A statistical-based material and process guidelines for design of carbon nanotube field-effect transistors in gigascale integrated circuits
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon nanotube field-effect transistors (CNFETs) show great promise as building blocks of future integrated circuits. However, synthesizing single-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) with accurate chirality and exact positioning control has been widely acknowledged as an exceedingly complex task. Indeed, density and chirality variations in CNT growth can compromise the reliability of CNFET-based circuits. In this paper, we present a novel statistical compact model to estimate the failure probability of CNFETs to provide some material and process guidelines for the design of CNFETs in gigascale integrated circuits. We use measured CNT spacing distributions within the framework of detailed failure analysis to demonstrate that both the CNT density and the ratio of metallic to semiconducting CNTs play dominant roles in defining the failure probability of CNFETs. Besides, it is argued that the large-scale integration of these devices within an integrated circuit will be feasible only if a specific range of CNT density with an acceptable ratio of semiconducting to metallic CNTs can be adjusted in a typical synthesis process.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Radiation Effects in Electronics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl035185x10.1021/nl035185x ↗
2. Wong H-S P Appenzeller J Derycke V Martel R Wind S Avouris P · IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf. · 2003 · 370
3. 10.1109/TED.2006.88381610.1109/TED.2006.883816 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.112279710.1126/science.1122797 ↗
5. Moriyama N · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 16520110.1088/0957-4484/21/16/165201 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2007.7710.1038/nnano.2007.77 ↗
7. 10.1109/JPROC.2007.91105110.1109/JPROC.2007.911051 ↗
8. 10.1038/nature0179710.1038/nature01797 ↗
9. 10.1016/0008-6223(95)00021-510.1016/0008-6223(95)00021-5 ↗
10. Zhang J Patil N Lin A Wong H-S P Mitra S · IEEE/ACM Design Automation Conf. · 2010 · 1159
11. 10.1021/ar010162f10.1021/ar010162f ↗
12. 10.1109/TNANO.2009.202834310.1109/TNANO.2009.2028343 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.04541110.1103/PhysRevB.66.045411 ↗
14. 10.1142/978186094379910.1142/9781860943799 ↗
15. Zhang J Patil N Hazeghi A Mitra S · IEEE/ACM Design Automation Conf. · 2009 · 71
16. 10.1109/TED.2008.201060410.1109/TED.2008.2010604 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20090323810.1002/adma.200903238 ↗
18. 10.1021/nl901890x10.1021/nl901890x ↗
19. Shulaker M M · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 188110.1021/nl200063x ↗
20. 10.1021/nl035097c10.1021/nl035097c ↗
21. 10.1126/science.113378110.1126/science.1133781 ↗
22. Hassanien A · Nanotechnology · 2005 · 16 · 27810.1088/0957-4484/16/2/017 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.108653410.1126/science.1086534 ↗
24. 10.1038/nnano.2006.5210.1038/nnano.2006.52 ↗
25. Zhang J Bobba S Patil N Lin A Wong H-S P De Micheli G Mitra S · IEEE/ACM Design Automation Conf. · 2010 · 889
26. 10.1109/TED.2009.203316810.1109/TED.2009.2033168 ↗
27. 10.1109/TNANO.2008.200690310.1109/TNANO.2008.2006903 ↗
28. 10.1109/TCAD.2009.202319710.1109/TCAD.2009.2023197 ↗
29. 10.1109/TED.2010.209278010.1109/TED.2010.2092780 ↗
30. 10.1109/TNANO.2010.204667410.1109/TNANO.2010.2046674 ↗
31. Populis A · Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes · 2002
32. Lozier D M · NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions · 2010
33. 10.1007/s12274-008-8034-310.1007/s12274-008-8034-3 ↗
34. Ross S A · A First Course in Probability · 2001
35. 10.1109/TED.2010.205320710.1109/TED.2010.2053207 ↗
36. Ghavami B Raji M Pedram H · IEEE Int. Symposium on VLSI · 2011 · 143
37. 10.1111/1467-842X.0007210.1111/1467-842X.00072 ↗