journal article·2026-06-17

Carbide–Os Interactions Enhance Deuterium Evolution and Electrolytic Hydrogen Isotope Separation Efficiency

Yuan Zhan, Wanbin Yang, Zhijian Li, Lintao Rui, Haoze Li, Haochong Zhong, Shuo Li, Liangbin Shao, Na Xu, Shibin Wang, Yuan Sheng, Jianguo Wang

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Deuterium gas is primarily produced by electrolysis of high-purity heavy water. Pt/C, the benchmark catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), suffers from high cost, insufficient activity for the deuterium evolution reaction (DER), and poor hydrogen/deuterium separation performance. This study employs the more cost-effective osmium (Os) as the active metal. Leveraging strong metal–support interactions (SMSI) between Os and B 4 C or TiC supports, distinct regulatory effects are achieved: B 4 C optimizes DER performance, while TiC enhances H/D separation efficiency. Os/B 4 C shows ultralow overpotentials of 94 mV in 1 M NaOD and 9 mV in 1 M NaOH at 10 mA·cm –2, outperforming Pt/C in both activity and stability. Os/TiC exhibits a high isotope separation factor of α H/D = 6.0 in contrast to 3.5 for Pt/C. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals that B 4 C reduces the electron density of Os, whereas TiC has an opposite effect. H/D underpotential deposition behavior demonstrates weakened adsorption of the deuterium intermediate (D*) on the electron-deficient Os for optimized reaction kinetics and strengthened D* adsorption on the electron-rich Os that slows down DER. In situ attenuated total reflection-surface enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy results show that B 4 C facilitates the dissociation of both H 2 O and D 2 O, while TiC selectively promotes H 2 O dissociation, which is found by density functional theory calculations to be a result of the lowered activation barrier of the Volmer reaction in HER. This work provides mechanistic insights into SMSI-mediated tuning of DER kinetics, offering a practical strategy for the design of high-performance DER and D 2 O enrichment catalysts.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Chemical Reactions and Isotopes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Synthesis and Conversion, Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Surface and Interface Science and Engineering for Catalysts, College of Chemical Engineering

Zhejiang University of Technology

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province · National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) · National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1364/OE.58077410.1364/OE.580774 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsami.2c1822110.1021/acsami.2c18221 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.0c0412210.1021/acsami.0c04122 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0026610.1021/acsenergylett.4c00266 ↗
5. 10.1021/ja511434j10.1021/ja511434j ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.01610.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.016 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20220652410.1002/adma.202206524 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20180485410.1002/anie.201804854 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.6b0581110.1021/acsami.6b05811 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20220113910.1002/smll.202201139 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.05210.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.052 ↗
12. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0139610.1021/acscatal.4c01396 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20250059510.1002/adma.202500595 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20241197510.1002/smll.202411975 ↗
15. 10.1039/D2TA09172K10.1039/D2TA09172K ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12121810.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121218 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.3c0449810.1021/acsami.3c04498 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-022-28805-810.1038/s41467-022-28805-8 ↗
19. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0310210.1021/acscatal.2c03102 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20250651210.1002/adma.202506512 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20250105410.1002/aenm.202501054 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.7084710.1002/aenm.70847 ↗
23. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c0023710.1021/acs.jctc.3c00237 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0142810.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01428 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c0172410.1021/acs.jpcc.5c01724 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.499976110.1063/1.4999761 ↗
32. 10.1063/5.013819710.1063/5.0138197 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.25610.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.256 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.06410.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.064 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.25910.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.259 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20150065810.1002/aenm.201500658 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10420810.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104208 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.15308110.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.153081 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.15275210.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.152752 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jcis.2025.13958110.1016/j.jcis.2025.139581 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ces.2024.11995110.1016/j.ces.2024.119951 ↗
42. 10.1002/celc.20200143610.1002/celc.202001436 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.04.06110.1016/j.talanta.2012.04.061 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.electacta.2025.14735410.1016/j.electacta.2025.147354 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.23753110.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.237531 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.2c1306310.1021/jacs.2c13063 ↗
47. 10.1002/adfm.20251485810.1002/adfm.202514858 ↗
48. 10.1002/anie.20190969710.1002/anie.201909697 ↗
49. Bard A. J. · 2022
50. 10.1038/s41557-025-01934-510.1038/s41557-025-01934-5 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20251256810.1002/adma.202512568 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2009.05.00210.1016/j.vibspec.2009.05.002 ↗
53. 10.1002/adfm.20230678610.1002/adfm.202306786 ↗
54. 10.1002/anie.20250880110.1002/anie.202508801 ↗
55. 10.1021/acscatal.2c0097810.1021/acscatal.2c00978 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jms.2013.09.00610.1016/j.jms.2013.09.006 ↗
57. 10.1002/aenm.20230177910.1002/aenm.202301779 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41467-023-44261-410.1038/s41467-023-44261-4 ↗