journal article·2021-04-02

Deposition amount effects on the microstructure of ion-beam-sputtering grown Mn 0.03 Ge 0.97 quantum dots for spintronic applications

Yahui Li, Chen Li, Haochen Tong, Tao Chen, Guangyang Li, Shizhe Huang, Shumin Tang, Feng Qiu, Jie Yang, Tao Sun, Yu Yang, Chong Wang

Nanotechnology· Volume 32· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Here, a relative simpler and lower cost method, ion beam sputtering deposition was applied to fabricate diluted magnetic Mn x Ge 1− x quantum dots (QDs). The effects of Ge–Mn co-deposition amount on the morphology and crystallization of Mn 0.03 Ge 0.97 QDs were investigated systematically by employing the atomic force microscopy and Raman spectroscopy techniques. It can be seen that the morphology, density, and crystallinity of Mn 0.03 Ge 0.97 QDs exhibit unique evolution processes with the increase of Ge–Mn co-sputtering amount. The optimal deposition amount for realizing well size-uniform, large-aspect-ratio, and high-density QDs is also determined. The unique evolution route of diluted magnetic semiconductor QDs and the amount of co-sputtering are also discussed sufficiently.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor materials and devices · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Xiu · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 33710.1038/nmat2716 ↗
2. Xiu · Nano Rev. · 2011 · 2 · 589610.3402/nano.v2i0.5896 ↗
3. Dietl · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 96510.1038/nmat2898 ↗
4. Makarov · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 3110.1088/0268-1242/31/11/113006 ↗
5. Toydemir · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 374 · 35410.1016/j.jmmm.2014.08.049 ↗
6. Portavoce · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 100 · 7010.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.12.016 ↗
7. Wang · Thin Solid Films · 2010 · 518 · S10410.1016/j.tsf.2009.10.066 ↗
8. Xiu · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 2110.1088/0957-4484/21/25/255602 ↗
9. Wang · APL Mater. · 2016 · 410.1063/1.4945657 ↗
10. Nie · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 710.1038/ncomms12866 ↗
11. Nie · Nanoscale · 2017 · 9 · 308610.1039/C6NR08688H ↗
12. Özer · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 8510.1103/PhysRevB.85.125208 ↗
13. Murate · Nanoscale · 2018 · 1010.1039/C7NR07177A ↗
14. Bottegoni · Nat. Mater. · 2014 · 13 · 79010.1038/nmat4015 ↗
15. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 10010.1063/1.4729752 ↗
16. Ottaviano · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 8310.1103/PhysRevB.83.134426 ↗
17. Guchhait · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 8410.1103/PhysRevB.84.024432 ↗
18. Reuther · J. Phys. D: Appl.Phys. · 2012 · 4510.1088/0022-3727/45/39/395001 ↗
19. Toydemir · J Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 393 · 22010.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.068 ↗
20. Nie · J. Cryst. Growth · 2015 · 425 · 27910.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.01.025 ↗
21. Dalmas de Réotier · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 9110.1103/PhysRevB.91.245408 ↗
22. Mouton · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 11210.1063/1.4768723 ↗
23. Yang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2016 · 386 · 30310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.05.175 ↗
24. Ke · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2015 · 328 · 38710.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.034 ↗
25. Ke · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 2610.1088/0957-4484/26/44/445602 ↗
26. Kassim · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 11310.1063/1.4792221 ↗
27. Wang · Nanotechnology · 2015 · 2610.1088/0957-4484/26/10/105201 ↗
28. Wang · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 16 · 804610.1166/jnn.2016.12792 ↗
29. Nolph · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 2510.1088/0953-8984/25/31/315801 ↗
30. Ferri · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2012 · 358 · 5810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.08.018 ↗
31. Ferri · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 10810.1063/1.3520661 ↗
32. Zhang · Nanotechnology · 2016 · 2710.1088/0957-4484/27/30/305601 ↗