journal article·2023-02-26

Simple Ge/Si bilayer junction-based doping-less tunnel field-effect transistor

Min-Won Kim, Ji-Hun Kim, Hyeon-Jun Kim, Jeong-Woo Seo, Jea-Gun Park, Jin-Pyo Hong

Nanotechnology· Volume 34· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Tunnel field-effect transistors (TFETs) have garnered great interest as an option for the replacement of metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors owing to their extremely low off-current and fast switching suitable for low-power-consumption applications. However, conventional doped TFETs have the disadvantage of introducing undesirable random dopant fluctuation (RDF) events, which cause a large variance in the threshold voltage and ambipolar leakage current at negative gate voltages. In this study, a simple approach for charge plasma-based doping-less TFETs (DL-TFETs), including the Ge/Si bilayer frame, which affects the RDF and low on-current issues, was developed by the commercially available Silvaco Atlas device simulator. The use of the Ge/Si bilayer enhances the on-current and point subthreshold swing to 1.4 × 10−6 A and 16.6 mV dec−1, respectively. In addition, the dependencies of the Ge/Si junction boundary position and Ge content were examined systematically to attain a firm understanding of the electrical features in DL-TFETs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Babu K Goel E 2022 Silicon ( https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-01826-0 )10.1007/s12633-022-01826-0) ↗
2. Turkane · Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. · 2016 · 11 · 4922
3. Tiwari · Silicon · 2021 · 14 · 650710.1007/s12633-021-01458-w ↗
4. Avci · IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. · 2015 · 3 · 8810.1109/JEDS.2015.2390591 ↗
5. Jeyanthi · 2020
6. Kim · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2019 · 66 · 165610.1109/TED.2019.2899206 ↗
7. Kim · 178
8. Choi · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2007 · 28 · 74310.1109/LED.2007.901273 ↗
9. Mayer · 2008 · 110.1109/IEDM.2008.4796641 ↗
10. Krishnamohan · 2008 · 110.1109/IEDM.2008.4796839 ↗
11. Gnani · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2011 · 58 · 290310.1109/TED.2011.2159608 ↗
12. Nagy · IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. · 2018 · 6 · 33210.1109/JEDS.2018.2804383 ↗
13. Veloso · ECS Trans. · 2016 · 72 · 3110.1149/07204.0031ecst ↗
14. Iwai · Sci. China Inf. Sci. · 2011 · 54 · 100410.1007/s11432-011-4220-0 ↗
15. Sacchetto · 2009 · 245
16. Nagy · IEEE Access · 2020 · 8 · 5319610.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980925 ↗
17. Yu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2017 · 2710.1002/adfm.201604093 ↗
18. Kim · IEEE J. Electron Devices Soc. · 2017 · 6 · 16410.1109/JEDS.2017.2781250 ↗
19. Jariwala · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 110210.1021/nn500064s ↗
20. Li · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 404110.1038/srep04041 ↗
21. Dong · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2017 · 64 · 62210.1109/TED.2016.2644719 ↗
22. Mulaosmanovic · 2017 · T17610.23919/VLSIT.2017.7998165 ↗
23. Jerry · 2017 · 2.110.1109/IEDM.2017.8268338 ↗
24. Trentzsch · 2016 · 5.110.1109/IEDM.2016.7838397 ↗
25. Wang · 2D Mater. · 2017 · 410.1088/2053-1583/aa5c17 ↗
26. Khan · 2011 · 3.110.1109/IEDM.2011.6131532 ↗
27. Kwon · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 30010.1109/LED.2017.2787063 ↗
28. Kobayashi · 2016 · 3.110.1109/IEDM.2016.7838402 ↗
29. Pahwa · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2018 · 65 · 86710.1109/TED.2018.2794499 ↗
30. Li · IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I · 2017 · 64 · 290710.1109/TCSI.2017.2702741 ↗
31. Zhou · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 70 · 59810.1063/1.118285 ↗
32. Hasegawa · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 6910.1103/PhysRevB.69.245115 ↗
33. Newns · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 78010.1063/1.121999 ↗
34. Son · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 11010.1063/1.3651612 ↗
35. Wang · Solid-State Electron. · 2004 · 48 · 228110.1016/j.sse.2004.04.006 ↗
36. Zhang · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2006 · 27 · 29710.1109/LED.2006.871855 ↗
37. Lee · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2016 · 63 · 182710.1109/TED.2016.2539209 ↗
38. Damrongplasit · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2013 · 34 · 18410.1109/LED.2012.2235404 ↗
39. Hueting · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2008 · 29 · 136710.1109/LED.2008.2006864 ↗
40. Raad · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2016 · 63 · 395010.1109/TED.2016.2600621 ↗
41. Kumar · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 328510.1109/TED.2013.2276888 ↗
42. Anand · J. Comput. Electron. · 2016 · 15 · 9410.1007/s10825-015-0771-4 ↗
43. Han · Micromachines · 2019 · 10 · 6
44. Aslam · Micro Nano Lett. · 2019 · 14 · 12310.1049/mnl.2018.5390 ↗
45. Dubey · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2019 · 66 · 283710.1109/TED.2019.2909182 ↗
46. Sharma · IETE Tech. Rev. · 2021 · 39 · 83810.1080/02564602.2021.1912661 ↗
47. Chen · Nanoscale Res. Lett. · 2020 · 15 · 20210.1186/s11671-020-03429-3 ↗
48. Li · Silicon · 2021 · 13 · 398110.1007/s12633-020-00665-1 ↗
49. Choi · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2010 · 57 · 231710.1109/TED.2010.2052167 ↗
50. Dutt · Silicon · 2022 · 14 · 978910.1007/s12633-022-01692-w ↗
51. Atlas User’s Manual · 2015
52. Lee · AIP Adv. · 2021 · 1110.1063/5.0035370 ↗
53. Kim · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2013 · 62 · 53110.3938/jkps.62.531 ↗