journal article·2006-09-14

The impact of silicon nano-wire technology on the design of single-work-function CMOS transistors and circuits

Ahmet Bindal, Sotoudeh Hamedi-Hagh

Nanotechnology· Volume 17· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

This three-dimensional exploratory study on vertical silicon wire MOS transistors with metal gates and undoped bodies demonstrates that these transistors dissipate less power and occupy less layout area while producing comparable transient response with respect to the state-of-the-art bulk and SOI technologies. The study selects a single metal gate work function for both NMOS and PMOS transistors to alleviate fabrication difficulties and then determines a common device geometry to produce an OFF current smaller than 1 pA for each transistor. Once an optimum wire radius and effective channel length is determined, DC characteristics including threshold voltage roll-off, drain-induced barrier lowering and sub-threshold slope of each transistor are measured. Simple CMOS gates such as an inverter, two- and three-input NAND, NOR and XOR gates and a full adder, composed of the optimum NMOS and PMOS transistors, are built to measure transient performance, power dissipation and layout area. Simulation results indicate that worst-case transient time and worst-case delay are 1.63 and 1.46 ps, respectively, for a two-input NAND gate and 7.51 and 7.43 ps, respectively, for a full adder for a fan-out of six transistor gates (24 aF). Worst-case power dissipation is 62.1 nW for a two-input NAND gate and 118.1 nW for a full adder at 1 GHz for the same output capacitance. The layout areas are 0.0066 µm2 for the two-input NAND gate and 0.049 µm2 for the full adder circuits.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TED.2005.84631710.1109/TED.2005.846317 ↗
2. 10.1109/TNANO.2005.84691310.1109/TNANO.2005.846913 ↗
3. Zhang R Roy K Janes D B · ISLPED · 2001 · 213
4. 10.1109/TNANO.2004.83784510.1109/TNANO.2004.837845 ↗
5. 10.1109/TED.2005.84479210.1109/TED.2005.844792 ↗
6. 10.1109/TED.2004.84271510.1109/TED.2004.842715 ↗
7. 10.1109/TNANO.2005.84691510.1109/TNANO.2005.846915 ↗
8. Yu B · IEDM · 2002 · 251
9. Choi Y-K Chang L Ranade P Lee J-S Ha D Balasubramanian S Agarwal A Ameen M King T-J Bokor J · IEDM · 2002 · 259
10. Yu B · NSTI · 2005 · 3 · 232
11. 10.1063/1.133564010.1063/1.1335640 ↗
12. Islam M S · Nanotechnology · 2004 · 15 · L510.1088/0957-4484/15/5/L01 ↗
13. 10.1116/1.58929110.1116/1.589291 ↗
14. Kikuchi T Moriya S Nakatsuka Y Matsuoka H Nakazato K Nishida A Chakihara H Matsuoka M Moniwa M · IEDM · 2004 · 923
15. Ecoffey S Pott V Bouvet D Mazza M Mahapatra S Schmid A Leblebici Y Declercq M J Ionescu A M · IEEE Int. Solid State Circuit Conf. · 2005 · 260
16. 10.1109/16.7516810.1109/16.75168 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl025875l10.1021/nl025875l ↗
18. 10.1109/TED.2005.84807710.1109/TED.2005.848077 ↗
19. Wang J Polizzi E Lundstrom M · IEDM · 2003 · 695
20. 10.1109/16.14467810.1109/16.144678 ↗
21. 10.1109/TVLSI.2004.83632210.1109/TVLSI.2004.836322 ↗
22. Dwyer C · Performance Simulation of Nanoscale Silicon Rod Field-Effect · 2003 · 2 · 69
23. 10.1143/JJAP.42.207310.1143/JJAP.42.2073 ↗
24. 10.1109/66.98343910.1109/66.983439 ↗
25. 10.1109/16.90272710.1109/16.902727 ↗
26. 10.1109/43.918610.1109/43.9186 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.32788510.1063/1.327885 ↗
28. Arora N D · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1982 · 29 · 29210.1109/T-ED.1982.20698 ↗
29. 10.1016/0026-2714(84)90450-510.1016/0026-2714(84)90450-5 ↗
30. 10.1109/TED.2005.84810910.1109/TED.2005.848109 ↗
31. Sery G Borkar S De V · DAC · 2002 · 78
32. Boeuf F · IEDM · 2004 · 425
33. Numata T · IEDM · 2004 · 177
34. 10.1109/TED.2005.84808110.1109/TED.2005.848081 ↗
35. Wang H C H · IEDM · 2004 · 161
36. Luo Z · IEDM · 2004 · 661
37. Lindert N Choi Y K Chang L Anderson E Lee W C · Device Research Conf. · 2001 · 26
38. Choi Y K Lindert N Xuan P Tang S Ha D Anderson E · IEDM · 2001 · 421
39. Wakabayashi H · IEDM · 2004 · 429
40. Bai P · IEDM · 2004 · 657
41. Kedzierski J Dried D M Nowak E J Kanarsky T Rankin J H · IEDM · 2001 · 437
42. Yang F L Chen H Y Chen F C Chan Y L · Symp. VLSI Technol. · 2001 · 104
43. Srivastava N Banerjee K · Proc. 21st Int. Multilevel Interconnect Conf. · 2004 · 393
44. Moon P Dubin V Johnston S Leu J Raol K Wu C · IEDM · 2003 · 841
45. Tada M · IEDM · 2003 · 845
46. Nakai S · IEDM · 2003 · 285
47. Kondo S Yoon B U Tokitoh S Misawa K Sone S Shin H J Ohashi N Kobayashi N · IEDM · 2003 · 151
48. Isobayashi A Enomoto Y Yamada H Takahashi S Kadomura S · IEDM · 2004 · 953
49. Alers G B · Semicond. Int. · 2006 · 29 · 38
50. Bai P · IEDM · 2004 · 657
51. 10.1109/TVLSI.2002.80844610.1109/TVLSI.2002.808446 ↗
52. 10.1109/TVLSI.2005.84880610.1109/TVLSI.2005.848806 ↗
53. Chang C H Zhang M Gu J · Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. Image Signal Proc. Analysis · 2003 · 454
54. 10.1109/92.98872710.1109/92.988727 ↗
55. Sayed M Badawy W · IEEE Int. Symp. Circuits Syst. · 2002 · 559
56. Khatibzade A A Raahemifar K · Canadian Conf. Electron. and Comput. Eng. · 2004 · 2139
57. Goel S Gollamudi S Kumar A Bayoumi M · 47th Midwest Symp. Circuits and Syst. · 2004 · 209