D. B. Device characteristics of a 10.1% hydrazine-processed Cu2ZnSn(Se,S)4 solar cell. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 20, 6–11 (2012).10.1002/pip.1160 ↗
35. Schwarz, T. et al. Atom probe tomography study of internal interfaces in Cu2ZnSnSe4 thin-films. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 095302 (2015).10.1063/1.4929874 ↗
36. Cojocaru-Mirédin, O., Schwarz, T. & Abou-Ras, D. Assessment of elemental distributions at line and planar defects in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin films by atom probe tomography. Scr. Mater. 148, 106–114 (2018).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.034 ↗
37. Gokmen, T., Gunawan, O., Todorov, T. K. & Mitzi, D. B. Band tailing and efficiency limitation in kesterite solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 103506 (2013).10.1063/1.4820250 ↗
38. Rey, G. et al. On the origin of band-tails in kesterite. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 179, 142–151 (2018).10.1016/j.solmat.2017.11.005 ↗
39. Shklovskii, B. I. & Efros, A. L. Electronic Properties of Doped Semiconductors vol. 45 (Springer, 2013).
40. Rau, U. & Werner, J. H. Radiative efficiency limits of solar cells with lateral band-gap fluctuations. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 3735–3737 (2004).10.1063/1.1737071 ↗
41. Nichterwitz, M., Caballero, R., Kaufmann, C. A., Schock, H.-W. & Unold, T. Generation-dependent charge carrier transport in Cu(In,Ga)Se2/CdS/ZnO thin-film solar-cells. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 044515 (2013).10.1063/1.4788827 ↗
42. Heath, J. T., Cohen, J. D. & Shafarman, W. N. Bulk and metastable defects in CuIn1−xGaxSe2 thin films using drive-level capacitance profiling. J. Appl. Phys. 95, 1000–1010 (2004).10.1063/1.1633982 ↗
43. Mendis, B. G., Bowen, L. & Jiang, Q. Z. A contactless method for measuring the recombination velocity of an individual grain boundary in thin-film photovoltaics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 092112 (2010).10.1063/1.3486482 ↗
44. Gershon, T. et al. The role of sodium as a surfactant and suppressor of non-radiative recombination at internal surfaces in Cu2ZnSnS4. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1400849 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201400849 ↗
45. Tampo, H., Kim, K. M., Kim, S., Shibata, H. & Niki, S. Improvement of minority carrier lifetime and conversion efficiency by Na incorporation in Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 122, 023106 (2017).10.1063/1.4993288 ↗
46. Hages, C. J. et al. Identifying the real minority carrier lifetime in nonideal semiconductors: a case study of kesterite materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700167 (2017).10.1002/aenm.201700167 ↗
47. Hempel, H., Hages, C. J., Eichberger, R., Repins, I. & Unold, T. Minority and majority charge carrier mobility in Cu2ZnSnSe4 revealed by Terahertz Spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 8, 14476 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-32695-6 ↗
48. Metzger, W. K. et al. Exceeding 20% efficiency with in situ group V doping in polycrystalline CdTe solar cells. Nat. Energy 4, 837–845 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0446-7 ↗
49. Kim, J. et al. High efficiency Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells by applying a double In2S3/CdS emitter. Adv. Mater. 26, 7427–31 (2014).10.1002/adma.201402373 ↗
50. He, M. et al. High efficiency Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells with shallow LiZn acceptor defects enabled by solution‐based Li post‐deposition treatment. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, (2021).10.1002/aenm.202003783 ↗
51. Li, J. et al. Interface recombination of Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells leveraged by high carrier density and interface defects. Sol. RRL 5, 2100418 (2021).10.1002/solr.202100418 ↗
52. Levcenko, S. et al. Deep defects in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 solar cells with varying Se content. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, (2016).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.5.024004 ↗
53. Li, J. et al. Growth of Cu2ZnSnSe4 film under controllable Se vapor composition and impact of low Cu content on solar cell efficiency. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 10283–92 (2016).10.1021/acsami.6b00081 ↗
54. Li, J. et al. Barrier effect of the alloy layer during selenization: tailoring the thickness of MoSe2 for efficient Cu2ZnSnSe4 Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1402178 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201402178 ↗
55. Drouin, D. et al. CASINO V2. 42—a fast and easy‐to‐use modeling tool for scanning electron microscopy and microanalysis users. Scanning 29, 92–101 (2007).10.1002/sca.20000 ↗
56. Pu, A. et al. Sentaurus modelling of 6.9% Cu2ZnSnS4 device based on comprehensive electrical & optical characterization. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 160, 372–381 (2017).10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.053 ↗
57. Jones, G. & Woods, J. The electrical properties of zinc selenide. J. Phys. D 9, 799 (1976).10.1088/0022-3727/9/5/013 ↗
58. El Otmani, R., El Manouni, A., & Al Maggoussi, A. Numerical simulation of CZTSe based solar cells using different back surface field layers: improvement and comparison. J. Electron. Mater. 50, 2021–2033 (2021).10.1007/s11664-020-08712-8 ↗