journal article·2026-07-01

FAP-α-Responsive Size-Transformable Lipid Nanoparticles for Stromal Remodeling and Enhanced Drug Penetration in Fibrotic Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Li Xiang, Jiachi Xu, Yukang Lin, Xianjing Xiang, Qiangqiang Jiao, Sainan Zhu, Wenhui Zhang, Yuting Qin, Yuping Chen

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Fibrotic tumor microenvironment driven by activated hepatic stellate cells (aHSCs) and cancer-associated fibroblasts poses a formidable challenge to antitumoral drug delivery in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by promoting angiogenesis, immunosuppression, and dense extracellular matrix barrier. Overcoming this fibrosis-associated delivery resistance requires nanotherapeutic systems to not only target the stromal compartment but also adapt their structure within the tumor matrix to improve deep penetration. Herein, we report a fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP-α)-responsive, size-transformable lipid nanoparticle platform with integrated stromal targeting, enzymatic activation, and intracellular delivery capacity for enhanced drug penetration and stromal remodeling in fibrotic HCC. This developed system, denoted as SOR/DOX@GPA-LNP, is co-loaded with sorafenib and doxorubicin and engineered with three key features: (i) a FAP-α-cleavable GPA peptide linker for TME-specific activation, (ii) FAP-α-mediated targeting of aHSCs, and (iii) a PAMAM core-mediated proton sponge activity to facilitate endosomal escape. Physicochemical characterization demonstrates that GPA-LNPs possess uniform size distribution, high colloidal stability, pH-responsive release behavior, and favorable heme- and cyto-compatibility. In vitro studies confirmed their selective aHSC-targeting ability, while in vivo imaging showed enhanced accumulation and retention in nude mice bearing subcutaneous tumors and orthotopic tumor-bearing mice. GPA-LNPs exhibited size reduction (from 170.5 to 146.3 nm) upon exposure to FAP-α, which significantly improved transport in three-dimensional HCC/aHSC spheroid models and increased deeper intratumoral accumulation. This size-transformable property establishes a direct structure-property-function relationship linking FAP-α enzymatic responsiveness with enhanced stromal penetration. Functionally, SOR/DOX@GPA-LNPs simultaneously suppressed aHSC activation, disrupted the fibrotic stromal barrier, and delivered cytotoxic agents to tumor cells. In the orthotopic HCC model, SOR/DOX@GPA-LNPs achieved superior antitumor efficacy, improved stromal remodeling and reduced systemic toxicity compared to nonresponsive counterparts. Overall, this work presents a versatile strategy that couples TME-responsive size adaptability with dual-action payloads, offering a compelling approach to navigate the complexities of fibrotic HCC therapy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Pharmaceutical Sciences

University of South China

The First Affiliated Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Hengyang Medical School

Department of General Surgery

The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

MOE Key Laboratory of Rare Pediatric Diseases, Hengyang Medical School

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) · Natural Science Foundation of?Hunan Province

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/ijc.2921010.1002/ijc.29210 ↗
2. 10.1038/nrdp.2016.1810.1038/nrdp.2016.18 ↗
3. Paget S. · Cancer Metastasis Rev. · 1989 · 8 · 98
4. 10.1038/s43018-022-00357-210.1038/s43018-022-00357-2 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41575-023-00821-z10.1038/s41575-023-00821-z ↗
6. 10.1038/s42255-022-00642-510.1038/s42255-022-00642-5 ↗
7. 10.14309/ctg.000000000000005610.14309/ctg.0000000000000056 ↗
8. 10.3390/cells1003057510.3390/cells10030575 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.18894510.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188945 ↗
10. 10.1186/s12967-020-02376-y10.1186/s12967-020-02376-y ↗
11. 10.2147/IJN.S36345610.2147/IJN.S363456 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.11450510.1016/j.biopha.2023.114505 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.00210.1016/j.addr.2012.10.002 ↗
14. 10.1038/nbt.333010.1038/nbt.3330 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-020-20588-010.1038/s41467-020-20588-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.04310.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.043 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20046296010.1002/anie.200462960 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.10.01210.1016/j.jconrel.2006.10.012 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.addr.2017.03.00110.1016/j.addr.2017.03.001 ↗
20. 10.3390/cells909202710.3390/cells9092027 ↗
21. 10.1186/s13578-020-00488-y10.1186/s13578-020-00488-y ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.11378310.1016/j.jconrel.2025.113783 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.smaim.2025.07.00410.1016/j.smaim.2025.07.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.04610.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.046 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41420-024-01995-410.1038/s41420-024-01995-4 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-022-29186-810.1038/s41467-022-29186-8 ↗
27. 10.1002/hep.2085310.1002/hep.20853 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.12519010.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125190 ↗
29. 10.1002/adhm.20250017610.1002/adhm.202500176 ↗
30. 10.1038/nprot.2015.08010.1038/nprot.2015.080 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20210629610.1002/smll.202106296 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.04010.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.040 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41421-024-00747-z10.1038/s41421-024-00747-z ↗
34. 10.1007/s12072-025-10788-510.1007/s12072-025-10788-5 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.0c2313710.1021/acsami.0c23137 ↗
36. 10.1007/s42242-020-00105-410.1007/s42242-020-00105-4 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.11483910.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.114839 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.13527710.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.135277 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2026.13955410.1016/j.colsurfa.2026.139554 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.9b0201610.1021/acsami.9b02016 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c0002310.1021/acs.bioconjchem.1c00023 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.12.00510.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.12.005 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41420-024-01995-410.1038/s41420-024-01995-4 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-024-52308-310.1038/s41467-024-52308-3 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-022-29186-810.1038/s41467-022-29186-8 ↗
46. 10.1172/JCI9425810.1172/JCI94258 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.acra.2025.04.01610.1016/j.acra.2025.04.016 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.01010.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.010 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c0113510.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c01135 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.12540310.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125403 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.03510.1016/j.actbio.2023.07.035 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41598-023-50680-610.1038/s41598-023-50680-6 ↗
53. 10.1088/1748-605x/adf47f10.1088/1748-605x/adf47f ↗
54. 10.1039/D0NR04465B10.1039/D0NR04465B ↗
55. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1401014310.3390/pharmaceutics14010143 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0391310.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03913 ↗
57. 10.1002/adhm.20230035110.1002/adhm.202300351 ↗
58. 10.1186/s13045-023-01509-210.1186/s13045-023-01509-2 ↗
59. 10.1034/j.1600-0676.2002.01503.x10.1034/j.1600-0676.2002.01503.x ↗
60. 10.1002/hep.2085310.1002/hep.20853 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cis.2018.06.00510.1016/j.cis.2018.06.005 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.01510.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.015 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.04610.1016/j.jconrel.2022.10.046 ↗
64. 10.1021/acsnano.5c0379910.1021/acsnano.5c03799 ↗
65. 10.1021/acsnano.4c1556210.1021/acsnano.4c15562 ↗
66. 10.1002/hep.3184810.1002/hep.31848 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41586-022-05289-610.1038/s41586-022-05289-6 ↗
68. 10.1002/hep.3179210.1002/hep.31792 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.21724310.1016/j.canlet.2024.217243 ↗
70. 10.1126/sciimmunol.abl720910.1126/sciimmunol.abl7209 ↗