journal article·2024-12-09

Analysis of coupling effect between TID and SET in SOI Tri-Gate nanowire field-effect transistors

Xilong Zhou, Chenyu Yin, Hongxia Liu, Shupeng Chen, Shulong Wang, Junjie Huang, Zhanpeng Yan, Chang Liu

Nanotechnology· Volume 35· Issue 50
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the response of nanowire field-effect transistors (NWFETs) to total ionizing dose (TID), single-event transient (SET), and their coupling effects in junctionless (JL), inversion (IM), and junctionless accumulation (AC) modes. The degradation of the three modes under irradiation and the effect of device bias configuration on the electrical properties of NWFETs are analyzed, and the different effects of SET on the three modes are compared. On this basis, the influence of TID on SET current generation and the charge collection mechanism are studied, and the changes in peak current, pulse width, and collected charge of transient current under different TIDs are compared. The results show that JL mode has the worst resistance to TID and SET coupling effects, followed by IM and AC modes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Radiation Effects in Electronics · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies10.1109/5.915374 ↗
2. Junctionless multiple-gate transistors for analog applications10.1109/TED.2011.2157826 ↗
3. Junctionless versus inversion-mode lateral semiconductor nanowire transistors10.1088/1361-648X/aad7c7 ↗
4. Performance estimation of sub-30 nm junctionless tunnel FET (JLTFET)10.1007/s10825-013-0483-6 ↗
5. Junctionless transistors: state-of-the-art10.3390/electronics9071174 ↗
6. Synergism between single event effects and total ionising dose
7. Charge-based compact analytical model for triple-gate junctionless nanowire transistors10.1016/j.sse.2016.04.013 ↗
8. Comparison of junctionless and conventional trigate transistors With Lg down to 26 nm10.1109/LED.2011.2158978 ↗
9. Electron−hole pair creation energy in SiO 210.1063/1.88104 ↗
10. Hole mobility and transport in thin SiO 2 films10.1063/1.88200 ↗
11. Total ionizing dose response of multiple-gate nanowire field effect transistors10.1109/TNS.2017.2702668 ↗
12. Investigations on the geometry effects and bias configuration on the TID response of nMOS SOI Tri-Gate nanowire field-effect transistors10.1109/TNS.2017.2776326 ↗
13. Si, SiGe nanowire devices by top–down technology and their applications10.1109/TED.2008.2005154 ↗
14. Junctionless Nanowire Transistor (JNT): properties and design guidelines10.1016/j.sse.2011.06.004 ↗
15. TID circuit simulation in nanowire FETs and nanosheet FETs10.3390/electronics10080956 ↗
16. The analysis of SEU in nanowire FETs and Nanosheet FETs10.3390/electronics10070863 ↗
17. Single event transients in Sub-10nm SOI MuGFETs due to heavy-ion irradiation10.1109/TDMR.2020.2985029 ↗
18. Investigation of Single Event Transient Effects in Junctionless Accumulation Mode MOSFET10.1109/TDMR.2020.3014176 ↗
19. Analysis of nanowire field-effect transistors SET response: geometrical considerations10.1109/TNS.2019.2916316 ↗
20. New concerns on heavy ion irradiation induced variation degradation in nanoscale CMOS devices10.1109/TED.2021.3060695 ↗
21. The total dose dependence of the single event upset sensitivity of IDT static RAMs10.1109/TNS.1984.4333477 ↗
22. Single event transients in digital CMOS—a review10.1109/TNS.2013.2255624 ↗