Scalable self-aligned fabrication of nanoscale vertical a-IGZO TFTs utilizing angled deposition
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Amorphous indium–gallium–zinc oxide (a-IGZO) thin-film transistors (TFTs) are promising for nanoscale logic and memory devices, including vertical-channel and monolithic 3D DRAM, owing to their high mobility, uniformity, and compatibility with low-temperature processing. However, nanolithographic definition of a-IGZO channels remains difficult because of their sensitivity to plasma damage and the poor volatility of In, Ga, and Zn etch by-products. Here, we present a scalable self-aligned fabrication strategy that exploits the shadowing effect of angled deposition to realize nanoscale devices without utilizing nanolithography. Using this method, we examined top-gate-top-contact device (TGTC), the widely adopted baseline that suffers from plasma-induced damage and top-gate-bottom-contact device (TGBC), which mitigate channel plasma exposure but undergo severe contact oxidation during post-deposition annealing. To overcome these limitations, we developed a nanoscale vertical TFT architecture in which obliquely deposited Ni/Au electrodes directly form self-aligned source/drain contacts without hard masks or dry etching. The resulting devices had a channel length of 55 nm, achieved an on-current of 2.6 × 10 –6 A µ m −1 at a drain bias ( V D ) of 40 mV, approximately four times higher than the TGTC and forty times higher than the TGBC which both had similar channel dimensions. At V D = 400 mV, a lateral field of 667 kV cm −1 , the on-current further increased to 1.6 × 10 –5 A µ m −1 with the off-state current remaining in the 10 −13 A µ m −1 range, giving an on/off ratio of 10 8 . These results demonstrate that angled deposition provides both a nanolithography-free route to nanoscale patterning and a device architecture for integrating a-IGZO transistors into future nanoscale logic and memory technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Nomura · Nature · 2004 · 432 · 48810.1038/nature03090 ↗
2. Shin · J. Soc. Inf. Disp. · 2023 · 31 · 25310.1002/jsid.1213 ↗
3. Ha · 2023 · 110.1109/IEDM45741.2023.10413772 ↗
4. Ha · 2024 · 110.1109/IMW59701.2024.10536968 ↗
5. Yang · 2024 · 110.1109/VLSITechnologyandCir46783.2024.10631550 ↗
6. Naqi · ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2023 · 5 · 337810.1021/acsaelm.3c00394 ↗
7. Olguín-Leija · IEEE J. Flex. Electron. · 2024 · 3 · 46610.1109/JFLEX.2024.3408135 ↗
8. Jeon · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 30110.1038/nmat3256 ↗
9. Yoon · J. Alloys Compd. · 2020 · 81710.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152788 ↗
10. Pu · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2013 · 283 · 72210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.007 ↗
11. Um · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 11210.1063/1.5007191 ↗
12. Prasad · Nanotechnology · 2021 · 3210.1088/1361-6528/ac0cb0 ↗
13. Shul · MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. · 1999 · 4S · G8.110.1557/PROC-537-G8.1 ↗
14. Lin · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2021 · 68 · 55610.1109/TED.2020.3047015 ↗
15. Yen · IEEE Electron. Device Lett. · 2024 · 45 · 158610.1109/LED.2024.3424579 ↗
16. Subhechha · 2021 · 1
17. Belmonte · 2021 · 110.1109/IEDM19574.2021.9720596 ↗
18. Petti · IEEE Electron. Device Lett. · 2015 · 36 · 47510.1109/LED.2015.2418295 ↗
19. Chen · IEEE Electron. Device Lett. · 2025 · 46 · 112710.1109/LED.2025.3563839 ↗
20. Ahn · IEEE Electron. Device Lett. · 2022 · 43 · 190910.1109/LED.2022.3210162 ↗
21. Lei · RSC Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 1791010.1039/D1RA02155A ↗
22. Ryoo · Nanotechnology · 2021 · 3210.1088/1361-6528/abcbc4 ↗
23. Ahn · Nanotechnology · 2023 · 3410.1088/1361-6528/acb3cc ↗
24. Cho · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2024 · 71 · 183910.1109/TED.2024.3350562 ↗
25. Noh · ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2023 · 5 · 666810.1021/acsaelm.3c01185 ↗
26. Tang · Solid Films · 2016 · 614 · 7310.1016/j.tsf.2016.03.005 ↗
27. Cord · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2006 · 24 · 313910.1116/1.2375090 ↗
28. Lecocq · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 2210.1088/0957-4484/22/31/315302 ↗
29. Costache · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2012 · 30 · 04E10510.1116/1.4722982 ↗
30. Jeon · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2014 · 3210.1116/1.4863512 ↗
31. Rousseau · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 10410.1063/1.4865814 ↗
32. Skinner-Ramos · J. Supercond. · 2025 · 1410.1016/j.supcon.2025.100158 ↗
33. Barber · J. Phys. Chem. · 1956 · 60 · 50510.1021/j150538a031 ↗
34. Brunetti · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2009 · 54 · 93910.1021/je8007167 ↗
35. Donnelly · J Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2013 · 3110.1116/1.4819316 ↗
36. Kang · IEEE Electron. Device Lett. · 2011 · 32 · 138510.1109/LED.2011.2161568 ↗
37. Lee · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 410.1002/aelm.201700550 ↗
38. Kim · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 11510.1063/1.4868630 ↗
39. Yang · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2023 · 70 · 12110.1109/TED.2022.3223642 ↗
40. Sharma · Adv. Mater. Interfaces · 2022 · 910.1002/admi.202200647 ↗
41. Greiner · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 11 · 7610.1038/nmat3159 ↗
42. Meyer · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 540810.1002/adma.201201630 ↗
43. Mews · IEEE J. Photovolt. · 2017 · 7 · 120910.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2714193 ↗
44. Michaelson · J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 472910.1063/1.323539 ↗
45. Lim · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2025 · 68210.1016/j.apsusc.2024.161693 ↗