Modulating Mid-Gap Electronic States Through Site-Selective Modification in β-Pb x /β′-Cu y V 2 O 5 /CdS Heterostructures for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution
Source abstract
Abstract
We interfaced β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5 compounds, with varying stoichiometries of precisely positioned Pb-ions (x) and Cu-ions (y) in interstitial sites along a tunnel-structured ζ-V2O5 framework, with cysteine-capped CdS (cysCdS) quantum dots (QDs) to yield heterostructured photocatalysts. β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5 compounds exhibit midgap electronic states with orbital contributions from both Cu 3d and stereochemically active Pb 6s states that show distinctive light-initiated reactivity with photoexcited QDs. β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5/CdS heterostructures were prepared by linker-assisted assembly (LAA). Scanning and transmission electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Raman spectroscopy revealed that cysCdS QDs were deposited onto surfaces of β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5 via LAA. HAXPES revealed that the site-selective positioning of Pb-ions and Cu-ions promoted close energetic alignment of the midgap states of β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5 compounds with the valence-band maximum of cysCdS QDs. Transient absorption spectroscopy revealed that photogenerated holes were transferred from CdS QDs to midgap states of β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5 compounds on time scales <50 ps. Finally, photoelectrochemical and photochemical experiments revealed that β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5/CdS heterostructures promoted the photocatalytic reduction of H+ to H2. In photoelectrochemical experiments, under oxidative conditions, for all β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5/CdS heterostructures, H2 was evolved at a Pt counter electrode while a sacrificial donor was oxidized at the heterostructure-functionalized working electrode. In contrast, under reductive conditions, for β-Pb0.152V2O5/CdS and β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5/CdS heterostructures, H2 was evolved at the working electrode. In photochemical experiments, dispersed β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5/CdS heterostructures promoted the reduction of H+ to H2 under white-light illumination; β'-Cu0.55V2O5/CdS and β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5/CdS heterostructures, for which midgap states have Cu 3d orbital character, generated 2-fold more H2 than β-Pb0.152V2O5/CdS heterostructures. Cu-ion insertion thus appends additional acceptor surface states that improve ligand-mediated hole transfer from photoexcited QDs, but such states are intrinsically limited in mediating hole transport to the substrate as a result of the low mobility of holes in narrow Cu 3d-states. Our results reveal that the density and orbital character of midgap states of β-Pbx/β'-CuyV2O5 compounds, tunable through recently developed site-selective ion insertion strategies, determine efficiencies of charge-transfer and charge-transport mechanisms that underpin photocatalysis.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry
University at Buffalo, The State University of New York
Department of Chemistry and Department of Material Science and Engineering
Texas A&M University
National Laboratory of the Rockies
Laboratory for Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
Laboratory for Battery Science, PSI Center for Energy and Environmental Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute
Forschungsstrasse 111
Funding
Welch Foundation · National Science Foundation
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.02010.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.020 ↗
2. 10.1038/ngeo303110.1038/ngeo3031 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.03310.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.033 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12331710.1016/j.fuel.2022.123317 ↗
5. 10.1073/pnas.060339510310.1073/pnas.0603395103 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.07.00710.1016/j.joule.2021.07.007 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41558-020-0891-010.1038/s41558-020-0891-0 ↗
8. 10.1039/C8CS00542G10.1039/C8CS00542G ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.17510.1038/nphoton.2012.175 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0376210.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03762 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.checat.2023.10084410.1016/j.checat.2023.100844 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.3c0672210.1021/acsami.3c06722 ↗
13. 10.1063/5.020155010.1063/5.0201550 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0020110.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00201 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mseb.2023.11641310.1016/j.mseb.2023.116413 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsaem.4c0009810.1021/acsaem.4c00098 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsaem.4c0147710.1021/acsaem.4c01477 ↗
18. 10.1002/smll.20240340110.1002/smll.202403401 ↗
19. 10.1002/adpr.20220006510.1002/adpr.202200065 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0037810.1021/acs.accounts.8b00378 ↗
21. 10.1021/jacs.5c1217310.1021/jacs.5c12173 ↗
22. 10.1039/c1cs15098g10.1039/c1cs15098g ↗
23. 10.1021/cm504574h10.1021/cm504574h ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.8b0992410.1021/jacs.8b09924 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matt.2023.01.02810.1016/j.matt.2023.01.028 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41563-024-01842-y10.1038/s41563-024-01842-y ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.01.02710.1016/j.matt.2020.01.027 ↗
28. 10.1021/jacs.6c0237010.1021/jacs.6c02370 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0281410.1021/acsnano.6b02814 ↗
30. 10.1038/srep0377710.1038/srep03777 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12274-024-6675-510.1007/s12274-024-6675-5 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b0121210.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b01212 ↗
33. 10.1103/RevModPhys.75.3510.1103/RevModPhys.75.35 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00726-022-03144-610.1007/s00726-022-03144-6 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b1086310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10863 ↗
36. 10.1039/C6SC00192K10.1039/C6SC00192K ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0016410.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00164 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0023110.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00231 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.487574710.1063/1.4875747 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.15511410.1103/PhysRevB.64.155114 ↗
41. 10.1002/cey2.28010.1002/cey2.280 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0323210.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03232 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c0041310.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00413 ↗
44. 10.1021/acselectrochem.5c0033410.1021/acselectrochem.5c00334 ↗