Direct solar-to-hydrogen conversion via inverted metamorphic multi-junction semiconductor architectures
Source abstract
Abstract
Solar water splitting via multi-junction semiconductor photoelectrochemical cells provides direct conversion of solar energy to stored chemical energy as hydrogen bonds. Economical hydrogen production demands high conversion efficiency to reduce balance-of-systems costs. For sufficient photovoltage, water-splitting efficiency is proportional to the device photocurrent, which can be tuned by judicious selection and integration of optimal semiconductor bandgaps. Here, we demonstrate highly efficient, immersed water-splitting electrodes enabled by inverted metamorphic epitaxy and a transparent graded buffer that allows the bandgap of each junction to be independently varied. Voltage losses at the electrolyte interface are reduced by 0.55 V over traditional, uniformly p-doped photocathodes by using a buried p–n junction. Advanced on-sun benchmarking, spectrally corrected and validated with incident photon-to-current efficiency, yields over 16% solar-to-hydrogen efficiency with GaInP/GaInAs tandem absorbers, representing a 60% improvement over the classical, high-efficiency tandem III–V device. Solar water-splitting efficiency can be enhanced by careful bandgap selection in multi-junction semiconductor structures. Young et al. demonstrate a route that allows independent bandgap tuning of each junction in an immersed water-splitting device, enabling a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency of over 16%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: solar cell performance optimization · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Nozik, A. J. Photoelectrochemical Cells. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 295, 453–470 (1980).10.1098/rsta.1980.0141 ↗
2. Nozik, A. J. Photoelectrochemistry: applications to solar energy conversion. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 29, 189–222 (1978).10.1146/annurev.pc.29.100178.001201 ↗
3. Bard, A. & Fox, M. A. Artificial photosynthesis: solar splitting of water to hydrogen and oxygen. Acc. Chem. Res. 28, 141–145 (1995).10.1021/ar00051a007 ↗
4. Bak, T., Nowotny, J., Rekas, M. & Sorrell, C. Photo-electrochemical hydrogen generation from water using solar energy. Materials-related aspects. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 27, 991–1022 (2002).10.1016/S0360-3199(02)00022-8 ↗
5. Heller, A. Hydrogen-evolving solar cells. Science 223, 1141–1148 (1984).10.1126/science.223.4641.1141 ↗
6. Jasinski, S. M., Kramer, D. A. & Ober, J. A. Fertilizers: Sustaining Global Food Supplies (USGS, 1999); http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs155-99/fs155-99.pdf10.3133/fs15599 ↗
7. Halmann, M. M. Chemical Fixation of Carbon Dioxide: Methods for Recycling CO2 into Useful Products (CRC Press, 1993).
8. Nowotny, J., Sorrell, C. C., Sheppard, L. R. & Bak, T. Solar-hydrogen: environmentally safe fuel for the future. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 30, 521–544 (2005).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.06.012 ↗
9. Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi-Year Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan Vol. 11007, 1–44 (Department of Energy, 2015).
10. Sathre, R. et al. Life-cycle net energy assessment of large-scale hydrogen production via photoelectrochemical water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3264–3278 (2014).10.1039/C4EE01019A ↗
11. Khaselev, O. & Turner, J. A. A monolithic photovoltaic-photoelectrochemical device for hydrogen production via water splitting. Science 280, 425–427 (1998).10.1126/science.280.5362.425 ↗
12. Döscher, H., Young, J. L., Geisz, J. F., Turner, J. A. & Deutsch, T. G. Solar to hydrogen efficiency: shining light on phoelectrochemical device performance. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 74–80 (2015).10.1039/C5EE03206G ↗
13. Murphy, A. B. et al. Efficiency of solar water splitting using semiconductor electrodes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 31, 1999–2017 (2006).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.014 ↗
14. Ager, J. W. III, Shaner, M. R., Walczak, K. A., Sharp, I. D. & Ardo, S. Experimental demonstrations of spontaneous, solar-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2811–2824 (2015).10.1039/C5EE00457H ↗
15. Parkinson, B. On the efficiency and stability of photoelectrochemical devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 17, 431–437 (1984).10.1021/ar00108a004 ↗
16. Weber, M. F. & Dignam, M. J. Efficiency of splitting water with semiconducting photoelectrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 131, 1258–1265 (1984).10.1149/1.2115797 ↗
17. Bolton, J. R., Strickler, S. J. & Connolly, J. S. Limiting and realizable efficiencies of solar photolysis of water. Nature 316, 495–500 (1985).10.1038/316495a0 ↗
18. Pinaud, B. A. et al. Technical and economic feasibility of centralized facilities for solar hydrogen production via photocatalysis and photoelectrochemistry. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1983–2002 (2013).10.1039/c3ee40831k ↗
19. Hu, S., Xiang, C., Haussener, S., Berger, A. D. & Lewis, N. S. An analysis of the optimal band gaps of light absorbers in integrated tandem photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2984–2993 (2013).10.1039/c3ee40453f ↗
20. Döscher, H., Geisz, J. F., Deutsch, T. G. & Turner, J. A. Sunlight absorption in water—efficiency and design implications for photoelectrochemical devices. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2951–2956 (2014).10.1039/C4EE01753F ↗
21. Geisz, J. F. et al. High-efficiency GaInP/GaAs/InGaAs triple-junction solar cells grown inverted with a metamorphic bottom junction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 23502 (2007).10.1063/1.2753729 ↗
22. May, M. M., Lewerenz, H.-J., Lackner, D., Dimroth, F. & Hannappel, T. Efficient direct solar-to-hydrogen conversion by in situ interface transformation of a tandem structure. Nat. Commun. 6, 8286 (2015).10.1038/ncomms9286 ↗
23. Steiner, M. A. et al. Optical enhancement of the open-circuit voltage in high quality GaAs solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 123109 (2013).10.1063/1.4798267 ↗
24. Shahrjerdi, D. et al. High-efficiency thin-film InGaP/(In)GaAs/Ge multijunction solar cells enabled by controlled spalling technology. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 53901 (2012).10.1063/1.3681397 ↗
25. Schermer, J. J. et al. Epitaxial lift-off for large area thin film III/V devices. Phys. Status Solidi 202, 501–508 (2005).10.1002/pssa.200460410 ↗
26. Smeenk, N. J. et al. Arsenic formation on GaAs during etching in HF solutions: relevance for the epitaxial lift-off process. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2, P58–P65 (2012).10.1149/2.006303jss ↗
27. Woodhouse, M. & Goodrich, A. A Manufacturing Cost Analysis Relevant to Single- and Dual-Junction Photovoltaic Cells Fabricated with III-Vs and III-Vs Grown on Czochralski Silicon NREL/PR-6A20-60126 (NREL, 2013).10.2172/1336550 ↗
28. Deutsch, T. et al. Stable photoelectrode surfaces and methods. US patent 2014/0332374 A1 (2014).
29. Kemppainen, E. et al. Scalability and feasibility of photoelectrochemical H2 evolution: the ultimate limit of Pt nanoparticle as an HER catalyst. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2991–2999 (2015).10.1039/C5EE02188J ↗
30. France, R. M. et al. Reduction of crosshatch roughness and threading dislocation density in metamorphic GaInP buffers and GaInAs solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 103528 (2012).10.1063/1.4721367 ↗
31. France, R. M., Dimroth, F., Grassman, T. J. & King, R. R. Metamorphic epitaxy for multijunction solar cells. MRS Bull. 41, 202–209 (2016).10.1557/mrs.2016.25 ↗
32. Garcia, I. et al. Metamorphic III–V solar cells: recent progress and potential. IEEE J. Photovolt. 6, 366–373 (2016).10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2501722 ↗
33. Osterwald, C. R. Translation of device performance measurements to reference conditions. Sol. Cells 18, 269–279 (1986).10.1016/0379-6787(86)90126-2 ↗
34. Standard Tables for Reference Solar Spectral Irradiances: Direct Normal and Hemispherical on 37∘ Tilted Surface ASTM G173-03 (ASTM International, 2012); www.astm.org
35. Bansal, A. & Turner, J. Suppression of band edge migration at the p-GaInP2/H2O interface under illumination via catalysis. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 6591–6598 (2000).10.1021/jp000387s ↗
36. Boettcher, S. W. et al. Photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution using Si microwire arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1216–1219 (2011).10.1021/ja108801m ↗
37. Heller, A., Miller, B., Lewerenz, H. J. & Bachmann, K. J. An efficient photocathode for semiconductor liquid junction cells: 9.4% solar conversion efficiency with p-InP/VCl3-VCl2-HCl/C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102, 6555–6556 (1980).10.1021/ja00541a029 ↗
38. Young, J. L., Steirer, K. X., Dzara, M. J., Turner, J. A. & Deutsch, T. G. Remarkable stability of unmodified GaAs photocathodes during hydrogen evolution in acidic electrolyte. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 2831–2836 (2016).10.1039/C5TA07648J ↗
39. Jain, N. et al. Development of Lattice-Matched 1.7 eV GaInAsP Solar Cells grown on GaAs by MOVPE. In 43rd IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. 2–7 (IEEE, 2016).10.1109/PVSC.2016.7749406 ↗
40. Standard Test Method for Calibration of Primary Non-Concentrator Terrestrial Photovoltaic Reference Cells Using a Tabular Spectrum ASTM E1125-99 1–5 (ASTM International, 1999).
41. Osterwald, C. R. Translation of device performance measurements to reference conditions. Sol. Cells 18, 269–279 (1986).10.1016/0379-6787(86)90126-2 ↗
42. Denton, A. R. & Ashcroft, N. W. Vegards law. Phys. Rev. A 43, 3161–3164 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevA.43.3161 ↗
43. Vurgaftman, I., Meyer, J. R. & Ram-Mohan, L. R. Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5815–5875 (2001).10.1063/1.1368156 ↗
44. Dameron, A. A. et al. Pt–Ru alloyed fuel cell catalysts sputtered from a single alloyed target. ACS Catal. 1, 1307–1315 (2011).10.1021/cs200200s ↗
45. Nielander, A. C., Shaner, M. R., Papadantonakis, K. M., Francis, S. A. & Lewis, N. S. A taxonomy for solar fuels generators. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 16–25 (2015).10.1039/C4EE02251C ↗