journal article·2026-07-15

Binary to Quaternary Rare-Earth Phosphates: Compositional Effects on Thermal Properties and CMAS Corrosion Resistance of Environmental Barrier Coatings

Bishnu Pada Majee, Jelili Kazeem, Liping Huang, Jie Lian

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 27
Publisher page

Abstract

Equimolar multicomponent xenotime rare-earth phosphates (REPO 4 ), ranging from binary to quaternary REPO 4, were synthesized via chemical coprecipitation. The synthesized powders were densified via spark plasma sintering (SPS) at 1500 °C. Their thermal conductivity, coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs), and resistance to calcium–magnesium–alumina–silicate (CMAS) corrosion were systematically characterized to evaluate their potential as environmental barrier coatings (EBCs) for SiC-based ceramic matrix composites (SiC/SiC CMCs). All REPO 4 compositions studied here exhibit CTEs close to SiC/SiC-CMCs. Thermal conductivity depends on cation-size disorder and compositional complexity. Notably, at a constant number of constituent elements, increased cation-size disorder reduces thermal conductivity. Among the quaternary compositions, (Sc 1/4 Lu 1/4 Er 1/4 Y 1/4 )PO 4 exhibits minimal thermal conductivity because of its higher degree of size disorder compared to (Lu 1/4 Yb 1/4 Er 1/4 Y 1/4 )PO 4. The CMAS corrosion test at 1300 °C for 96 h resulted in the formation of a uniform, dense, and continuous reaction layer mainly consisting of Ca 8 MgRE(PO 4 ) 7 and RE 2 Si 2 O 7 for all REPO 4 . However, at 1400 °C, the CMAS corrosion behavior of REPO 4 differs significantly. Binary and ternary REPO 4 exhibit direct CMAS infiltration along the grain boundaries without creating a protective reaction layer, whereas quaternary (4RE 0.25 )PO 4 develops a discontinuous reaction layer and halts the CMAS penetration to some extent. The reduced thermal conductivity and enhanced CMAS corrosion resistance of the quaternary compositions, in particular (Lu 1/4 Yb 1/4 Er 1/4 Y 1/4 )PO 4, compared to their binary (Lu 1/2 Y 1/2 )PO 4 and ternary (Lu 1/3 Er 1/3 Y 1/3 )PO 4 counterparts, imply the potential of quaternary phosphates as promising EBC candidates for SiC/SiC CMCs in high-temperature environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering

Funding

Division of Materials Research in the National Science Foundation

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Steibel, J. Ceramic Matrix Composites Taking Flight at GE Aviation . www.ceramics.org.
2. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.05110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.051 ↗
3. Eaton, H. E.; Linsey, G. D. Accelerated Oxidation of SiC CMC’s by Water Vapor and Protection via Environmental Barrier Coating Approach . www.elsevier.com/locate/jeurceramsoc.
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.21010.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.210 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.15310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.153 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.05710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.057 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.106860910.1126/science.1068609 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.0c2286810.1021/acsami.0c22868 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.17010.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.170 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.05310.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.053 ↗
11. Lee, K. N. Key Durability Issues With Mullite-Based Environmental Barrier Coatings for Si-Based Ceramics , 2000. http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/gasturbinespower/article-pdf/122/4/632/5704705/632_1.pdf.10.1115/1.1287584 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.05.03010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.05.030 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.09.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.09.013 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mtla.2021.10128910.1016/j.mtla.2021.101289 ↗
15. 10.26599/JAC.2025.922104110.26599/JAC.2025.9221041 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41529-025-00619-110.1038/s41529-025-00619-1 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.12310.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.123 ↗
18. 10.1111/jace.1398210.1111/jace.13982 ↗
19. 10.1111/jace.2025110.1111/jace.20251 ↗
20. 10.26599/JAC.2024.922097810.26599/JAC.2024.9220978 ↗
21. 10.1111/jace.7001710.1111/jace.70017 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.01810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.16997810.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169978 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.09.02610.1016/j.ceramint.2024.09.026 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.09.28110.1016/j.ceramint.2023.09.281 ↗
26. 10.1134/S001670291004007510.1134/S0016702910040075 ↗
27. 10.1134/S002016851307004210.1134/S0020168513070042 ↗
28. 10.1134/S002016851208012210.1134/S0020168512080122 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.tca.2012.02.00210.1016/j.tca.2012.02.002 ↗
30. 10.1134/S001670291009006510.1134/S0016702910090065 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.06.03010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.06.030 ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01209.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01209.x ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-020-70648-010.1038/s41598-020-70648-0 ↗
34. 10.1007/s40145-019-0327-310.1007/s40145-019-0327-3 ↗
35. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03244.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03244.x ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.26610.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.266 ↗
37. 10.1038/ncomms948510.1038/ncomms9485 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.15810.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.158 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.mtla.2022.10155710.1016/j.mtla.2022.101557 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.11581910.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115819 ↗
41. 10.1134/S002016851305003810.1134/S0020168513050038 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2025.11735910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2025.117359 ↗
43. 10.1557/jmr.2020.13210.1557/jmr.2020.132 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.corsci.2024.11210810.1016/j.corsci.2024.112108 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.09.18710.1016/j.ceramint.2023.09.187 ↗
46. 10.1080/25787616.2021.201938910.1080/25787616.2021.2019389 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.61010.1103/PhysRevLett.65.610 ↗
48. 10.1557/s43577-021-00055-x10.1557/s43577-021-00055-x ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.18486610.1016/j.jallcom.2025.184866 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.03310.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.033 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.05810.1016/j.ceramint.2018.09.058 ↗
52. 10.1111/jace.1919210.1111/jace.19192 ↗
53. 10.1111/jace.1899910.1111/jace.18999 ↗
54. 10.2138/rmg.2010.72.810.2138/rmg.2010.72.8 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.12150810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121508 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.07.02010.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.07.020 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41529-024-00462-w10.1038/s41529-024-00462-w ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.12.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.12.013 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10888110.1016/j.corsci.2020.108881 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.corsci.2022.11034310.1016/j.corsci.2022.110343 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.mser.2021.10064410.1016/j.mser.2021.100644 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.corsci.2023.11166410.1016/j.corsci.2023.111664 ↗