journal article·2024-07-26Open access

Enhanced Nonlinear Optical Limiter in the Visible Spectral Region Based on Fe- and Co-Doped NiO Nanoparticles within PVP Nanofibers

Yasemin Pepe, Yusuf Tutel, Serife Akkoyun, Nurcan Asci, Eda Cevik, Ahmet Karatay, Husnu Emrah Unalan, Ayhan Elmali

ACS Applied Nano Materials· Volume 7· Issue 14

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In this study, electrospun cobalt (Co)- and iron (Fe)-doped nickel oxide (NiO) nanofilled polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) composite nanofibers were produced, and their linear and nonlinear optical and optical limiting properties were investigated. Three distinct average particle sizes (61, 110, and 150 nm) of Co- and Fe-doped NiO nanoparticles were produced using the coprecipitation method. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques were used to analyze the morphology and structure of particles. Composite nanofibers were found to be homogeneous and continuous, with average diameters ranging from 177 to 314 nm. It was found that different particle sizes of Co- and Fe-doped NiO nanoparticles and aggregations in nanofibers did not have a significant effect on the results. The Fe-doped structure mostly contained defect states and showed the weakest fluorescence emission among the other composite nanofibers. These behaviors indicate a further charge transfer mechanism via defect states, with multiphoton absorption favoring nonlinear absorption. Open aperture Z-scan experiments were carried out at 532 nm with a 4-ns pulsed laser to observe the nonlinear optical features of nanocomposite fibers. It was observed that all of the composite nanofibers exhibited a nonlinear absorption (NA) feature, which weakened with an increase in input intensity. The Fe-doped structure, characterized by more defect states, demonstrated the strongest NA behavior. All of the composite nanofibers displayed a strong optical limiting behavior within the range of 1.35 × 10 –5 and 1.92 × 10 –5 J/cm 2 . Given the strong NA and robust optical confinement behavior of Fe-doped NiO nanoparticles, composite nanofibers have emerged as promising candidates for optoelectronic applications in the visible spectral region.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · Optical Polarization and Ellipsometry · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Engineering Physics, Faculty of Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Türkiye

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara 06800, Türkiye

Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara 06010, Türkiye

Central Research Laboratory, Application and Research Center, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara 06010, Türkiye

Energy Storage Materials and Devices Research Center (ENDAM), Middle East Technical University (METU), Ankara 06800, Türkiye

References (78)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1134/S003602442210023510.1134/S0036024422100235 ↗
2. 10.1002/er.760810.1002/er.7608 ↗
3. 10.1093/nsr/nwac10410.1093/nsr/nwac104 ↗
4. 10.1002/advs.20210523110.1002/advs.202105231 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-018-07947-810.1038/s41467-018-07947-8 ↗
6. 10.1007/s43994-022-00007-410.1007/s43994-022-00007-4 ↗
7. Ashour G. · Umm Al-Qura Univ. J. Appl. Sci. · 2021 · 7 · 1
8. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.06.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2013.06.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10998710.1016/j.optmat.2020.109987 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16597510.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165975 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.11008810.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110088 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00377-910.1016/S0169-4332(00)00377-9 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41598-023-33713-y10.1038/s41598-023-33713-y ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10626010.1016/j.mssp.2021.106260 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.optcom.2019.04.08310.1016/j.optcom.2019.04.083 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.325423310.1063/1.3254233 ↗
17. 10.1109/LPT.2018.285904210.1109/LPT.2018.2859042 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20120226910.1002/adfm.201202269 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0322110.1021/acsanm.1c03221 ↗
20. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab600e10.1088/2053-1591/ab600e ↗
21. 10.1039/C5RA05334J10.1039/C5RA05334J ↗
22. 10.1016/j.spmi.2012.11.02410.1016/j.spmi.2012.11.024 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.06210.1016/j.proche.2016.03.062 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.29810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.298 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.30110.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.301 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.16837310.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168373 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00339-020-3293-210.1007/s00339-020-3293-2 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10854-018-8626-y10.1007/s10854-018-8626-y ↗
29. 10.1016/j.physb.2019.41195510.1016/j.physb.2019.411955 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10757910.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107579 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.10.00910.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.10.009 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.00710.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.007 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.01.11010.1016/j.ijleo.2017.01.110 ↗
34. 10.1186/s40580-020-00237-410.1186/s40580-020-00237-4 ↗
35. 10.3390/nano907104510.3390/nano9071045 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10467210.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104672 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12923910.1016/j.snb.2020.129239 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.snr.2020.10000510.1016/j.snr.2020.100005 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20200609310.1002/adma.202006093 ↗
40. 10.1039/D0TC02983A10.1039/D0TC02983A ↗
41. 10.1002/pen.2570910.1002/pen.25709 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b0117810.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01178 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10392710.1016/j.est.2021.103927 ↗
44. 10.1039/D2TC04945G10.1039/D2TC04945G ↗
45. 10.1007/s10853-024-09502-x10.1007/s10853-024-09502-x ↗
46. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0657210.1021/acsomega.3c06572 ↗
47. 10.1039/D3NR03859A10.1039/D3NR03859A ↗
48. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.10949710.1016/j.optlastec.2023.109497 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10853-022-07948-510.1007/s10853-022-07948-5 ↗
50. 10.1007/s11051-006-9109-210.1007/s11051-006-9109-2 ↗
51. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
52. 10.1039/C5RA17017F10.1039/C5RA17017F ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15808710.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158087 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.021 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.06.00310.1016/j.materresbull.2018.06.003 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.16363710.1016/j.ijleo.2019.163637 ↗
57. 10.1149/1945-7111/abcf5110.1149/1945-7111/abcf51 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.04010.1016/j.jmst.2021.05.040 ↗
59. 10.1021/ic300749a10.1021/ic300749a ↗
60. 10.1039/C9QI01133A10.1039/C9QI01133A ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12157010.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121570 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.01510.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.015 ↗
63. 10.1002/adma.20160679310.1002/adma.201606793 ↗
64. 10.1002/adma.20190653910.1002/adma.201906539 ↗
65. 10.1039/C5QI00247H10.1039/C5QI00247H ↗
66. 10.1016/j.physb.2019.41190510.1016/j.physb.2019.411905 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.11064110.1016/j.inoche.2023.110641 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.03.03310.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.03.033 ↗
69. Pankove J. I. · 1971
70. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.05.02210.1016/j.matlet.2011.05.022 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRev.92.132410.1103/PhysRev.92.1324 ↗
72. 10.1063/1.329850010.1063/1.3298500 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2022.11917010.1016/j.jlumin.2022.119170 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10949510.1016/j.optmat.2019.109495 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.optmat.2023.11448110.1016/j.optmat.2023.114481 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.12831010.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128310 ↗
77. 10.1109/3.5339410.1109/3.53394 ↗
78. 10.1063/1.495503710.1063/1.4955037 ↗